21.07.2014 Views

DRAFT REPORT OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE USE ... - Samuel Walker

DRAFT REPORT OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE USE ... - Samuel Walker

DRAFT REPORT OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE USE ... - Samuel Walker

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mr. Earl F. Martin<br />

RE: <strong>REPORT</strong> TO <strong>USE</strong> <strong>OF</strong> FORCE COMMISSION<br />

December 3, 2012<br />

Page 33<br />

staff. Likewise, with regard to an annual training plan as required by the SPD policy, Academy<br />

Training Staff members were unable to identify a formalized annual training plan that had been<br />

approved for any year in the past. It should be noted that this something that I find to be commonly<br />

the case with agencies that are Lexipol subscribers. Nonetheless it must be addressed or the policy<br />

revised. To their credit the Academy Training Staff was immediately responsive to this issue and<br />

although the SPD had performed the function of assessing training needs and planning for in-service<br />

training every year for SPD, the staff recognized and appreciated the benefit of a more formalized<br />

process in accomplishing the same goal. Working with the training staff, a memorandum entitled<br />

"Spokane Police Department Memorandum to All SPD Personnel from Lt. Drollinger re: 2013<br />

Training Needs Assessment" was created with regard to the 2013 Training Needs Assessment.<br />

Additionally, Lt. Drollinger prepared an e-mail entitled "Spokane Police Department 2013 Training<br />

Needs Assessment and In-Service Training Plan" that details the preparation of the training needs<br />

assessment. (See Exhibit "J") Lt. Drollinger has been extremely responsive and receptive to<br />

suggestions, and he and the other members of the training staff have moved forward and addressed<br />

this concern, as well as many of the other areas discussed herein.<br />

Finally, with regard to the training requirements identified throughout SPD policy and<br />

training materials, it needs to be clearly defined in each block of training what "successfully<br />

complete" actually means and what provisions are set forth for remediation when an individual fails.<br />

Additionally, it should be clearly defined what the ramifications are when an individual is unable,<br />

even after remediation, to "successfully complete" any particular block of training. These may seem<br />

like small concerns; however, if an officer or another employee must "successfully complete" a task<br />

to perform their job or must be provided "remediation" and then still cannot "successfully complete"<br />

that task - an employer must be able to articulate what those terms mean.<br />

Summary of Recommendations for Consideration:<br />

- Foster and support a cultural environment that promotes excellence in the SPD from<br />

the executive and management levels that is reinforced by supervision and peer group leaders such<br />

as in-house subject matter experts/instructors and Academy Training Staff and FTOs as it pertains<br />

to training of personnel and the professional services provided to the community;<br />

- Conduct prompt review, revision and adoption of policy updates to SPD policy and<br />

transmission and incorporation of such changes as appropriate in operations, training and training<br />

materials in a systematic fashion which is documented;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!