DRAFT REPORT OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE USE ... - Samuel Walker
DRAFT REPORT OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE USE ... - Samuel Walker
DRAFT REPORT OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE USE ... - Samuel Walker
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Mr. Earl F. Martin<br />
RE: <strong>REPORT</strong> TO <strong>USE</strong> <strong>OF</strong> FORCE COMMISSION<br />
December 3, 2012<br />
Page 33<br />
staff. Likewise, with regard to an annual training plan as required by the SPD policy, Academy<br />
Training Staff members were unable to identify a formalized annual training plan that had been<br />
approved for any year in the past. It should be noted that this something that I find to be commonly<br />
the case with agencies that are Lexipol subscribers. Nonetheless it must be addressed or the policy<br />
revised. To their credit the Academy Training Staff was immediately responsive to this issue and<br />
although the SPD had performed the function of assessing training needs and planning for in-service<br />
training every year for SPD, the staff recognized and appreciated the benefit of a more formalized<br />
process in accomplishing the same goal. Working with the training staff, a memorandum entitled<br />
"Spokane Police Department Memorandum to All SPD Personnel from Lt. Drollinger re: 2013<br />
Training Needs Assessment" was created with regard to the 2013 Training Needs Assessment.<br />
Additionally, Lt. Drollinger prepared an e-mail entitled "Spokane Police Department 2013 Training<br />
Needs Assessment and In-Service Training Plan" that details the preparation of the training needs<br />
assessment. (See Exhibit "J") Lt. Drollinger has been extremely responsive and receptive to<br />
suggestions, and he and the other members of the training staff have moved forward and addressed<br />
this concern, as well as many of the other areas discussed herein.<br />
Finally, with regard to the training requirements identified throughout SPD policy and<br />
training materials, it needs to be clearly defined in each block of training what "successfully<br />
complete" actually means and what provisions are set forth for remediation when an individual fails.<br />
Additionally, it should be clearly defined what the ramifications are when an individual is unable,<br />
even after remediation, to "successfully complete" any particular block of training. These may seem<br />
like small concerns; however, if an officer or another employee must "successfully complete" a task<br />
to perform their job or must be provided "remediation" and then still cannot "successfully complete"<br />
that task - an employer must be able to articulate what those terms mean.<br />
Summary of Recommendations for Consideration:<br />
- Foster and support a cultural environment that promotes excellence in the SPD from<br />
the executive and management levels that is reinforced by supervision and peer group leaders such<br />
as in-house subject matter experts/instructors and Academy Training Staff and FTOs as it pertains<br />
to training of personnel and the professional services provided to the community;<br />
- Conduct prompt review, revision and adoption of policy updates to SPD policy and<br />
transmission and incorporation of such changes as appropriate in operations, training and training<br />
materials in a systematic fashion which is documented;