21.07.2014 Views

DRAFT REPORT OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE USE ... - Samuel Walker

DRAFT REPORT OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE USE ... - Samuel Walker

DRAFT REPORT OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE USE ... - Samuel Walker

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mr. Earl F. Martin<br />

RE: <strong>REPORT</strong> TO <strong>USE</strong> <strong>OF</strong> FORCE COMMISSION<br />

December 3, 2012<br />

Page 22<br />

The most recent and apparently operative set of policies adopted by SPD were received on<br />

October 2, 2012 with an adoption date of September 17, 2012. The language with regard to firearms<br />

qualifications has been modified to read as follows:<br />

"All sworn personnel are required to qualify bi-annually with their duty firearm on<br />

an approved range course. The Rangemaster shall keep accurate records of<br />

qualifications, repairs, maintenance, and training. In addition to regular qualification<br />

schedules, the Rangemaster shall be responsible for providing all sworn personnel<br />

with annual practical training designed to simulate field situations. At least annually,<br />

all personnel carrying a firearm will receive training on the department Use of Force<br />

policy."<br />

Thus, it appears that firearms qualifications requirements have been reduced from 4 times<br />

a year to 2 times a year. This is likely a result of budget concerns; however, it is recommended that<br />

firearms qualifications be conducted at a minimum of 3 times a year. Qualifications should include<br />

not only marksmanship, but also decision-making and review of policy and law relating to the use<br />

of non-deadly and deadly force options. There are so many elements of concern in firearms<br />

training that twice a year training provides a severely compressed amount of time to achieve desired<br />

results. At a minimum, it is recommended that the Rangemaster for SPD survey agencies statewide<br />

to provide a comparative perspective.<br />

With regard to patrol rifle and patrol shotgun training and qualification, a redlined policy<br />

provided set forth requirements for both in SPD Policy 432. According to that draft policy, officers<br />

are required to complete 24-hours of training with the patrol rifle and to annually re-qualify or lose<br />

the right to carry the patrol rifle. There appears to be some redundancy in the provisions of the<br />

redlined version of the draft policy that was provided in sections 432.5, 432.6 (same numerical<br />

designation used twice) and presumably this would be cleaned up if the redlined version was<br />

adopted. Likewise, the patrol shotgun policy listed numerically as 432 et.seq. is redundant and<br />

presumably this would be cleaned up if the policy was adopted. The redlined version of the patrol<br />

shotgun policy required completion of an 8-hour course of instruction and qualification and<br />

subsequent re-qualification annually. However, the policy as adopted on September 17, 2012 does<br />

not include a patrol shotgun policy at all that I could find. My understanding from firearms training<br />

personnel is that the recommendation was for a separate policy, and thus, it appears this issue needs<br />

to be addressed.<br />

All SPD officers are required to complete a block of training on long gun familiarization<br />

which deals with safety and disarming issues. Carrying either a patrol shotgun or patrol rifle is<br />

optional. This policy apparently is a result of a history of issues relating to failures to qualify, and<br />

the maintenance and neglect of shotguns in particular. With regard to the provision and issuance

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!