20.07.2014 Views

Wetenschappelijk jaaroverzicht 2012 - Catharina Ziekenhuis

Wetenschappelijk jaaroverzicht 2012 - Catharina Ziekenhuis

Wetenschappelijk jaaroverzicht 2012 - Catharina Ziekenhuis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RESULTS: For the majority of biomarkers, we observed lower levels in the healthy control<br />

group compared with patients with stable angina who underwent coronary catheterization.<br />

We found no difference for any of the selected biomarkers between patients with a positive<br />

FFR (d 0.75) and negative FFR (>0.80). We observed no relationship between the<br />

investigated biomarkers and FSS.<br />

CONCLUSION: The presence of local atherosclerotic lesions that result in inducible<br />

myocardial ischemia as measured by FFR in patients with stable coronary artery disease is<br />

not associated with increased plasma levels of IL-6, IL-8 and TNF- or increased expression of<br />

TLR2 and TLR4, CD11b, CD62L and CD14 on circulating leukocytes.<br />

Impactfactor: --<br />

Sels JE<br />

Functional measurement of coronary stenosis<br />

Pijls NH*, Sels JW*<br />

J Am Coll Cardiol. <strong>2012</strong> Mar 20;59(12):1045-57<br />

Voor abstract zie: Cardiologie - Pijls NH<br />

Impactfactor: 14.156<br />

Tonino WA<br />

Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease<br />

De Bruyne B, Pijls NH*, Kalesan B, Barbato E, Tonino PA*, Piroth Z, Jagic N, Möbius-<br />

Winkler S, Rioufol G, Witt N, Kala P, MacCarthy P, Engström T, Oldroyd KG, Mavromatis<br />

K, Manoharan G, Verlee P, Frobert O, Curzen N, Johnson JB, Jüni P, Fearon WF; FAME 2<br />

Trial Investigators<br />

N Engl J Med. <strong>2012</strong> Sep 13;367(11):991-1001<br />

Voor abstract zie: Cardiologie - Pijls NH<br />

Impactfactor: 53.298<br />

Tonino WA<br />

The impact of sex differences on fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous<br />

coronary intervention: a FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for<br />

Multivessel Evaluation) substudy<br />

Kim HS, Tonino PA*, Bruyne B de, Yong AS, Tremmel JA, Pijls NH*, Fearon WF; FAME<br />

Study Investigators<br />

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. <strong>2012</strong> Oct;5(10):1037-42<br />

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the impact of sex differences on fractional flow<br />

reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).<br />

BACKGROUND: The FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel<br />

Evaluation) study demonstrated that FFR-guided PCI improves outcomes compared with an<br />

angiography-guided strategy. The role of FFR-guided PCI in women versus men has not been<br />

evaluated.<br />

METHODS: We analyzed 2-year data from the FAME study in the 744 men and 261 women<br />

with multivessel coronary disease, who were randomized to angiography- or FFR-guided PCI.<br />

Statistical comparisons based on sex were stratified by treatment method.<br />

RESULTS: Although women were older and had significantly higher rates of hypertension<br />

than men did, there were no differences in the rates of major adverse cardiac events (20.3%<br />

vs. 20.2%, p = 0.923) and its individual components at 2 years. FFR values were significantly<br />

higher in women than in men (0.75 ± 0.18 vs. 0.71 ± 0.17, p = 0.001). The proportion of<br />

51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!