20.07.2014 Views

Wetenschappelijk jaaroverzicht 2012 - Catharina Ziekenhuis

Wetenschappelijk jaaroverzicht 2012 - Catharina Ziekenhuis

Wetenschappelijk jaaroverzicht 2012 - Catharina Ziekenhuis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Koolen JJ<br />

Angiographic maximal luminal diameter and appropriate deployment of the<br />

everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold as assessed by optical coherence<br />

tomography: an ABSORB cohort B trial sub-study<br />

Gomez-Lara J, Diletti R, Brugaletta S, Onuma Y, Farooq V, Thuesen L, McClean D,<br />

Koolen J*, Ormiston JA, Windecker S, Whitbourn R, Dudek D, Dorange C, Veldhof S,<br />

Rapoza R, Regar E, Garcia-Garcia HM, Serruys PW<br />

EuroIntervention. <strong>2012</strong> Jun 20;8(2):214-24. Epub 2011 Oct 28<br />

Aims: Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) present different mechanical properties as<br />

compared to metallic platform stents. Therefore, the standard procedural technique to<br />

achieve appropriate deployment may differ. Methods and results: Fifty-two lesions treated<br />

with a 3x18 mm BVS were imaged with optical coherence tomography (OCT) postimplantation<br />

and screened for parameters suggesting non-optimal deployment. These<br />

included minimal scaffold area (minSA)20%, edge<br />

dissections, incomplete scaffold/strut apposition (ISA)>5% and scaffold pattern irregularities.<br />

The angiographic proximal and distal maximal lumen diameters (DMAX) were measured by<br />

quantitative coronary angiography. Based on the DMAX values, the population was divided<br />

into three groups: DMAX 3.3 mm (n=9). All three groups presented with similar pre-implantation angiographic<br />

characteristics except for the vessel size and were treated with similar balloon/artery ratios.<br />

The group with a DMAX 3.3 mm<br />

(7.7% vs. 36.7% vs. 66.7%; p=0.02). RAS >20% was similar between all groups (46.2 vs. 53.3<br />

vs. 77.8%; p=0.47) and scaffold pattern irregularities were only documented in three cases.<br />

Conclusions: BVS implantation guided with quantitative angiography may improve the OCT<br />

findings of optimal deployment. The clinical significance of these angiographic and OCT<br />

findings warranted long term follow-up of larger cohort of patients.<br />

Impactfactor: 3.285<br />

Koolen JJ<br />

Circumferential evaluation of the neointima by optical coherence tomography after<br />

ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation: can the scaffold cap the<br />

plaque?<br />

Brugaletta S, Radu MD, Garcia-Garcia HM, Heo JH, Farooq V, Girasis C, van Geuns RJ,<br />

Thuesen L, McClean D, Chevalier B, Windecker S, Koolen J*, Rapoza R, Miquel-Hebert<br />

K, Ormiston J, Serruys PW<br />

Atherosclerosis. <strong>2012</strong> Mar;221(1):106-12. Epub 2011 Dec 13<br />

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the circumferential healing process at 6 and 12 months following<br />

scaffold implantation.<br />

BACKGROUND: The healing process following stent implantation consists of tissue growing<br />

on the top of and in the space between each strut. With the ABSORB bioresorbable vascular<br />

scaffold (BVS), the outer circumference of the scaffold is detectable by optical coherence<br />

tomography (OCT), allowing a more accurate and complete evaluation of the intra-scaffold<br />

neointima.<br />

METHODS: A total of 58 patients (59 lesions), who received an ABSORB BVS 1.1 implantation<br />

and a subsequent OCT investigation at 6 (n=28 patients/lesions) or 12 (n=30 patients with 31<br />

lesions) months follow-up were included in the analysis. The thickness of the neointima was<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!