Energy Handbook 2011 - GBR
Energy Handbook 2011 - GBR
Energy Handbook 2011 - GBR
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
P o w e r S u m m i t - T h e E n e r g y H a n d b o o k 2 0 1 1<br />
C o u n t r y P r o f i l e : U n i t e d K i n g d o m<br />
The UK is already the world leader in<br />
offshore wind power, and the amount of<br />
energy the UK generates from wind will<br />
continue to rise dramatically: according<br />
to some proposals, offshore wind alone<br />
could eventually provide up to 40 GW of<br />
installed capacity. The speed with which<br />
wind energy can be deployed is vital to<br />
the UK’s chances of realising its energy<br />
targets for 2020. “If you want to build<br />
and commission a nuclear plant, you are<br />
looking at 10 years,” explains Anders<br />
Søe-Jensen, President of wind turbine<br />
manufacturer Vestas Offshore. “You can<br />
deploy wind energy much more quickly.”<br />
The UK’s Crown Estate has developed<br />
a three-round leasing strategy for UK<br />
offshore sites with the aim of installing<br />
25 GW of offshore wind capacity by<br />
2020. Round 1, which catered to<br />
demonstration-scale projects of up to 30<br />
turbines, began in December 2000. and<br />
show respectively the existing Rounds 1<br />
and 2 sites and the proposals for Round<br />
3.<br />
David Hodkinson is UK Business<br />
Development Manager at Swedish power<br />
company Vattenfall, which acquired<br />
Thanet, currently the world’s largest<br />
offshore wind farm, in 2008. He attests to<br />
the success of the offshore wind programs<br />
of the UK Government and the Crown<br />
Estate. “UK Round 3 is a cornerstone<br />
for the development of offshore wind in<br />
Europe and perhaps beyond,” he says. “It<br />
is an excellent and very well conceived<br />
program of activity by the Government<br />
and the Crown Estate. Round 3 is already<br />
stimulating interest and commitment<br />
from other European countries. Vattenfall<br />
is a European operator, and in the end<br />
we will go where the investment returns<br />
are the strongest. I think our involvement<br />
in Round 3 will strengthen the offshore<br />
wind industry.”<br />
The default is that one ROC is issued for<br />
each megawatt-hour (MWh) of eligible<br />
renewable output. Some technologies get<br />
more, some less. For instance, offshore<br />
wind installations receive two ROCs per<br />
MWh; onshore wind gets one ROC per<br />
MWh, and plants fired by biogas receive<br />
half a ROC per MWh.<br />
Anders Søe-Jensen attests to the success<br />
of ROCs: “Business case certainty has<br />
been created through the ROC system.<br />
The UK politicians have put in some<br />
systems at a very early stage to give<br />
you business case certainty. That’s very<br />
important in our industry: that the guys<br />
who put the money on the table can see<br />
they will get richer.”<br />
The UK’s plan to decarbonise its<br />
economy also includes building new<br />
nuclear power plants, yet this could be<br />
inhibited by incentives weighted towards<br />
the development of wind resources. New<br />
nuclear was proposed at a time when EU<br />
ETS was the prominent legislation and<br />
carbon prices were expected to rise. “The<br />
nuclear sector needs a high carbon price<br />
in order to be profitable,” explains David<br />
Porter.<br />
Why then does the UK need either<br />
traditional generation or new nuclear?<br />
Cannot it simply dispense with these<br />
for ever, given the huge potential wind<br />
generating capacity around the British<br />
Isles? Here we run into the issue of<br />
intermittence. When consumers press a<br />
switch they expect electricity to flow –<br />
they pay not only for the power they use,<br />
but also for reliability.<br />
Because wind varies from place to place,<br />
putting wind power plants all around the<br />
UK increases reliability. Yet no matter<br />
how much wind capacity we install, there<br />
will always be times – for example on a<br />
calm day in mid-winter – when demand<br />
will exceed supply from wind.<br />
“The sort of place people might<br />
put their pensions”<br />
Ofgem’s Project Discovery states that<br />
the British energy infrastructure requires<br />
a total investment of £200bn for the UK<br />
to realise its 2020 targets.<br />
Figure1:(top) UK electricity generation<br />
“There’s this financing challenge because<br />
from renewable sources from 2000<br />
the Government has chosen to say that<br />
to 2010, and Renewables Obligation A series of incentives under the<br />
nuclear is possible – yet each nuclear<br />
targets. Figure2:(above) Forecast<br />
Renewables Obligation encourages the<br />
power station costs £5–7bn,” explains<br />
growth in UK renewable power up to development of green energy generation.<br />
Ofgem CEO Alasdair Buchanan. “On top<br />
2020 offsets a steep decline in nuclear The UK’s electricity regulator Ofgem<br />
How will the market manage this? There of that, we would like large offshore wind<br />
capacity. We see that wind power, incentivises renewable technology by<br />
will have to be other modes of generation farms – London Array, for example, will<br />
which currently accounts for about issuing Renewables Obligation Certificates<br />
able to pick up the slack when the wind cost £2bn; and we would like clean coal<br />
half of the renewable electricity total, (ROCs) to accredited renewable<br />
is not blowing. Exactly how to incentivise – the Longannet scheme in Scotland is<br />
is forecast to grow threefold by 2020 generators; companies which fail to meet<br />
the building of generation facilities that £2–3bn.” With a conventional gas-fired<br />
to provide around three-quarters of our the Renewables Obligation by amassing<br />
will only be used occasionally is by no power plant costing just £300m, Buchanan<br />
72<br />
renewable electricity.<br />
sufficient ROCs are subject to charges.<br />
means clear, however.<br />
points out, “the scale is completely<br />
73