20.07.2014 Views

Energy Handbook 2011 - GBR

Energy Handbook 2011 - GBR

Energy Handbook 2011 - GBR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

P o w e r S u m m i t - T h e E n e r g y H a n d b o o k 2 0 1 1<br />

F o c u s : H y d r o a n d M a r i n e P o w e r<br />

Epiphany at Sea<br />

Michele Grassi was midway through the Columbus route<br />

when the idea hit him. Some sailors get an anchor tattoo<br />

to commemorate their voyage across the Atlantic, but for<br />

mathematician Grassi the memento was more cerebral.<br />

“I sometimes think of it in terms of how flight was<br />

invented,” says Grassi.<br />

“There were many crazy aircraft projects out there, and in<br />

the end only one succeeded because only one got the idea<br />

that you didn’t need a huge amount of power, but that<br />

you needed to find the right way to move the air around<br />

the wing. We think that we’ve got the idea, our approach<br />

is completely different: to move with the wave, not to<br />

fight it.”<br />

On 11 August 2010, Grassi’s London-based company<br />

40South <strong>Energy</strong> – a name inspired by the scope of<br />

applications for its product – installed its prototype D100t<br />

machine in a bid to tap the enormous energy potential of<br />

waves. The D100t is one of a series of machines 40 South<br />

<strong>Energy</strong> has designed to operate below the water’s surface.<br />

Each has a “lower member” at a depth of 15–25 m and<br />

one or more “upper members” at a depth of 1–12 m (the<br />

depths in each case depending on the type of machine<br />

and the nature of the site). The relative motion between<br />

the upper and lower members is converted directly into<br />

electricity.<br />

Previous generations of devices designed to extract energy<br />

from waves have bobbed on the surface of the water, not<br />

only limiting the amount of energy they are ultimately able<br />

to capture but rendering them vulnerable to storm damage.<br />

In contrast, 40South <strong>Energy</strong>’s machines have the capacity<br />

to autonomously vary their operating depth in response<br />

to changes in sea state. This means that they are able to<br />

operate within the same limits wherever they are installed<br />

and whatever the weather.<br />

“Wave energy is primed to become an<br />

important part of the world’s renewable<br />

energy portfolio,” said Brice Koch, head<br />

of ABB Marketing and Customer Solutions<br />

in November 2010, following a large<br />

investment by the Swedish-Swiss giant<br />

in Edinburgh-based marine technology<br />

company Aquamarine Power.<br />

A Drop in the Ocean<br />

The marine energy sector has long had<br />

a reputation for a kind of Jules Verne<br />

whimsicality. Bad press resulting from<br />

previous failures has made attracting the<br />

right audience for new inventions difficult<br />

for some companies, according to Michele<br />

Grassi of 40South <strong>Energy</strong> (see Box). “The<br />

first wave devices encountered many<br />

problems, especially in terms of cost and<br />

survivability. That gave the sector a very<br />

bad press,” he says. Martin McAdam,<br />

CEO of Aquamarine Power – the company<br />

responsible for creating the Oyster wave<br />

power technology – supports Grassi’s<br />

assessment and concedes that there have<br />

been plenty of failures in the past: “This<br />

industry hasn’t necessarily covered itself<br />

in glory. I think the industry needs fewer<br />

failures; it needs to be more professional<br />

in its approach. We are happy to share<br />

and work with other developers in the<br />

space. The sooner more of that begins to<br />

happen in this industry the better.”<br />

“At this point technology is not our<br />

main problem,” Grassi says. “Our main<br />

problem is the misconceptions burdening<br />

the sector. When we are able to bring<br />

people in front of our machine and explain<br />

the schematics they understand that<br />

this is a different product to any of its<br />

predecessors. The problem is that because<br />

of the negative perception of wave<br />

energy, people won’t even connect to us<br />

initially.” But the difficulty in marketing<br />

new wave and tidal devices should not be<br />

wholly attributed to a negative perception<br />

of the industry. “It’s very difficult to bring<br />

equity into a business from investors at<br />

the early stages when you’re developing<br />

unproven technologies,” says McAdam.<br />

“The government has a role to play in<br />

this.”<br />

“When you can mix grant funding with<br />

equity you can raise in the market or from<br />

investors, it’s very attractive, because<br />

investors can see that their effort is being<br />

supported by the government.” In addition<br />

to private-sector investment, Aquamarine<br />

Power’s Oyster and Oyster 2 devices have<br />

received financial backing from both the<br />

Scottish and UK Governments. Following<br />

the success of their prototype technology,<br />

these are some of the industry’s most<br />

While the proven success of machines<br />

installed by companies such as Aquamarine<br />

Power and Pelamis Wave Power has<br />

gone a long way to assuaging concerns<br />

about a sector once perceived as “pie<br />

in the sky”, the backing of associations<br />

such as RenewableUK has also helped to<br />

bolster the reputation of wave and tidal.<br />

“Because of the similarities in the policy<br />

challenges between offshore wind and<br />

tidal, from 2004 onwards we made a firm<br />

commitment that we would represent<br />

wave and tidal as well [as onshore and<br />

offshore wind],” says Maria McCaffery,<br />

CEO of RenewableUK. “We saw offshore<br />

wind as paving the way and making<br />

the case for big investments into grid<br />

infrastructure to bring electricity ashore;<br />

we thought wave and tidal devices would<br />

be seriously impeded if they had grid<br />

infrastructure as an additional challenge,<br />

whereas if we succeeded in getting<br />

offshore wind – because the quantities of<br />

electricity are so much greater – it would<br />

justify the investment in the grid. When<br />

wave and tidal followed the infrastructure<br />

would already be in place.”<br />

It is essential that the appropriate support<br />

mechanisms are in place if the UK is to<br />

ensure that its most innovative companies<br />

remain in the country. “I think that when<br />

we look historically at the UK, we have<br />

been great at inventing technologies, but<br />

not necessarily the best at taking full<br />

commercial advantage of them,” says<br />

Martin McAdam of Aquamarine Power.<br />

Charles Hendry, Minister of State for<br />

the Department of <strong>Energy</strong> and Climate<br />

Change, concedes that the migration of<br />

start-up companies is a concern: “We are<br />

looking at how we encourage people to<br />

develop their technologies in the UK. It is<br />

disturbing that some of the lead players in<br />

the UK have already looked to take their<br />

projects to the next stage of development<br />

elsewhere. We want to encourage them<br />

to stay here, and indeed to be a beacon<br />

for other inventors and developers around<br />

the world to come here.”<br />

technology, according to RenewableUK.<br />

“The UK is now fully committed to<br />

developing the next generation of<br />

commercial renewable energy technologies<br />

in the emerging wave and tidal energy<br />

market,” says the organisation.<br />

The opening of a collection of world-class<br />

wave and tidal testing centres is testament<br />

to how seriously the UK, and particularly<br />

Scotland, is taking the contribution the<br />

marine sector could make to its future<br />

energy mix. The largest of these, the<br />

European Marine <strong>Energy</strong> Centre (EMEC)<br />

in Orkney, is a “plug and play” facility<br />

– the first of its kind in the world – that<br />

allows companies to test wave devices at<br />

a site outside Stromness on the mainland,<br />

and tidal devices off the island of Eday.<br />

The National Renewable <strong>Energy</strong> Centre<br />

(Narec) in Northumberland boasts dry<br />

docks converted to enable the testing of<br />

smaller prototype wave and tidal devices.<br />

Wave Hub, installed off the Cornish coast<br />

in September 2010, is a grid-connected<br />

offshore facility which leases space to<br />

developers for the large-scale testing of<br />

wave power devices.<br />

Scotland is offering an additional<br />

incentive for the development of wave<br />

and tidal devices. The £10m Saltire<br />

Prize will be awarded to the team that<br />

can demonstrate, in Scottish waters,<br />

a commercially viable wave or tidal<br />

stream energy technology that achieves<br />

the greatest electrical output, above a<br />

threshold of 100 GWh, over a two-year<br />

period. The prize has attracted interest<br />

from around 131 different projects from<br />

31 different countries and is being run<br />

in conjunction with National Geographic<br />

magazine. “National Geographic are able<br />

to broadcast this, so they’re making<br />

Scotland synonymous with clean energy,<br />

synonymous with green-tech, and<br />

synonymous with the cutting edge on<br />

wave and tidal devices,” says Jim Mather,<br />

Scottish Minister for <strong>Energy</strong>, Enterprise<br />

and Tourism.<br />

Ian Marchant, Chief Executive of Scottish<br />

and Southern <strong>Energy</strong> – who has also<br />

In the same way that Denmark and One of the world’s richest sites for wave<br />

invested substantially in Aquamarine<br />

Germany have been able to dominate the energy generation is the Pentland Firth,<br />

Power – echoed Koch’s sentiments:<br />

manufacturing market for wind energy, the stretch of water between Caithness<br />

“Wave energy can play a very important<br />

supporting innovation early is the key in the north of Scotland and the Orkney<br />

part in meeting our electricity needs over<br />

to developing a globally competitive islands. Owned by the Crown Estate, the<br />

the long term.”<br />

promising prospects.<br />

manufacturing industry in marine Pentland Firth has been described as the<br />

62 63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!