18.07.2014 Views

central route to persuasion - Sozialpsychologie

central route to persuasion - Sozialpsychologie

central route to persuasion - Sozialpsychologie

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Rolf van Dick<br />

Social Psychology (Winter 2011/12)<br />

Lecture 5: Persuasion and Attitude Change<br />

Social Psychology


Sample MC-Items (last week)<br />

1) According <strong>to</strong> which model are attitudes described variously as<br />

containing feelings, likes, dislikes, behavioural intentions,<br />

thoughts and ideas?<br />

A) the three component model B) the dual model of attitudes<br />

C) the cognitive consistency model D) the one-component model<br />

2) Dissonance theory and balance theory are both examples of:<br />

A) accidental discoveries in the study of attitudes<br />

B) cognitive consistency theories<br />

C) social identity theory<br />

D) behaviourism in the study of attitudes<br />

Social Psychology


Sample MC-Items (last week)<br />

3) The theory of planned behaviour extended the theory of reasoned<br />

action by:<br />

A) specifying the questions that are asked in order <strong>to</strong> predict behaviour<br />

B) re-arranging the three components of “beliefs“, “intentions“ and<br />

“action“<br />

C) adding the variable of perceived behavioural control<br />

D) defining “intention“<br />

4) In balance theory, a triad is balanced when there is (are):<br />

A) two positive relationships<br />

B) just one negative relationship<br />

C) an odd number of negative relationships<br />

D) none of the above<br />

Social Psychology


Schedule<br />

1. Introducing Social Psychology 19.10.<br />

2. Attribution and Social Knowledge 26.10.<br />

3. Self and Identity 02.11.<br />

4. Attitudes 09.11.<br />

5. Persuasion and Attitude Change 16.11.<br />

6. Social Influence 23.11.<br />

7. People in Groups 30.11.<br />

8. Prejudice and Discrimination 07.12.<br />

9. Intergroup Behavior 14.12.<br />

10.Leadership and Decision Making 21.12<br />

11.Aggression 11.01.<br />

12.Affiliation, Attraction, and Love 18.01.<br />

13.Prosocial Behavior 25.01.<br />

14.Revision 01.02.<br />

15.Exam 08.02.


Social Psychology<br />

Some terms (1/2)<br />

• Persuasion - Überzeugung/Überredung<br />

• neatly – ordentlich<br />

• extraneous – von außen<br />

• <strong>to</strong> enhance – fördern / steigern<br />

• uptight – angespannt<br />

• distracted – zerstreut<br />

• compliance – Folgsamkeit / Fügsamkeit<br />

• <strong>to</strong> enhance – erleichtern<br />

• ingratiation – Anbiederung<br />

• <strong>to</strong> emphasise - be<strong>to</strong>nen<br />

• Elaboration-likelihood model – Modell der Verarbeitungstiefe<br />

• attempt - Versuch<br />

• Inoculation – Impfung


Some terms (2/2)<br />

• trustworthiness – Vertrauenswürdigkeit / Zuverlässigkeit<br />

• Source derogation – Abwertung der Quelle (der Botschaft)<br />

• tedium – Überdruss<br />

• slight – ein wenig<br />

• heuristics – Faustregeln<br />

• superficial – oberflächlich<br />

• <strong>to</strong> preserve – bewahren / beibehalten<br />

• obvious – offensichtlich<br />

• <strong>to</strong> induce – herbeiführen / bewegen<br />

• assault – Angriff<br />

• conformity - Angepasstheit<br />

Social Psychology


Focus Question<br />

You have just joined the army. Along with other cadets you listen <strong>to</strong> an<br />

amazing talk by an officer skilled in the use of survival techniques in<br />

difficult combat conditions. Among other things, he asks you <strong>to</strong> eat<br />

some fried grasshoppers. „Try <strong>to</strong> imagine this is the real thing! You<br />

know, you might have <strong>to</strong> do this <strong>to</strong> save your live one day“, he says.<br />

Despite your first reaction, you go ahead and eat them. Would you end<br />

up liking the delicacy more if the officer„s style of presentation was<br />

warm and friendly or cold and distant?<br />

Social Psychology


In General<br />

Teaching objectives<br />

The various models of the <strong>persuasion</strong> process; tactics for<br />

enhancing compliance; the theory of cognitive<br />

dissonance and fac<strong>to</strong>rs which guard against attitude<br />

change.<br />

Social Psychology


Teaching objectives<br />

Specific <strong>to</strong>pics<br />

Attitudes, arguments and behaviour<br />

Persuasive communications<br />

Compliance: Interpersonal influence<br />

Attitude behaviour discrepancy and cognitive dissonance<br />

When attitude change fails<br />

Social Psychology


The <strong>persuasion</strong> process:<br />

communica<strong>to</strong>r, message, and audience<br />

The field of attitude change is vast and complex.<br />

Hovland headed the Yale approach <strong>to</strong><br />

communication and <strong>persuasion</strong>, which studied<br />

variables dealing with the communica<strong>to</strong>r, the<br />

source of the message, the message itself, and<br />

the context in which <strong>persuasion</strong> occurs.<br />

Social Psychology


The Yale approach <strong>to</strong> communication and <strong>persuasion</strong><br />

Social Psychology<br />

Based on Janis & Hovland (1959).


The effect of communica<strong>to</strong>r credibility and position<br />

discrepancy on opinion change<br />

Social Psychology<br />

Based on data from Bochner & Insko (1996).


The effects of source modality and message<br />

difficulty on opinion change<br />

Social Psychology<br />

Based on Chaiken & Eagly (1983).


The effect of fear arousing messages<br />

Fear-arousing communications are most<br />

effective if they induce a moderate amount of<br />

fear and people believe that listening <strong>to</strong> the<br />

message will reduce this fear. If the<br />

message is <strong>to</strong>o scary or not scary enough, it<br />

will fail.<br />

Social Psychology


Social Psychology<br />

The inverted U-curve relationship between<br />

fear and attitude change


The <strong>persuasion</strong> process:<br />

communica<strong>to</strong>r, message, and audience<br />

• Several aspects of a communica<strong>to</strong>r affect<br />

whether a person is evaluated favorably.<br />

– Credibility<br />

• Expertise<br />

• Trustworthiness<br />

– Liking<br />

Social Psychology


The <strong>persuasion</strong> process:<br />

communica<strong>to</strong>r, message, and audience<br />

• We are persuaded by the opinions of our<br />

reference groups, those we like or identify<br />

with.<br />

– This occurs both because of the motivational<br />

fac<strong>to</strong>rs of liking and perceived similarity, and<br />

because messages from in-groups are more likely<br />

<strong>to</strong> be processed using the <strong>central</strong> <strong>route</strong> (see ELM<br />

later).<br />

Social Psychology


The <strong>persuasion</strong> process:<br />

communica<strong>to</strong>r, message, and audience<br />

• Source derogation involves deciding the source<br />

is unreliable or negative in some way. It can<br />

make all future as well as current arguments<br />

from that source less powerful.<br />

Social Psychology


The <strong>persuasion</strong> process:<br />

communica<strong>to</strong>r, message, and audience<br />

• Repetition and familiarity tend <strong>to</strong> increase<br />

liking, but only up <strong>to</strong> a point.<br />

• Repetition may help people process strong<br />

arguments more completely but expose the flaws in<br />

weak arguments.<br />

• Repetition may lead <strong>to</strong> tedium; this can be dealt<br />

with by having ads that provide slight variations on<br />

a theme.<br />

Social Psychology


Dual process models of <strong>persuasion</strong><br />

Two important areas of our lives that employ relevant<br />

principles from social psychological research are<br />

advertising and political propaganda.<br />

Two models, each dealing with how a persuasive message<br />

is learned, draw on developments in research on<br />

cognition. Petty and Cacioppo‟s elaboration likelihood<br />

model proposes that, when people attend <strong>to</strong> a message<br />

carefully, they use a <strong>central</strong> <strong>route</strong> <strong>to</strong> process it; otherwise<br />

they use a peripheral <strong>route</strong>. Chaiken‟s heuristic–<br />

systematic model suggests that people use systematic<br />

processing when they attend <strong>to</strong> a message carefully;<br />

otherwise they use heuristic processing.<br />

Social Psychology


Dual process models of <strong>persuasion</strong><br />

Both theories state that under certain<br />

conditions, people are motivated <strong>to</strong> pay<br />

attention <strong>to</strong> and think about the facts in a<br />

message; this is referred <strong>to</strong> as the <strong>central</strong><br />

<strong>route</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>persuasion</strong>.<br />

Social Psychology


Dual process models of <strong>persuasion</strong><br />

Under other conditions, people are not<br />

motivated <strong>to</strong> pay attention <strong>to</strong> the facts a<br />

message presents and only attend <strong>to</strong><br />

superficial characteristics such as who<br />

delivers it and how long it is. In this case<br />

people may be influenced by the peripheral<br />

<strong>route</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>persuasion</strong>.<br />

Social Psychology


Dual process models of <strong>persuasion</strong><br />

CENTRAL<br />

ROUTE<br />

PERI-<br />

PHERAL<br />

ROUTE<br />

Social Psychology


The elaboration–likelihood<br />

model of <strong>persuasion</strong><br />

Petty & Cacioppo (1986)<br />

Social Psychology


Dual process models of <strong>persuasion</strong><br />

Which <strong>route</strong> <strong>to</strong> attitude change will people<br />

take? One determinant is the personal<br />

relevance of the <strong>to</strong>pic. The more relevant the<br />

<strong>to</strong>pic, the more people will take the <strong>central</strong><br />

<strong>route</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>persuasion</strong>. Here, they will be<br />

influenced the most by the strength of the<br />

arguments.<br />

Social Psychology


Social Psychology<br />

Dual process models of <strong>persuasion</strong>


Einstellung (Semantisches Differential, STDR)<br />

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0<br />

Results Live-Experiment<br />

BSc 2009<br />

Einstellung zu Klausuren / Ergebnisse Vorlesung<br />

schwache Argumente<br />

starke Argumente<br />

niedrige Relevanz<br />

hohe Relevanz<br />

Social Psychology


Dual process models of <strong>persuasion</strong><br />

The <strong>route</strong> <strong>to</strong> attitude change also depends on<br />

people‟s ability <strong>to</strong> pay attention <strong>to</strong> the<br />

arguments. The more distracted people are,<br />

the more they will take the peripheral <strong>route</strong>.<br />

Attitude change will be more long-lasting if it<br />

occurs through the <strong>central</strong> <strong>route</strong>.<br />

Social Psychology


Dual process models of <strong>persuasion</strong><br />

In order <strong>to</strong> get people <strong>to</strong> use the <strong>central</strong><br />

processing <strong>route</strong>, you need <strong>to</strong> get their<br />

attention. This can be done by playing <strong>to</strong><br />

their emotions.<br />

Social Psychology


Dual process models of <strong>persuasion</strong><br />

However, people want <strong>to</strong> preserve good<br />

moods, so they will avoid activities that might<br />

spoil their good mood. This means that<br />

people in good moods will often avoid paying<br />

close attention <strong>to</strong> a persuasive<br />

communication, because they think that doing<br />

so will lower their mood.<br />

Social Psychology


Tactics for enhancing compliance<br />

A variety of techniques that deal with ways of<br />

inducing another person <strong>to</strong> comply with our<br />

requests has been intensively studied: these<br />

include ingratiation, reciprocity and guilt arousal.<br />

There are also multiple-request techniques (footin-the-door,<br />

door-in-the-face and low-balling), in<br />

which a first request functions as a set-up for the<br />

second, real request.<br />

Social Psychology


Social Psychology<br />

Three classic techniques for inducing compliance


The foot-in-the-door technique: compliance with an<br />

impossible request followed by a possible request<br />

Based on data from<br />

Dolinski (2000), Experiment 2<br />

Social Psychology


The theory of cognitive dissonance<br />

Festinger‟s cognitive dissonance theory is a major<br />

approach <strong>to</strong> the <strong>to</strong>pic of attitude change. It<br />

addresses not only conflict between a person‟s<br />

beliefs but discrepancy between behaviour and<br />

underlying attitudes, and behaviour and selfconception.<br />

It includes three variations on the<br />

way in which dissonance is brought about: effort<br />

justification, induced compliance and free<br />

choice.<br />

Social Psychology


The effect of incentives on evaluating a boring task<br />

in an induced- compliance context<br />

Social Psychology<br />

Based on data from Festinger & Carlsmith (1959).


Social Psychology<br />

The theory of cognitive dissonance


Interest in a group discussion in relation <strong>to</strong> the<br />

severity of the initiation procedure<br />

Based on data from Aronson & Mills (1959).<br />

Social Psychology


Change in weight among overweight women after<br />

expending psychological effort<br />

Social Psychology<br />

Based on data from Cooper & Axom (1982).


Degree of liking fried grasshoppers as food by military<br />

cadets in relation <strong>to</strong> the interpersonal style of an officer<br />

Based on data from Zimbardo, Weisenberg, Fires<strong>to</strong>ne & Levy (1965).<br />

Social Psychology


Resistance <strong>to</strong> <strong>persuasion</strong><br />

Reactance is an increase in resistance <strong>to</strong><br />

<strong>persuasion</strong> when the communica<strong>to</strong>r‟s efforts <strong>to</strong><br />

persuade are obvious. Techniques for building<br />

up resistance include forewarning and the<br />

inoculation defence. In recent years,<br />

manufacturing companies have used inoculating<br />

media releases <strong>to</strong> shore up consumer loyalty.<br />

Social Psychology


Resistance <strong>to</strong> <strong>persuasion</strong><br />

• Attitude Inoculation<br />

One way <strong>to</strong> bolster people against <strong>persuasion</strong><br />

attempts is <strong>to</strong> have them consider the arguments for<br />

and against their attitude before somebody attacks it.<br />

Social Psychology


Resistance <strong>to</strong> <strong>persuasion</strong><br />

• Attitude Inoculation<br />

McGuire (1964)<br />

Attitude inoculation procedure does this by exposing<br />

people <strong>to</strong> a small dose of the argument against their<br />

position; this induced them <strong>to</strong> counter-argue and<br />

provide a “vaccination” that helps people ward off<br />

later, stronger influence attempts.<br />

Social Psychology


Resistance <strong>to</strong> <strong>persuasion</strong><br />

• Resisting Peer Pressure<br />

Attitude inoculation that is designed <strong>to</strong> combat<br />

affectively based <strong>persuasion</strong> techniques can be<br />

effective at helping people resist peer pressure.<br />

Social Psychology


Resistance <strong>to</strong> <strong>persuasion</strong><br />

• When Persuasion Attempts Boomerang:<br />

Reactance Theory<br />

Brehm (1966)<br />

It is important not <strong>to</strong> use <strong>to</strong>o heavy a hand when trying<br />

<strong>to</strong> persuade people. If you administer <strong>to</strong>o strong a<br />

prohibition (e.g. alcohol consumption, smoking), the<br />

prohibition may boomerang and lead <strong>to</strong> an increase in<br />

the prohibited activity.<br />

Social Psychology


Resistance <strong>to</strong> <strong>persuasion</strong><br />

• When Persuasion Attempts Boomerang:<br />

Reactance Theory<br />

Reactance theory explains this by saying that strong<br />

prohibitions threaten a person‟s feeling of freedom,<br />

and engaging in the forbidden behavior is an attempt<br />

<strong>to</strong> res<strong>to</strong>re that feeling of freedom.<br />

Social Psychology


Literature, Film and TV<br />

• Tin Men: 1987 comedy written and directed by Barry Levinson,<br />

starring Richard Dreyfuss and Danny Devi<strong>to</strong>. Two aluminium<br />

salesmen are in competition. They use all their skills <strong>to</strong> outsell each<br />

other by persuading cus<strong>to</strong>mers.<br />

• Matchstick Men: 2003 black comedy by Ridley Scott, starring<br />

Nicholas Cage. A pair of con artists spend their lives engaging in<br />

<strong>persuasion</strong> and living a double life <strong>to</strong> avoid being caught. They pull<br />

off scams, but the last huge scam backfires big time on Nicholas<br />

Cage‟s character who becomes the victim of his own con.<br />

• Glengarry Glen Ross: 1992 film directed by James Foley, written by<br />

David Mamet, and starring Jack Lemmon, Al Pacino, Ed Harris,<br />

Kevin Spacey, Alec Baldwin and others. The film is about real estate<br />

office and the different ways in which salesmen under pressure try<br />

<strong>to</strong> sell, and <strong>to</strong> persuade others.<br />

Social Psychology


Your Portfolio<br />

• Read the chapter along the slides!<br />

• Answer the sample questions!<br />

• What have I learned?<br />

• What did I NOT understand?<br />

• How can I apply the knowledge?<br />

Social Psychology


Sample MC-Items<br />

1) When Karen hears graphic news about disasters she becomes<br />

somewhat stressed, focussed and attentive. However, when she<br />

gets extremely stressed, she is so uptight that she becomes<br />

distracted from the details of the s<strong>to</strong>ry. This sequence<br />

characterises the:<br />

A) J-curve B) boomerang effect<br />

C) reactance response D) the inverted U-curve<br />

2) In Petty and Cacioppo‘s (1986) elaboration-likelihood model<br />

A) people are never assumed <strong>to</strong> take mental shortcuts<br />

B) a <strong>central</strong> <strong>route</strong> is used when the message is delivered in visual form<br />

C) a peripheral <strong>route</strong> is used when attention <strong>to</strong> the argument of a<br />

message is low<br />

D) <strong>persuasion</strong> occurs only when the source is likeable<br />

Social Psychology

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!