18.07.2014 Views

Boxoffice-August.1989

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

—<br />

OPENING CREDITS<br />

THIS<br />

ISSUE OF BoxoFFiCE marks the 51st edition of our<br />

annual buying guide to the motion picture industry.<br />

As in years past, our annual listing of distributors of<br />

theatrical films and suppliers of motion picture equipment<br />

is the most comprehensive in the industry. A quick look at<br />

these information packed pages wiW give you an impressive<br />

overview of all aspects of this business: from the suppliers<br />

of hard-to-find parts for aging projectors to the distributors<br />

of an film shorts; from back-of-seat cupholder manufacturers<br />

to the people who write software for in-theatre computer<br />

systems. But an equally quick comparison between this<br />

year's directory and last year's provides some sobering<br />

thoughts for the theatrical industry.<br />

In our listings of film distributors, for example, some<br />

familiar names no longer appear: in the last few months the<br />

industry has lost the distribution talents of Atlantic, Cannon<br />

(absorbed by Pathe), Cineplex, New World, Spectrafilm and<br />

Vestron, to name just a few. Some of the these companies<br />

folded due to a lack of return on their investment money<br />

Buying Fever<br />

who only are interested in New World's television division).<br />

Though these moves might make sense from a short term<br />

conglomerate business standpoint (all the above companies<br />

are part of or were taken over by conglomerates), we worry<br />

about the long term effects on the film industry as a whole.<br />

The conglomeration fever in our industry has now moved<br />

from the acquisition of exhibition outlets to the acquisition<br />

of production outlets, and this does not augur well for us.<br />

Just recently, George Lucas bemoaned the rash of corporate<br />

takeovers (in particular, the almost scandalous hostile<br />

Time-Wamer-Paramount takeover battle) by stating that<br />

such actions "damage the creative energies of the entertainment<br />

industry" by creating companies with enormous<br />

debts, thus tying up resources that should be made available<br />

instead for risk-taking on new films, new filmmakers, and<br />

new ideas. That is precisely what has happened to New<br />

World and Atlantic; despite what one may have thought<br />

about their film product, two voices of independent distribution<br />

have been silenced. What this means is less product<br />

for American theatre screens and, in particular, less product<br />

for the screens of American independent theatre owners.<br />

Taken alone, that is a bad sign for our industry, as more<br />

(Vestron, for example, which just couldn't come up with a<br />

major boxoffice hit after their success with "Dirty<br />

Dancing"); others were folded up as a result of sales or buyouts<br />

(Atlantic, purchased by the owners of Kartes Video Communications,<br />

was promised an infusion of money which<br />

was never forthcoming; New World Distribution has seem-<br />

and more smaller theatres are forced out of business. But<br />

worse yet is the impact on American society as a whole, of<br />

which more will be said in this space next month. Harley<br />

ingly been jettisoned by new owners Andrews Group Inc., W. Lond<br />

••••<br />

(Highest Sating)<br />

T \ }<br />

u^<br />

ptuous view of gl<<br />

Fortable theater chair. American Desit's Asl<br />

Lounger II and Astro Rocker 11 theater chai "<br />

' "^ '^<br />

AMERICAN DESK ^^

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!