Carolyn Dimmick Final PDF.indd - Washington Secretary of State
Carolyn Dimmick Final PDF.indd - Washington Secretary of State
Carolyn Dimmick Final PDF.indd - Washington Secretary of State
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Dimmick</strong>: The way I interpret that is (the debate) over strict constitutional adherence vs.<br />
stretching it to include a lot <strong>of</strong> things that were never meant to be. One who follows the<br />
law as a strict constructionist is not an activist judge. An activist judge is somebody who<br />
can find reasons to go outside what is commonly accepted.<br />
Hughes: So if you’re opposed to the death penalty you’ll find any kind <strong>of</strong> subterfuge?<br />
<strong>Dimmick</strong>: That’s right.<br />
Hughes: Is that an indictment you’d make – that we’ve seen too much activism on the part<br />
<strong>of</strong> judges?<br />
<strong>Dimmick</strong>: You know, I don’t really think so. I don’t really think that because I’ve listened<br />
to the issues; I’ve seen it, and I haven’t agreed with some <strong>of</strong> it, but I see that they’ve got a<br />
point <strong>of</strong> view. They could be just as right as I am.<br />
Hughes: Here’s a news story from the time <strong>of</strong> your appointment to the Supreme Court<br />
in 1980. It says, “<strong>Dimmick</strong> said the courts have gone too far in protecting the rights <strong>of</strong><br />
criminals by giving them, ‘Every possible consideration, down to the smallest technicality.’”<br />
<strong>Dimmick</strong>: I was quoted?<br />
Hughes: Yes.<br />
<strong>Dimmick</strong>: Hmmmm.<br />
Hughes: This is a piece in The Seattle Times in 1984. Let’s make sure I’ve got the context<br />
right: “Three <strong>Washington</strong> <strong>State</strong> judicial conservatives likely will be President Reagan’s<br />
nominees to fill new federal judgeships when the 99 th Congress convenes next year. The<br />
Times has learned the three: <strong>State</strong> Supreme Court Justice Caroline <strong>Dimmick</strong>, former but<br />
longtime Kitsap County Superior Court Judge Robert Bryan, and Yakima attorney Alan<br />
McDonald, will be formerly announced at a 2 P.M. press conference today in U.S. Senator<br />
Slade Gorton’s Seattle <strong>of</strong>fice. <strong>Dimmick</strong>’s confirmation would cause a vacancy on the state<br />
Supreme Court, which the governor could fill by appointment. Yesterday <strong>Dimmick</strong> refused<br />
comment. At the time <strong>of</strong> the appointment in 1980 <strong>Dimmick</strong> said the courts had gone too<br />
far in protecting the rights <strong>of</strong> criminals by giving them every possible consideration, down<br />
to the smallest technicality.”<br />
<strong>Dimmick</strong>: They must have got me on that day. I think what happened there was that the<br />
89