16.07.2014 Views

Carolyn Dimmick Final PDF.indd - Washington Secretary of State

Carolyn Dimmick Final PDF.indd - Washington Secretary of State

Carolyn Dimmick Final PDF.indd - Washington Secretary of State

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Dimmick</strong>: The way I interpret that is (the debate) over strict constitutional adherence vs.<br />

stretching it to include a lot <strong>of</strong> things that were never meant to be. One who follows the<br />

law as a strict constructionist is not an activist judge. An activist judge is somebody who<br />

can find reasons to go outside what is commonly accepted.<br />

Hughes: So if you’re opposed to the death penalty you’ll find any kind <strong>of</strong> subterfuge?<br />

<strong>Dimmick</strong>: That’s right.<br />

Hughes: Is that an indictment you’d make – that we’ve seen too much activism on the part<br />

<strong>of</strong> judges?<br />

<strong>Dimmick</strong>: You know, I don’t really think so. I don’t really think that because I’ve listened<br />

to the issues; I’ve seen it, and I haven’t agreed with some <strong>of</strong> it, but I see that they’ve got a<br />

point <strong>of</strong> view. They could be just as right as I am.<br />

Hughes: Here’s a news story from the time <strong>of</strong> your appointment to the Supreme Court<br />

in 1980. It says, “<strong>Dimmick</strong> said the courts have gone too far in protecting the rights <strong>of</strong><br />

criminals by giving them, ‘Every possible consideration, down to the smallest technicality.’”<br />

<strong>Dimmick</strong>: I was quoted?<br />

Hughes: Yes.<br />

<strong>Dimmick</strong>: Hmmmm.<br />

Hughes: This is a piece in The Seattle Times in 1984. Let’s make sure I’ve got the context<br />

right: “Three <strong>Washington</strong> <strong>State</strong> judicial conservatives likely will be President Reagan’s<br />

nominees to fill new federal judgeships when the 99 th Congress convenes next year. The<br />

Times has learned the three: <strong>State</strong> Supreme Court Justice Caroline <strong>Dimmick</strong>, former but<br />

longtime Kitsap County Superior Court Judge Robert Bryan, and Yakima attorney Alan<br />

McDonald, will be formerly announced at a 2 P.M. press conference today in U.S. Senator<br />

Slade Gorton’s Seattle <strong>of</strong>fice. <strong>Dimmick</strong>’s confirmation would cause a vacancy on the state<br />

Supreme Court, which the governor could fill by appointment. Yesterday <strong>Dimmick</strong> refused<br />

comment. At the time <strong>of</strong> the appointment in 1980 <strong>Dimmick</strong> said the courts had gone too<br />

far in protecting the rights <strong>of</strong> criminals by giving them every possible consideration, down<br />

to the smallest technicality.”<br />

<strong>Dimmick</strong>: They must have got me on that day. I think what happened there was that the<br />

89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!