16.07.2014 Views

Carolyn Dimmick Final PDF.indd - Washington Secretary of State

Carolyn Dimmick Final PDF.indd - Washington Secretary of State

Carolyn Dimmick Final PDF.indd - Washington Secretary of State

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

emotional benefits <strong>of</strong> parenthood. “It is a question which meddles with the concept <strong>of</strong> life<br />

and the stability <strong>of</strong> the family unit. Litigation cannot answer every question; every question<br />

cannot be answered in terms <strong>of</strong> dollars and cents.”<br />

<strong>Dimmick</strong>: I do remember that! Having two adopted children it was not hard for me to<br />

explain. I haven’t seen that for years. What year was that written?<br />

Hughes: It was written in 1984. The couple sought damages to compensate for the costs<br />

and “emotional burdens” <strong>of</strong> rearing and educating the unplanned child. You concluded that<br />

they were entitled only to medical and other expenses directly related to the child’s birth.<br />

“A child is more than an economic liability,” you wrote. “A child may provide its parents<br />

with love, companionship, a sense <strong>of</strong> achievement and a limited form <strong>of</strong> immortality. … The<br />

child may turn out to be loving, obedient and attentive or hostile, unruly and callous. The<br />

child may grow up to be president <strong>of</strong> the United <strong>State</strong>s or to be an infamous criminal.”<br />

<strong>Dimmick</strong>: I remember that so well.<br />

Hughes: Why was the federal bench a lot more interesting to you than the Supreme<br />

Court when the opportunity arose in 1984? For one thing, as you mentioned earlier, it’s in<br />

Seattle, right?<br />

<strong>Dimmick</strong>: Yes, that’s right. And it’s a trial bench, and the Supreme Court is an appellate<br />

bench. Appellate benches aren’t a lot <strong>of</strong> fun.<br />

Hughes: You’re not the first person I’ve heard say that. You’d think that with all the marble<br />

and the pomp and circumstance —<br />

<strong>Dimmick</strong>: We’re still sitting there by ourselves in a cell writing opinions.<br />

Hughes: Albeit a pretty nice cell. I was in Justice Madsen’s <strong>of</strong>fice and it’s very comfy.<br />

<strong>Dimmick</strong>: I haven’t been down there since they’ve remodeled.<br />

Hughes: Oh they’re nice <strong>of</strong>fices. She’s got oak and leather. But not as nice as this, with<br />

your stunning view <strong>of</strong> Puget Sound.<br />

So tell us about your appointment to the U.S. District Court. How does this come<br />

about?<br />

<strong>Dimmick</strong>: Strangely. I’m running for re-election for the Supreme Court, a statewide<br />

election in 1984. First time I’d had a campaign against me. We all fly up to Bellingham or<br />

83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!