Carolyn Dimmick Final PDF.indd - Washington Secretary of State
Carolyn Dimmick Final PDF.indd - Washington Secretary of State
Carolyn Dimmick Final PDF.indd - Washington Secretary of State
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
So you didn’t go home after that one and lose a lot <strong>of</strong> sleep over Charles Rodman<br />
Campbell?<br />
<strong>Dimmick</strong>: No. Philosophically, however, I think the death penalty is outdated because<br />
it’s too expensive. It breaks communities. Small communities can’t afford to try a death<br />
penalty case and put forth all the experts needed, all the defense money that’s needed.<br />
You might as well put them away and throw away the key is now my philosophy. But when<br />
I wrote a dissent … when I wrote on one <strong>of</strong> those (death penalty) cases, I had researched<br />
and found that the governor had commuted cases where they were supposed to have life<br />
without possibility <strong>of</strong> parole, and they had been given clemency by the governor. And so<br />
it didn’t really mean what it said when you’re putting them away forever. There’s always<br />
some way out.<br />
Hughes: With all these multiple appeals —<br />
<strong>Dimmick</strong>: It’s too expensive.<br />
Hughes: If you ruled the world would you change that? Have we just gone too far in<br />
allowing appeals to drag on?<br />
<strong>Dimmick</strong>: I think we have. I mean you can’t take away any more rights than you’ve now<br />
given them, which is public defense. You can’t do that. But in order not to bankrupt the<br />
counties and wherever it happens, you might as well do something differently.<br />
<strong>Dimmick</strong>: That Campbell case came over here when I was on this court.<br />
Hughes: It did?<br />
<strong>Dimmick</strong>: Yes, because they appealed and then it goes to the federal system.<br />
Hughes: What happened then?<br />
<strong>Dimmick</strong>: He got it. He went through the ropes – all <strong>of</strong> his avenues <strong>of</strong> appeal.<br />
Hughes: My favorite <strong>Carolyn</strong> <strong>Dimmick</strong> decision – from the standpoint <strong>of</strong> both wisdom<br />
and wonderful writing — is the one from 1984 where you wrote for a unanimous <strong>State</strong><br />
Supreme Court in a “wrongful birth” case that made headlines. A woman and her<br />
spouse sued a doctor who performed sterilization. Despite the tubal ligation, the woman<br />
became pregnant and delivered a healthy, normal child. In the final analysis, you said it<br />
was impossible to weigh with reasonable certainty the costs <strong>of</strong> raising a child against the<br />
82