16.07.2014 Views

Carolyn Dimmick Final PDF.indd - Washington Secretary of State

Carolyn Dimmick Final PDF.indd - Washington Secretary of State

Carolyn Dimmick Final PDF.indd - Washington Secretary of State

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

So you didn’t go home after that one and lose a lot <strong>of</strong> sleep over Charles Rodman<br />

Campbell?<br />

<strong>Dimmick</strong>: No. Philosophically, however, I think the death penalty is outdated because<br />

it’s too expensive. It breaks communities. Small communities can’t afford to try a death<br />

penalty case and put forth all the experts needed, all the defense money that’s needed.<br />

You might as well put them away and throw away the key is now my philosophy. But when<br />

I wrote a dissent … when I wrote on one <strong>of</strong> those (death penalty) cases, I had researched<br />

and found that the governor had commuted cases where they were supposed to have life<br />

without possibility <strong>of</strong> parole, and they had been given clemency by the governor. And so<br />

it didn’t really mean what it said when you’re putting them away forever. There’s always<br />

some way out.<br />

Hughes: With all these multiple appeals —<br />

<strong>Dimmick</strong>: It’s too expensive.<br />

Hughes: If you ruled the world would you change that? Have we just gone too far in<br />

allowing appeals to drag on?<br />

<strong>Dimmick</strong>: I think we have. I mean you can’t take away any more rights than you’ve now<br />

given them, which is public defense. You can’t do that. But in order not to bankrupt the<br />

counties and wherever it happens, you might as well do something differently.<br />

<strong>Dimmick</strong>: That Campbell case came over here when I was on this court.<br />

Hughes: It did?<br />

<strong>Dimmick</strong>: Yes, because they appealed and then it goes to the federal system.<br />

Hughes: What happened then?<br />

<strong>Dimmick</strong>: He got it. He went through the ropes – all <strong>of</strong> his avenues <strong>of</strong> appeal.<br />

Hughes: My favorite <strong>Carolyn</strong> <strong>Dimmick</strong> decision – from the standpoint <strong>of</strong> both wisdom<br />

and wonderful writing — is the one from 1984 where you wrote for a unanimous <strong>State</strong><br />

Supreme Court in a “wrongful birth” case that made headlines. A woman and her<br />

spouse sued a doctor who performed sterilization. Despite the tubal ligation, the woman<br />

became pregnant and delivered a healthy, normal child. In the final analysis, you said it<br />

was impossible to weigh with reasonable certainty the costs <strong>of</strong> raising a child against the<br />

82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!