16.07.2014 Views

Carolyn Dimmick Final PDF.indd - Washington Secretary of State

Carolyn Dimmick Final PDF.indd - Washington Secretary of State

Carolyn Dimmick Final PDF.indd - Washington Secretary of State

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Hughes: Yes, a female majority from 2003-2005. What did you think <strong>of</strong> that?<br />

<strong>Dimmick</strong>: I thought it was great.<br />

Hughes: Did you know those ladies?<br />

<strong>Dimmick</strong>: Yes.<br />

Hughes: Madsen, Ireland, Bridge, Owens and Fairhurst.<br />

<strong>Dimmick</strong>: Fairhurst was a law clerk when I was on the Supreme Court.<br />

Hughes: I didn’t ask you earlier if you had entertained the notion <strong>of</strong> applying for a law<br />

clerk job when you graduated from Law School, like Smith and Utter.<br />

<strong>Dimmick</strong>: No, it didn’t occur to me. It was not the kind <strong>of</strong> work that I wanted to do.<br />

Hughes: And now the newest member <strong>of</strong> the Supreme Court is Debra Stephens, who is<br />

obviously extraordinarily bright, and looks like she’s 25 years old.<br />

<strong>Dimmick</strong>: I know it!<br />

Hughes: Are there other female judges that you view as extremely capable, that you stay<br />

in touch with, and that you feel as if you’re mentoring?<br />

<strong>Dimmick</strong>: Oh yes, I get along with all <strong>of</strong> them. I really enjoy Bobbe Bridge. I’m sorry she’s<br />

not there (on the Supreme Court) any more.<br />

Hughes: Did they call you <strong>of</strong>ten? Even in an era when there are a lot more female judges,<br />

is there a network?<br />

<strong>Dimmick</strong>: Oh sure.<br />

Hughes: What kind <strong>of</strong> things do you talk about?<br />

<strong>Dimmick</strong>: I have a group <strong>of</strong> three judges and two lawyers. We meet about once a month<br />

and go out to dinner and do stuff.<br />

Hughes: I wanted to ask you about the judicial canons <strong>of</strong> ethics, about running for <strong>of</strong>fice.<br />

Do you think that Canon Seven is too restrictive in mandating that judges refrain from<br />

“inappropriate” political activity?<br />

<strong>Dimmick</strong>: It’s pretty constraining and it really should be because why are you going to<br />

announce how you would decide a case when you haven’t even heard the case? That’s<br />

the thing. You can have a philosophy, but when the facts come up in front <strong>of</strong> you that<br />

goes out the window. You’ve got to base it on the facts. You can say “I’m against this. I’m<br />

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!