THE WEIL-´ETALE FUNDAMENTAL GROUP OF A NUMBER FIELD I
THE WEIL-´ETALE FUNDAMENTAL GROUP OF A NUMBER FIELD I THE WEIL-´ETALE FUNDAMENTAL GROUP OF A NUMBER FIELD I
132 B. Morin THEOREM 6.7. We have canonical isomorphisms ⎧( ∏ )/ R R for n = 1 ⎪⎨ H n v|∞ ( ¯X L ,ϕ !˜R) = Hom c (( ⊕ v|∞ ⎪⎩ W k(v)) 1 , R) for n = 2 0 for n ≠ 1, 2. Proof. The direct image i v∗ is exact hence the group H n ( ¯X L , ∏ v|∞ i v∗˜R) is canonically isomorphic to ∏ R n = 0 ⎧⎪ ∏ ⎨ v|∞ ( ∑ ) H n (B Wk(v)˜R) = Hom c W k(v) , R n = 1 v|∞ ⎪ ⎩ v|∞ 0 n ≥ 2. Using the exact sequence (32), the result for n ≥ 3 follows from Property (9). By (32) we have the exact sequence 0 → H 0 ( ¯X L ,ϕ !˜R) → H 0 ( ¯X W , ˜R) = R → ∏ v|∞ H n (B Wk(v)˜R) = ∏ v|∞ R → H 1 ( ¯X L ,ϕ !˜R) → 0, where the central map is the diagonal embedding. The result follows for n = 0, 1. For n = 2, we have the exact sequence ( ∑ ) Hom c (Pic( ¯X), R) → Hom c W k(v) , R → H 2 ( ¯X L ,ϕ !˜R) → 1, v|∞ where, by Property (8), the first map is induced by the canonical morphism ∑ v|∞ W k(v) → Pic( ¯X). We obtain a canonical isomorphism (( ∑ ) 1 ) H 1 ( ¯X L ,ϕ !˜R) = Homc W k(v) , R . ✷ v|∞ Definition 6.8. We define the fundamental class θ ∈ H 1 ( ¯X L , ˜R) as the canonical morphism θ ∈ H 1 ( ¯X L , ˜R) = Hom c (Pic( ¯X), R). Recall that, for any closed point v ∈ ¯X, wehaveH n (B Wk(v) , ˜R) = R, Hom c (W k(v) , R) and0forn = 0, 1andn ≥ 2 respectively. Definition 6.9. For any closed point v ∈ ¯X, the v-fundamental class is the canonical morphism θ v : W k(v) → R: θ v ∈ H 1 (B Wk(v) , ˜R) = Hom c (W k(v) , R). The morphism obtained by cup product with θ v is the canonical isomorphism ∪θ v : H 0 (B Wk(v) , ˜R) = R −→ H 1 (B Wk(v) , ˜R) = Hom c (W k(v) , R) 1 ↦−→ θ v .
The Weil-étale fundamental group of a number field I 133 THEOREM 6.10. The morphism ∪θ obtained by cup product with the fundamental class θ is the canonical isomorphism ∪θ : H 1 ( ¯X L ,ϕ !˜R) = ( ∏v|∞ R)/R −→ H 2 ( ¯X L ,ϕ !˜R) = Homc (( ∑ v|∞ W k(v)) 1 , R) v ↦−→ θ v ◦ p v , where p v : ( ∑ w|∞ W k(w)) 1 → W k(v) is given by the projection. Proof. By Property (8), the morphism H 1 (B Pic( ¯X) , ˜R) = H 1 ( ¯X L , ˜R) −→ H 1 ( ∐ v∈X ∞ B Wk(v) , ˜R) = ∏ v|∞ H 1 (B Wk(v) , ˜R) θ ↦−→ (θ v ) v|∞ , which is induced by ∐ v∈X ∞ B Wk(v) → ¯X L → B Pic( ¯X) , sends fundamental class to fundamental class. Hence the cup-product morphism ∪θ is induced by ∏ ∏ (∪θ v ) v|∞ : H 0 ( ¯X L ,i ∞∗˜R) = R −→ H 1 ( ¯X L ,i ∞∗˜R) = Hom c (B Wk(v) , ˜R) v|∞ and the result follows. Note that ∪θ is well defined, since ∪θ( ∑ v|∞ v) = ∑ v|∞ θ v is the canonical map ∑ v|∞ W k(v) → R, which vanishes on ( ∑ v|∞ W k(v)) 1 . ✷ THEOREM 6.11. For any n ≥ 1, the morphism v|∞ R n : H n ( ¯X et ,τ ≤2 Rγ ∗ (ϕ ! Z)) ⊗ R −→ H n ( ¯X L ,ϕ !˜R), induced by the morphism of sheaves ϕ ! Z → ϕ !˜R, is an isomorphism. Proof. We denote by κ n : H n ( ¯X et ,τ ≤2 Rγ ∗ (ϕ ! Z)) −→ H 1 ( ¯X L ,ϕ !˜R) the morphism induced by ϕ ! Z → ϕ !˜R. The result is obvious for n ≠ 1, 2. The result is also clear for n = 1, since κ 1 is canonically identified with ( ∐ )/ ( ∐ )/ H 0 B Wk(v) , Z H 0 ( ¯X L , Z) → H 0 B Wk(v) , ˜R H 0 ( ¯X L , ˜R), v∈X ∞ v∈X ∞ hence R 1 is the identity. Assume that n = 2. On the one hand, we have canonically H 2 ( ¯X et ,τ ≤2 Rγ ∗ (ϕ ! Z)) = H 2 ( ¯X L , Z) = H 1 ( ¯X L , ˜S 1 )/H 1 ( ¯X L , ˜R). On the other hand, we have ( ∐ )/ ( ∐ H 2 ( ¯X L ,ϕ !˜R) = H 1 B Wk(v) , ˜R H 1 ( ¯X L , ˜R) = H 1 B Wk(v) , ˜S )/H 1 1 ( ¯X L , ˜R) v|∞ v|∞ and the map R 2 is induced by ( ∐ ) ( ∑ ) H 1 ( ¯X L , ˜S 1 ) = Hom c (Pic( ¯X), S 1 ) −→ H 1 B Wk(v) , ˜S 1 = Hom c W k(v) , S 1 v|∞ v|∞ which is in turn induced by the canonical morphism ∑ v|∞ W k(v) → Pic( ¯X), as it follows from Property (8). We have the exact sequence Hom c (Pic( ¯X), R) → Hom c (Pic( ¯X), S 1 ) → Hom c (Pic 1 ( ¯X), S 1 ) → 0,
- Page 1 and 2: Kyushu J. Math. 65 (2011), 101-140
- Page 3 and 4: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 5 and 6: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 7 and 8: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 9 and 10: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 11 and 12: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 13 and 14: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 15 and 16: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 17 and 18: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 19 and 20: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 21 and 22: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 23 and 24: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 25 and 26: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 27 and 28: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 29 and 30: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 31: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 35 and 36: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 37 and 38: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 39 and 40: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
The Weil-étale fundamental group of a number field I 133<br />
<strong>THE</strong>OREM 6.10. The morphism ∪θ obtained by cup product with the fundamental class θ is<br />
the canonical isomorphism<br />
∪θ : H 1 ( ¯X L ,ϕ !˜R) = (<br />
∏v|∞ R)/R −→ H 2 ( ¯X L ,ϕ !˜R) = Homc (( ∑ v|∞ W k(v)) 1 , R)<br />
v ↦−→ θ v ◦ p v ,<br />
where p v : ( ∑ w|∞ W k(w)) 1 → W k(v) is given by the projection.<br />
Proof. By Property (8), the morphism<br />
H 1 (B Pic( ¯X) , ˜R) = H 1 ( ¯X L , ˜R) −→ H 1 ( ∐ v∈X ∞<br />
B Wk(v) , ˜R) = ∏ v|∞ H 1 (B Wk(v) , ˜R)<br />
θ ↦−→ (θ v ) v|∞ ,<br />
which is induced by ∐ v∈X ∞<br />
B Wk(v) → ¯X L → B Pic( ¯X) , sends fundamental class to<br />
fundamental class. Hence the cup-product morphism ∪θ is induced by<br />
∏<br />
∏<br />
(∪θ v ) v|∞ : H 0 ( ¯X L ,i ∞∗˜R) = R −→ H 1 ( ¯X L ,i ∞∗˜R) = Hom c (B Wk(v) , ˜R)<br />
v|∞<br />
and the result follows. Note that ∪θ is well defined, since ∪θ( ∑ v|∞ v) = ∑ v|∞ θ v is the<br />
canonical map ∑ v|∞ W k(v) → R, which vanishes on ( ∑ v|∞ W k(v)) 1 .<br />
✷<br />
<strong>THE</strong>OREM 6.11. For any n ≥ 1, the morphism<br />
v|∞<br />
R n : H n ( ¯X et ,τ ≤2 Rγ ∗ (ϕ ! Z)) ⊗ R −→ H n ( ¯X L ,ϕ !˜R),<br />
induced by the morphism of sheaves ϕ ! Z → ϕ !˜R, is an isomorphism.<br />
Proof. We denote by<br />
κ n : H n ( ¯X et ,τ ≤2 Rγ ∗ (ϕ ! Z)) −→ H 1 ( ¯X L ,ϕ !˜R)<br />
the morphism induced by ϕ ! Z → ϕ !˜R. The result is obvious for n ≠ 1, 2. The result is also<br />
clear for n = 1, since κ 1 is canonically identified with<br />
( ∐<br />
)/<br />
( ∐<br />
)/<br />
H 0 B Wk(v) , Z H 0 ( ¯X L , Z) → H 0 B Wk(v) , ˜R H 0 ( ¯X L , ˜R),<br />
v∈X ∞ v∈X ∞<br />
hence R 1 is the identity. Assume that n = 2. On the one hand, we have canonically<br />
H 2 ( ¯X et ,τ ≤2 Rγ ∗ (ϕ ! Z)) = H 2 ( ¯X L , Z) = H 1 ( ¯X L , ˜S 1 )/H 1 ( ¯X L , ˜R).<br />
On the other hand, we have<br />
( ∐<br />
)/<br />
( ∐<br />
H 2 ( ¯X L ,ϕ !˜R) = H 1 B Wk(v) , ˜R H 1 ( ¯X L , ˜R) = H 1 B Wk(v) , ˜S<br />
)/H 1 1 ( ¯X L , ˜R)<br />
v|∞ v|∞<br />
and the map R 2 is induced by<br />
( ∐<br />
) ( ∑<br />
)<br />
H 1 ( ¯X L , ˜S 1 ) = Hom c (Pic( ¯X), S 1 ) −→ H 1 B Wk(v) , ˜S 1 = Hom c W k(v) , S 1<br />
v|∞<br />
v|∞<br />
which is in turn induced by the canonical morphism ∑ v|∞ W k(v) → Pic( ¯X), as it follows<br />
from Property (8). We have the exact sequence<br />
Hom c (Pic( ¯X), R) → Hom c (Pic( ¯X), S 1 ) → Hom c (Pic 1 ( ¯X), S 1 ) → 0,