THE WEIL-´ETALE FUNDAMENTAL GROUP OF A NUMBER FIELD I
THE WEIL-´ETALE FUNDAMENTAL GROUP OF A NUMBER FIELD I THE WEIL-´ETALE FUNDAMENTAL GROUP OF A NUMBER FIELD I
118 B. Morin Note that we have W k(w) ≃ Z for w ultrametric and W k(w) ≃ R × + for w archimedean. We denote by G k(w) := D w /I w the Galois group of the residue field k(w),whereD w and I w are, respectively, the decomposition and the inertia subgroups of G K at w. Hence G k(w) is the trivial group for w archimedean. There is a canonical morphism W k(w) −→ G k(w) (23) for any closed point w ∈ Ū. We consider the big classifying topos B Wk(w) and the small classifying topos BG sm k(w) , i.e. the category of continuous G k(w) -sets. In particular, BG sm k(w) is just the final topos Sets for w archimedean. The map (23) induces a morphism of toposes: α v : B Wk(w) −→ BG sm k(w) . We denote by T the topos of sheaves on the site (Top, J op ),whereTop is the category of Hausdorff locally compact spaces endowed with the open cover topology. If we need to use constant sheaves represented by non-locally compact spaces, then we can define T ′ := (Top h , J op ),whereTop h is the category of Hausdorff spaces, and consider the base change ¯X L × T T ′ to obtain a connected and locally connected topos over T ′ . Finally, if G is a strict pro-group object of T given by a covariant functor G : I → Gr(T ) where Gr(T ) denotes the category of groups in T and I is a small filtered category. We consider the pro-abelian group object G DD of T defined as the composite functor (−) DD ◦ G : I −→ Gr(T ) −→ Ab(T ). Let t : E → T be a connected and locally connected topos over T ,i.e.t is a connected and locally connected morphism. In particular, t ∗ has a left adjoint t ! . An object X of E is said to be connected over T if t ! X is the final object of T .AT -point of E is a section s : T → E of the structure map t, i.e.t ◦ s is isomorphic to Id T . 5.2. Expected properties (1) The conjectural Lichtenbaum topos ¯X L should be naturally associated to ¯X. There should be a canonical connected morphism from ¯X L to the Artin–Verdier étale topos: γ : ¯X L −→ ¯X et . (2) The conjectural Lichtenbaum topos ¯X L should be defined over T . The structure map t : ¯X L −→ T should be connected and locally connected, and ¯X L should have a T -point p. For any connected étale ¯X-scheme Ū, the object γ ∗ Ū of ¯X L should be connected over T . It follows that the slice topos Ū L := ¯X L /γ ∗ Ū −→ ¯X L −→ T is connected and locally connected over T , for any connected étale ¯X-scheme Ū, and has a T -point pŪ : T −→ Ū L .
The Weil-étale fundamental group of a number field I 119 Then the fundamental group π 1 (Ū L ,pŪ ) is well defined as a prodiscrete localic group in T . Moreover, π 1 (Ū L ,pŪ ) should be pro-representable by a locally compact strict pro-group, and we consider this fundamental group as a locally compact pro-group. By Corollary 3.3, we have π 1 (Ū L ,pŪ ) DD = π 1 (Ū L ,pŪ ) ab = π 1 (Ū L ) ab . We have a canonical connected morphism inducing a morphism Ū L := ¯X L /γ ∗ Ū −→ ¯X et /Ū = Ū et ϕŪ : π 1 (Ū L ,pŪ ) −→ π 1 (Ū et ,qŪ ), where qŪ is defined by pŪ as in (15). We obtain a morphism ϕ DD Ū : π 1(Ū L ) ab = π 1 (Ū L ,pŪ ) DD −→ π 1 (Ū et ,pŪ ) DD = π 1 (Ū et ) ab . (3) We should have a canonical isomorphism such that the composition ϕ DD Ū rŪ : CŪ ≃ π 1 (Ū L ) ab ◦ r Ū : C Ū ≃ π 1(Ū L ) ab −→ π 1 (Ū et ) ab is the reciprocity law of class field theory. This reciprocity morphism is defined by the topological class formation (π 1 (Ū et ,qŪ), lim C −→ ¯V ), where ¯V runs over the filtered system of pointed étale cover of (Ū,qŪ ) (see [15, Proposition 8.3.8] and [15, Theorem 8.3.12]). (4) The isomorphism rŪ should be covariantly functorial for any map f : ¯V → Ū of connected étale ¯X-schemes. More precisely, such a map induces a morphism of toposes: f L : ¯V L := ¯X L / ¯V −→ Ū L := ¯X L /Ū hence a morphism of abelian pro-groups in T , ˜f L : π 1 ( ¯V L ) ab −→ π 1 (Ū L ) ab . Then the following diagram should be commutative: π 1 ( ¯V L ) ab ˜f L π 1 (Ū L ) ab r ¯V C ¯V rŪ CŪ N where N is induced by the norm map.
- Page 1 and 2: Kyushu J. Math. 65 (2011), 101-140
- Page 3 and 4: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 5 and 6: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 7 and 8: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 9 and 10: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 11 and 12: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 13 and 14: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 15 and 16: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 17: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 21 and 22: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 23 and 24: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 25 and 26: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 27 and 28: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 29 and 30: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 31 and 32: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 33 and 34: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 35 and 36: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 37 and 38: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
- Page 39 and 40: The Weil-étale fundamental group o
118 B. Morin<br />
Note that we have W k(w) ≃ Z for w ultrametric and W k(w) ≃ R × + for w archimedean. We<br />
denote by G k(w) := D w /I w the Galois group of the residue field k(w),whereD w and I w are,<br />
respectively, the decomposition and the inertia subgroups of G K at w. Hence G k(w) is the<br />
trivial group for w archimedean. There is a canonical morphism<br />
W k(w) −→ G k(w) (23)<br />
for any closed point w ∈ Ū. We consider the big classifying topos B Wk(w) and the small<br />
classifying topos BG sm<br />
k(w)<br />
, i.e. the category of continuous G k(w) -sets. In particular, BG sm<br />
k(w)<br />
is<br />
just the final topos Sets for w archimedean. The map (23) induces a morphism of toposes:<br />
α v : B Wk(w) −→ BG sm<br />
k(w)<br />
.<br />
We denote by T the topos of sheaves on the site (Top, J op ),whereTop is the category<br />
of Hausdorff locally compact spaces endowed with the open cover topology. If we need<br />
to use constant sheaves represented by non-locally compact spaces, then we can define<br />
T ′ := (Top h , J op ),whereTop h is the category of Hausdorff spaces, and consider the base<br />
change<br />
¯X L × T T ′<br />
to obtain a connected and locally connected topos over T ′ .<br />
Finally, if G is a strict pro-group object of T given by a covariant functor G : I → Gr(T )<br />
where Gr(T ) denotes the category of groups in T and I is a small filtered category. We<br />
consider the pro-abelian group object G DD of T defined as the composite functor<br />
(−) DD ◦ G : I −→ Gr(T ) −→ Ab(T ).<br />
Let t : E → T be a connected and locally connected topos over T ,i.e.t is a connected<br />
and locally connected morphism. In particular, t ∗ has a left adjoint t ! . An object X of E is said<br />
to be connected over T if t ! X is the final object of T .AT -point of E is a section s : T → E<br />
of the structure map t, i.e.t ◦ s is isomorphic to Id T .<br />
5.2. Expected properties<br />
(1) The conjectural Lichtenbaum topos ¯X L should be naturally associated to ¯X. There<br />
should be a canonical connected morphism from ¯X L to the Artin–Verdier étale topos:<br />
γ : ¯X L −→ ¯X et .<br />
(2) The conjectural Lichtenbaum topos ¯X L should be defined over T . The structure map<br />
t : ¯X L −→ T<br />
should be connected and locally connected, and ¯X L should have a T -point p. For any<br />
connected étale ¯X-scheme Ū, the object γ ∗ Ū of ¯X L should be connected over T .<br />
It follows that the slice topos<br />
Ū L := ¯X L /γ ∗ Ū −→ ¯X L −→ T<br />
is connected and locally connected over T , for any connected étale ¯X-scheme Ū, and<br />
has a T -point<br />
pŪ : T −→ Ū L .