15.07.2014 Views

Port Nelson Annual Report 2012 (pdf)

Port Nelson Annual Report 2012 (pdf)

Port Nelson Annual Report 2012 (pdf)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

annual report <strong>2012</strong>


vision<br />

Become the Benchmark – through continuous improvement<br />

The six pillars of our vision appear on the photo pages<br />

vision<br />

throughout this report.<br />

2<br />

Executive Officers (from left): Martin Byrne, Chief Executive Officer; Parke Pittar, Chief Commercial Officer;<br />

Digby Kynaston, <strong>Port</strong> Logistics Manager; Matt McDonald, Infrastructure Manager; Melisa Kappely, Employee Relations Manager.


content<br />

Directors’ <strong>Report</strong>............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................5<br />

CEO’s <strong>Report</strong>....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................6<br />

Community......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................9<br />

Governance......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................9<br />

Environment................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 10<br />

<strong>Port</strong> People.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 13<br />

Directors......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14<br />

Financial <strong>Report</strong>.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15<br />

Auditor’s <strong>Report</strong>.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16<br />

Statutory Information............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 17<br />

Statement of Corporate Intent.............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 19<br />

Statement of Comprehensive Income................................................................................................................................................................................................ 20<br />

Statement of Movements in Equity..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 20<br />

Balance Sheet............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21<br />

Statement of Cash Flows......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 22<br />

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.................................................................................................................................................................................... 24<br />

Notes to the Accounts.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 28<br />

Directory........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 40<br />

purpose<br />

To facilitate regional prosperity<br />

mission<br />

To operate <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> as a successful business providing cost efficient, effective and competitive services and facilities for port<br />

users and shippers.<br />

To provide for the present and future needs of <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> in ways that are sensitive to people, use resources wisely, and are in<br />

harmony with the environment of an export port.<br />

objectives<br />

• To operate as a successful business.<br />

• To be a good employer.<br />

• The debt equity ratio not to exceed 66.67% (40/60).<br />

• To aim to grow the business through stimulation of throughput, added value services and related business activities, so leading to<br />

increased revenue.<br />

• To achieve a commercially acceptable rate of return on shareholders’ funds in accordance with meeting the objectives herein.<br />

• To ensure that port development takes place which meets the needs of the region.<br />

• To ensure that high environmental standards are maintained.<br />

• To strive for continuous improvement in everything that we do.<br />

3


performance<br />

performance review - <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> Limited<br />

<strong>2012</strong> 2011 2010 2009 2008<br />

Operations<br />

Trade (millions of cargo tonnes) 2.65 2.71 2.75 2.76 2.68<br />

Container throughput (TEUs) 86,178 83,800 85,735 82,272 77,561<br />

Vessel arrivals (over 100GT) 733 850 835 921 921<br />

Total Vessel GT calling (millions) 6.9 7.9 8.1 8.3 8.3<br />

Employees (FTEs) 135 136 141 148 137<br />

Financial ($ millions)<br />

Revenue* $38.8 $38.3 $37.9 $38.0 $36.2<br />

EBITDA** $19.1 $16.9 $16.7 $14.8 $17.8<br />

Earnings before interest<br />

and taxation (EBIT) $14.4 $12.6 $12.5 $10.7 $13.9<br />

Net interest expense $2.5 $2.7 $2.7 $3.1 $3.3<br />

Taxation $1.6 $3.4 $6.3 $2.7 $3.2<br />

Net surplus after taxation $10.4 $6.6 $3.4 $4.9 $7.5<br />

Dividends declared $12.2 $4.2 $4.1 $4.0 $3.8<br />

Capital Expenditure $3.3 $10.3 $4.1 $8.5 $10.1<br />

Net interest bearing debt $39.9 $39.3 $36.5 $43.0 $41.0<br />

Total non-current tangible assets $185.6 $186.8 $181.4 $182.8 $152.3<br />

Shareholder return metrics<br />

Earnings per share (cents) 40.8 25.9 13.5 19.4 29.5<br />

Dividend per share (cents) 48.0 16.5 16.1 15.7 15.0<br />

Net assets per share $5.27 $5.38 $5.27 $5.26 $5.29<br />

Equity 69.9% 70.6% 71.2% 69.6% 71.2%<br />

Return on average equity 7.7% 4.9% 2.6% 3.7% 6.1%<br />

Return on average assets 7.5% 6.6% 6.5% 5.6% 8.0%<br />

* Revenue includes investment property revaluations<br />

** Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation<br />

processes<br />

An efficient and consistent approach to the way we do things<br />

• Embed a culture of continuous improvement<br />

vision<br />

• Ensure the integrity of source data<br />

• Provide for an accurate flow of information between systems<br />

• Streamline processes to achieve zero wastage<br />

• Standardise, document and train in what we do<br />

4


directors’ report<br />

As Chairman of <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> Limited (<strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>), it gives me great<br />

pleasure to report on a good year for the company, particularly when<br />

taking into account the ongoing challenging conditions in the wider<br />

economy.<br />

<strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> has produced another strong financial result, with earnings<br />

before interest and tax of $14.4 million, some $1.4 million above budget.<br />

One of the main influences on the result was the strong performance of<br />

the Unimar business over the last 12 months, as mentioned below.<br />

Operating revenue for the last 12 months was marginally under budget,<br />

but was compensated for by lower-than-budgeted operating expenses<br />

and by maintenance costs coming in around $600,000 lower than<br />

anticipated.<br />

The main points to note regarding the revenue and expenses figures<br />

are as follows:<br />

•Cargo volumes were 131,000 tonnes lower than budgeted, due<br />

mainly to the drop off in log exports to China<br />

• Container volumes at 86,178 TEU* were just above the previous<br />

record figure of two years ago<br />

• Maintenance costs were well contained for the year, with dredging<br />

expenses in particular not as high as had been expected<br />

• Tax expense was significantly reduced due to the recognition of<br />

buildings and building fit outs previously not depreciable now<br />

being depreciable for tax purposes. This adjustment resulted in<br />

a reduction in tax expense of $0.65 million. Additionally a further<br />

$0.35 million tax expense reduction was recognised due to a<br />

previous period adjustment.<br />

Total cargo for 2011/12 was 2.65 million tonnes, down very slightly on<br />

the previous year and also below what had been budgeted. The main<br />

reason for this, as mentioned above, was the reduction in log exports to<br />

China from the region, from the middle of 2011 onwards.<br />

MDF, fish and wine volumes were all above budget during this period,<br />

with sawn timber and fruit being at slightly lower levels than had been<br />

expected.<br />

We have continued our ongoing programme of maintaining, and where<br />

necessary upgrading, equipment and facilities to ensure the business is<br />

sustainable and reliable for the long term. Major items this year included<br />

purchase of a new Empty Container Handler (ECH), and pavement<br />

upgrading in sections of the container yard and log storage area. We<br />

also completed the camera installation project around the port area,<br />

resulting in vastly improved coverage with operational and security<br />

benefits.<br />

From a property-holding perspective, the major development we<br />

undertook in the last year was the upgrading of the Steel and Tube<br />

leased property. This meant lesees could consolidate two sites they<br />

had around the wider <strong>Nelson</strong> area into one within the port precinct. As<br />

the commercial property market in <strong>Nelson</strong> picks up, it is hoped we can<br />

attract more such tenants to the port area, with the advantages that it<br />

can offer.<br />

While still on the subject of property, during the year, <strong>Nelson</strong> City<br />

Council purchased the former Reliance Engineering and Four Seasons<br />

buildings and sites from <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>. Long term, these were not seen as<br />

being of operational use to us and this sale fits in with the council plan<br />

to further connect the city to the sea.<br />

The performance of the partly <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>-owned Unimar Limited<br />

has been a highlight of the last 12 months, with the company heavily<br />

involved in the salvage of cargo from the stricken vessel Rena off the<br />

coast of Tauranga. As the New Zealand representative for UK-based<br />

Braemar Howells, Unimar has been intricately involved in a large amount<br />

of recovery work. This has seen the fortunes of the business change<br />

significantly from only 12 months earlier, and it has been pleasing to see<br />

a <strong>Nelson</strong>-based company at the forefront of the salvage project.<br />

This year’s net surplus after tax, significantly inflated by the one-off<br />

effect of the Unimar work on the Rena and the aforementioned tax<br />

adjustments, resulted in an average return of shareholders’ funds of 7.7<br />

per cent, and dividends declared for the full year of $12.2 million.<br />

These dividends were made up of the normal annual dividend plus<br />

an additional special dividend of a further $8 million that the Board<br />

also declared. This put the total dividends paid out to shareholders<br />

since <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> Limited was formed in 1988 in the region of $122<br />

million. The special dividend was paid after the Board undertook a<br />

comprehensive review of the company’s position.<br />

As the financial year came to an end, the main focus was on the continued<br />

uncertainty over container shipping services and the challenges this<br />

brings to regional ports in particular. After much speculation and<br />

considerable lobbying by a number of key <strong>Nelson</strong> exporters and others<br />

including <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>, Maersk made the decision to retain a <strong>Nelson</strong><br />

call, with the introduction of calls from their NZ1 service from early<br />

August. While this announcement was pleasing for all concerned, the<br />

uncertainty that the service changes created only served to emphasise<br />

the vulnerability of regional ports in retaining ongoing services, a<br />

continued concern for us all.<br />

As we head into another financial year, it is clear that <strong>2012</strong>/13 will be a<br />

difficult one, with cargo volumes predicted to remain static and costs<br />

such as insurance and electricity continuing to rise. <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> is<br />

committed to continuing to work hard to provide our customers with<br />

the most efficient service we can offer, recognising this is an ongoing<br />

process as customer expectations continue to increase.<br />

In closing, I would like to thank our management team and all our<br />

staff for their efforts over the last year. I would also like to extend our<br />

continued appreciation to our customers, whether they be importers,<br />

exporters or shipping lines, for their continued custom. We also value<br />

and appreciate the ongoing contribution from our two shareholders<br />

Tasman District Council and <strong>Nelson</strong> City Council. Finally, my thanks go<br />

out to my fellow directors for their contribution over the previous 12<br />

months.<br />

Nick Patterson<br />

Chairman, <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> Limited.<br />

*TEU = Twenty-foot Equivalent Container Unit.<br />

5


chief executive officer’s report<br />

The financial year just ended has been a further challenging 12 months<br />

for us, on the back of a drop-off in some cargo volumes, continuing<br />

reviews of shipping services and the ongoing financial challenges<br />

faced in many markets served by exporters from the region.<br />

On the cargo side, log volumes for the year were around 636,000<br />

tonnes, well down on the 723,000 handled in the previous year and<br />

even further below the expected budget. The softening of the Chinese<br />

market in particular has been very apparent to exporters in the <strong>Nelson</strong>-<br />

Tasman area, and it appears the current volumes are likely to be the<br />

reality for some time to come.<br />

Apple volumes were also lower than the previous year, due to a<br />

combination of a smaller crop and fruit being later this year following<br />

a cooler-than-usual summer. On a more positive note, at the time<br />

of preparing this report, pipfruit prices in major overseas markets<br />

seemed to be more robust than in recent years, which is a positive for<br />

the horticultural industry.<br />

Fish volumes have also held up well this year after a good hoki season,<br />

and it is hoped, with continued good catches and the addressing of<br />

some storage issues for diesel supplies on the reclamation that fish<br />

volumes will continue to grow in the coming years.<br />

Processed wood volumes were in line with expectations, wine volumes<br />

remained strong and fertiliser and gypsum imports were also at<br />

pleasing levels.<br />

On the container side, while the figures for the year were slightly below<br />

budget, at 86,178 TEU, this was the highest number of containers<br />

handled annually through the port to date.<br />

Vessel visits, at 733, were well down on the previous year’s total of<br />

850. This was partly due to the withdrawal of Strait Shipping’s weekly<br />

<strong>Nelson</strong>-to-Wellington service in June 2011, and the absence of extra<br />

loader vessels calling during the export fruit season this year.<br />

As mentioned in the Directors’ <strong>Report</strong> on the previous page, the<br />

decision of Maersk to review their <strong>Nelson</strong> weekly service caused<br />

considerable consternation in the export community during the<br />

month of June. While the final result of <strong>Nelson</strong> receiving a regular<br />

call on the NZ1 service was a positive one, the decision of Maersk to<br />

withdraw their Timaru service further emphasised the continual state<br />

of change prevalent in the industry.<br />

We firmly believe that the wide and varied cargo base available for<br />

shipping lines in this region is a major point of difference from some<br />

other regional ports, and is one that the lines themselves acknowledge.<br />

The continuining increase in container vessel sizes is of ongoing<br />

concern to us, given the physical limitations of <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> and the<br />

unrealistic cost of deepening beyond our present limitations. That<br />

having been said, we remain firmly of the opinion that cargo moving<br />

over our wharves, whether by the use of feeder or direct services, and<br />

probably a combination of both, is the logical means for the bulk of<br />

<strong>Nelson</strong> export cargo to make its way to overseas destinations.<br />

see Gary Rae from Incite Ltd and <strong>Nelson</strong> City Council jointly win the<br />

New Zealand Planning Institute Award for the implementation of the<br />

<strong>Port</strong> Noise Variation. While not a direct recipient of the award itself,<br />

PNL staff undertook much of the work that went on behind the scenes<br />

to make the Variation workable, and it was very satisfying to see this<br />

recognised at a national level.<br />

Noise complaints for the year were down to eight, which remains<br />

encouraging, and is a testament both to the efforts of our staff and also<br />

to the ongoing assistance and understanding of <strong>Port</strong> Hills’ residents,<br />

including the representatives on the Noise Liaison Committee.<br />

We take this opportunity to thank the members of the Environmental<br />

Consultative Committee for their ongoing work as well.<br />

In the wider community, earlier this year, we commenced monthly<br />

visits to the port from school groups and community groups such as<br />

Probus and Rotary Clubs. This programme has proven very popular and<br />

we currently have bookings right through until the end of this year. In<br />

the past, we have run open days every three to four years, but this new<br />

initiative gives us an additional regular opportunity to interact with a<br />

wide range of people and to show them exactly what goes on within<br />

our port confines. Feedback to date has been tremendous.<br />

Internally, much of our focus at present is around what we term our<br />

Journey to Excellence (J2E) which has a major emphasis on reducing<br />

wastage and increasing efficiency and productivity through utilising<br />

the ideas of our people. Part of this wider process has been working<br />

through our Vision, which is based around the six pillars of our<br />

business, which are people, processes, customers, financial results,<br />

the community and the environment. These are tied into our Purpose,<br />

which we clearly see as being to help facilitate regional prosperity.<br />

Clearly, in the current economic climate, achieving that is challenging,<br />

but I am convinced that we have the people within our organisation to<br />

drive the business forward.<br />

In closing, I would like to once again express my thanks to our Board<br />

of Directors for their support over the last 12 months, and my sincere<br />

appreciation to our staff without whom this business would not<br />

function. I would also like to thank the importers and exporters of<br />

<strong>Nelson</strong>-Tasman and Marlborough who put cargo over our wharves and<br />

support us through many challenges such as the Maersk service review<br />

mentioned above. That process proved the influence that all of us can<br />

have when working together as a cohesive unit. We wish you all the<br />

best for a successful <strong>2012</strong>/13.<br />

Martin Byrne<br />

Chief Executive Officer, <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> Limited.<br />

The last year has seen us make further positive steps in continuing to<br />

enhance our environmental credentials within the region and in the<br />

wider port industry. Recertification of our ISO 14001 management<br />

system was a positive sign that we continue to perform well<br />

environmentally, and an endorsement of the work undertaken by our<br />

Environmental Officer Thomas Marchant. It was also very pleasing to<br />

6


financial results<br />

A sustainable business delivering value to our shareholders<br />

• Consistently meet our agreed targets<br />

vision<br />

• Minimise reliance on one off events<br />

• Minimise waste to reduce our costs<br />

• Identify new opportunities to grow our revenue<br />

• Reduce business risk through diversity


community<br />

A sense of great pride in the role we play in our community<br />

• Have a sponsorship programme that supports our local region<br />

vision<br />

• Make opportunities for our people to volunteer in<br />

our community<br />

• Provide access for the community to the <strong>Port</strong><br />

• Deliver external communications that inform and engage


community<br />

governance<br />

highlights<br />

Some of our sponsorships include:<br />

Sports: FC <strong>Nelson</strong>, multi-sports events PNL Blokes Day Out<br />

and PNL Kauri Kids, Beach Volleyball, <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong><br />

Street Races<br />

Community: Richmond Santa Parade, <strong>Nelson</strong> Film Society, Blessing<br />

of the Fleet<br />

Charitable: Life Education Trust, Lions International, Relay for<br />

Life, Fifeshire Foundation<br />

Business: <strong>Nelson</strong> Tasman Chamber of Commerce Cornerstone<br />

Sponsorship and Business Awards, <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong><br />

Fisherman’s Association, Sealord Marine Rescue<br />

Centre.<br />

supPORTing our region<br />

Whether it’s buying petrol, eating seafood, picking fruit or sitting on<br />

the lawn enjoying summer jazz, <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> touches the lives of most<br />

people in the <strong>Nelson</strong> region most days.<br />

The <strong>Port</strong> Company is the region’s gateway to the world, and its role in<br />

the region’s export-led economy is vital. <strong>Nelson</strong>’s exports provide jobs<br />

in forestry and wood processing, fishing and aquaculture, orchards<br />

and coolstores and in the research and marketing associated with<br />

these key industries. <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> is also active at a lesser level in<br />

tourism, and this year led an initiative to market <strong>Nelson</strong> offshore to the<br />

lucrative luxury yacht sector.<br />

We are also privileged and proud to be able to support a range of<br />

groups and projects, and maintained our spend of $150,000 on<br />

sponsorships this year. This is particularly noteworthy, and very<br />

much appreciated by the organisations we support, given that the<br />

current tough economic climate has seen many other businesses<br />

slashing their sponsorship budgets. We aim to cover a spectrum with<br />

this funding, setting a balance between sports, charitable groups,<br />

community projects and the business sector.<br />

We broadened our focus on support for youth catchments of major<br />

winter codes by continuing as the major sponsor of the Tasman<br />

Makos’ Rugby Academy, and picking up a three-year commitment<br />

as a cornerstone sponsor of FC <strong>Nelson</strong>. This support has supplied<br />

equipment and kept participation free for after-school weekday<br />

football. At the other end of the age spectrum, we backed the South<br />

Island Masters Games held in <strong>Nelson</strong> in October. Our support for the<br />

Summer Sea Swim Series is now in its sixth year and has been key to<br />

the growth in participation and status of these events.<br />

In line with our own environmental endeavours, we continued to<br />

support the Sustainable Business Network, and picked up local<br />

support of Paper4trees, an initiative that encourages children to<br />

recycle paper through providing green bins for classrooms, with<br />

native trees for school grounds as a reward. This year’s proceeds from<br />

our <strong>Nelson</strong> <strong>Port</strong> and Transport Industry Charity Golf Tournament went<br />

to the Jack Inglis Friendship Hospital in Motueka.<br />

The Finance and Risk Committee and the Remuneration Committee<br />

met as required by their respective Terms of Reference and have been<br />

effective in dealing with matters that may not warrant full Board<br />

attention. Both committees report to the Board.<br />

director changes<br />

Mr Patterson and Mr Lough both retired by rotation and were<br />

reappointed for a further three years in September 2011.<br />

board and sub commit tee composition<br />

as at 30 june <strong>2012</strong><br />

Board<br />

Nick Patterson (Chair) Phil Lough (Deputy Chair)<br />

Tim King (Director)<br />

Paul Le Gros (Director)<br />

Bronwyn Monopoli (Director) Peter Schuyt (Director)<br />

Finance and Risk Committee<br />

Peter Schuyt (Chair)<br />

Bronwyn Monopoli (Director)<br />

Tim King (Director)<br />

Remuneration Committee<br />

Nick Patterson (Chair)<br />

Paul Le Gros (Director)<br />

Meeting attendance<br />

Phil Lough (Director)<br />

Meeting type<br />

Board Finance & Risk Remuneration<br />

Meetings held 12 4 2<br />

T King 11 3 -<br />

P Le Gros 12 - 2<br />

P Lough 10 - 2<br />

B Monopoli 11 4 -<br />

N Patterson 12 - 2<br />

P Schuyt 11 4 -<br />

further governance matters<br />

<strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> operates under <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>’s Corporate Governance<br />

Code of Practice. The Code specifies matters such as:<br />

• Ethical Standards<br />

• Role of the Board<br />

• Composition and Performance of the Board<br />

• Directors (duties and responsibilities)<br />

• Committees of the Board<br />

• Finance and Risk<br />

• Role of the Chairperson<br />

• Role of the CEO<br />

• Shareholder Relations and Statement of Corporate Intent<br />

• <strong>Report</strong>ing and Disclosure.<br />

Both sub-committees have undertaken a review of their respective<br />

terms of reference in the last 12 months. The full Board has also<br />

undertaken a self review in the period. The <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> subcommittees<br />

and full Board have been active in reviewing <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong><br />

policies and amending where deemed appropriate. The Board<br />

continuously monitors for conflicts of interest.<br />

9


environment<br />

highlights<br />

• <strong>Port</strong> Noise Variation now ratified and operative<br />

• Recognition for the implementation of the <strong>Port</strong> Noise Variation<br />

through a New Zealand Planning Institute Best Practice Award<br />

• Continued reduction in the number of noise complaints<br />

• Obtaining Ministry for the Environment (MFE) funding for<br />

remediation planning for the Calwell Slipway Basin contamination.<br />

Although we have been operating as though the Variation was operative<br />

for a number of years, the ratification of the Variation means that <strong>Port</strong><br />

<strong>Nelson</strong> now has certainty with regards to our obligations for noise<br />

generated at the port. The preparation of the Variation commenced in<br />

the mid-2000s and its development has required signficant input from<br />

not only <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> but also NCC and our respective noise, planning<br />

and legal consultants. There has also been significant input from the<br />

local community. This hard work and the success of the Variation as an<br />

approach for noise management was recognised during the year with<br />

the awarding of a New Zealand Planning Institute Best Practice Award<br />

to NCC and its planning consultant Gary Rae.<br />

The past year has seen us continue to take a wider view of our<br />

approach to environmental management and, in particular to focus<br />

on the environmental sustainability of the business. The inclusion<br />

of ‘Environment’ in our Vision is a clear indication of this and of our<br />

intention to be a leader in sustainable environmental management in<br />

the New Zealand port industry.<br />

<strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> has continued its involvement with the Mayoral Taskforce<br />

for Sustainability, which is overseeing the development of the<br />

Community Sustainability Strategy for <strong>Nelson</strong>. Engaging effectively<br />

with our local community around our environmental issues will<br />

continue to be an important obligation for <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> to meet both<br />

in the short and long term.<br />

At an operational level, our Environmental Management System was<br />

re-certified as meeting the requirements of ISO 14001. This system<br />

continues to drive our day-to-day environmental management. We<br />

have continued our focus on our most significant environmental<br />

aspect, which is port noise, and we are pleased that we have continued<br />

to make progress in this area.<br />

Indicators of Environmental Performance<br />

port noise variation<br />

The past year has seen the acheivement<br />

of a major milestone with<br />

<strong>Nelson</strong> City Council (NCC) ratifying<br />

the <strong>Port</strong> Noise Variation. The Variation<br />

has three key elements: a committee<br />

comprising representatives from<br />

both <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> and the local<br />

community; a Noise Management<br />

2006/7 2007/8 2008/9 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 Plan, which describes how we manage<br />

noise at the port; and a Noise Mitigation Plan, which describes how we<br />

carry out the noise insulation of affected properties on the <strong>Port</strong> Hills.<br />

calwell slipway basin contamination<br />

The Calwell Slipway Basin is an area of the port that has become<br />

contaminated from vessel repair activites in and around the basin<br />

since the development of the slipway in the 1970s. The ongoing<br />

shallowing of the basin has resulted in the need to dredge the area;<br />

however, the contaminated sediments are unable to be disposed of at<br />

our usual site for dredge spoil in Tasman Bay.<br />

In a joint application with NCC, we have successfully obtained funding<br />

from the MFE Contaminated Sites Remediation Fund to identify<br />

the preferred option for the remediation of the site. The work is<br />

being funded 50/50 by <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>/MFE, with NCC providing in-kind<br />

support. We intend to have that work completed by the end of the<br />

<strong>2012</strong> calendar year. It is then hoped that a further application can<br />

be made to the fund, to support the completion of the preferred<br />

remediation option. We are positive that this project is an opportunity<br />

to remediate an area of historic contamination and improve the<br />

marine environment at the port.<br />

indicators of environmental<br />

performance<br />

Our performance indicators are provided in both actual units and in<br />

TEU to provide a measure of the improvements in efficiency. Most<br />

indicators are showing that PNL is making good progress in reducing<br />

its environmental footprint.<br />

environmental issues register 2011/12<br />

In total, 26 incidents were recorded, a significant decrease on last<br />

year. This is mainly due to the drop in the number of noise complaints,<br />

thanks to the continued emphasis on the management of port noise.<br />

Environmental Issues<br />

Aspect Indicator Baseline: 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12<br />

Fuel Fuel use (litres) per TEU* of cargo handled 7.13 (613,459) 7.23 (606,047) 7.05 (607,774)<br />

Power Electricity use (kw hours) per TEU of cargo handled 48.39 (4,163,012) 55.43 (4,645,683) 55.39 (4,775,071)<br />

Waste Waste generated per FTE employee** (m3) 3.56 (501) 4.35 (592) 3.9 (534)<br />

Methyl Bromide Quantity of methyl bromide used at <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> (tonnes) 4.0 3.7 3.4<br />

Noise Number of noise complaints 29 9 8<br />

Oil Spills Number of oil spills when bunkering 0 0 1<br />

Dust Number of dust complaints 1 2 0<br />

Codes of Practice Number of audit reports completed 4 7 13<br />

Number of non-conformances identified 2 4 13<br />

Number of non-conformances resolved 2 4 5<br />

Continuous improvement Number of targets reported on 15 15 15<br />

Number of new initiatives 20 15 12<br />

Water Water use (m3) per TEU (site use excluding ships) 0.29 (24,961) 0.22 (19,113) 0.21 (18,402)<br />

* Twenty-foot equivalent container units for 2011/12 = 86,200. ** Full-time equivalent employees for 2011/12 = 135.<br />

10


Photo: <strong>Nelson</strong> Mail<br />

environment<br />

A leader in sustainable environmental management in the NZ<br />

<strong>Port</strong> industry<br />

• Implement best practice environmental management<br />

vision<br />

• Minimise the impact of our operations<br />

• Integrate sustainability into what we do<br />

• Raise environmental awareness<br />

• Measure, report and improve our performance


people<br />

An engaged and highly capable team at <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong><br />

• Increase the engagement of our people<br />

• Provide opportunities for ongoing training and learning<br />

vision<br />

• Drive a culture of zero harm<br />

• Maximise career options<br />

• Increase the utilisation of our talent<br />

• Provide opportunities for our families to see what we do


our vision<br />

port people<br />

Percentage of Positives<br />

4.5%<br />

This year we set out defining our Vision and Purpose. In order to<br />

ensure that we captured input from all our people, we held companywide<br />

workshops and asked the fundamental questions of ‘why are we<br />

here?’ and ‘where are we going?’.<br />

The result was that our Purpose is clearly defined as ‘To facilitate<br />

regional prosperity’ and our Vision is to ‘Be the Benchmark – through<br />

continuous improvement’ with both encapsulating a strong part of<br />

our history and focus for the future.<br />

The Vision is underpinned by six pillars and a brief statement about<br />

what we want to achieve in these key areas over the next five years, as<br />

detailed throughout this report.<br />

Pre-implementation<br />

of Random Testing<br />

Post-implementation<br />

of Random Testing<br />

4.0%<br />

3.5%<br />

3.0%<br />

2.5%<br />

2.0%<br />

1.5%<br />

1.0%<br />

.5%<br />

0%<br />

developing capabilities<br />

New staff joining us, and increasing <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>’s expertise, include:<br />

• Rob Hawkes, our new Customer Relations and Business Development<br />

Manager, brings a wealth of logistics experience in both marine and<br />

shore-based environments.<br />

• Our new Health and Safety Advisor, Lee-anne Ricketts, has been<br />

working with a wide range of the PNL team to identify future<br />

initiatives towards ‘zero harm’.<br />

• Nevin Price transferred from a marine role into project management<br />

and is working to progress our ‘Journey to Excellence’ (J2E) programme,<br />

identifying improvements to reduce waste using the team’s own ideas.<br />

Also joining us in permanent positions were Barry Cross, Workshop;<br />

Josef Beyer-Rieger, Security; Odile Gibbs, Finance and Administration;<br />

and Mike Cresswell, Stevedoring.<br />

health and safety training<br />

Continuing with the development of our Health and Safety (H&S)<br />

representatives, congratulations to both Paul Stent from Quaypack and<br />

Peter Moore from Stevedoring who attended Level 1 H&S representative<br />

training in May. Additionally, we rolled out our first tailored fall arrest<br />

systems on building and construction sites to our stevedores in August.<br />

Overall, the feedback from the course attendees was positive and all<br />

gained further skills in working safely at heights. Congratulations to all<br />

ten course attendees in achieving the unit standard.<br />

lost time injury<br />

We had seven LTIs this year, yielding an LTI Frequency Rate of 2.48<br />

compared to 3.89 in June 2011 and 2.75 in June 2010. While it is positive<br />

to see this reducing, there have still been seven of our people who have<br />

sustained an injury serious enough to require time off work. Reducing<br />

our accident rate to zero requires the ongoing focus of everyone in the<br />

prevention of accidents through proactive hazard management, being<br />

aware and alert on our safety-sensitive site, acting safely and watching<br />

out for each other. ‘Good Safety is Good Business’.<br />

random testing<br />

The random drug and alcohol testing programme is now well<br />

implemented at <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>, having been in place since March 2011.<br />

The programme is an important monitoring tool for ensuring that<br />

our people are coming to the workplace fit for work. The following<br />

graph has been created using data from the last three financial years,<br />

with the information being split into pre and post-implementation of<br />

random testing.<br />

The graph provides a clear indication of the impact our random<br />

testing programme has had on our results.<br />

training<br />

Our training processes, trainer competency and module development<br />

have been the focus for the last year. In the past 12 months, we have<br />

developed and implemented 16 new Learner Guides for operational<br />

positions across Stevedoring, Marine and Logistics, that need to be<br />

completed before the trainee is deemed competent to work safely<br />

and efficiently alongside their fellow crew members.<br />

Our training team has increased in size by four people, as we’ve<br />

identified new trainers from Marine, Stevedoring, Logistics and<br />

Quaypack. All of our trainers have upskilled by attending training<br />

sessions on: How Adults Learn, Giving Trainees Effective Feedback<br />

and Creating Interest in Training.<br />

We have four staff that are 90 per cent through their National<br />

Certificate in Stevedoring and <strong>Port</strong>s, Level 3 with a completion date<br />

of December <strong>2012</strong>. Our intention is that more staff will acquire this<br />

qualification.<br />

The Vault software system is now well established as our way of<br />

storing all company training information, and we are now entering all<br />

Health and Safety, personal protective equipment, lifting equipment<br />

registers and contractor details into the system.<br />

employee survey<br />

In late 2011, we reported on the results of our Employee Survey, which<br />

was carried out by an independent survey company, JRA. The survey<br />

measures overall engagement levels and benchmarks the results<br />

against the best workplaces in New Zealand. We have an excellent<br />

response rate with 84 per cent of employees completing the survey.<br />

In terms of engagement, our results on employees who are prepared<br />

to ‘go the extra mile’ were similar to other companies. The survey<br />

confirmed that there is a general sense that our people enjoy<br />

the teamwork they experience in their roles. In addition, there<br />

were pleasing results around the priority placed on safety, the<br />

understanding and belief in our ASPIRE values, the expectations<br />

of a high level of performance, and awareness of how each role<br />

contributes to the success of the organisation.<br />

The survey also identified areas we can improve on, including<br />

providing more development opportunities, dealing effectively with<br />

poor performance, and better utilising our talent.<br />

13


directors<br />

Nick<br />

Patterson<br />

Nick is the<br />

Managing Director<br />

of Wai-West<br />

Horticulture Ltd,<br />

an integrated<br />

horticulture company<br />

with extensive<br />

plantings and post-harvest investments in<br />

the <strong>Nelson</strong> district. Nick is a director of Cold<br />

Storage <strong>Nelson</strong> Ltd, Freshco <strong>Nelson</strong> Ltd and<br />

other associated companies.<br />

Paul<br />

Le Gros<br />

Paul used to be a<br />

partner with Duncan<br />

Cotterill, and is now a<br />

consultant with that<br />

firm. He holds other<br />

business and board<br />

appointments. Over<br />

the past 30 years, Paul has been extensively<br />

involved with the YMCA movement, in <strong>Nelson</strong>,<br />

nationally and internationally.<br />

B r o nw y n<br />

M o n o p o l i<br />

Bronwyn is<br />

a Chartered<br />

Accountant, with her<br />

Richmond-based<br />

practice providing<br />

specialist accounting<br />

and financial advice<br />

to mainly rural businesses. She is also a<br />

director of the Animal Health Board and a<br />

trustee of several arts-related organisations.<br />

T i m<br />

King<br />

Tim is Deputy Mayor<br />

of the Tasman<br />

District Council and<br />

chairs its Corporate<br />

Services Committee.<br />

He farms on the<br />

Waimea Plains<br />

and has governance roles on a range of<br />

community organisations, including the<br />

Waimea Rural Fire Authority and the Wakefield<br />

and Community Health Centre Trust.<br />

Peter<br />

Schuyt<br />

Peter is a professional<br />

director and holds<br />

directorships<br />

in a number of<br />

organisations across<br />

a range of different<br />

business sectors. He<br />

has previously been Chief Financial Officer of<br />

several major New Zealand companies.<br />

P h i l<br />

Lough<br />

Phil is currently<br />

Chair of Methven Ltd<br />

and Quotable Value<br />

Ltd, and also holds<br />

directorships with a<br />

range of other New<br />

Zealand companies.<br />

He was previously CEO of the Sealord Group<br />

and is based in <strong>Nelson</strong>.<br />

<strong>2012</strong> financial highlights<br />

Financial Highlights<br />

<strong>2012</strong> 2011 2010 2009 2008<br />

Revenue (millions) $38.8 $38.3 $37.9 $38.0 $36.2<br />

Net surplus after taxation* (millions) $10.4 $6.6 $3.4 $4.9 $7.5<br />

Dividend (millions) $12.2 $4.2 $4.1 $4.0 $3.8<br />

Basic earnings per ordinary share (cents) 40.8 25.9 13.5 19.4 29.5<br />

Return on average shareholders’ funds 7.7% 4.9% 2.6% 3.7% 6.1%<br />

Net asset backing per share $5.27 $5.38 $5.27 $5.26 $5.29<br />

Dividend – recommended per share (cents) 48.0 16.5 16.1 15.7 15.0<br />

Return on average total assets** 7.5% 6.6% 6.5% 5.6% 8.0%<br />

Ratio of shareholders’ funds to total assets 69.9% 70.6% 71.2% 69.6% 71.2%<br />

Trade Highlights<br />

<strong>2012</strong> 2011 2010 2009 2008<br />

Cargo tonnes (millions) 2.65 2.71 2.75 2.78 2.68<br />

Vessel arrivals 733 850 835 921 921<br />

Container throughput (TEUs) 86,178 83,800 85,735 82,272 77,561<br />

* Net Surplus is prior to Other Comprehensive Income<br />

** Based on EBIT<br />

14


<strong>2012</strong> financial report<br />

customers<br />

An organisation that delivers real value to its customers<br />

• Understand our customers and their needs<br />

• Continually engage with our customers<br />

vision<br />

• Deliver consistent service<br />

• Develop active and engaged working groups<br />

• Build strategic alliances with our key customers<br />

• Grow the business through attracting new customers


audit report<br />

Independent Auditor’s <strong>Report</strong><br />

To the readers of <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> Limited’s financial statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2012</strong><br />

The Auditor-General is the auditor of <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> Limited (<strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>). The Auditor-General has appointed me, Julian Tan, using the staff and<br />

resources of Audit New Zealand, to carry out the audit of the financial statements of <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> on her behalf.<br />

We have audited the financial statements of <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> on pages 20 to 39, that comprise the balance sheet as at 30 June <strong>2012</strong>, the statement<br />

of comprehensive income, statement of changes in equity, statement of cash flows and the summary of significant accounting policies for the<br />

year ended on that date and the notes to the financial statements that include other explanatory information.<br />

Opinion<br />

Financial statements<br />

• In our opinion the financial statements of <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> on pages 20 to 39:<br />

• comply with generally accepted accounting practice in New Zealand;<br />

• give a true and fair view of <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>’s:<br />

• financial position as at 30 June <strong>2012</strong>; and<br />

• financial performance and cash flows for the year ended on that date.<br />

Other legal requirements<br />

In accordance with the Financial <strong>Report</strong>ing Act 1993 we report that, in our opinion, proper accounting records have been kept by <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong><br />

as far as appears from an examination of those records.<br />

Our audit was completed on 28 September <strong>2012</strong>. This is the date at which our opinion is expressed.<br />

The basis of our opinion is explained below. In addition, we outline the responsibilities of the Board of Directors and our responsibilities, and<br />

explain our independence.<br />

Basis of opinion<br />

We carried out our audit in accordance with the Auditor-General’s Auditing Standards, which incorporate the International Standards on<br />

Auditing (New Zealand). Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and carry out our audit to obtain<br />

reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.<br />

Material misstatements are differences or omissions of amounts and disclosures that would affect a reader’s overall understanding of the<br />

financial statements. If we had found material misstatements that were not corrected, we would have referred to them in our opinion.<br />

An audit involves carrying out procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The<br />

procedures selected depend on our judgement, including our assessment of risks of material misstatement of the financial statements whether<br />

due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, we consider internal control relevant to the preparation of <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>’s financial<br />

statements that give a true and fair view of the matters to which they relate. We consider internal control in order to design audit procedures that<br />

are appropriate in the circumstances but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>’s internal control.<br />

An audit also involves evaluating:<br />

• the appropriateness of accounting policies used and whether they have been consistently applied;<br />

• the reasonableness of the significant accounting estimates and judgements made by the Board of Directors;<br />

• the adequacy of all disclosures in the financial statements; and<br />

• the overall presentation of the financial statements.<br />

We did not examine every transaction, nor do we guarantee complete accuracy of the financial statements. In accordance with the Financial<br />

<strong>Report</strong>ing Act 1993, we report that we have obtained all the information and explanations we have required. We believe we have obtained<br />

sufficient and appropriate audit evidence to provide a basis for our audit opinion.<br />

Responsibilities of the Board of Directors<br />

The Board of Directors is responsible for preparing financial statements that:<br />

• comply with generally accepted accounting practice in New Zealand;<br />

• give a true and fair view of <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows.<br />

The Board of Directors is also responsible for such internal control as it determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements<br />

that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.<br />

The Board of Directors’ responsibilities arise from the Financial <strong>Report</strong>ing Act 1993 and the <strong>Port</strong> Companies Act 1988.<br />

Responsibilities of the Auditor<br />

We are responsible for expressing an independent opinion on the financial statements and reporting that opinion to you based on our audit.<br />

Our responsibility arises from section 15 of the Public Audit Act 2001and section 19 of the <strong>Port</strong> Companies Act 1988.<br />

Independence<br />

When carrying out the audit, we followed the independence requirements of the AuditorGeneral, which incorporate the independence<br />

requirements of the New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants.<br />

Other than the audit, we have no relationship with or interests in <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>.<br />

Julian Tan<br />

Audit New Zealand<br />

On behalf of the AuditorGeneral<br />

Christchurch, New Zealand<br />

16


statutory information<br />

to the shareholders, on the affairs of port nelson limited<br />

for the year ended 30 june <strong>2012</strong><br />

principal activities<br />

<strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> is primarily engaged in the commercial operation of the port of <strong>Nelson</strong>. There has been no significant change in the<br />

nature of <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>’s business during the year.<br />

review of activities<br />

A review of the year’s operations is contained in the Chairman’s <strong>Report</strong> and the Chief Executive Officer’s Review.<br />

review of operations<br />

The net surplus for <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> for the year was $10.367 million (2011 $6.584 million).<br />

dividends<br />

Dividends of $12,200,000 were recognised in the <strong>2012</strong> financial year ($1,000,000 interim dividend, $8,000,000 special dividend and<br />

a provision for $3,200,000 final dividend for the <strong>2012</strong> financial year). Dividends of $12,200,000 were paid during the <strong>2012</strong> financial<br />

year ($3,200,000 final dividend for the 2011 financial year, $1,000,000 interim dividend and $8,000,000 special dividend for the <strong>2012</strong><br />

financial year).<br />

directors<br />

In accordance with <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>’s constitution Messrs P M Schuyt and B A Monopoli will retire by rotation at the AGM in September <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

remuneration of directors<br />

Fees paid to Directors during the year were as follows:<br />

A O Patterson $60,800<br />

P D Le Gros* $38,800<br />

T B King $32,200<br />

P V Lough $31,300<br />

B A Monopoli $32,200<br />

P M Schuyt $32,200<br />

Total $227,500<br />

statutory information<br />

P D Le Gros was paid an additional $7,500 in director’s fees as recognition for services rendered on behalf of the board dealing with<br />

an ad-hoc commercial matter that required board input. Without the additional fee, the amount paid to P D Le Gros fees would be<br />

$31,300 and total director fees $220,000.<br />

directors’ insurance<br />

<strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> has arranged policies of Directors’ Liability Insurance to ensure that as far as possible Directors will not personally incur<br />

any monetary loss as a result of actions undertaken by them as Directors. Certain actions are specifically excluded, for example the<br />

incurring of penalties and fines that may be imposed in respect of breaches of the law.<br />

directors’ interest<br />

The following notices have been received from Directors disclosing their interests in other companies with whom the group may have<br />

transactions. All transactions with these companies are conducted on normal commercial terms.<br />

• 
Ms B A Monopoli has the following entries in the Register of Directors’ Interests: Director of the Animal Health Board Inc. Trusteeships;<br />

Chairman of <strong>Nelson</strong> Millennium Centre Trust, Trustee of Wearable Arts Development Charitable Trust, Trustee of New Zealand International<br />

Arts Festival Trust, Trustee of the Wellington Jazz Festival Trust. Other; Principal of Bronwyn Monopoli Chartered Accountant.<br />

• 
Mr A O Patterson has the following entries in the Register of Directors’ Interests: Directorships; Director of Cold Storage <strong>Nelson</strong> Ltd,<br />

Director of Freshco <strong>Nelson</strong> Ltd, Chairman of Wai-West Horticulture Ltd, Director of Wai-West Farms Ltd, Director of Nayland Road<br />

Cool Storage Ltd, Chairman of Saxton Fruit Limited, Chairman of Tasman Rugby Union. Trusteeships; Nil. Other; Nil.<br />

• 
Mr P M Schuyt has the following entries in the Register of Directors’ Interests: Directorships; Director of Dairy Investment Fund Ltd,<br />

Director of Golden Bay Fruit 2008 Ltd, Director of Landcare Research Ltd, Director of Tatua Co-operative Dairy Company Ltd, Chairman<br />

of carbonZero Ltd. Trusteeships; Trustee of World Wildlife Fund, Trustee of Wellington College. Other; Councillor of Waikato University.<br />

• 
Mr P V Lough has the following entries in the Register of Directors’ Interests: Directorships; Director of LIC Ltd, Director od Fisher<br />

and Paykel Appliances Ltd, Chairman of Methven Limited, Chairman of Quotable Value Limited. Trusteeships; Nil. Other; Nil.<br />

• 
Mr P D Le Gros has the following entries in the Register of Directors’ Interests: Directorships; Director of Unimar Limited, Director<br />

of Fico Finance Limited, Director of Duncan Cotterill <strong>Nelson</strong> Trustees (2008) Limited, Director of <strong>Nelson</strong> Electricity Limited, Director<br />

of Building Connexion Limited. Trusteeships; Trustee of <strong>Nelson</strong> YMCA. Other; Nil.<br />

• 
Mr T B King has the following entries in the Register of Directors’ Interests: Directorships; Waimea Rural Fire Authority. Trusteeships;<br />

Trustee of Kaiteriteri Recreation Reserve Board. Other; Deputy Mayor of Tasman District Council, which is a shareholder of <strong>Port</strong><br />

<strong>Nelson</strong>, member of the Waimea Water Augmentation Committee and National Rural Fire Authority.<br />

17


statutory information<br />

to the shareholders, on the affairs of port nelson limited<br />

for the year ended 30 june <strong>2012</strong><br />

statutory information<br />

directors’ loans<br />

There were no loans by <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> to Directors.<br />

shareholding by directors<br />

No Directors hold shares in <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>.<br />

use of company information<br />

During the year the Board received no notices from Directors requesting to use Company information received in their capacity as<br />

Directors that would not otherwise have been available to them.<br />

committees of the board<br />

The Board has established a Finance and Risk Committee to assist the Board in carrying out its responsibilities under the Companies<br />

Act 1993 and the Financial <strong>Report</strong>ing Act 1993 and a Remuneration Committee.<br />

auditors<br />

Under section 14 of the Public Audit Act 2001 and section 19 of the <strong>Port</strong> Companies Act 1988, the Auditor-General is the Auditor of<br />

<strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>. The Auditor-General has appointed Audit New Zealand to undertake the audit on its behalf. Fees paid to the Auditors<br />

are disclosed in the Financial Statements.<br />

performance indicators<br />

As required under Section 16 of the <strong>Port</strong> Companies Act 1988, performance indicators in the Statement of Corporate Intent are given<br />

on page 19.<br />

donations<br />

Donations made during the year are disclosed in the Financial Statements.<br />

employee remuneration<br />

<strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> has remunerated employees in excess of $100,000 per annum in the following bands:<br />

Remuneration Number of employees Number of employees<br />

<strong>2012</strong> 2011 <strong>2012</strong> 2011<br />

$100,000 to $110,000 1 1 $170,000 to $180,000 1 2<br />

$110,000 to $120,000 1 - $180,000 to $190,000 1 1<br />

$120,000 to $130,000 - 2* $190,000 to $200,000 1 -<br />

$130,000 to $140,000 2 2 $210,000 to $220,000 - 1<br />

$140,000 to $150,000 1 - $220,000 to $230,000 1 -<br />

$150,000 to $160,000 - - $320,000 to $330,000 - 1<br />

$160,000 to $170,000 - - $340,000 to $350,000 1 -<br />

* Includes employment cessation payments.<br />

changes in accounting policies<br />

FRS-44 New Zealand Additional Disclosures and Amendments to NZ IFRS was adopted during the year to harmonise with source<br />

IFRS and Australian Accounting Standards (Harmonisation Amendments). The purpose being to eliminate many of the differences<br />

between the accounting standards in each jurisdiction. Apart from this additional policy adoption there have been no other changes<br />

in accounting policies during the financial year disclosed in the Financial Statements.<br />

Nick Patterson<br />

Chairman of Directors<br />

For and on behalf of the Board<br />

Date: 28 September <strong>2012</strong><br />

Peter Schuyt<br />

Director<br />

18


statement of corporate intent<br />

mission statement<br />

• 
To operate <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> as a successful business providing cost efficient, effective and competitive services and facilities for port<br />

users and shippers.<br />

• 
To provide for the present and future needs of <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> in ways that are sensitive to people, use resources wisely, and are in<br />

harmony with the environment of an export port.<br />

objectives<br />

1. To operate as a successful business.<br />

2. To be a good employer.<br />

3. The debt equity ratio not to exceed 45.0% (31/69).<br />

4. To aim to grow the business through stimulation of throughput, added value services and related business activities, so leading<br />

to increased revenue.<br />

5. To achieve a commercially acceptable rate of return on shareholders’ funds in accordance with meeting the objectives herein.<br />

6. To ensure that port development takes place which meets the needs of the region.<br />

7. To ensure that high environmental standards are maintained.<br />

8. To strive for continuous improvement in everything that we do.<br />

measure of performance against objectives<br />

Target <strong>2012</strong> 2011 2010 Target Met?<br />

Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate *


statement of comprehensive income<br />

for the year ended 30 june <strong>2012</strong><br />

income and equity head<br />

Notes <strong>2012</strong> 2011<br />

$000 $000<br />

revenue<br />

Operations 32,833 32,371<br />

Property 5,974 5,937<br />

Operating Revenue 1 38,807 38,308<br />

expenses<br />

Employee Wages and Related Expenses 9,337 9,130<br />

Depreciation and Amortisation 4,677 4,234<br />

Other Operational and Property Expenses 2 12,455 12,206<br />

Total Expenses from Operating and Property Activities 26,469 25,570<br />

Results from Operating and Property Activities 12,338 12,738<br />

Finance Income 58 18<br />

Finance Expenses 2,524 2,664<br />

Net Finance Costs 2,466 2,646<br />

Profit after Financing Costs 9,872 10,092<br />

Expenses Associated with Noise Mitigation 21 85 (37)<br />

Profit before Share of Associate Loss 9,787 10,129<br />

Share of Profit / (Loss) from Associate 7 1,881 (149)<br />

Gain on Convertible Notes from Associate 7 272 -<br />

2,153 (149)<br />

NET SURPLUS BEFORE TAXATION 11,940 9,980<br />

Less Taxation Expense 3 1,573 3,396<br />

NET SURPLUS (Attributable to Owners) 10,367 6,584<br />

other comprehensive income<br />

First Time Recognition of Infrastructural Assets 9b - 1,554<br />

Movements in Deferred Tax 6 (435)<br />

Movements in Hedging Reserve 9h (1,014) (87)<br />

Movements in Revaluation Reserve - Unimar 7 (34) (606)<br />

TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Attributable to Owners) 9,325 7,010<br />

statement of movements in equity<br />

for the year ended 30 june <strong>2012</strong><br />

<strong>2012</strong> 2011<br />

$000 $000<br />

Balance at 1 july 136,751 133,935<br />

Total Comprehensive Income Attributable to Owners 9,325 7,010<br />

Dividends 9b (12,200) (4,200)<br />

Deferred Tax Adjustment 9b (3) 6<br />

balance at 30 june 133,873 136,751<br />

20<br />

The Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Notes to the Accounts on pages 24 to 39 form part of these Financial Statements.


alance sheet<br />

as at 30 june <strong>2012</strong><br />

Notes <strong>2012</strong> 2011<br />

$000 $000<br />

current assets<br />

Cash and Cash Equivalents 10 - 504<br />

Trade and Other Receivables 11 4,705 4,455<br />

Inventories 12 306 365<br />

Prepayments and Accruals 295 131<br />

Advance to Associate 8 - 611<br />

Properties Intended for Sale 6 - -<br />

Hedging Asset 16 - 37<br />

5,306 6,103<br />

less current liabilities<br />

Bank Overdraft 10 46 -<br />

Trade and Other Payables 13 2,229 1,749<br />

Employee Benefit Liabilities 20 1,083 967<br />

Tax Payable 1,220 1,361<br />

Dividend Payable 9b 3,200 3,200<br />

Hedging Liability Current <strong>Port</strong>ion 16 144 -<br />

Noise Mitigation Current <strong>Port</strong>ion 21 54 97<br />

7,976 7,374<br />

head balance<br />

working capital (2,670) (1,271)<br />

non-current assets<br />

Property, Plant and Equipment 14 169,613 173,422<br />

Intangible Assets 15 728 799<br />

Investment Properties 5 12,527 12,682<br />

Investments in Associates 7 3,477 693<br />

186,345 187,596<br />

non-current liabilities<br />

Employee Benefit Liabilities 20 163 110<br />

Deferred Tax Liability 4 6,038 7,674<br />

Term Loan 16 39,900 39,300<br />

Hedging Liability Non-Current <strong>Port</strong>ion 16 3,152 1,979<br />

Noise Mitigation Non-Current <strong>Port</strong>ion 21 549 511<br />

49,802 49,574<br />

TOTAL NET ASSETS 133,873 136,751<br />

shareholders’ funds<br />

Issued Capital 9a 6,046 6,046<br />

Retained Earnings 9b 40,487 41,247<br />

Asset Revaluation Reserves 9f 89,562 90,631<br />

Other Reserves 9g 151 186<br />

Hedging Reserve 9h (2,373) (1,359)<br />

TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ FUNDS 133,873 136,751<br />

Nick Patterson<br />

Chairman of Directors<br />

For and on behalf of the Board<br />

Date: 28 September <strong>2012</strong><br />

Peter Schuyt<br />

Director<br />

The Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Notes to the Accounts on pages 24 to 39 form part of these Financial Statements.<br />

21


statement of cash flows<br />

for the year ended 30 june <strong>2012</strong><br />

cashflows<br />

cash flows from operating activities<br />

Cash was provided from:<br />

<strong>2012</strong> 2011<br />

$000 $000<br />

Receipts from Customers 32,457 32,304<br />

Rent Received 5,956 5,731<br />

Interest Received 5 18<br />

Cash was applied to:<br />

38,418 38,053<br />

Payments to Suppliers and Employees (21,518) (21,007)<br />

Interest Paid (2,584) (2,607)<br />

Taxes Paid (3,001) (3,071)<br />

Net GST (Paid)/Received 483 (566)<br />

(26,620) (27,251)<br />

Net Cash In Flows from Operating Activities 11,798 10,802<br />

cash flows from investing activities<br />

Cash was provided from:<br />

Property Plant and Equipment Sold 2,553 1,159<br />

Cash was applied to:<br />

Purchase of Property Plant and Equipment (3,018) (9,548)<br />

Purchase of Intangibles (283) (142)<br />

Purchase of Investment - (611)<br />

(3,301) (10,301)<br />

Net Cash Out Flows from Investing Activities (748) (9,142)<br />

cash flows from financing activities<br />

Cash was provided from:<br />

Loans Raised 600 2,800<br />

Cash was applied to:<br />

Dividend Paid (12,200) (4,100)<br />

Net Cash Out Flows from Financing Activities (11,600) (1,300)<br />

Net Increase/(Decrease) in Cash Held (550) 360<br />

Cash at 1 July 504 144<br />

CASH AT 30 JUNE (46) 504<br />

Represented by:<br />

Cash at Bank - 504<br />

Call Advance (Overdraft) (46) -<br />

CASH AT 30 JUNE (46) 504<br />

The GST (net) component of operating activities reflects the net GST paid and received with the Inland Revenue Department. The<br />

GST (net) component has been presented on a net basis, as the gross amounts do not provide meaningful information for financial<br />

statement purposes.<br />

22 The Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Notes to the Accounts on pages 26 to 39 form part of these Financial Statements.


statement of cash flows<br />

for the year ended 30 june <strong>2012</strong><br />

<strong>2012</strong> 2011<br />

$000 $000<br />

reconciliation with net surplus<br />

Net Surplus 10,367 6,584<br />

Add Non Cash Items:<br />

Depreciation and Amortisation 4,677 4,234<br />

Increase (Decrease) in Deferred Tax (1,275) 35<br />

Less:<br />

Noise Mitigation Provision (5) (92)<br />

3,397 4,177<br />

Add (Less) Movements in Other Working Capital Items:<br />

(Increase)/Decrease in Accounts Receivable (250) (338)<br />

(Increase)/Decrease in Inventory 59 28<br />

(Increase)/Decrease in Prepayments and Accruals (164) (31)<br />

Increase/(Decrease) in Accounts Payable (excluding Assets Payable) 480 (861)<br />

Increase/(Decrease) in Current Employee Benefit Liabilities 116 (83)<br />

Increase/(Decrease) in Tax Payable (141) 244<br />

100 (1,041)<br />

Add (Less) Items Classified as Investing Activities:<br />

Movement in Employee Benefit Liabilities Non-Current 53 (57)<br />

Net (Profit) Loss on Sale of Assets including Investing Activities 67 142<br />

Impairment of Investment Property 155 415<br />

Movement in Capital Creditors (135) 175<br />

Accrued Interest on Notes Capitalised (53) -<br />

Gain on Conversion of Notes (272) -<br />

Share of (Gain)/Loss from Investment in Associate (1,881) 149<br />

Writedown of Goodwill - 258<br />

(2,066) 1,082<br />

Net Cash Inflow From Operating Activities 11,798 10,802<br />

cashflows<br />

The Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Notes to the Accounts on pages 26 to 39 form part of these Financial Statements.<br />

23


summary of significant accounting policies<br />

policies<br />

reporting entity<br />

<strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> Limited (<strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>) is registered under the Companies Act 1993 and created pursuant to the <strong>Port</strong> Companies Act 1988.<br />

<strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> is a reporting entity in terms of the Financial <strong>Report</strong>ing Act 1993. The financial statements of <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> have been<br />

prepared in accordance with the Financial <strong>Report</strong>ing Act 1993.<br />

basis of preparation<br />

The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Practice in New Zealand (‘NZ GAAP’).<br />

They comply with New Zealand equivalents to International Financial <strong>Report</strong>ing Standards (‘NZ IFRS’) and other applicable reporting<br />

standards as appropriate for profit-orientated entities.<br />

The financial statements are presented in New Zealand dollars and the functional currency of <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> is New Zealand dollars.<br />

The financial statements were authorised for issue by the directors on 28 September <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

standards and interpretations issued and not yet adopted<br />

There are no standards, interpretations and amendments that have been issued, that are not yet effective, and that are relevant to<br />

<strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> that <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> has not yet applied except for NZ IFRS 8. NZ IFRS 8 provides guidance on the disclosure requirements<br />

in respect of the operating segments of the entity. <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> is awaiting the outcome of a proposed change in the standard by the<br />

Financial <strong>Report</strong>ing Standards Board that may result in <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> being outside the scope before assessing the impact.<br />

The amendments to the following standards and interpretations are not relevant to <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>’s operations and are not expected to<br />

have any significant impact:<br />

Effective for the<br />

financial year ending:<br />

NZ IFRS 7 Disclosures – Transfers of Financial Assets (Amendments) 2013<br />

NZ IAS 12 Income Taxes – Deferred Tax Recovery of Underlying Assets (Amendments) 2013<br />

NZ IAS 1 Presentation of Items of Other Comprehensive Income – Amendment to NZ IAS 1 2014<br />

NZ IAS 19 Employee Benefits (Revised) 2014<br />

NZ IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures 2014<br />

NZ IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities 2014<br />

NZ IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement 2014<br />

NZ IFRS 9 Financial Instruments – Classification and Measurement 2016<br />

accounting policies<br />

FRS-44 New Zealand Additional Disclosures and Amendments to NZ IFRS was adopted during the year to harmonise with source<br />

IFRS and Australian Accounting Standards (Harmonisation Amendments). The purpose being to eliminate many of the differences<br />

between the accounting standards in each jurisdiction. Apart from this additional policy adoption there have been no other changes<br />

in accounting policies during the financial year disclosed in the Financial Statements.<br />

measurement system<br />

Those accounting principles considered appropriate for the measurement and reporting of results and financial position under the<br />

historical cost method, modified by the revaluation of land, buildings, wharves, offshore vessels and investment property, have been<br />

followed.<br />

rounding of amounts<br />

Amounts in this report have, unless otherwise indicated, been rounded to the nearest 1,000 dollars.<br />

specific accounting policies<br />

The accounting policies adopted in the financial statements which have a significant effect on the result and the financial position<br />

disclosed are set out below:<br />

1.1 Revenue Recognition<br />

Revenue is recognised to the extent that it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> and that revenue<br />

can be reliably measured as follows:<br />

Cargo and Marine revenue – is recognised based on departure of the vessel.<br />

Stevedoring – is recognised based on partial completion of the vessel at balance date.<br />

Property lease revenue – is recognised on an accrual basis at balance date. Rentals are payable in advance.<br />

Interest revenue – is recognised on a time proportion basis using the effective interest method.<br />

1.2 Provisions<br />

Provisions are recognised when a present obligation exists as a result of a past event, the future sacrifice of economic benefits<br />

24


summary of significant accounting policies<br />

is probable, and the amount of the provision can be measured reliably. The amount recognised as a provision is the best<br />

estimate of the consideration required to settle the present obligation at reporting date, taking into account the risks and<br />

uncertainties surrounding the obligation.<br />

1.3 Property Plant and Equipment and Depreciation<br />

Property, Plant and Equipment, except land, buildings, wharves and offshore capable floating plant are stated at valuation<br />

taken over from the <strong>Nelson</strong> Harbour Board on 1 October 1988 and subsequent additions at cost. Depreciation is written off<br />

depreciable assets on a straight line basis over the estimated economic lives of the assets, ranging as follows:<br />

Y years years<br />

Wharves, Quays and Berths 20-72 Software 5<br />

Vessels (inshore) 20 Buildings 50-100<br />

Vessels (offshore capable) 20 Cranes 15-20<br />

Forklifts 15-25 Tractors and Vehicles 10<br />

Sundry Plant and Equipment 5-20 Navigation and Pilot Equipment 3-40<br />

Office Equipment 5-15 Hard Standing 50<br />

Infrastructural Assets 50-80 Building Fit-out 10<br />

Capital dredging is not amortised. The cost of maintaining the dredged depth is expensed.<br />

Land is valued at least every three years. Land is included at the valuation as at 30 June 2008. As at 30 June <strong>2012</strong>, <strong>Port</strong><br />

<strong>Nelson</strong> engaged TelferYoung, an independent valuer to complete a fair value assessment, which indicated no revaluation<br />

was required. The carrying value reflects the fair value. Land owned and leased to third parties is valued at the market value<br />

of the lessor’s interests. Non leased land is recorded at market value. Additions between valuations are recorded at cost. The<br />

land valuation was completed by Ian McKeage, Registered Valuer, FNZIV, FPINZ of TelferYoung. Land will be revalued at 30<br />

June 2013.<br />

Buildings are stated at fair value. Fair value was determined as at 30 June 2008 using either a market-based approach (where<br />

evidence can be reliably analysed) or optimised depreciated replacement cost. Additions between valuations are recorded<br />

at cost. Buildings are valued at least every five years. The buildings’ valuation was completed by Ian McKeage, Registered<br />

Valuer, FNZIV, FPINZ of TelferYoung. Buildings will be revalued at 30 June 2013.<br />

Wharves are stated at fair value as determined by <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>’s engineering staff and reviewed by Ian McKeage, Registered<br />

Valuer, FNZIV, FPINZ of TelferYoung. Fair value was determined as at 30 June 2008 using optimised depreciated replacement<br />

cost. Wharves are valued at least every five years. Additions between valuations are recorded at cost. Wharves will be<br />

revalued at 30 June 2013.<br />

Infrastructural assets include stormwater, sewerage and water reticulation located underground.<br />

The asset classes that are subject to revaluation are assessed at each balance date to ensure that the values are not materially<br />

different from fair value. Where the carrying value is materially different from fair value a revaluation is undertaken. Gains<br />

and losses on disposals are determined by comparing the proceeds with the carrying amount of the asset. Gains and losses<br />

are included in the Statement of Comprehensive Income. When revalued assets are sold, the amounts included in asset<br />

revaluation reserves in respect of those assets are transferred to retained earnings.<br />

Cost incurred subsequent to initial acquisition are capitalised only when it is probable that future economic benefits or service<br />

potential associated with the item will flow to <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> and the cost of the item can be reliably measured.<br />

1.4 Investment Properties<br />

Investment Property which is property held to earn rentals and/or capital appreciation is measured at its fair value at the<br />

reporting date. Gains or losses from changes in the fair value of investment property are included in the profit or loss in the<br />

period in which they arise. Investment Properties are not depreciated.<br />

1.5 Properties Intended for Sale<br />

At each reporting date, <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> reviews the carrying amount of any Properties Intended for Sale to determine whether<br />

there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable<br />

amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any). Properties Intended for Sale<br />

are not depreciated. Properties are actively marketed and there is probable sale within one year.<br />

1.6 Cash and Cash Equivalents<br />

Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash on hand, cash in banks and investments in money market instruments, net of<br />

outstanding bank overdrafts. Bank overdrafts are disclosed separately in current liabilities in the balance sheet.<br />

policies<br />

25


summary of significant accounting policies<br />

policies<br />

1.7 Trade and Other Receivables<br />

Trade and Other Receivables are valued at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective<br />

interest method, less any provision for impairment.<br />

A provision for the impairment of receivables is established when there is objective evidence that all amounts due will not be<br />

able to be collected as per the original terms of the receivables. The amount of the provision is the difference between the<br />

asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted using the effective interest method.<br />

1.8 Inventories<br />

Inventory is valued at the lower of cost using the weighted average method and net realisable value. Full provision has been<br />

made for obsolescence where applicable. Inventory is held for internal maintenance and construction work only.<br />

1.9 Intangible Assets<br />

Intangible assets are limited to computer software. On acquisition they are capitalised at cost which equates to fair value.<br />

The computer software will have a finite life. Amortisation is to be charged to the Statement of Comprehensive Income<br />

based on the finite life of the asset. Software is amortised on a straight line basis over five years. Intangible assets will be<br />

tested for impairment where an indicator of impairment exists and useful lives will be assessed on an annual basis.<br />

1.10 Impairment of Assets<br />

At each reporting date, <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> reviews the carrying amount of its tangible and intangible assets to determine whether<br />

there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable<br />

amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any).<br />

Where the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its recoverable amount the asset is considered impaired and is written<br />

down to its recoverable amount. For revalued assets the impairment loss is recognised against the revaluation reserve for<br />

that class of asset. Where that results in a debit balance in the revaluation reserve, the balance is recognised in the Statement<br />

of Comprehensive Income. For assets not carried at a revalued amount the impairment loss is recognised in the Statement<br />

of Comprehensive Income.<br />

The reversal of an impairment loss on a revalued asset is credited to the revaluation reserve. However, to the extent that<br />

an impairment loss for that class of asset was previously recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income, a reversal<br />

of the impairment loss is also recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income. For assets not carried at a revalued<br />

amount, the total impairment loss is recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income.<br />

1.11 Goods and Services Tax<br />

All items in the financial statements are exclusive of goods and services tax (GST) with the exception of receivables and<br />

payables which are stated with the GST included. Where GST is not recoverable as an input tax then it is recognised as part<br />

of the related asset or expense.<br />

The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the Inland Revenue Department (IRD) is included as part of<br />

receivables or payables in the Balance Sheet.<br />

The net GST paid to or received from the IRD, including the GST relating to investing and financing activities, is classified as<br />

an operating cash flow in the Statement of Cash Flows. Commitments and contingencies are disclosed exclusive of GST.<br />

1.12 Income Tax<br />

The income tax expense for the period is the tax payable on the current period’s taxable income based on the income tax<br />

rate and adjusted by changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities attributable to temporary differences between the tax<br />

bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the financial statements and for unused tax losses (if any).<br />

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognised for temporary differences at the rate expected to apply when the assets are<br />

recovered or liabilities are settled. The tax rate is applied to the cumulative amounts of deductible and taxable temporary<br />

differences to measure the deferred tax asset or liability.<br />

Deferred tax assets are recognised for deductible temporary differences and unused tax losses only if it is probable that<br />

future taxable amounts will be available to utilise those temporary differences and losses.<br />

Deferred tax is charged or credited to the Statement of Comprehensive Income, except where it relates to items charged or<br />

credited directly to equity, in which case the tax is dealt with in other comprehensive income.<br />

1.13 Borrowings<br />

Borrowings are initially recognised at their fair value. After initial recognition, all borrowings are measured at amortised cost<br />

using the effective interest method where this differs from face value.<br />

1.14 Derivative Financial Instruments<br />

<strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> uses derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps to hedge against interest rate fluctuations. <strong>Port</strong><br />

<strong>Nelson</strong> does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. Such derivative financial instruments are<br />

stated at fair value. The fair value of interest rate swaps is determined by reference to market values. The effective portion<br />

26


summary of significant accounting policies<br />

of changes in the fair value of the derivative financial instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges are<br />

deferred in equity.<br />

If a hedging instrument is sold, terminated, revoked or no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, the cumulative<br />

gain or loss that remains recognised directly in equity from the period when the hedge was effective will be recognised in<br />

the Statement of Comprehensive Income.<br />

1.15 Financing Costs<br />

Finance costs are recognised as an expense when incurred. Financing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, construction<br />

or production of qualifying assets, which are assets that take a substantial period of time to get ready for their intended use,<br />

are added to the cost of those assets until such a time as the assets are substantially ready for their intended use.<br />

1.16 Employee Entitlements<br />

Provision is made in respect of <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>’s liability for annual leave, long service leave and retirement gratuities. <strong>Annual</strong><br />

leave and long service leave have been calculated on an actual entitlement basis at current rates of pay and retirement<br />

gratuities calculated at current rates of pay assuming the payment will be made upon retirement.<br />

1.17 Foreign Exchange Transactions<br />

Transactions in foreign currencies are converted at the New Zealand rate of exchange ruling at the date of the transaction.<br />

Capital items are converted at the exchange rate ruling at balance date or the forward exchange contract rate where<br />

applicable.<br />

1.18 Leases<br />

Leases of plant and equipment are classified as operating leases. Operating lease payments are charged as an expense in<br />

the period in which they are incurred, as this represents the pattern of benefits derived from the leased assets.<br />

1.19 Dividends<br />

Provision is made for the amount of any dividend declared on or before the end of the financial year but not distributed at<br />

balance date.<br />

1.20 Critical Judgements<br />

In preparing these financial statements <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> has made estimates and assumptions concerning the future. These<br />

estimates and assumptions may differ from the subsequent actual results and are continually being evaluated based on<br />

historical experience and other factors, including expectations or future events that are expected to be reasonable under<br />

the circumstances. The estimates and assumptions that have a risk of causing a significant adjustment to the carrying<br />

amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are the provision for noise mitigation and the carrying value<br />

of the investment in associate.<br />

The provision for noise mitigation is based on a number of variables such as the costs to mitigate, number of houses requiring<br />

mitigation, and period over which mitigation will occur. The provision is <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>’s best estimate at this point in time, and<br />

will be updated as more information is obtained.<br />

For comparative purposes, judgements for the investment in associate has been assessed considering past financial<br />

performance and future financial forecasts underpinned by such factors as vessel valuations (based on likely realisation),<br />

vessel utilisation and foreign exchange rates which are subject to sensitivity of assumptions. The forecasts indicate that the<br />

carrying value in the financial statements is appropriate. Any difference in the future profitability of the associate compared<br />

to that forecast will result in <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> needing to reassess the carrying value.<br />

1.21 Associates<br />

<strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>’s associate investment is accounted for in the financial statements using the equity method. An associate is an<br />

entity over which <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> has significant influence and that is neither a subsidiary nor an interest in a joint venture. The<br />

investment in an associate is initially recognised at cost and the carrying amount in the financial statements is increased or<br />

decreased to recognise <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>’s share of the surplus or deficit of the associate after the date of acquisition. Distributions<br />

received from an associate reduce the carrying amount of the investment.<br />

If the share of deficits of an associate equals or exceeds its interest in the associate, <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> discontinues recognising its<br />

share of further deficits. After <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>’s interest is reduced to zero, additional deficits are provided for, and a liability is<br />

recognised, only to the extent that <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> has incurred legal or constructive obligations or made payments on behalf<br />

of the associate. If the associate subsequently reports surpluses, <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> will resume recognising its share of those<br />

surpluses only after its share of the surpluses equals the share of deficits not recognised.<br />

Where <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> transacts with an associate, surplus or deficits are eliminated to the extent of <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>’s interest in the<br />

associate. Dilution gains or losses arising from investments in associates are recognised in the surplus or deficit.<br />

policies<br />

27


notes to the accounts<br />

notes<br />

note 1: operating revenue<br />

<strong>2012</strong> 2011<br />

Includes the following revenue: $000 $000<br />

port operations<br />

<strong>Port</strong> Operations 32,815 32,368<br />

Gain on Sale of Assets 18 3<br />

Total <strong>Port</strong> Operations 32,833 32,371<br />

property<br />

Property Leases and Licences 4,996 4,910<br />

Investment Property 978 1,027<br />

Total Property 5,974 5,937<br />

Total operating Revenue 38,807 38,308<br />

All revenue relates to continuing operations.<br />

note 2: other operational and property expenses<br />

<strong>2012</strong> 2011<br />

Includes the following expense: $000 $000<br />

Administration Related 3,206 2,323<br />

Audit Fees - Prior Year - 10<br />

Audit Fees - Current Year 58 57<br />

Bad Debts Written Off 5 13<br />

Directors’ Fees 228 216<br />

Donations/Corporate Sponsorship 151 146<br />

Net Fair Value Write-Down on Investment Property 155 415<br />

Goodwill Write-down in Associate - 258<br />

Investment Property Expenses 15 17<br />

Loss on Sale of Assets 85 145<br />

Operating Leases 18 22<br />

Other Operating Expenses 8,533 8,584<br />

Total Expense 12,455 12,206<br />

All expenses relate to continuing operations.<br />

note 3: provision for taxation<br />

<strong>2012</strong> 2011<br />

$000 $000<br />

Current Tax 3,200 3,361<br />

Prior Year Adjustment (351) 35<br />

Deferred Tax (622) (134)<br />

Deferred Tax Adjustment for Reduction in Tax Rate - 20<br />

Deferred Tax Adjustment for Reinstatement of Tax Depreciation on Buildings (654) 114<br />

TAX EXPENSE 1,573 3,396<br />

Profit from Continuing Operations 11,940 9,980<br />

Tax at 28% (2011: 30%) 3,343 2,994<br />

Prior Year Adjustment (351) 35<br />

Non Deductible Expenses 108 268<br />

Non Taxable Income (633) (35)<br />

Deferred Tax Adjustment for Reduction in Tax Rate - 20<br />

Deferred Tax Movement (240) -<br />

Deferred Tax Adjustment for Reinstatement of Tax Depreciation on Buildings (654) 114<br />

TAX EXPENSE 1,573 3,396<br />

28


notes to the accounts<br />

note 4: deferred tax (assets) and liabilities<br />

Employee Intangible<br />

PP&E Provision Derivatives Entitlements Assets Total<br />

<strong>2012</strong> $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000<br />

Opening Balance 8,549 (168) (544) (304) 141 7,674<br />

Charged to Profit and Loss (581) (1) - (16) (24) (622)<br />

Building tax change to Profit and Loss (654) - - - - (654)<br />

Charged to Equity 19 - (379) - - (360)<br />

balance AT 28% 7,333 (169) (923) (320) 117 6,038<br />

notes<br />

2011<br />

Opening Balance 8,237 (272) (546) (357) 140 7,202<br />

Charged to Profit and Loss (272) 104 - 33 1 (134)<br />

Building tax change to Profit and Loss 114 - - - - 114<br />

Charged to Equity 435 - (37) - - 398<br />

balance AT 28% 8,549 (168) (583) (324) 141 7,615<br />

Tax rate adjustment<br />

Charged to Profit and Loss - - - 20 - 20<br />

Charged to Equity - - 39 - - 39<br />

CLOSING balance 8,549 (168) (544) (304) 141 7,674<br />

note 5: investment property<br />

<strong>2012</strong> 2011<br />

$000 $000<br />

Opening Balance 12,682 13,097<br />

Additions - -<br />

Revaluations (155) (415)<br />

Reclassification - -<br />

Properties Intended for Sale - -<br />

Properties Sold - -<br />

Closing Balance 12,527 12,682<br />

Basis of Valuation<br />

Investment Property is stated at fair value. Fair value was determined as at 30 June <strong>2012</strong> being the market value of the lessor’s interests<br />

as at 30 June <strong>2012</strong>, and is valued annually. Valuation was completed by Ian McKeage, Independent Registered Valuer, FNZIV, FPINZ of<br />

TelferYoung.<br />

note 6: properties intended for sale<br />

<strong>2012</strong> 2011<br />

$000 $000<br />

Opening Balance - 1,073<br />

Additions - -<br />

Disposals - (1,073)<br />

Impairment - -<br />

Closing Balance - -<br />

Properties Intended for sale<br />

<strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> was required to purchase three properties in the 2009 financial year as part of its obligation in respect of the <strong>Nelson</strong> City<br />

Council Resource Management Plan Noise Variation. Subsequent remedial noise mitigation work has been undertaken on the three<br />

houses. Two of these properties were sold in 2010. The third property was sold in 2011. An additional property not associated with the<br />

Noise Variation was held at the 30 June 2010 balance date as Intended for Sale. This property was also disposed of in the 2011 year.<br />

29


notes to the accounts<br />

notes<br />

note 7: investment in associates<br />

Investment in Unimar Group<br />

<strong>2012</strong> 2011<br />

$000 $000<br />

Total 3,477 693<br />

Movements in the Carrying Amount of Investment in Associate<br />

Opening Balance 693 1,707<br />

New Investments 666 -<br />

Disposal of Investments - -<br />

Share in Revaluation Reserve Movement (35) (606)<br />

Goodwill Write-off - (259)<br />

Gain on conversion of notes 272 -<br />

Share of recognised revenues and expenses 1,881 (149)<br />

Closing Balance 3,477 693<br />

Summarised Financial Information of Associate Company<br />

Assets 15,039 19,100<br />

Liabilities 7,094 16,649<br />

Revenues 50,899 13,221<br />

Surplus (deficit) for <strong>2012</strong> 4,298 (596)<br />

<strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> Interest 44% 25%<br />

<strong>2012</strong><br />

Unimar had a trading surplus of $4,298,000. Additionally during the year the vessel Marsol Pride was sold realising the equity portion<br />

invested via the financial lease on the vessel. <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> also exercised its conversion rights on the convertible notes realising a gain<br />

on conversion of $272,000.<br />

2011<br />

Unimar had a trading deficit of $595,637. Unimar undertook a Convertible Notes issue in 2010 to assist with funding operations. The<br />

vessel leased by Unimar has a conditional back to back purchase and sales contract on it which will see Unimar realise the investment<br />

in the vessel accrued from the time of lease to date of sale. The funds realised will allow Unimar to continue operating and provide<br />

for the repayment of the Convertible Notes.<br />

note 8: advance to associate<br />

Advance to Unimar Group<br />

<strong>2012</strong> 2011<br />

$000 $000<br />

Total - 611<br />

Movements in Advance to Associate<br />

Opening Balance 611 -<br />

Capitalisation of interest 53 -<br />

Conversion of notes (664) -<br />

Advance - 611<br />

Closing Balance - 611<br />

<strong>2012</strong><br />

On the 9th December 2011 <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> converted the first tranche of convertible notes at an exercise price of $0.75 per share. The amount<br />

converted consisted of $333,000 advance and $53,645 interest receivable capitalised resulting in the issuing of 515,527 shares and taking <strong>Port</strong><br />

<strong>Nelson</strong>’s shareholding to 39.69%. On the 31st May <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> converted the second tranche at an exercise price of $0.75 per share. The<br />

amount converted was $277,778 resulting in the issuing of a further 370,371 shares and taking <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>’s shareholding to 43.76%.<br />

2011<br />

Advances were made to Unimar totalling $610,778 by way of two tranches. These were made on the 15th October 2010 ($333,000) and<br />

the 31st March 2011 ($277,778). The advances are in the form of Convertible Notes. The Convertible Notes have an exercise price of $0.75c<br />

per share and attract an interest rate of 14.0% per annum. The Convertible Notes are convertible at the option of the note holder. It is not<br />

anticipated that any further advances will have to be made.<br />

30


notes to the accounts<br />

note 9: equity<br />

<strong>2012</strong> 2011<br />

(a) Share Capital $000 $000<br />

Opening Balance 6,046 6,046<br />

Redeemed During the Year - -<br />

Balance at 30 June 6,046 6,046<br />

At 30 June <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> has 25,415,404 ordinary shares. All shares are fully paid and have no par value. All shares carry equal voting<br />

rights and the right to share in any surplus on winding up of the company. None of the shares carry fixed dividend rights.<br />

notes<br />

(b) Retained Earnings<br />

Retained Earnings 41,247 37,413<br />

Net Surplus 10,367 6,584<br />

Dividends Paid (9,000) (1,000)<br />

Transfer to Dividend Payable (3,200) (3,200)<br />

Infrastructural Assets Recognised for the First Time - 1,554<br />

Deferred Tax - Prior Period 3 6<br />

Deferred Tax - Infrastructural Assets (6) (435)<br />

Transfer – Revaluation Reserve 18 -<br />

Transfer - Revaluation Reserve Properties Sold 1,058 325<br />

Retained Earnings at 30 June 40,487 41,247<br />

(c) Asset Revaluation Reserve (Land and Improvements)<br />

Opening Balance 78,376 78,701<br />

Revaluation Movement - -<br />

Transfer to Retained Earnings - Properties Sold (1,058) (325)<br />

Deferred Tax Movement - -<br />

Transfer to Retained Earnings - -<br />

Closing Balance 77,319 78,376<br />

d) Asset Revaluation Reserve (Wharves)<br />

Opening Balance 10,246 10,248<br />

Revaluation Movement - -<br />

Revaluation Movement - Wharf Reclassification - -<br />

Deferred Tax Movement - -<br />

Transfer to Retained Earnings - (2)<br />

Closing Balance 10,246 10,246<br />

(e) Asset Revaluation Reserve (Buildings)<br />

Opening Balance 2,009 2,009<br />

Revaluation Movement (19) -<br />

Deferred Tax Movement 6 -<br />

Transfer to Retained Earnings - -<br />

Closing Balance 1,997 2,009<br />

(f) Asset Revaluation Summary<br />

Opening Balance 90,631 90,957<br />

Revaluation Movement (19) -<br />

Transfer to Retained Earnings - Properties Sold (1,058) (325)<br />

Deferred Tax Movement 6 -<br />

Transfer to Retained Earnings 2 (1)<br />

Closing Balance 89,562 90,631<br />

31


notes to the accounts<br />

notes<br />

note 9: equity (...continued)<br />

<strong>2012</strong> 2011<br />

(g) Associate’s Revaluation Reserve $000 $000<br />

Opening Balance 186 793<br />

Revaluation Movement (35) (607)<br />

Deferred Tax Movement - -<br />

Transfer to Retained Earnings - -<br />

Closing Balance 151 186<br />

(h) Hedging Reserve<br />

Opening Balance (1,359) (1,274)<br />

Fair Value Movement (1,354) (122)<br />

Deferred Tax Movement 340 37<br />

Closing balance (2,373) (1,359)<br />

The Revaluation Reserves relate to the revaluation of land, wharves, buildings and <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>’s associate.<br />

The Hedging Reserve comprises the effective portion of the cumulative net change in the fair value of cash flow hedging instruments related<br />

to hedged transactions that have not yet occurred.<br />

The Associate’s Revaluation Reserve relates to <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>’s share of the associate’s equity reserve balances.<br />

note 10: cash and cash equivalents <strong>2012</strong> 2011<br />

$000 $000<br />

Cash On Hand 2 2<br />

General Account (48) 502<br />

Total (46) 504<br />

note 11: trade and other receivables <strong>2012</strong> 2011<br />

$000 $000<br />

GST Receivable - 173<br />

Trade Receivables 4,700 4,226<br />

Related Party Receivables 5 56<br />

Total 4,705 4,455<br />

The status of the receivables as at 30 June are detailed below:<br />

Not Past Due 3,055 2,809<br />

Past Due 1-31 Days 1,409 1,309<br />

Past Due 32-61 Days 110 112<br />

Past Due 62-92 Days 88 9<br />

Past Due > 92 Days 43 43<br />

Total 4,705 4,282<br />

note 12: inventories <strong>2012</strong> 2011<br />

$000 $000<br />

Opening Balance 365 383<br />

Purchases 603 768<br />

Expensed (662) (796)<br />

Closing Balance 306 365<br />

No inventories are pledged as security for liabilities nor are any inventories subject to retention of title clauses.<br />

32<br />

note 13: trade and other payables <strong>2012</strong> 2011<br />

$000 $000<br />

Accruals 628 783<br />

GST Payable 322 -<br />

ACC Payable 244 216<br />

Trade Payables 1,020 740<br />

Related Party Payables 15 10<br />

Closing Balance 2,229 1,749


notes to the accounts<br />

note 14: property plant and equipment<br />

<strong>2012</strong> asset class<br />

Accumulated<br />

Accumulated<br />

Depreciation Current Current Depreciation<br />

and Current Year Year Cost/ and<br />

Cost/ Impairment Carrying Year Current Impair- Depre- Revalu- Revalu- Impairment Carrying<br />

Revaluation Charges Amount Additions/ Year ment ciation ation ation Charges Amt<br />

1/07/11 1/07/11 1/07/11 Transfers Disposals Charges Charges Surplus 30/6/12 30/6/12 30/6/12<br />

$000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000<br />

Mobile Plant 19,687 (11,716) 7,971 6,667 (120) - (1,362) - 25,826 (12,670) 13,156<br />

Floating Plant 5,819 (4,113) 1,706 97 - - (153) - 5,830 (4,180) 1,650<br />

Wharves & Berths 25,464 (2,744) 22,720 83 - - (889) - 25,546 (3,632) 21,914<br />

Wharves Leased 3,021 (683) 2,338 - - - (216) - 3,021 (899) 2,122<br />

Plant, Furniture & Fittings 12,627 (7,488) 5,139 260 (16) - (742) - 12,705 (8,064) 4,641<br />

Infrastructural Assets 1,554 - 1,554 3 - - (78) - 1,557 (78) 1,479<br />

IT Equipment 1,593 (1,221) 372 158 - - (138) - 1,751 (1,359) 392<br />

Hardstanding & Roadways 8,713 (1,498) 7,215 629 (1) - (191) - 9,341 (1,687) 7,654<br />

Dredging 2,105 - 2,105 12 - - - - 2,117 - 2,117<br />

Buildings 9,595 (743) 8,852 (1,077) (130) - (237) - 8,321 (913) 7,408<br />

Building Fit-Out - - - 1,160 - - (96) - 1,449 (385) 1,064<br />

Buildings Leased 7,657 (608) 7,049 (44) (1,155) - (222) - 6,246 (618) 5,628<br />

Land 55,321 - 55,321 29 - - - - 55,350 - 55,350<br />

Land Leased 45,097 - 45,097 - (1,200) - - - 43,897 - 43,897<br />

Work in Progress 5,983 - 5,983 (4,842) - - - - 1,141 - 1,141<br />

204,236 (30,814) 173,422 3,135 (2,620) - (4,324) - 204,098 (34,485) 169,613<br />

notes<br />

2011 asset class<br />

Mobile Plant 19,252 (11,317) 7,935 1,370 (226) - (1,108) - 19,687 (11,716) 7,971<br />

Floating Plant 5,434 (3,983) 1,451 385 - - (130) - 5,819 (4,113) 1,706<br />

Wharves & Berths 25,464 (1,857) 23,607 - - - (887) - 25,464 (2,744) 22,720<br />

Wharves Leased 3,021 (456) 2,565 - - - (227) - 3,021 (683) 2,338<br />

Plant, Furniture & Fittings 12,095 (6,728) 5,367 542 - - (770) - 12,627 (7,488) 5,139<br />

Infrastructural Assets* - - - 1,554 - - - - 1,554 - 1,554<br />

IT Equipment 1,474 (1,089) 385 124 (2) - (135) - 1,593 (1,221) 372<br />

Hardstanding & Roadways 7,988 (1,318) 6,670 724 - - (179) - 8,713 (1,498) 7,215<br />

Dredging 2,105 - 2,105 - - - - - 2,105 - 2,105<br />

Buildings 9,595 (497) 9,098 - - - (246) - 9,595 (743) 8,852<br />

Buildings Leased 7,241 (402) 6,839 416 - - (206) - 7,657 (608) 7,049<br />

Land 55,321 - 55,321 - - - - - 55,321 - 55,321<br />

Land Leased 44,704 - 44,704 393 - - - - 45,097 - 45,097<br />

Work in Progress 409 - 409 5,574 - - - - 5,983 - 5,983<br />

194,103 (27,647) 166,456 11,082 (228) - (3,888) - 204,236 (30,814) 173,422<br />

Note: All assets are held primarily for the operating of port facilities.<br />

Land, buildings and wharves were valued as at 30 June 2008. As at 30 June <strong>2012</strong>, <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> engaged TelferYoung, an independent valuer to<br />

complete a fair value assessment, which indicated no revaluation was required. The carrying value reflects the fair value.<br />

<strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> is required to undertake seismic assessments of some of its buildings in accordance with the Building Act and <strong>Nelson</strong> City Council’s<br />

Policy for Earthquake Prone, Dangerous and Insanitary Buildings. These assessments are being undertaken by independent consultants. It is<br />

likely that some buildings will be assessed as Earthquake Prone. Buildings assessed as Earthquake Prone will either require seismic strengthening<br />

or demolition in the longer term. <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> therefore expects that these seismic assessments will lead to the impairment of some buildings in<br />

coming years. <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> expects that the programme to complete all of the required assessments will extend over a number of years.<br />

* Infrastructural Assets, including stormwater, sewerage and water reticulation assets located underground have been recognised for the first<br />

time in 2011. The valuation performed by an independent valuer, Darroch Limited, brings into account assets previously owned by the former<br />

<strong>Nelson</strong> Harbour Board, that did not get recognised on the formation of <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> Limited on the 1st October 1988. The valuation method<br />

used for recording cost is depreciated replacement cost. The amounts recognised are deemed to be cost and no subsequent valuations will<br />

be performed. There has been no tax deductibility allowed for any additional depreciation associated with the infrastructural assets being<br />

recognised.<br />

33


notes to the accounts<br />

notes<br />

note 15: intangible assets<br />

Accumulated<br />

Accumulated<br />

Ammortisation Current Current Ammortisation<br />

and Current Year Year Cost/ and<br />

Cost/ Impairment Carrying Year Current Impair- Ammort- Revalu- Impairment Carrying<br />

Revaluation Charges Amount Additions/ Year ment isation ation Charges Amt<br />

1/07/11 1/07/11 1/07/11 Transfers Disposals Charges Charges 30/6/12 30/6/12 30/6/12<br />

$000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000<br />

<strong>2012</strong> asset class<br />

Software 3,525 (2,726) 799 283 - - (354) 3,808 (3,080) 728<br />

3,525 (2,726) 799 283 - - (354) 3,808 (3,080) 728<br />

2011 asset class<br />

Software 3,383 (2,381) 1,002 142 - - (345) 3,525 (2,726) 799<br />

3,383 (2,381) 1,002 142 - - (345) 3,525 (2726) 799<br />

All Intangible Assets are externally generated.<br />

note 16: financial instruments<br />

Financial Risk Management Objectives<br />

<strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> does not enter into or trade financial instruments, including derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. Treasury<br />

functions are governed by a Treasury Policy approved by the Board of Directors. Approved instruments include:<br />

• Forward rate agreements<br />

• Options on a swap<br />

• Interest rate collars<br />

• Interest rate swaps<br />

• Interest rate options<br />

• Spot and forward foreign exchange<br />

Fixed rate hedging parameters are as follows:<br />

Term Minimum Fixed Rate Amount Maximum Fixed Rate Amount<br />

Less than 1 year 50% 100%<br />

1 year to 4 years 30% 70%<br />

5 years to 10 years 0% 50%<br />

Market Risk<br />

Currency Risk<br />

<strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> purchases plant and equipment from time to time from overseas which require it to enter into forward foreign exchange<br />

contracts to hedge the foreign currency risk exposure. This means that <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> is able to fix the New Zealand dollar amount payable<br />

prior to delivery of the plant and equipment from overseas. As at balance date <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> had NIL currency risk exposure.<br />

Cash flow interest rate risk<br />

Cash flow interest rate risk is the risk that the cash flows from a financial instrument will fluctuate due to changes in market interest rates.<br />

Borrowings issued at variable interest rates expose <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> to cash flow interest rate risk.<br />

<strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>’s Treasury Policy is to maintain a portion of its borrowings using interest rate swap instruments within the parameters as set<br />

out in the Hedging Parameter table disclosed under the Financial Risk Management Objectives section. Under the interest rate swaps, <strong>Port</strong><br />

<strong>Nelson</strong> agrees with other parties to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between fixed contract rates and floating-rate interest<br />

amounts calculated by reference to the agreed notional principle amounts.<br />

Credit Risk<br />

<strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> is exposed to credit risk from the possibility of counter-parties failing to perform their obligations.<br />

Credit risk exposure on financial assets other than cash at bank and at call has been recognised in the balance sheet net of any provision for<br />

doubtful debts. Principally any risk is in respect of cash and bank, and accounts receivable.<br />

The major components of debtor exposure are to shipping companies and forestry exporters. Terms of trade are either payment on the 20th<br />

of the month following or 7 working days. The majority of debtors are major international companies with extensive histories of payment.<br />

There are no major concentrations of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable and any single debtor.<br />

34


notes to the accounts<br />

note 16: financial instruments (...continued)<br />

Maximum exposures to credit risk at balance date are: <strong>2012</strong> 2011<br />

$000 $000<br />

Cash and Cash Equivalents - 504<br />

Trade and Other Receivables 4,705 4,455<br />

Advance to Associate - 611<br />

TOTAL CREDIT RISK 4,705 5,570<br />

notes<br />

The above maximum exposures are net of any recognised provision for losses on these financial instruments. No collateral is held on the<br />

above accounts.<br />

The Directors do not consider there is any significant exposure to interest rate risk on its investments.<br />

Credit Quality of Financial Assets<br />

The credit quality of financial assets that are neither past due nor impaired can be assessed by reference to Standard and Poor’s credit rating<br />

(if available) or to historical information about counterparty default rates:<br />

<strong>2012</strong> 2011<br />

$000 $000<br />

Cash and Cash Equivalents<br />

AA - 504<br />

Debtors and receivables arise in the ordinary course of <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>’s business. There are no procedures in place to monitor or report the<br />

credit quality of debtors and other receivables with reference to internal or external credit ratings. <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> does instigate a credit check<br />

on new debtors prior to providing business on <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> Standard Terms and Conditions.<br />

Liquidity Risk<br />

Management of liquidity risk<br />

Liquidity risk is the risk that <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> will encounter ‘difficulty’ raising funds to meet commitments as they fall due. Prudent liquidity risk<br />

management implies maintaining sufficient cash, the availability of funding through an adequate amount of committed credit facilities and<br />

the ability to close out market positions. <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> aims to maintain flexibility in funding by keeping committed credit lines available.<br />

<strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> has financing arrangements with Westpac Banking Corporation. The total facility is $50,000,000 for a term of 2 years. (2011:<br />

$50,000,000 for a term of 2 years).<br />

Security for the multi-option credit facility is by a first and exclusive debenture charge over the assets and undertakings of <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>.<br />

The following table details the notional principal amounts and remaining terms of interest rate swap contracts outstanding as at reporting<br />

date.<br />

Note: Swaps expiring within 12 months are treated as core debt and will be replaced with another approved instrument.<br />

<strong>2012</strong> (at balance date)<br />

Notional Amount Fair Value Interest 0 to 1 1 to 2 2 to 3 3 to 4 4 to 5 6 to 7 8 to 9 9 to 10<br />

($000’s) gain/(loss) rate %* year years years years years years years years<br />

$4,000 Swap (144) 6.95 4,000 - - - - - - -<br />

Total Current (144) 4,000 - - - - - - -<br />

$9,000 Swap (412) 6.19 - 9,000 - - - - - -<br />

$4,000 Swap (252) 6.34 - - 4,000 - - - - -<br />

$5,000 Swap (434) 6.50 - - - - 5,000 - - -<br />

$6,000 Swap (819) 6.49 - - - - 6,000 - - -<br />

$5,000 Swap (170) 5.70 - - - - - 5,000 - -<br />

$5,000 Swap (747) 5.99 - - - - - 5,000 - -<br />

$4,000 Swap (212) 5.90 - - - - - - 4,000 -<br />

$5,000 Swap (56) 5.35 - - - - - - - 5,000<br />

$4,000 Swap (49) 3.99 - - - - - - - 4,000<br />

Total Non-Current (3,151) - - - - - - - - -<br />

<strong>2012</strong> Total (3,295) - 4,000 9,000 4,000 - 11,000 10,000 4,000 9,000<br />

2011 Total (1,942) - - 4,000 9,000 4,000 - 11,000 - 10,000<br />

*Interest rate is exclusive of margin and line of credit fee.<br />

All interest rate options and interest swap options are on 90 day roll-over terms.<br />

The following table summarises the <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> exposure to interest rate risk as at 30 June <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

35


notes to the accounts<br />

notes<br />

note 16: financial instruments (...continued)<br />

<strong>2012</strong><br />

(000’s) Weighted Fixed Maturity Dates<br />

Average<br />

Non<br />

Financial Effective Floating 0 to 1 1 to 5 5+ Interest<br />

Instruments Interest Rate Interest Year Years Years Bearing Total<br />

financial assets<br />

Loans and Receivables:<br />

Cash and Cash Equivalents - - - - - - -<br />

Trade and Other Receivables - - - - - 4,705 4,705<br />

Total Loans and other receivablEs - - - - 4,705 4,705<br />

financial liabilities<br />

Financial Liabilities at amortised Cost:<br />

Bank Overdraft 5.70% 46 -<br />

Borrowings 6.38% 11,946 4,000 15,000 9,000 - 39,946<br />

Trade and Other Payables - - - - - 2,229 2,229<br />

Total Financial liabilities<br />

at Amortised cost 11,992 4,000 15,000 9,000 2,229 42,175<br />

2011<br />

(000’s) Weighted Fixed Maturity Dates<br />

Average<br />

Non<br />

Financial Effective Floating 0 to 1 1 to 5 5+ Interest<br />

Instruments Interest Rate Interest Year Years Years Bearing Total<br />

financial assets<br />

Loans and Receivables:<br />

Cash and Cash Equivalents 2.00% 504 - - - - 504<br />

Trade and Other Receivables - - 611 - - 4,455 5,066<br />

Total Loans and other receivablEs 504 611 - - 4,455 5,570<br />

financial liabilities<br />

Financial Liabilities at amortised Cost:<br />

Borrowings 7.03% 15,300 - 13,000 11,000 - 39,300<br />

Trade and Other Payables - - - - - 1,749 1,749<br />

Total Financial liabilities<br />

at Amortised cost 15,300 - 13,000 11,000 1,749 41,049<br />

Sensitivity Analysis<br />

The following table illustrates the potential profit and loss and equity impact for reasonably possible market movements, with all<br />

other variables held constant, based on <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>’s financial instrument exposure at the balance date.<br />

Carrying<br />

Interest rate<br />

amount<br />

NZD 000’s -100bp -100bp +100bp +100bp<br />

Financial assets Profit Equity Profit Equity<br />

Cash and Cash Equivalents - - - - -<br />

Derivatives – designated as cash flow hedges - - - - -<br />

Financial liabilities<br />

Borrowings 11,946 119 119 (119) (119)<br />

Derivatives – designated as cash flow hedges 3,296 (1,735) 1,904<br />

Fair Values<br />

Cash and Cash Equivalents are valued as the amount of the deposit or the purchase of the underlying security.<br />

Receivables are carried at the nominal amount due, less any provision for doubtful debts which represents the assessed credit risk.<br />

Liability to trade creditors is recognised on receipt of goods and services at nominal value. Payment would normally occur within 30 days.<br />

The following table details the fair value comparison of the long term borrowings as at 30 June <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

36


notes to the accounts<br />

note 16: financial instruments (...continued)<br />

Carrying Value<br />

Fair Value<br />

<strong>2012</strong> 2011 <strong>2012</strong> 2011<br />

financial liabilities $000 $000 $000 $000<br />

Term Debt 39,900 39,300 39,900 39,300<br />

Fair Value Movement (Net) - - 3,296 1,942<br />

Total Financial Liabilities 39,300 39,300 43,196 41,242<br />

notes<br />

note 17: term loan<br />

Interest Rate Contracts:<br />

The notional principal amounts of interest rate contracts outstanding at 30 June <strong>2012</strong> are as follows:<br />

1. $4,000,000 for 4 years @ 6.95% p.a. terminating 31 May 2013<br />

2. $9,000,000 for 2 years @ 6.19% p.a. terminating 29 November 2013<br />

3. $6,000,000 for 9 years @ 6.49% p.a. terminating 30 November 2016<br />

4. $5,000,000 for 10 years @ 5.99% p.a terminating 31 July 2019<br />

5. $4,000,000 for 10 years @ 3.99% p.a terminating 29 April 2022<br />

Swaps expiring within 12 months are treated as core debt and will be replaced with another approved instrument.<br />

note 18: commitments<br />

<strong>2012</strong> 2011<br />

The following expenditure was contracted for at balance date: $000 $000<br />

Capital Development 8 598<br />

note 19: operating leases<br />

<strong>2012</strong> 2011<br />

Non-cancellable operating leases as lessee $000 $000<br />

Not later than one year 14 14<br />

Later than one year and not later than five years 10 24<br />

Total Non-Cancellable Operating Lease 24 38<br />

Non-cancellable operating leases as lessor<br />

Not later than one year 5,478 4,857<br />

Later than one year and not later than five years 14,992 14,530<br />

Later than five years 7,314 6,975<br />

Total Non-Cancellable Operating Lease 27,784 26,392<br />

note 20: employee benefit liabilities<br />

<strong>2012</strong> 2011<br />

$000 $000<br />

Accrued Pay 182 100<br />

<strong>Annual</strong> Leave 694 666<br />

Long Service Leave 157 97<br />

Retirement Gratuities 47 47<br />

Other Benefits 166 168<br />

Total Employee Benefit Liabilities 1,246 1,078<br />

Comprising:<br />

Current 1,083 968<br />

Non-current 163 110<br />

Total Employee Benefit Liabilities 1,246 1,078<br />

37


notes to the accounts<br />

notes<br />

note 21: noise mitigation provision <strong>2012</strong> 2011<br />

$000 $000<br />

Opening Balance 608 700<br />

Additional Provisions Made in the Period 85 -<br />

Decrease to Existing Provisions - (55)<br />

Provision Used (90) (37)<br />

Total NOISE MITIGATION PROVISION 603 608<br />

Comprising:<br />

Current 54 97<br />

Non-current 549 511<br />

Total NOISE MITIGATION PROVISION 603 608<br />

<strong>2012</strong><br />

<strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> reviews its Noise Liability provision each year as the mitigation work is undertaken. The year end provision balance of<br />

$603,000 is for Stages One, Two and now also includes Stage Three. Under the Noise Variation which is now operative, <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong><br />

has an obligation to Stage Three property owners to provide technical advice, where requested, and to consider providing financial<br />

assistance for mitigation works (up to 50 percent of costs). The decision on whether to provide financial assistance will be based on a<br />

recommendation made to <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> by the <strong>Port</strong> Noise Liaison Committee on a case by case basis. <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> has now quantified<br />

the costs of this obligation as at 30 June <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

The Noise Variation within the <strong>Nelson</strong> City Resource Management Plan was notified with effect on 14 July 2008 and was adopted by the<br />

<strong>Nelson</strong> City Council on the 23rd February <strong>2012</strong>. <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> has an obligation to assist with noise mitigation works for noise affected<br />

properties adjacent to the <strong>Port</strong>. These properties are separated into three stages based on the level of <strong>Port</strong> Noise received. In Stage<br />

One (these are houses that are exposed to night time Ldn from port generated noise of 65 dBa or more) <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> is required to make<br />

offers to either fully fund noise mitigation work or to purchase the eleven Stage One properties and at 30 June <strong>2012</strong> nine of these eleven<br />

properties have had this obligation met. For the properties in the 55 to 59.9 dBa and 60 to 64.9 dBa areas (Stage Two), offers have been<br />

made by <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> to owners in these areas to cover 50 percent of the noise mitigation cost. There is no offer for the purchase of these<br />

properties required. For properties in Stage Two <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> is required to approach all owners with this offer. For properties in the 55<br />

to 59.9 dBa area (Stage Three) the owners are required to approach <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> and seek approval for this. Offers will include 50 percent<br />

of the costs of building work, any professional fees, building consents, preparation of drawings and project management.<br />

2011<br />

<strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> has made a Noise Liability provision of $608,000. The year end provision balance is for Stages One and Two. Stage Three<br />

has been recognised as a contingent liability (see note 22). <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> has an obligation to Stage Three property owners to provide<br />

technical advice, where requested, and to consider providing financial assistance for mitigation works (50 percent of costs). The<br />

decision on whether to provide financial assistance will be based on a recommendation made to <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> by the <strong>Port</strong> Noise Liaison<br />

Committee. <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> cannot currently quantify the cost of this obligation at 30 June 2011.<br />

note 22: contingent assets and liabilities<br />

<strong>2012</strong><br />

The Calwell Slipway basin contains contaminated seabed sediments. <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> has title to this area of seabed. While the marine<br />

engineering and vessel coating industries in and around the slipway area are now controlled the historical contamination still persists<br />

in the sediments. The on-going sedimentation of the basin now requires dredging to allow for the on-going operation of the slipway.<br />

<strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>, together with the <strong>Nelson</strong> City Council, has obtained funding from the Ministry for the Environment (MFE) to undertake<br />

Remediation Planning (Phase Three) work to establish a preferred approach for remediation of the contaminated sediments. It is<br />

hoped that once Phase Three is successfully completed funding from MFE for Site Remediation (Phase Four) will also be obtained.<br />

Phase Three is scheduled to be completed in the 2013 financial year and at that stage <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> hopes to able to quantify any liability<br />

associated with the eventual remediation works.<br />

2011<br />

<strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> continues to have an obligation to Stage 3 property owners to provide technical advice, where requested, and to consider<br />

providing financial assistance for mitigation works (50 percent of costs). The decision on whether to provide financial assistance will<br />

be based on a recommendation made to <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> by the <strong>Port</strong> Noise Liaison Committee. <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> cannot currently quantify the<br />

cost of this obligation at 30 June 2011. The Noise Variation within the <strong>Nelson</strong> City Resource Management Plan was notified with effect<br />

on 14 July 2008. <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> is required to make offers to either fully fund noise mitigation work or to purchase 11 closest properties<br />

in the residential zone adjacent to the port. (These are houses that are exposed to night time Ldn from port generated noise of 65 dBa<br />

or more). For the properties in the 55 to 59.9 dBa and 60 to 64.9 dBa areas, offers have been made by <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> to owners in these<br />

areas to cover 50 percent of the noise mitigation cost. There is no offer for the purchase of these properties required. For properties<br />

in the 60 to 64.9 dBa area <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> is required to approach all owners with this offer. For properties in the 55 to 59.9 dBa area the<br />

owners are required to approach <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> and seek approval for this. Offers will include 50 percent of the costs of building work,<br />

any professional fees, building consents, preparation of drawings and project management.<br />

The contingent asset associated with Unimar in 2010 and the vessel the Marsol Pride was not realised.<br />

38


notes to the accounts<br />

note 23: related party disclosure <strong>2012</strong> 2011<br />

$000 $000<br />

<strong>Nelson</strong> City Council Services Provided by <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> 45 12<br />

Services Provided to <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> 398 433<br />

Accounts Payable by <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> 12 8<br />

Accounts Receivable by <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> 3 2<br />

*Dividends Paid by <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> 6,100 2,050<br />

Tasman District Council Services Provided by <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> 1 1<br />

Accounts Receivable by <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> 1 -<br />

*Dividends paid by <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> 6,100 2,050<br />

Nelmac Services Provided to <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> 53 38<br />

Accounts Payable by <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> 3 2<br />

Unimar Services Provided by <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> 180 144<br />

Accounts Receivable by <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> 2 54<br />

Nelmac - Nelmac is 100% owned by <strong>Nelson</strong> City Council and is therefore a related party.<br />

Unimar Group - The Unimar Group is 44% owned by <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>. Unimar has the following 100% owned subsidiaries, Maritime Services<br />

Ltd, Calwell Slipway <strong>Nelson</strong> Ltd and Maritime and Industrial Ltd. <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> invested in Unimar on the 23rd of December 2008.<br />

All Related Parties - There were no NIL or nominal value transactions between <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> and related parties (2011 NIL).<br />

No inter-entity debt has been forgiven or written off (2011 NIL).<br />

Directors - Mr A O Patterson is a director of Cold Storage <strong>Nelson</strong> Ltd that leases land from <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong>. The amount received from Cold<br />

Storage <strong>Nelson</strong> Ltd was $448,033 for the year (2011 $438,557), and NIL was receivable at year end (2011 NIL). The amount paid to Cold<br />

Storage <strong>Nelson</strong> Ltd was $NIL (2011 $425) for the year, and $NIL was payable at year end (2011 $NIL).<br />

Key Management Personnel - Details of compensation paid to key management personnel and directors during the financial year:<br />

<strong>2012</strong> 2011<br />

$000 $000<br />

Salaries and Other Short-Term Benefits 1,392 1,344<br />

Total 1,392 1,344<br />

notes<br />

note 24: financial reporting by segments<br />

<strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> operates in one industry and one geographical segment providing and managing port facilities, marine services, cargo<br />

handling operations, and investment properties at the port of <strong>Nelson</strong>.<br />

note 25: imputation credits<br />

<strong>2012</strong> 2011<br />

Imputation credits to shareholders $000 $000<br />

CredITS AVAILABLE FOR FUTURE USE 14,449 16,335<br />

note 26: events occurring after balance date<br />

<strong>2012</strong><br />

Unimar declared a dividend for payment on 26 September <strong>2012</strong>. <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong> will receive $487,172 fully imputed ($676,628 gross) in<br />

relation to its share of Unimar. Apart from this, there are no events after balance date that requires adjustment or disclosure in the<br />

financial statements.<br />

2011<br />

Unimar has entered into a contract to buy the vessel Marsol Pride (previously leased). On the same day (1 July 2011), Unimar entered<br />

into an agreement to sell the vessel.<br />

39


directory<br />

Board of Directors<br />

Nick Patterson, Chairman<br />

Tim King<br />

Paul Le Gros<br />

Phil Lough, Deputy Chairman and Chairman Remuneration Committee<br />

Bronwyn Monopoli<br />

Peter Schuyt, Chairman Finance and Risk Committee<br />

Secretary<br />

Parke Pittar<br />

Executive Officers<br />

Martin Byrne, Chief Executive Officer<br />

Digby Kynaston, <strong>Port</strong> Logistics Manager<br />

Matt McDonald, Infrastructure Manager<br />

Melisa Kappely, Employee Relations Manager<br />

Parke Pittar, Chief Commercial Officer<br />

Registered Office<br />

10 Low Street, <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Nelson</strong><br />

PO Box 844, <strong>Nelson</strong> 7040 New Zealand<br />

Tel. (03) 548 2099, Fax. (03) 546 9015<br />

info@portnelson.co.nz<br />

www.portnelson.co.nz<br />

Auditors<br />

Audit New Zealand, on behalf of the Auditor-General<br />

Solicitors<br />

Pitt & Moore, Barristers and Solicitors, PO Box 42, <strong>Nelson</strong> 7040<br />

Simpson Grierson, Barristers and Solicitors, PO Box 2402, Wellington 6140<br />

Bankers<br />

Westpac Banking Corporation, PO Box 643, <strong>Nelson</strong> 7040<br />

www.portnelson.co.nz

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!