Vigilance Compedium - CCL
Vigilance Compedium - CCL Vigilance Compedium - CCL
No.000/VGL/161 Government of India Central Vigilance Commission Office Order No.18/3/05 Satarkta Bhawan, Block ‘A’, GPO Complex, INA, New Delhi – 110 023 Dated the 24 th March, 2005. Subject: Banning of business dealings with firms/contractors - clarification regarding. Para 31 of Chapter-XIII, Vigilance Manual Part-I provides that business dealings with the firms/contractors may be banned whenever necessary. It was also suggested that for banning of the business with such firms/contractors or for withdrawal of banning orders, advice of the Central Vigilance Commission need not be sought. 2. It is however observed by the Commission that some of the departments/organizations cite the Commission as the authority behind the decision in their orders while banning of the firms/contractors. This is not appropriate. The Commission once again reiterates its instructions that banning of business is an administrative matter to be decided by the management of the organization and the Central Vigilance Commission does not give its advice in such matters. This may please be noted for strict compliance. All Chief Vigilance Officers Sd/- (Anjana Dube) Deputy Secretary
No.OFF-1-CTE-1(Pt) V Government of India Central Vigilance Commission Office Order No.15/3/05 Subject: Notice inviting tenders - regarding. Satarkta Bhawan, Block ‘A’, GPO Complex, INA, New Delhi – 110 023 Dated the 24 th March, 2005. The Commission has observed that some of the Notice Inviting Tenders (NITs) have a clause that the tender applications could be rejected without assigning any reason. This clause is apparently incorporated in tender enquiries to safeguard the interest of the organisation in exceptional circumstances and to avoid any legal dispute, in such cases. 2. The Commission has discussed the issue and it is emphasized that the above clause in the bid document does not mean that the tender accepting authority is free to take decision in an arbitrary manner. He is bound to record clear, logical reasons for any such action of rejection/recall of tenders on the file. 3. This should be noted for compliance by all tender accepting authorities. All Chief Vigilance Officers Sd/- (Anjana Dube) Deputy Secretary
- Page 13 and 14: Leveraging Technology - e-payments
- Page 15 and 16: Total amount involved : 4. Out of t
- Page 17 and 18: Guidelines on Security consideratio
- Page 19 and 20: 2.3.3 Security in Data storage and
- Page 21 and 22: No.4CC-1-CTE-2 Government of India
- Page 23 and 24: NIT / Tendering / Negotiations / Pu
- Page 25 and 26: No.98/ORD/1 Government of India Cen
- Page 27 and 28: iii) The Comptroller & Auditor Gene
- Page 29 and 30: fair manner. The authority may in s
- Page 31 and 32: No.001/VGL/21 Government of India C
- Page 33 and 34: N. Vittal 98/ORD/1 GOVERNMENT OF IN
- Page 35 and 36: No.12-02-1-CTE-6 Central Vigilance
- Page 37 and 38: establishment, plant, equipment etc
- Page 39 and 40: No.98/ORD/1(Pt.IV) Government of In
- Page 41 and 42: No.98/ORD/1 Government of India Cen
- Page 43 and 44: No.98/ORD/1 Government of India Cen
- Page 45 and 46: No.06-03-02-CTE-34 Government of In
- Page 47 and 48: No.98/ORD/1 Central Vigilance Commi
- Page 49 and 50: No.OFF-1-CTE-1 Government of India
- Page 51 and 52: No.98/ORD/1 Government of India Cen
- Page 53 and 54: Subject: Consideration of Indian Ag
- Page 55 and 56: No.98/ORD/1 CENTRAL VIGILANCE COMMI
- Page 57 and 58: supplier/contractor will lead to pr
- Page 59 and 60: No.004/ORD/9 Government of India Ce
- Page 61 and 62: subsequently providing goods or wor
- Page 63: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Te
- Page 67 and 68: No.005/MSC/25 Government of India C
- Page 69 and 70: No.005/VGL/66 Government of India C
- Page 71 and 72: (iv) (v) As regards the splitting o
- Page 73 and 74: No.005/CRD/19 Government of India C
- Page 75 and 76: No.004/VGL/90 Government of India C
- Page 77 and 78: No.005/VGL/4 Government of India Ce
- Page 79 and 80: No.005/CRD/012 Government of India
- Page 81 and 82: Annexure-1 Check list for examinati
- Page 83 and 84: No.005/CRD/19 Government of India C
- Page 85 and 86: No.02-07-01-CTE-30 Government of In
- Page 87 and 88: No.007/VGL/033 Government of India
- Page 89 and 90: and approval by the Commission as I
- Page 91 and 92: INTERNAL CIRCULARS/ GUIDELINES OF C
- Page 93 and 94: CENTRAL COALFIELDS LIMITED DARBHANG
- Page 95 and 96: CENTRAL COALFIELDS LIMITED DARBHANG
- Page 97 and 98: INTERNAL CIRCULARS/ GUIDELINES OF C
- Page 99 and 100: CENTRAL COALFIELDS LIMITED DARBHANG
- Page 101 and 102: CENTRAL COALFIELDS LIMITED DARBHANG
- Page 103 and 104: Encl: as above. Copy to: 1. DT(O),C
- Page 105 and 106: Coal India Limited VIGILANCE DIVISI
- Page 107 and 108: WIRELESS DT: 01.7.2002 FOR : SO(E&M
- Page 109 and 110: PROCEDURE TO BE ADOPTED FOR REPAIR
- Page 111 and 112: 1. Name of the Project/Colliery 2.
- Page 113 and 114: CENTRAL COALFIELDS LIMITED DARBHANG
No.000/VGL/161<br />
Government of India<br />
Central <strong>Vigilance</strong> Commission<br />
Office Order No.18/3/05<br />
Satarkta Bhawan, Block ‘A’,<br />
GPO Complex, INA,<br />
New Delhi – 110 023<br />
Dated the 24 th March, 2005.<br />
Subject: Banning of business dealings with firms/contractors - clarification<br />
regarding.<br />
Para 31 of Chapter-XIII, <strong>Vigilance</strong> Manual Part-I provides that business<br />
dealings with the firms/contractors may be banned whenever necessary. It was also<br />
suggested that for banning of the business with such firms/contractors or for<br />
withdrawal of banning orders, advice of the Central <strong>Vigilance</strong> Commission need not<br />
be sought.<br />
2. It is however observed by the Commission that some of the departments/organizations<br />
cite the Commission as the authority behind the decision in their orders while banning<br />
of the firms/contractors. This is not appropriate. The Commission once again<br />
reiterates its instructions that banning of business is an administrative matter to<br />
be decided by the management of the organization and the Central <strong>Vigilance</strong><br />
Commission does not give its advice in such matters. This may please be noted for<br />
strict compliance.<br />
All Chief <strong>Vigilance</strong> Officers<br />
Sd/-<br />
(Anjana Dube)<br />
Deputy Secretary
Change language