Vigilance Compedium - CCL

More documents

Recommendations

Info

No.98/ORD/1 Central Vigilance Commission Satarkta Bhawan, Block- ‘A’, GPO Complex, INA, New Delhi – 110 023 Dated the 29 th April, 2002 To i) The Secretaries of All Ministries/Departments of Government of India ii) The Chief Secretaries to All Union Territories iii) The Comptroller & Auditor General of India iv) The Chairman, Union Public Service Commission v) The Chief Executives of All PSEs/Public Sector Banks/Insurance Companies/Autonomous Organisations/Societies vi) The Chief Vigilance Officers in the Ministries/Departments/PSEs/Public Sector Banks/Insurance Companies/Autonomous Organisations/Societies viii) President’s Secretariat/Vice-President’s Secretariat/Lok Sabha Secretariat/Rajya Sabha Secretariat/PMO Subject: Applicability of CVCs instruction No.8(1)(h)/98(1) dated 18.11.98 on post tender negotiation. Sir, The undersigned has been directed to refer to the Commission’s letter of even number dated 28.03.2002; on the above subject, and to say that the instructions contained therein are hereby withdrawn. Yours faithfully, Sd/- (K.L. Ahuja) Officer on Special Duty
No.12-02-1-CTE-6 Central Vigilance Commission (CTE’S Organisation) OFFICE MEMORANDUM Subject: Prequalification criteria (PQ). Satarkta Bhawan, Block ‘A’, GPO Complex, INA, New Delhi – 110 023 Dated the 17 th December, 2002. The commission, has received complaints regarding discriminatory prequalification criteria incorporated in the tender documents by various Deptts./Organisations. It has also been observed during intensive examination of various works/contracts by CTEO that the prequalification criteria is either not clearly specified or made very stringent/very lax to restrict/facilitate the entry of bidders. 2. The prequalification criteria is a yard stick to allow or disallow the firms to participate in the bids. A vaguely defined PQ criteria results in stalling the process of finalizing the contract or award of the contract in a non-transparent manner. It has been noticed that organizations, at times pick up the PQ criteria from some similar work executed in the past, without appropriately amending the different parameters according to the requirements of the present work. Very often it is seen that only contractors known to the officials of the organization and to the Architects are placed on the select list. This system gives considerable scope for malpractices, favouritism and corruption. It is, therefore, necessary to fix in advance the minimum qualification, experience and number of similar works of a minimum magnitude satisfactorily executed in terms of quality and period of execution. 3. Some of the common irregularities/lapses observed in these regard are highlighted as under: i) For a work with an estimated cost of Rs.15 crores to be completed in two years the criteria for average turnover in the last 5 years was kept as 15 crores although the amount of work to be executed in one year was only Rs.7.5 crores. The above resulted in prequalification of a single firm. ii) One organization for purchase of computer hardware kept in criteria for financial annual turnover of Rs.100 crores, although the value of purchase was less than Rs.10 crores, resulting in disqualification of reputed computer firms. iii) In one case of purchase of Computer hardware, the prequalification criteria stipulated was that the firms should have made profit in the last two years and should possess ISO Certification. It resulted in disqualification of reputed vendors including a PSU.
Page 1 and 2: CONTENTS Sl.no. Contents Page no. A
Page 3 and 4: standard specifications) 37. Circul
Page 5 and 6: FROM THE DESK OF THE CVO It gives m
Page 7 and 8: e-Procurement / Reverse auction e-P
Page 9 and 10: No.98/ORD/1 Government of India Cen
Page 11 and 12: No.4CC-1-CTE-2 Government of India
Page 13 and 14: Leveraging Technology - e-payments
Page 15 and 16: Total amount involved : 4. Out of t
Page 17 and 18: Guidelines on Security consideratio
Page 19 and 20: 2.3.3 Security in Data storage and
Page 21 and 22: No.4CC-1-CTE-2 Government of India
Page 23 and 24: NIT / Tendering / Negotiations / Pu
Page 27 and 28: iii) The Comptroller & Auditor Gene
Page 29 and 30: fair manner. The authority may in s
Page 31 and 32: No.001/VGL/21 Government of India C
Page 33: N. Vittal 98/ORD/1 GOVERNMENT OF IN
Page 37 and 38: establishment, plant, equipment etc
Page 39 and 40: No.98/ORD/1(Pt.IV) Government of In
Page 45 and 46: No.06-03-02-CTE-34 Government of In
Page 47 and 48: No.98/ORD/1 Central Vigilance Commi
Page 49 and 50: No.OFF-1-CTE-1 Government of India
Page 53 and 54: Subject: Consideration of Indian Ag
Page 55 and 56: No.98/ORD/1 CENTRAL VIGILANCE COMMI
Page 57 and 58: supplier/contractor will lead to pr
Page 59 and 60: No.004/ORD/9 Government of India Ce
Page 61 and 62: subsequently providing goods or wor
Page 63 and 64: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Te
Page 65 and 66: No.OFF-1-CTE-1(Pt) V Government of
Page 67 and 68: No.005/MSC/25 Government of India C
Page 71 and 72: (iv) (v) As regards the splitting o
Page 73 and 74: No.005/CRD/19 Government of India C
Page 77 and 78: No.005/VGL/4 Government of India Ce
Page 79 and 80: No.005/CRD/012 Government of India
Page 81 and 82: Annexure-1 Check list for examinati
Page 83 and 84: No.005/CRD/19 Government of India C
Page 85 and 86:
No.02-07-01-CTE-30 Government of In
Page 87 and 88:
No.007/VGL/033 Government of India
Page 89 and 90:
and approval by the Commission as I
Page 91 and 92:
INTERNAL CIRCULARS/ GUIDELINES OF C
Page 93 and 94:
CENTRAL COALFIELDS LIMITED DARBHANG
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
INTERNAL CIRCULARS/ GUIDELINES OF C
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Encl: as above. Copy to: 1. DT(O),C
Page 105 and 106:
Coal India Limited VIGILANCE DIVISI
Page 107 and 108:
WIRELESS DT: 01.7.2002 FOR : SO(E&M
Page 109 and 110:
PROCEDURE TO BE ADOPTED FOR REPAIR
Page 111 and 112:
1. Name of the Project/Colliery 2.
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
e) The fund for repairing shall be
Page 117 and 118:
7. At the opening and close of the
Page 119 and 120:
Annexure-I HSD Issue statement with
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
INTERNAL CIRCULARS/ GUIDELINES OF F
Page 125 and 126:
INTERNAL CIRCULARS/ GUIDELINES OF M
Page 127 and 128:
Government of India Ministry of Coa
Page 129 and 130:
INTERNAL CIRCULARS/ GUIDELINES OF P
Page 131 and 132:
from SC/ST, the roster points to be
Page 133 and 134:
Government of India Ministry of Coa
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
CENTRAL COALFIELDS LIMITED A Minira
Page 139 and 140:
INTERNAL CIRCULARS/ GUIDELINES OF S
Page 141 and 142:
Proposal seeking approval of draft
Page 143 and 144:
In line with the above, based on th
Page 145 and 146:
are extended on request of the cons
Page 147 and 148:
(d)Sale orders received at the coll
Page 149 and 150:
(o)The party wise/sale order wise
Page 151 and 152:
h) CSC will send a list of un close
Page 153 and 154:
Case Study -01 BRIEF OF ALLEGATION
Page 155 and 156:
Case Study -02 BRIEF OF ALLEGATION
Page 157 and 158:
2.2 Deficient work order, which was
Page 159 and 160:
• Payment of contractually transp
Page 161 and 162:
Case Study -05 Sub: Purchase of gum
Page 163 and 164:
Case Study -06 Lapses in conduction
Page 165 and 166:
Case Study -08 Lapses in processing
Page 167:
Case Study -09 A complaint was rece
show all

Vigilance Compedium - CCL

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?