Vigilance Compedium - CCL
Vigilance Compedium - CCL
Vigilance Compedium - CCL
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Case Study -05<br />
Sub:<br />
Purchase of gum boots in an improper manner<br />
1. It was alleged that poor quality gum boots were purchased in an improper manner at<br />
one of the Regional stores of <strong>CCL</strong> were made in one of the complaints received in<br />
<strong>CCL</strong> <strong>Vigilance</strong>:<br />
2. A detailed investigation into the above allegation revealed the following<br />
lapses/irregularities on part of the dealing officials:-<br />
Purchase of non-DGMS approved type/non-ISS certified Gum Boots<br />
2.1 The procured Gum Boots were neither ISI/BIS marked nor did it carry any DGMS<br />
approval, which was essential as Gum Boots were to be used in Mines. But still the<br />
SO (Safety) had passed the above gumboots for use in mines during inspection of the<br />
same.<br />
Deficient indent:<br />
2.2 The indent raised for the procurement of said Gum boots were grossly deficient. Gum<br />
boot is a safety item and therefore need to be DGMS approved type/ISS certified, if<br />
intended to be used in the mine. But in the indent raised for the procurement of Gum<br />
Boots, no reference was made for the procurement of DGMS approved Gumboots,<br />
although it was mentioned in the indent that the supply of Gumboots was must for<br />
safety purpose and to avoid any unwanted incident etc.<br />
Purchase of centralized item from the Area<br />
2.3 It was confirmed by CGM (MM) that the gumboot is a centralized item and therefore<br />
should have been purchased from the <strong>CCL</strong> (HQ). But in the instant case the said<br />
gumboots were purchased at the Area level itself without obtaining competent<br />
approval for the same. The following deviations were observed:-<br />
a. First of all it was incorrectly written in the proposal note sheet by the dealing<br />
Purchase Officer that Gum-Boots were de-centralized item<br />
b. No competent approval was obtained for the purchase of centralized items at Area<br />
level<br />
c. In total, 560 pairs of gum-boots were available in the central store on the date on<br />
which the proposal of gum-boots was moved for tendering. Surprisingly the above<br />
available stock of Gum-Boots in the Central Store was not verified, in spite of the fact<br />
that:-<br />
• Initiation of action for procurement of Gum Boots indented by the concerned Area in<br />
its annual MB and allocation of 225 pairs if gumboots against the indented quantity in<br />
the MB were communicated to the concerned regional store.