14.07.2014 Views

Addendum 2 - State of Delaware

Addendum 2 - State of Delaware

Addendum 2 - State of Delaware

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

<strong>Delaware</strong> Health<br />

And Social Services<br />

DIVISION OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES<br />

PROCUREMENT<br />

HSS 13-012<br />

DATE: June 12, 2013<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM<br />

FOR<br />

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES<br />

Date Due: August 7, 2013<br />

11:00AM<br />

ADDENDUM #2<br />

Please Note:<br />

THE ATTACHED SHEETS HEREBY BECOME A PART<br />

OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED BID. Pre-bid meeting<br />

questions and answers.<br />

___________________________<br />

Kieran Mohammed<br />

PROCUREMENT ADMINISTRATOR<br />

(302)255-9291<br />

_____________________________<br />

Nicolette M. Shuhart<br />

(302) 255-9752<br />

Page 1 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

1 IV&V Will our IV&V be a<br />

separate RFP and when<br />

will it be published?<br />

2 RFP<br />

Genera<br />

l<br />

Would like to receive<br />

information on the RFP<br />

for a MMIS, please send<br />

via e-mail.<br />

3 IV&V I noticed in the text that<br />

there was mention <strong>of</strong><br />

RFP HSS-13-013 for<br />

IV&V/QA services. When<br />

is this anticipated to be<br />

released?<br />

Yes, it will be a separate RFP and<br />

we will publish it the near future<br />

E-mail response, the MMIS RFP<br />

is housed at :<br />

http://www.bids.delaware.gov<br />

See response to question<br />

number 1.<br />

4 DW/DS<br />

S<br />

It also says in the RFP<br />

that a Data<br />

Warehouse/Decision<br />

Support System is not<br />

part <strong>of</strong> this<br />

procurement. Does the<br />

state anticipate releasing<br />

a RFP in the future for<br />

The state will not be releasing<br />

an RFP for a DW/DSS vendor.<br />

Page 2 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

these services? If so, is<br />

there an anticipated<br />

time frame for release?<br />

5 2 Section 2, RFP Schedule,<br />

lists July 1 @ 4:30 for<br />

submission <strong>of</strong> questions.<br />

Section 5.1.4 lists May<br />

31 @ 4:30 as the time<br />

questions must be<br />

received.<br />

The Questions due date is July<br />

1st @4:30pm.<br />

6 RFP<br />

Genera<br />

l<br />

Which is the correct day<br />

and time?<br />

Will you all ever see the<br />

need or have any<br />

interest in doing<br />

discovery/eDiscovery<br />

work for your cases?<br />

We do not have a need for<br />

discovery/eDiscovery. For other<br />

state level opportunities, keep<br />

up with new RFP’s at<br />

http://www.bids.delaware.gov/.<br />

7 1.5 How do we secure a<br />

copy <strong>of</strong> the DVD and<br />

which NDA we need to<br />

Any undistributed<br />

documentation will be provided<br />

to bidders at the bidders<br />

Page 3 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

sign?<br />

8 IV&V Can you tell me where I<br />

can find the IV&V RFP, or<br />

when you expect to<br />

release it?<br />

9 2.1 The RFP schedule<br />

indicates that vendor<br />

questions will be<br />

answered by July 15,<br />

2013, approximately<br />

three weeks before<br />

vendors will begin final<br />

production <strong>of</strong> proposals<br />

due on August 7. The<br />

bidders would<br />

appreciate a staggered<br />

release <strong>of</strong> answers as<br />

they are developed by<br />

DMMA.<br />

To ensure the highestquality<br />

technical and<br />

cost proposals from<br />

bidders, would DMMA<br />

meeting.<br />

See response to question<br />

number 1.<br />

The state will issue one set <strong>of</strong><br />

vendor answers prior to the<br />

bidders meeting. The remaining<br />

vendor answers will be issued<br />

July 15, 2013.<br />

Page 4 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

consider a staggered<br />

release <strong>of</strong> answers to<br />

bidder questions?<br />

10 Cover<br />

page<br />

On the Cover Page <strong>of</strong> the<br />

RFP, we see the<br />

following sentence: “A<br />

brief ‘Letter <strong>of</strong> Interest’<br />

must be submitted with<br />

your proposal.”<br />

How is this Letter<br />

different from the Letter<br />

<strong>of</strong> Interest that must be<br />

submitted at the June 14<br />

Mandatory Bidder’s<br />

Meeting?<br />

Where in the proposal<br />

should this Letter <strong>of</strong><br />

Interest be placed?<br />

2.2 Letter <strong>of</strong> Interest<br />

Bidders are required to submit a<br />

Letter <strong>of</strong> Interest to bid. This<br />

letter will be due by 9:00 a.m.<br />

ET on June 14, 2013 and must<br />

be hand delivered at the<br />

mandatory pre-bid meeting and<br />

the same letter <strong>of</strong> interest is to<br />

be included in the proposal.<br />

Page 5 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

11 Cover<br />

page<br />

On the second page <strong>of</strong><br />

the RFP cover sheet, we<br />

see this statement:<br />

“NOTE TO BIDDERS:<br />

Your proposal must be<br />

signed and all<br />

information on the<br />

signature page<br />

completed.”<br />

This signature page does<br />

not appear to be<br />

included with the<br />

attachments to the RFP.<br />

Please clarify this<br />

requirement:<br />

• Is the signature page a<br />

reference to the<br />

Transmittal Letter?<br />

• Or—is this a reference<br />

to Attachment R, Bidders<br />

Signature Form (which<br />

goes in Tab 4)?<br />

• If not, will the <strong>State</strong><br />

provide the signature<br />

Please sign, ATTACHMENT R:<br />

BIDDER’S SIGNATURE FORM<br />

Page 6 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

page template for<br />

completion by bidders?<br />

12 5.1 11 The proposal<br />

preparations instructions<br />

include this instruction:<br />

“Bid proposal Materials<br />

must be printed on 8.5”<br />

x 11” paper.”<br />

The proposals will<br />

include very detailed<br />

system graphics and<br />

organization charts (the<br />

organization charts<br />

require a great deal <strong>of</strong><br />

information). These<br />

charts and graphics will<br />

be very difficult to read<br />

on 8.5” x 11” paper.<br />

Will the <strong>State</strong> allow<br />

bidders to print these<br />

very complex, detailed<br />

Yes<br />

Page 7 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

illustrations as fold-out<br />

graphics, on 11” by 17”<br />

paper?<br />

13 5.2.4 15 The instructions for Tab<br />

4 mention Attachment<br />

V, the Bidder Contact<br />

Information form. This<br />

completed attachment<br />

must be submitted at<br />

the June 14 Mandatory<br />

Bidder Meeting.<br />

Does the <strong>State</strong> want<br />

another copy <strong>of</strong> it also<br />

submitted with the<br />

proposal?<br />

14 5.2.7 18 Requirement 4 at the<br />

top <strong>of</strong> page 18 requires<br />

“A Staffing Plan in which<br />

the bidder details its<br />

approach to staffing the<br />

project to meet DHSS<br />

requirements<br />

established in 5.2.14.”<br />

Yes<br />

The <strong>State</strong> does not wish to see a<br />

generic staffing template. As<br />

indicated in B.1.12.6 a staffing<br />

management plan (SMP) must<br />

be submitted with the proposal<br />

and will be updated 20 days<br />

after the contract start date.<br />

The format and content must<br />

Page 8 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

Since the response to<br />

5.2.14 (which is the<br />

Staffing section, Tab 13)<br />

contains all the<br />

information requested in<br />

this Requirement 4, it’s<br />

not clear what the <strong>State</strong><br />

wishes to see in<br />

response to<br />

Requirement 4.<br />

Does the <strong>State</strong> wish to<br />

see a template <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Bidder’s standard<br />

staffing plan along with a<br />

pointer to Tab 13 for the<br />

actual details?<br />

If not, please clarify what<br />

the <strong>State</strong> expects to see<br />

in response to<br />

Requirement 4.<br />

adhere to the requirements in<br />

E.1.1.4. Section 5.2.14 seeks to<br />

obtain information not<br />

contained in the SMP. This<br />

would included expanding upon<br />

the individuals; experience, skill<br />

sets, selection, successes and<br />

direct relevance as assigned to<br />

each project phase.<br />

Page 9 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

15 5.2.9(1) 19 The first requirement<br />

says that “Bidders shall<br />

provide a Project Plan<br />

with a work breakdown<br />

structure, project<br />

schedule, and a quality<br />

management plan.”<br />

This closely resembles<br />

the requirement for a<br />

Work Breakdown<br />

Structure and Project<br />

Schedule found in the<br />

requirements for Tab 7<br />

Project Management<br />

Oversight and Planning,<br />

requirement 1 at the top<br />

<strong>of</strong> page 18.<br />

In the requirement in<br />

Tab 8, is the <strong>State</strong> asking<br />

for a “breakout” piece <strong>of</strong><br />

the total plan that<br />

describes just the plan<br />

and activities for Design,<br />

Development, and<br />

This interpretation is correct.<br />

Page 10 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

Testing?<br />

16 5.2.14.<br />

6<br />

26 Staffing section 5.2.14.6<br />

Resumes and Tab 4 both<br />

refer to Attachment W.<br />

Please clarify: where<br />

does the <strong>State</strong> want<br />

bidders to place<br />

Attachment W:<br />

• In Tab 4 Required<br />

Forms (under “Named<br />

Position Resume”)?<br />

• Or in Tab 13,<br />

subsection 5.2.14.6<br />

Resumes?<br />

Attachment W needs to be<br />

completed and placed in Tab 4.<br />

Tab 13 requires more specific<br />

information.<br />

Page 11 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

17 Attach<br />

ments<br />

The file containing the<br />

RFP and attachments<br />

was in pdf format and<br />

contained a number <strong>of</strong><br />

forms that must be<br />

completed by the<br />

Bidders and submitted<br />

with their proposal. Will<br />

the state provide the<br />

following attachments in<br />

their “native” formats<br />

that can then be<br />

completed by the<br />

Bidders?<br />

• RFP: Word format<br />

• Attachment B, C, D, E,<br />

: Word format<br />

• Attachment K: Excel<br />

format<br />

• Attachments L, M, O,<br />

P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W and<br />

X: Word format<br />

Yes, and will be provided at the<br />

mandatory bidders meeting<br />

Page 12 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

18 E.1 E-3 Deliverable Numbers<br />

11.5 and 11.6 (within<br />

Task 11 System<br />

Operation and<br />

Maintenance Support)<br />

may have the incorrect<br />

Section Number<br />

references:<br />

• 11.5 System Updates<br />

refers to 1.45, but the<br />

correct reference seems<br />

to be 1.43<br />

• 11.6 Operations &<br />

Maintenance Procedures<br />

Manual refers to 1.46,<br />

but the correct<br />

reference seems to be<br />

1.44<br />

Is this correct?<br />

This is correct, 11.5 System<br />

Updates refers to 1.45, the<br />

correct reference is 1.43 and<br />

11.6. Operations &<br />

Maintenance Procedures<br />

Manual refers to 1.46, the<br />

correct reference is 1.44<br />

Page 13 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

19 L.2 L-3 and L-<br />

6<br />

In Attachment L,<br />

Paragraph L.2 (2) states:<br />

“If Bidders are unwilling<br />

to comply with certain<br />

RFP requirements, terms<br />

and conditions,<br />

objections must be<br />

clearly stated in the<br />

proposal and will be<br />

subject to negotiation at<br />

the discretion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Department.”<br />

In Attachment L,<br />

Paragraph L.2 (18)<br />

states: “The <strong>State</strong> will<br />

not entertain any<br />

modifications to the<br />

language <strong>of</strong> this<br />

document. By<br />

submitting a proposal to<br />

this RFP, the Bidder<br />

agrees to be bound by<br />

the terms and conditions<br />

in that contract<br />

L.2-18 refers to the standard<br />

department contract (aka<br />

boilerplate) only. The <strong>State</strong> will<br />

not entertain any modifications<br />

to this document. Other RFP<br />

modifications may be<br />

negotiated.<br />

Page 14 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

document.”<br />

The language in (2) and<br />

(18) conflicts on the<br />

topic <strong>of</strong> submitting<br />

objections to certain RFP<br />

requirements, terms and<br />

conditions:<br />

• Will the <strong>State</strong> allow<br />

bidders to present<br />

alternate contract<br />

language in their<br />

proposals (while also<br />

agreeing to comply with<br />

all <strong>State</strong> requirements)?<br />

• If the <strong>State</strong> allows<br />

bidders to submit this<br />

alternate language,<br />

where should the<br />

language be placed?<br />

20 L.3 L-6 to L-14 It does not appear that<br />

any part <strong>of</strong> Attachment L<br />

“Contract Terms and<br />

Conditions” should be<br />

Per addendum #1 section titled<br />

Cloud/Hosting Requirements,<br />

"to properly complete the terms<br />

and conditions and technical<br />

Page 15 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

submitted with the<br />

proposal.<br />

Should we then assume<br />

that the section called<br />

“<strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Delaware</strong> Cloud<br />

and Offsite Hosting<br />

Specific Terms and<br />

Conditions” (which<br />

includes a column for<br />

Vendor’s<br />

Acknowledgement)<br />

should be completed by<br />

the winning vendor<br />

following contract award<br />

(and not submitted with<br />

bidder proposals)?<br />

requirements located in section<br />

L.3 complete the Vendor’s<br />

Acknowledgement section as<br />

follows..." this must be included<br />

with the proposal and clearly<br />

identified.<br />

Page 16 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

21 Attach<br />

ment U<br />

U-1 Attachment U-1 is called<br />

the “Deliverable<br />

Acceptance Request<br />

Form.” It appears in the<br />

midst <strong>of</strong> a series <strong>of</strong><br />

forms that must be<br />

completed and<br />

submitted with the<br />

proposal. However,<br />

after searching the RFP,<br />

we can’t find any<br />

requirement to submit<br />

this form with the<br />

proposal or where to<br />

place it.<br />

Please clarify: Should<br />

Attachment U be<br />

submitted with the<br />

proposal, or is it<br />

provided for<br />

informational purposes<br />

only?<br />

If Attachment U should<br />

be submitted with the<br />

This is a standard deliverable<br />

acceptance template that can<br />

be used to sign <strong>of</strong>f on<br />

deliverables in attachment E.<br />

Bidders can choose to develop<br />

their own but must be approved<br />

by the state.<br />

Page 17 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

proposal, please tell<br />

bidders where to place<br />

it.<br />

22 Attach<br />

ment S<br />

S-2 Attachment S is the<br />

Office <strong>of</strong> Minority and<br />

Women Business<br />

Enterprise Certification<br />

Tracking Form.<br />

If the Prime Contractor is<br />

not a Minority or<br />

Women Business<br />

Enterprise, does the<br />

Prime need to submit<br />

this form with its<br />

proposal?<br />

If not, should the Prime<br />

The Minority and Women<br />

Business Enterprise tracking<br />

form is no longer used by DHSS.<br />

Completion <strong>of</strong> this form is no<br />

longer a mandatory<br />

requirement in this proposal.<br />

The Office <strong>of</strong> Minority and<br />

Women Business Enterprise has<br />

been changed to Office <strong>of</strong><br />

Supplier Diversity. Any vendor<br />

seeking more information<br />

should visit<br />

http://gss.omb.delaware.gov/os<br />

Page 18 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

provide a statement in<br />

place <strong>of</strong> Attachment S<br />

explaining that they are<br />

not a Minority or<br />

Women Business<br />

Enterprise?<br />

If the Prime Contractor is<br />

not a minority but has<br />

minorities on the bid<br />

team as subcontractors,<br />

do those subcontractors<br />

need to complete the<br />

form?<br />

d/index.shtml.<br />

23 5.2.14.<br />

4<br />

25 The third position in<br />

section “5.2.14.4 Named<br />

Staff for Core Fiscal<br />

Agent Operations” is the<br />

Deputy Account<br />

Manager.<br />

However, Attachment N<br />

does not include an<br />

entry for this position<br />

with Qualifications,<br />

As per the tasks <strong>of</strong> the Deputy<br />

Project Manager on page N-4<br />

this position moves to Deputy<br />

Account Manager during the<br />

operations project phase. This<br />

is a named staff.<br />

Page 19 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

Roles and<br />

Responsibilities, and<br />

Tasks.<br />

Does the <strong>State</strong> intend for<br />

the Deputy Account<br />

Manager to be a Named<br />

Staff, with resume in the<br />

proposal?<br />

24 1.5 3 The instructions in<br />

Section 1.5 tell Bidders<br />

that they must submit a<br />

signed Non-Disclosure<br />

Agreement in order to<br />

gain access to the<br />

procurement library and<br />

its documentation.<br />

To whom should bidders<br />

submit this Non-<br />

Disclosure Agreement?<br />

25 L.1.3 L-2 In Attachment L, section<br />

L.1.3 Contract Term<br />

(page L-2), the<br />

paragraph on the top <strong>of</strong><br />

See response to question<br />

number 7.<br />

Yes, the contract end date<br />

including the 6 extensions<br />

would be June 30, 2027. Yes,<br />

the state will execute<br />

Page 20 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

page L-2 states, “The<br />

term <strong>of</strong> this contract is<br />

for twenty-nine (29)<br />

months <strong>of</strong> DDI and 5<br />

years <strong>of</strong> Fiscal Agent (FA)<br />

operations with 6<br />

extensions. Any contract<br />

awarded hereunder shall<br />

commence on or about<br />

January 2, 2014, or date<br />

<strong>of</strong> award if later, and<br />

shall remain in effect<br />

through June 30, 2024. .<br />

.”<br />

Attachment K (Cost<br />

Proposal) agrees with<br />

this statement,<br />

requesting pricing for<br />

DDI pricing (in Pricing<br />

Schedule B and Pricing<br />

Schedule D) and pricing<br />

for 5 years <strong>of</strong> Fiscal<br />

Agent base year<br />

operations (in Pricing<br />

amendments for the optional<br />

year extensions. The last<br />

sentence <strong>of</strong> L.1.3 should sate,<br />

"Assuming this contract runs the<br />

eleven full years and all annual<br />

extensions are used, the<br />

contract end date would be<br />

June 30, 2027."<br />

Page 21 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

Schedule C and Pricing<br />

Schedule E).<br />

By adding the 6<br />

extension years to the 3<br />

years <strong>of</strong> DDI and the 5<br />

base years <strong>of</strong> operations,<br />

the contract end date<br />

would by June 30, 2027<br />

(not 2024).<br />

Which is correct: a<br />

contract end date on<br />

June 30, 2027, or are<br />

there only 3 extension<br />

years?<br />

For the optional<br />

extension years, will the<br />

<strong>State</strong> execute each<br />

optional year through a<br />

contract amendment?<br />

26 Attach<br />

ment V<br />

V-1 Whose name and<br />

signature shall we<br />

include on Attachment<br />

V? As our company’s<br />

Whomever can commit the<br />

company<br />

Page 22 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

lead representative on<br />

this procurement, should<br />

it be me, or should it be<br />

the president <strong>of</strong> our<br />

company, who will<br />

ultimately be submitting<br />

and be responsible for<br />

our bid?<br />

27 Cover<br />

page<br />

The RFP indicates that<br />

further information re<br />

Specifications and<br />

Administrative<br />

Procedure for the Letter<br />

<strong>of</strong> Interest can be<br />

obtained from your<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice. Any guidance is<br />

welcomed.<br />

28 2.1 5 There appears to be an<br />

inconsistency in the<br />

version <strong>of</strong> the RFP I am<br />

reading regarding the<br />

deadline for submission<br />

<strong>of</strong> questions. Page 5,<br />

Per RFP, specifications and<br />

administration procedures may<br />

be obtained at the above <strong>of</strong>fice<br />

or phone (302) 255-9290.<br />

See question 5<br />

Page 23 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

Section 2.1 “Submission<br />

<strong>of</strong> Questions” indicates<br />

4:30PM on July 1, 2013,<br />

while page 12, Section<br />

5.1.4 shows May 31,<br />

2013. Can you please<br />

clarify?<br />

29 1.5 3 Per the mention <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Procurement Library on<br />

page 3, we would like to<br />

schedule an onsite visit.<br />

What is your availability<br />

this week?<br />

30 IV&V Can you tell me where I<br />

can find HSS-13-103, the<br />

IV&V RFP which is<br />

referenced in the DMES<br />

RFP?<br />

31 IV&V Is the IV&V procurement<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the DMES<br />

procurement? Do we<br />

need to submit a letter<br />

No on site visit is necessary, the<br />

Procurement Library will be<br />

provided in electronic format at<br />

the bidders conferences.<br />

See response to question #1<br />

See response to question #1<br />

Page 24 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

<strong>of</strong> intent to be eligible to<br />

bid on the IV&V<br />

contractor RFP? Where<br />

will the answers be<br />

published?<br />

32 Attach<br />

ment S<br />

33 Attach<br />

ment S<br />

34 Attach<br />

ment S<br />

S-2 Does the <strong>State</strong> have a<br />

registration for WBE-SBE<br />

firms who are interested<br />

in partnering up with the<br />

systems integrators who<br />

will most likely be prime<br />

contractors<br />

S-2 Is such a list <strong>of</strong> potential<br />

sub-contractors<br />

provided to the systems<br />

integrators who attend<br />

the pre-bid meeting?<br />

S-2 Do WBE-SBE firms who<br />

would only have a subcontracting<br />

role in any<br />

response to this<br />

Yes, please visit<br />

http://gss.omb.delaware.gov/os<br />

d/index.shtml<br />

No, vendors wishing to attain<br />

any information regarding WM/<br />

SBE may visit the Office <strong>of</strong><br />

Supplier Diversity page on the<br />

link provided for Supplier<br />

Diversity contact information.<br />

No<br />

Page 25 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

solicitation, have to<br />

attend the mandatory<br />

pre-bid meeting?<br />

35 Attach<br />

ment S<br />

S-2 Does the <strong>State</strong> have an<br />

expectation <strong>of</strong> a portion<br />

<strong>of</strong> the ensuing contract<br />

being set aside for<br />

minority-owned<br />

businesses? If yes, how<br />

much?<br />

36 1.5 I also wanted to alert<br />

you <strong>of</strong> our intent to<br />

request the<br />

Procurement Library<br />

materials on a Digital<br />

Versatile Disk (DVD-R)<br />

referenced in the RFP<br />

section highlighted<br />

below. As our two<br />

representatives will be in<br />

New Castle on the 14th I<br />

was wondering if we<br />

could prepare to arrange<br />

No<br />

See response to question # 1<br />

Page 26 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

for delivery <strong>of</strong> said disk<br />

to them at that time.<br />

37 Attach<br />

ment L<br />

L-43 In Attachment L: section<br />

L.7.2.19 Item 5 states:<br />

General Maintenance<br />

tasks include the best<br />

practices adopted by the<br />

Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Technology and<br />

Information (DTI),<br />

through the Technology<br />

and Architecture<br />

Standards Committee<br />

(TASC). The Contractor<br />

will develop solutions<br />

using architecture,<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware, and hardware<br />

deemed to be in a<br />

Standard or Acceptable<br />

category by DTI. When<br />

Yes<br />

Page 27 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

an architecture,<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware, or hardware is<br />

moved to a category <strong>of</strong><br />

discontinue the<br />

Contractor must develop<br />

a plan to move to a<br />

solution considered<br />

Standard. DHSS expects<br />

contractors to monitor<br />

the applicable sections<br />

<strong>of</strong> DTI Enterprise<br />

Standards and Policies<br />

website and maintain<br />

these standards<br />

throughout the life <strong>of</strong><br />

the contract. These<br />

standards are applicable<br />

to all Information<br />

Technology use<br />

throughout the <strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Delaware</strong>.<br />

When an architecture,<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware, or hardware is<br />

moved to a category <strong>of</strong><br />

Page 28 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

discontinue the<br />

Contractor must develop<br />

a plan to move to a<br />

solution considered<br />

Standard. Since a move<br />

to a new and presently<br />

unknown architecture,<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware, or hardware<br />

may be costly will the<br />

<strong>State</strong> allow the<br />

contractor plan to<br />

include pricing for said<br />

move?<br />

38 L.6 L-25 With respect to<br />

fingerprinting as a part<br />

<strong>of</strong> background checks,<br />

will you allow the vendor<br />

to utilize and leverage<br />

your vendor and process<br />

for your employees for<br />

fingerprint checks?<br />

Further, what do you do<br />

in the case where an<br />

It is mandatory<br />

Page 29 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

employee refuses to<br />

allow for fingerprints to<br />

be taken?<br />

39 L.6 L-25 Regarding fingerprinting,<br />

are you looking to follow<br />

a <strong>Delaware</strong> law<br />

requirement and if so,<br />

can you provide a legal<br />

citation?<br />

This is an agency requirement<br />

40 Attach<br />

ment C<br />

41 Attach<br />

ment B<br />

C-20 This question is related<br />

to the following<br />

requirement:<br />

“GTT142 -<br />

Degree <strong>of</strong> customization<br />

for proposed s<strong>of</strong>tware to<br />

meet <strong>State</strong> needs cannot<br />

exceed 15%.”<br />

How will this be<br />

calculated or measured?<br />

B-24 There are several<br />

inconsistencies in RFP<br />

See narrative <strong>of</strong> section 3.13 <strong>of</strong><br />

DMES RFP<br />

Please address the schedule due<br />

dates as indicated however the<br />

Page 30 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

requirements related to<br />

the project schedule for<br />

the replacement MMIS<br />

project.<br />

Throughout Attachment<br />

B – <strong>State</strong>ment <strong>of</strong> Work, a<br />

table is used to denote<br />

deliverables and<br />

information related to<br />

each deliverable, such as<br />

Due Date. For most <strong>of</strong><br />

the deliverables, there is<br />

no specified due date.<br />

For a select few<br />

deliverables, there is a<br />

specified due date. For<br />

example, in section<br />

B.1.17.6 Deliverables,<br />

there is a table that<br />

shows Acceptance Test<br />

Results and Operational<br />

Readiness Test Results<br />

are due by Month 20 <strong>of</strong><br />

the new contract.<br />

entire project plan will be<br />

negotiated with the <strong>State</strong> prior<br />

to contract signature.<br />

Page 31 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

42 Attach<br />

ment D<br />

D-7 “Coordinating Legacy<br />

and DMES updates<br />

Modifications, changes,<br />

and updates are made<br />

through a process <strong>of</strong><br />

Change Control (CC)<br />

requests. As <strong>of</strong> the start<br />

date <strong>of</strong> this Contract,<br />

there will be an existing<br />

workload <strong>of</strong> CC requests<br />

that will be applied to<br />

the legacy DE MMIS by<br />

the current contractor.<br />

As new change orders<br />

for the legacy MMIS are<br />

implemented, the DMES<br />

Contractor must<br />

participate in the Change<br />

Control Board (CCB)<br />

meetings with the <strong>State</strong><br />

and incumbent Fiscal<br />

Agent (FA) to determine<br />

if the changes in the<br />

legacy system include<br />

Changes in scope to add or<br />

subtract functionality are<br />

normally done through contract<br />

amendments. Change request<br />

costs are done at that time.<br />

Page 32 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

new business and<br />

technical functionality<br />

that were not<br />

communicated in the<br />

requirements for the<br />

new DMES.<br />

How does a bidder<br />

propose costs for<br />

potential changes that<br />

will be identified after<br />

the new contract is<br />

executed? Will this work<br />

be billed under a<br />

contract amendment for<br />

modifications or<br />

enhancements above<br />

and beyond the fixedprice<br />

contract to install<br />

and configure the<br />

MMIS? When will this<br />

work need to be<br />

completed?<br />

Page 33 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

43 C.3.3 C-7 Each row on this table<br />

indicates two reference<br />

numbers. For example:<br />

“GTT003 and GTT132,”<br />

with a narrative<br />

description <strong>of</strong> “A<br />

modern relational<br />

database management<br />

system must be used”<br />

In this example, the<br />

second reference<br />

GTT132 appears<br />

elsewhere in the RFP in<br />

Section C.3.11 Record<br />

Retention requirements.<br />

GTT003 and GTT132<br />

appear to be unrelated<br />

to one another.<br />

This issue is repeated<br />

throughout the table in<br />

section C.3.3 and<br />

appears to be a<br />

formatting issue. Can the<br />

<strong>State</strong> clarify which<br />

The proper references for C.3.3<br />

Data Quality Control are as<br />

follows: GTT132, GTT133,<br />

GTT134, GTT135, GTT136,<br />

GTT137, GTT138, GTT139,<br />

GTT140, GTT141, GTT142,<br />

GTT143, GTT144, GTT145,<br />

GTT146<br />

Page 34 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

identifier is correct?<br />

44 L.3 L-12 The RFP section L.3 <strong>State</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Delaware</strong> Cloud and<br />

Offsite Hosting Specific<br />

Terms and Conditions,<br />

Item 20, states that the<br />

Service Provider shall<br />

ensure that the <strong>State</strong>’s<br />

Recovery Time Objective<br />

(RTO) <strong>of</strong> 24 hours is met.<br />

Based on the level <strong>of</strong> severity<br />

the vendor is free to propose<br />

what they think is the most<br />

appropriate RTO for their<br />

solution however this will be<br />

negotiated with the <strong>State</strong>.<br />

A 24-hour RTO is entirely<br />

feasible, but it requires<br />

disaster recovery<br />

equipment that is in a<br />

Page 35 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

continuous state <strong>of</strong><br />

readiness. A 72-hour<br />

RTO would reduce costs<br />

associated with<br />

dedicated or ‘warm’<br />

backup site equipment<br />

and continuous<br />

operations to sustain<br />

production volumes.<br />

Will the <strong>State</strong> consider a<br />

greater RTO; up to 72<br />

hours for recovery time?<br />

45 Attach<br />

ment B<br />

B-24 There are several<br />

inconsistencies in RFP<br />

requirements related to<br />

the project schedule for<br />

the replacement MMIS<br />

project.<br />

Throughout Attachment<br />

B – <strong>State</strong>ment <strong>of</strong> Work, a<br />

table is used to denote<br />

deliverables and<br />

Please address the schedule due<br />

dates as indicated however the<br />

entire project plan will be<br />

negotiated with the <strong>State</strong> prior<br />

to contract signature.<br />

Page 36 <strong>of</strong> 37


REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. HSS-13-012<br />

DELAWARE MEDICAID ENTERPRISE SYSTEM PROCUREMENT<br />

<strong>Addendum</strong> #3<br />

Question<br />

#<br />

RFP<br />

Section<br />

Document<br />

Page<br />

Number<br />

Vendor Questions<br />

DHSS Response<br />

information related to<br />

each deliverable, such as<br />

Due Date. For most <strong>of</strong><br />

the deliverables, there is<br />

no specified due date.<br />

For a select few<br />

deliverables, there is a<br />

specified due date. For<br />

example, in section<br />

B.1.17.6 Deliverables,<br />

there is a table that<br />

shows Acceptance Test<br />

Results and Operational<br />

Readiness Test Results<br />

are due by Month 20 <strong>of</strong><br />

the new contract.<br />

Page 37 <strong>of</strong> 37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!