14.07.2014 Views

Russian Nuclear Weapons: Past, Present, and Future

Russian Nuclear Weapons: Past, Present, and Future

Russian Nuclear Weapons: Past, Present, and Future

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RUSSIAN MILITARY DOCTRINE 2010:<br />

“STRATEGIC DISCONNECT”<br />

The long awaited new <strong>Russian</strong> military doctrine,<br />

first mooted by the then President Vladimir Putin in<br />

the spring of 2005 <strong>and</strong> intended to replace its previous<br />

version in 2000, was finally signed by President<br />

Medvedev on February 5, 2010. 46 Although western<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> analysts focused their speculation on the<br />

nuclear elements of the doctrine, there was no explicit<br />

move toward lowering the nuclear threshold, though<br />

as many noted there can be no certainty on the issue<br />

since further detail on the nuclear posture was contained<br />

a classified addendum (The Foundations of State<br />

Policy in the Area of <strong>Nuclear</strong> Deterrence to 2020). The<br />

military doctrine, tactically released during the ongoing<br />

START negotiations <strong>and</strong> s<strong>and</strong>wiched between the<br />

publication of the U.S. Quadrennial Defense Review <strong>and</strong><br />

the 46th Munich Security Conference, appeared balanced,<br />

encapsulating a compromise between hawks<br />

<strong>and</strong> doves <strong>and</strong> really offering something in its text for<br />

everyone, avoiding being either too provocative or<br />

controversial. Little in its content fitted with the image<br />

of a “resurgent Russia.” 47<br />

Nonetheless, as many <strong>Russian</strong> analysts <strong>and</strong> commentators<br />

noted, the doctrine is remarkable for a<br />

number of less positive reasons. First, <strong>and</strong> perhaps<br />

most striking, it bears no resemblance to the new look<br />

armed forces. In fact, it is quite the opposite since it<br />

is almost entirely divergent from the actual ongoing<br />

military reform. 48 The gap between official theory <strong>and</strong><br />

practice is therefore staggering by any rational measurement.<br />

Moreover, the doctrine occasionally contradicts<br />

the May 2009 National Security Strategy (NSS) <strong>and</strong><br />

54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!