14.07.2014 Views

Russian Nuclear Weapons: Past, Present, and Future

Russian Nuclear Weapons: Past, Present, and Future

Russian Nuclear Weapons: Past, Present, and Future

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

44. See George Perkovich, “After Prague: What’s Next<br />

for Arms Control?” International Herald Tribune, April 7, 2010,<br />

available from www.carnegieendowment.org/publications/index.<br />

cfm?fa=view&id=40532.<br />

45. On Iran’s progress toward the capability for nuclear weaponization<br />

<strong>and</strong> related issues, see Iran’s <strong>Nuclear</strong> <strong>and</strong> Missile Potential:<br />

A Joint Threat Assessment by U.S. <strong>and</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> Technical Experts,<br />

New York: East-West Institute, May 2009, available from www.<br />

ewi.info; <strong>and</strong> “Iran’s <strong>Nuclear</strong> Timetable,” Iran Watch, updated February<br />

23, 2010, <strong>and</strong> regularly, available from www.iranwatch.org/<br />

ourpubs/articles/iranucleartimetable.html. For possible scenarios if<br />

diplomacy fails, see Anthony Cordesman, Iran, Israel <strong>and</strong> the Effects<br />

of a <strong>Nuclear</strong> Conflict in the Middle East, Washington, DC: Center<br />

for Strategic <strong>and</strong> International Studies, June 1, 2009, esp. pp.<br />

5-8 <strong>and</strong> 32-46. On North Korea, see Leon V. Sigal, “Let’s Make<br />

a Deal,” The American Interest Magazine, January-February 2010,<br />

available from the-american-interest.com/article-bd.cfm?piece=767;<br />

<strong>and</strong> Andrew Scobell <strong>and</strong> John M. Sanford, North Korea’s Military<br />

Threat: Pyongyang’s Conventional Forces, <strong>Weapons</strong> of Mass Destruction,<br />

<strong>and</strong> Ballistic Missiles, Carlisle, PA: U.S. Army War College,<br />

Strategic Studies Institute, April 2007.<br />

46. Henry Sokolski, “Moving Toward Zero <strong>and</strong> Armageddon?”<br />

Chap. 5, in Sokolski, ed., Reviewing the <strong>Nuclear</strong> Nonproliferation<br />

Treaty, Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army<br />

War College, May 2010, pp. 77-101, citation from p. 87.<br />

47. For possible dangers <strong>and</strong> pathways to nuclear first use, see<br />

George H. Quester, <strong>Nuclear</strong> First Strike: Consequences of a Broken<br />

Taboo, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006. On<br />

the concept of a nuclear taboo, see Nina Tannenwald, The <strong>Nuclear</strong><br />

Taboo: The United States <strong>and</strong> the Non-Use of <strong>Nuclear</strong> <strong>Weapons</strong> Since<br />

1945, Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007, esp. pp.<br />

327-360.<br />

48. See Graham Allison, <strong>Nuclear</strong> Terrorism: The Ultimate Preventable<br />

Catastrophe, New York: Henry Holt, Times Books, 2004,<br />

pp. 61-63.<br />

49. For informative discussion on this point, see Blank, Russia<br />

<strong>and</strong> Arms Control; <strong>and</strong> Joseph Cirincione, Bomb Scare: The History<br />

456

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!