14.07.2014 Views

Russian Nuclear Weapons: Past, Present, and Future

Russian Nuclear Weapons: Past, Present, and Future

Russian Nuclear Weapons: Past, Present, and Future

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2010 AND INTO THE FUTURE<br />

The new, third <strong>Russian</strong> Military Doctrine, which<br />

ushered in yet another turn in the role of nuclear<br />

weapons, was revealed in February 2010. 23 Work on<br />

that document was launched by a special conference<br />

convened at the <strong>Russian</strong> Academy of Military Sciences<br />

in January 2007. Speakers at that meeting, including<br />

then-Chief of General Staff Yuri Baluyevskii, agreed<br />

that nuclear weapons would still play a central role in<br />

Russia’s security, but the overall tone suggested that<br />

the nuclear component of the 2000 Doctrine would<br />

remain unchanged; attention focused instead on the<br />

upcoming reforms <strong>and</strong> modernization of general-purpose<br />

forces. 24<br />

Quite unexpectedly, however, the nuclear section<br />

of the draft became a contested issue in the months<br />

preceding its release <strong>and</strong> was perhaps one of the reasons<br />

for multiple delays (it was initially scheduled to<br />

be released in the fall of 2009). In an interview in October<br />

2009, Secretary of the Security Council Nikolai<br />

Patrushev indicated that the future document might<br />

assign nuclear weapons to yet one more type of war—<br />

”local conflicts.” 25 This would have represented a<br />

massive expansion of the role of nuclear weapons:<br />

whereas the 1993 Doctrine assigned them to “global<br />

wars,” <strong>and</strong> the 2000 one added “regional wars,” the<br />

further expansion described by Patrushev would have<br />

assigned them to conflicts similar to the 2008 war with<br />

Georgia.<br />

In the end, however, the trend set by the new<br />

Doctrine was opposite to what Patrushev described.<br />

Instead of further exp<strong>and</strong>ing the role of nuclear weapons,<br />

it somewhat reduced it by tightening conditions<br />

209

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!