12.07.2014 Views

A Separate Peace Essay Prompt and Rubric_ 2010

A Separate Peace Essay Prompt and Rubric_ 2010

A Separate Peace Essay Prompt and Rubric_ 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SMCHS ENGLISH DEPARTMENT WRITING RUBRIC<br />

SMCHS Graduates will be: Spiritual - People of Faith, Intellectual - Skilled Lifelong Learners,<br />

Physical - Healthy Individuals, Social & Moral - Involved Citizens of the World<br />

Student: ________________________________________ Date: _____________ Class: English 2- Ms. Ayoub<br />

<strong>Essay</strong> Requirements:<br />

A <strong>Separate</strong> <strong>Peace</strong> <strong>Essay</strong><br />

1. Contain a minimum of 5 paragraphs<br />

2. Contain a minimum of 2 concrete details per body paragraph<br />

3. Each body paragraph must include at least two sentences of analysis<br />

4. All sources must be primary (text), must be properly cited, per MLA.<br />

4. All MLA formatting must be used (margins, heading, spacing, Works Cited, etc.).<br />

Topics:<br />

You may choose your own topic. Some themes we have discussed in class include: Counterpoints: war vs.<br />

peace; innocence vs. maturity; conformity vs. rebellion; illusion (or appearance) vs. reality; reality vs. memory;<br />

<strong>and</strong> the characters of Gene <strong>and</strong> Finny as opposites. Others: coming of age (loss of innocence); denial;<br />

reflection; conscious <strong>and</strong> guilt; change under crisis; shadow (doppelganger).<br />

It is also recommended that you bring in other literature we have read so far this year to support your thesis.<br />

There are definite connections between A <strong>Separate</strong> <strong>Peace</strong> <strong>and</strong> Lord of the Flies in terms of shadow; opposite<br />

characters, innocence vs. maturity; conscious <strong>and</strong> guilt; change under crisis; <strong>and</strong> coming of age. The choice is<br />

up to you.<br />

Structure: (please look at the essay structure h<strong>and</strong>out I gave you for LOF)<br />

1. Make sure you include a hook, précis (short summary of literary work), <strong>and</strong> a clear thesis that sets up the<br />

topics of your 3 (minimum) body paragraphs.<br />

2. Body paragraphs must use primary source (text) quotations for some of the concrete details. Other<br />

concrete details may be paraphrases of actual events in the literature.<br />

3. Your conclusion should tie in back to your hook <strong>and</strong> introduction <strong>and</strong> summarize your analysis. No new<br />

information or primary source quotes – all commentary.<br />

Timeline:<br />

1. Your rough draft is due on Monday, October 25, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>and</strong> is worth 20 points.<br />

2. You must turn in your essay to turnitin.com no later than Thursday, October 28 11:59 p.m.<br />

3. Your final essay (hard copy) is due on Thursday October 28 th whether you have my class or not.<br />

The <strong>Essay</strong> is worth 100 points.


SMCHS ENGLISH DEPARTMENT WRITING RUBRIC<br />

SMCHS Graduates will be: Spiritual - People of Faith, Intellectual - Skilled Lifelong Learners,<br />

Physical - Healthy Individuals, Social & Moral - Involved Citizens of the World<br />

Use the following rubric to assess the assignment:<br />

SCORING 5 4.<br />

5<br />

Argument<br />

Application: Does the writing have an argumentative thesis that responds to the prompt?<br />

Analysis: Is the argument divided into logical parts? Are provoking questions addressed <strong>and</strong> terms defined?<br />

Synthesis: Are the parts related to the whole with an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the big picture evident?<br />

Evaluation: Are opinions presented in arguable fashion? Are judgments made? Is a thrust proposed?<br />

Development<br />

Evidence: Are specific, concrete details presented? Are the concrete details accurate <strong>and</strong> true?<br />

Accuracy: Are the concrete details introduced/blended accurately?<br />

Relevance: Is the evidence relevant to the argument <strong>and</strong> the relevance explained? Does it validate the thrust<br />

of the argument?<br />

Substance: Is enough evidence presented to validate the thrust of the argument?<br />

Organization<br />

Unity & Coherence: Does all of the writing center on the argument?<br />

Order: Are the argument <strong>and</strong> evidence arranged in the most convincing/appropriate order?<br />

Structure: Are introduction, thesis, body paragraphs, <strong>and</strong> conclusion constructed appropriately? Are<br />

paragraphs introduced, maintained, <strong>and</strong> concluded?<br />

Presentation: Are symmetry, parallel structure, transitions, <strong>and</strong> variation employed effectively? Is<br />

the word count/length of the writing appropriate to the argument <strong>and</strong> the prompt?<br />

Expression<br />

Style: Is the style appropriate to the assignment – formal, informal, scholarly, personal, or creative?<br />

Voice: Is a recognizable identity present? Is the audience understood? Is the tone appropriate?<br />

Diction & Language: Are the most effective words chosen? Is rhetorical or figurative language<br />

employed appropriately?<br />

Clarity: Is the writing clear, active, readable, <strong>and</strong> appropriately concise?<br />

Conventions<br />

Diction & Spelling: Are words spelled correctly?<br />

Grammar & Usage: Are person, tense, subject/verb agreement, <strong>and</strong> subordination used<br />

appropriately? Are words <strong>and</strong> phrases used according to custom?<br />

Mechanics & Punctuation: Is sentence construction sound? Is punctuation correctly applied?<br />

MLA: Is the proper formatting applied to font, margins, spacing, citations, etc.?<br />

4<br />

3.<br />

5<br />

3 2 1<br />

Rationale for numeric values:<br />

5 Skill or element applied subtly, sophisticatedly, <strong>and</strong> with superior insight <strong>and</strong> complexity.<br />

4.5 Skill or element applied with greater competence <strong>and</strong> with greater insight <strong>and</strong> complexity but lacking the distinction of a 5.<br />

4 Skill or element applied with greater competence <strong>and</strong> with greater insight <strong>and</strong> complexity but lacking the distinction of a 5.<br />

3.5 Skill or element applied competently.<br />

3 Skill or element applied approaching competence.<br />

2 Little evidence of skill or element applied.<br />

1 Lacking evidence of skill or element applied; too brief to evaluate.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!