PolyOne 2009 Annual Report

PolyOne 2009 Annual Report PolyOne 2009 Annual Report

11.07.2014 Views

Description Income Taxes • We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. In addition, deferred tax assets are also recorded with respect to net operating losses and other tax attribute carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Valuation allowances are established when realization of the benefit of deferred tax assets is not deemed to be more likely than not. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. • We recognize net tax benefits under the recognition and measurement criteria of ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes, which prescribes requirements and other guidance for financial statement recognition and measurement of positions taken or expected to be taken on tax returns. We record interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense. Environmental Liabilities • Based upon estimates prepared by our environmental engineers and consultants, we have $81.7 million accrued at December 31, 2009 to cover probable future environmental remediation expenditures. Judgments and Uncertainties • The ultimate recovery of certain of our deferred tax assets is dependent on the amount and timing of taxable income that we will ultimately generate in the future and other factors such as the interpretation of tax laws. This means that significant estimates and judgments are required to determine the extent that valuation allowances should be provided against deferred tax assets. We have provided valuation allowances as of December 31, 2009 aggregating $132.9 million against such assets based on our current assessment of future operating results and these other factors. • This accrual represents our best estimate of the remaining probable remediation costs based upon information and technology currently available and our view of the most likely remedy. Depending upon the results of future testing, the ultimate remediation alternatives undertaken, changes in regulations, new information, newly discovered conditions and other factors; it is reasonably possible that we could incur additional costs in excess of the amount accrued. However, such additional costs, if any, cannot currently be estimated. Our estimate of this liability may be revised as new regulations or technologies are developed or additional information is obtained. Changes during the past five years have primarily resulted from an increase in the estimate of future remediation costs at existing sites and payments made each year for remediation costs that were already accrued. Effect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions • Although management believes that the estimates and judgments discussed herein are reasonable, actual results could differ, which could result in gains or losses that could be material. • If further developments or resolution of these matters are not consistent with our assumptions and judgments, we may need to recognize a significant charge in a future period. POLYONE CORPORATION 30

Description Share-Based Compensation • We have share-based compensation plans that include non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units and stock appreciation rights (SARs). See Note 15, Share-Based Compensation, to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for a complete discussion of our stock-based compensation programs. • We determine the fair value of our SARs granted in 2009 and 2007 based on a Monte Carlo simulation method. For SARs granted during 2008, the option pricing model used was the Black-Scholes method. • We determine the fair value of our marketbased and performance-based nonvested share awards at the date of grant using generally accepted valuation techniques and the average of the high and low grant date market price of our stock. • Management reviews its assumptions and the valuations provided by independent third-party valuation advisors to determine the fair value of share-based compensation awards. Judgments and Uncertainties • Option-pricing models and generally accepted valuation techniques require management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to determine the fair value of our awards. These assumptions and judgments include estimating the future volatility of our stock price, future employee turnover rates and risk-free rate of return. Effect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions • We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to determine share-based compensation expense. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to changes in share-based compensation expense that could be material. New Accounting Pronouncements — Consolidation — In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued new guidance that modifies how a company determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. The new guidance clarifies that the determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an entity’s purpose and design and a company’s ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. A requirement of the new guidance is an ongoing reassessment of whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. Additional disclosures are also required about a company’s involvement in variable interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. The new requirements are effective for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2010. The adoption of this guidance will not materially affect our financial statements. Subsequent Events — In May 2009, the FASB issued new guidance to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The new guidance also requires entities to disclose the date through which subsequent events were evaluated as well as the rationale for the date that was selected and is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. Refer to Note 22, Subsequent Events. Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures — In September 2006, the FASB issued new guidance regarding fair value measurements, which defines fair value, establishes the framework for measuring fair value under U.S. GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. In February 2008, the FASB issued further guidance that delayed the effective date of fair value measurements for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis, to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of this new guidance on January 1, 2009, for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, did not materially affect our financial statements. See Note 19, Fair Value, for information on our assets and liabilities measured at fair value. Business Combinations — In December 2007, the FASB issued new guidance that establishes principles over the method entities use to recognize and measure assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination and enhances disclosures of business combinations. The new guidance is effective for business combinations completed on or after January 1, 2009. The adoption of this new guidance did not materially impact our 2009 financial statements. Refer to Note 20, Business Combinations. Derivatives and Hedging — In March 2008, the FASB issued new guidance that requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2009 did not materially affect our financial statements. Refer to Note 18, Financial Instruments, for information on our derivatives and the required disclosures. POLYONE CORPORATION 31

Description<br />

Income Taxes<br />

• We account for income taxes using the<br />

asset and liability method. Under the asset<br />

and liability method, deferred tax assets<br />

and liabilities are recognized for the<br />

estimated future tax consequences<br />

attributable to differences between the<br />

financial statement carrying amounts of<br />

existing assets and liabilities and their<br />

respective tax bases. In addition, deferred<br />

tax assets are also recorded with respect<br />

to net operating losses and other tax<br />

attribute carryforwards. Deferred tax<br />

assets and liabilities are measured using<br />

enacted tax rates in effect for the year in<br />

which those temporary differences are<br />

expected to be recovered or settled.<br />

Valuation allowances are established when<br />

realization of the benefit of deferred tax<br />

assets is not deemed to be more likely<br />

than not. The effect on deferred tax assets<br />

and liabilities of a change in tax rates is<br />

recognized in income in the period that<br />

includes the enactment date.<br />

• We recognize net tax benefits under the<br />

recognition and measurement criteria of<br />

ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes, which<br />

prescribes requirements and other<br />

guidance for financial statement<br />

recognition and measurement of positions<br />

taken or expected to be taken on tax<br />

returns. We record interest and penalties<br />

related to uncertain tax positions as a<br />

component of income tax expense.<br />

Environmental Liabilities<br />

• Based upon estimates prepared by our<br />

environmental engineers and consultants,<br />

we have $81.7 million accrued at<br />

December 31, <strong>2009</strong> to cover probable<br />

future environmental remediation<br />

expenditures.<br />

Judgments and Uncertainties<br />

• The ultimate recovery of certain of our<br />

deferred tax assets is dependent on the<br />

amount and timing of taxable income that<br />

we will ultimately generate in the future<br />

and other factors such as the<br />

interpretation of tax laws. This means that<br />

significant estimates and judgments are<br />

required to determine the extent that<br />

valuation allowances should be provided<br />

against deferred tax assets. We have<br />

provided valuation allowances as of<br />

December 31, <strong>2009</strong> aggregating $132.9<br />

million against such assets based on our<br />

current assessment of future operating<br />

results and these other factors.<br />

• This accrual represents our best estimate<br />

of the remaining probable remediation<br />

costs based upon information and<br />

technology currently available and our view<br />

of the most likely remedy. Depending upon<br />

the results of future testing, the ultimate<br />

remediation alternatives undertaken,<br />

changes in regulations, new information,<br />

newly discovered conditions and other<br />

factors; it is reasonably possible that we<br />

could incur additional costs in excess of<br />

the amount accrued. However, such<br />

additional costs, if any, cannot currently be<br />

estimated. Our estimate of this liability<br />

may be revised as new regulations or<br />

technologies are developed or additional<br />

information is obtained. Changes during<br />

the past five years have primarily resulted<br />

from an increase in the estimate of future<br />

remediation costs at existing sites and<br />

payments made each year for remediation<br />

costs that were already accrued.<br />

Effect if Actual Results<br />

Differ from Assumptions<br />

• Although management believes that the<br />

estimates and judgments discussed herein<br />

are reasonable, actual results could differ,<br />

which could result in gains or losses that<br />

could be material.<br />

• If further developments or resolution of<br />

these matters are not consistent with our<br />

assumptions and judgments, we may need<br />

to recognize a significant charge in a future<br />

period.<br />

POLYONE CORPORATION<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!