Flora of Dominica, Part 2 - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
Flora of Dominica, Part 2 - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
Flora of Dominica, Part 2 - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
NUMBER 77 5<br />
Sugar Loaf Estate: An estate just across the Indian River<br />
from Portsmouth. Eggers also collected here, e.g., no. 723<br />
(Blepharocalyx eggersii). Other collections are 717 (Connarus<br />
grandiflorus), 753 (Licania leucosepala), and 1084 (Byrsonima<br />
lucida).<br />
ENDEMISM IN DOMINICA<br />
The flora <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dominica</strong> is most similar to that <strong>of</strong> the nearby<br />
French islands, Guadeloupe and Martinique. Several factors<br />
affect supposed endemics <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dominica</strong> and/or the French<br />
islands, new records, changes in taxonomic concepts, and<br />
errors <strong>of</strong> identification or locality.<br />
New records <strong>of</strong> species thought endemic to <strong>Dominica</strong> have<br />
recently been found on the French islands, and species thought<br />
endemic to the French islands have been found on <strong>Dominica</strong>.<br />
The recent publication <strong>of</strong> Fournet (1978) enables one to check<br />
whether or not a given species, supposedly endemic to<br />
<strong>Dominica</strong>, actually is now known on the French islands.<br />
Examples: Gonocalyx smilacifolius (Ericaceae), thought to be<br />
endemic to <strong>Dominica</strong>, has been collected on Guadeloupe.<br />
Oreopanar dussii (Araliaceae), previously thought to be only<br />
on the peaks <strong>of</strong> the French islands, has now been collected on<br />
<strong>Dominica</strong>.<br />
Changing species concepts also affect endemism. As more<br />
specimens become available it becomes possible to recognize<br />
that something that seemed quite distinct, perhaps only known<br />
from one collection in a rather extreme aspect, is only part <strong>of</strong> a<br />
continuous range <strong>of</strong> variation observable when many collections<br />
are studied. Piper dominicanum cannot be maintained as<br />
distinct from the variable and wide-ranging species, Piper<br />
aequale.<br />
An example <strong>of</strong> an error in identification is provided by the<br />
supposed endemic <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dominica</strong> Morisonia imrayi (Capparaceae).<br />
Its type is a misidentified specimen <strong>of</strong> Styrar glaber<br />
(S tyracaceae).<br />
Errors in locality information arise from three sources: (1)<br />
confusing <strong>Dominica</strong> with the <strong>Dominica</strong>n Republic, (2) assumption<br />
<strong>of</strong> occurrence in <strong>Dominica</strong> from published generalized<br />
distribution statements, and (3) mislabeling <strong>of</strong> collections from<br />
the French Islands as from Trinidad.<br />
Confusion between <strong>Dominica</strong> and the <strong>Dominica</strong>n Republic<br />
(on Hispaniola) is occasionally found in monographs and<br />
revisions, i.e., citing an Imray specimen from the <strong>Dominica</strong>n<br />
Republic, when it actually was from <strong>Dominica</strong>. The reverse<br />
rarely occurs, citing <strong>Dominica</strong>n Republic material as if it were<br />
from <strong>Dominica</strong>.<br />
Some questionable records for species on <strong>Dominica</strong> have<br />
been traced to Velez’ compilation (1957), “Herbaceous<br />
Angiosperms <strong>of</strong> the Lesser Antilles.” Most <strong>of</strong> these questionable<br />
records proved to be based on generalized distribution<br />
statements in works like Britton and Wilson’s “<strong>Flora</strong> <strong>of</strong> Port0<br />
Rico” (1923-1925) such as “Anguilla to Barbados.” In such<br />
cases, Velez inserted a B (for Britton) in the column for<br />
<strong>Dominica</strong>. If a confiing specimen was not located, an<br />
arbitrary decision was made for handling the species involved.<br />
It was included if its occurrence on <strong>Dominica</strong> seemed<br />
reasonably probable or it was listed as excluded if its<br />
occurrence seemed improbable.<br />
According to C. Denis Adams (in litt.), there are some sixty<br />
records <strong>of</strong> Trinidad plants that are known only from Sieber “Fl.<br />
TMitatis” specimens and have not been recollected on that<br />
island. Franz Wilhelm Sieber financed collecting trips <strong>of</strong> Franz<br />
Kohaut to Martinique (1819-1821) and Franz Wrbna to<br />
Trinidad (1822) and distributed the specimens, labeling the<br />
former as Fl. Martinicensis and the latter as Fl. Trinitensis<br />
under his own name and numbers. It is supposed that the sixty<br />
anomalous records were actually collected by Kohaut and were<br />
inadvertently mislabeled as “Fl. Trinitatis,” possibly at least<br />
partially involving a confusion with the town <strong>of</strong> La Trinite on<br />
Martinique. Three <strong>of</strong> these are listed in the following list as<br />
restricted to <strong>Dominica</strong> and the French Islands, Rauvolfia<br />
biauriculata, Critonia macropoda, and Marcgravia trinitatis.<br />
The following list was prepared from information available<br />
to me for those interested in endemism involving <strong>Dominica</strong> and<br />
the French Islands. An asterisk (*) denotes a species possibly<br />
rare and endangered; species names in upper case are believed<br />
to be endemics <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dominica</strong>; species known to occur beyond<br />
<strong>Dominica</strong> and the French Islands are not normally included,<br />
unless they seem to be rare. There are a dozen or two species<br />
that also reach Montserrat, St. Lucia, and/or St. Vincent.<br />
Amonoa coriboeo (Euphorbiaceae): carapite, <strong>Dominica</strong> and Guadeloupe.<br />
Anibo romogeono (Lauraceae): <strong>Dominica</strong> and Martinique.<br />
Begoniu obliqua (Begdaceae): common on Guadeloupe to Madnique.<br />
BESLERIA PETIOLARIS (Gesneriaceae): only on <strong>Dominica</strong>, common.<br />
Charionthus corymbosus (Melastomataceae): Guadeloupe to Martinique,<br />
possibly St. Lucia.<br />
CHARIANTHUS PURPUREUS var. RUGOSUS (Melastmataceae): only on<br />
<strong>Dominica</strong>.<br />
*Chiononthus dussii (Oleaceae): supposedly endemic to Martinique but known<br />
from at least one collection from <strong>Dominica</strong>.<br />
CHROMOLAENA IMPETIOLARIS (Asteraceae): only on <strong>Dominica</strong>, at higher<br />
elevations.<br />
CHROMOLAENA MACRODON (Asteraceae): only on <strong>Dominica</strong> but possibly<br />
also on St. Kitts.<br />
Chromoloeno trigonmorpa (Asteraceae): Guadeloupe to Martinique but<br />
possibly elsewhere in the Lesser Antilles.<br />
Clidemio guadalupensk Melastomataceae): Guadeloupe and <strong>Dominica</strong>.<br />
Clusio mangle (Clusiaceae): kaklin, a dominant in peak forests from<br />
Guadeloupe to Mamnique.<br />
*Critoniu mocropoda (Asteraceae): Once recently collected on <strong>Dominica</strong>,<br />
possibly earlier (by Eggen). Also known from NE Martinique. The<br />
attribution <strong>of</strong> the type to Trinidad is believed to be an error.<br />
Duronto stenostochya (Verbenaceae): Martinique and <strong>Dominica</strong>. Foumet said<br />
it was originally from Brazil.<br />
EUGENIA HODGEI (Myaaceae): only on <strong>Dominica</strong> but a dominant in the<br />
Mome Gay area.<br />
Eugenia octopleuro (Myrtaceae): Guadeloupe to Martinique, possibly also in<br />
Central America.<br />
Exostemo sanctoe- lube (Rubiaceae): <strong>Dominica</strong> to St. Vincent.<br />
*Freziero cordato (Theaceae): mountain top from Guadeloupe to Martinique.<br />
Freziero unduloto var. elegans (Theaceae): Guadeloupe to Martinique.