08.07.2014 Views

A Comprehensive Comparison of Lexemes in the ... - SIL International

A Comprehensive Comparison of Lexemes in the ... - SIL International

A Comprehensive Comparison of Lexemes in the ... - SIL International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

23<br />

(27) Kwamera hymn with English translation<br />

Ketaha pam tesagien<br />

Asori te Iesu.<br />

In reiwaiupehe iesa,<br />

Mamabi ketaha.<br />

In ravahi namiseien<br />

Ia nei kamerkwauwi.<br />

In ratagi neten, menwa,<br />

Rahakwi ketaha.<br />

We all rejoice<br />

Greatly about Jesus.<br />

He came here<br />

And had mercy on us.<br />

He has goodness<br />

On <strong>the</strong> cross.<br />

He poured out His blood so that<br />

It cleanses us.<br />

The difference between <strong>the</strong>se two orthographies is not due to different<br />

phonologies but reflects different op<strong>in</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> how <strong>the</strong> sounds <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> various<br />

languages should be represented <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir respective orthographies. Missionaries<br />

who pr<strong>in</strong>ted materials <strong>in</strong> Kwamera were not opposed to us<strong>in</strong>g to show<br />

velarization. However, Lynch and L<strong>in</strong>dstrom used to show velarization<br />

only after and , while after <strong>the</strong>y used .<br />

These early orthographies also set <strong>the</strong> trend for represent<strong>in</strong>g [ŋ] as <br />

and <strong>the</strong> high central unrounded semi-vowel as .<br />

3.1.2 Influence <strong>of</strong> unique phonologies on orthography<br />

The languages <strong>of</strong> Tanna have slightly vary<strong>in</strong>g phonologies. These slight<br />

variations affect decisions about a suitable orthography. For example, dialects <strong>of</strong><br />

Kwamera, SW Tanna, and Vaha employ ei<strong>the</strong>r /r/ or /l/ but not both, while <strong>the</strong><br />

rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> languages <strong>of</strong> Tanna employ both <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se phonemes. The phoneme /f w /<br />

is more common <strong>in</strong> Kwamera than <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r languages and has, <strong>the</strong>refore, at<br />

times been represented <strong>in</strong> Kwamera publications. As shown <strong>in</strong> example (28),<br />

certa<strong>in</strong> dialects—or certa<strong>in</strong> speakers <strong>of</strong> some dialects—regularly pronounce *ti as<br />

[ti] ra<strong>the</strong>r than with an affricate as [tʃi]. Note that for ‘choke,’ Lenakel uses /ti/<br />

whereas Kwamera, SW Tanna, Vaha, and Whitesands use /ji/ (pronounced [tʃi]).<br />

Likewise, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> word for ‘earthworm,’ Lenakel and N Tanna use /ti/ (reduced to<br />

/t/ <strong>in</strong> Lenakel) whereas <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r languages use /ji/.<br />

(28) choke V/TR earthworm N<br />

Kwamera: jiu Kwamera: m̃ əjikəro<br />

Lenakel: tiu Lenakel: m̃ ɨtkələu<br />

N Tanna: armegah N Tanna: m̃ atikəlo<br />

SW Tanna: jiu SW Tanna: m̃ əjikərəu<br />

Vaha: jiu Vaha: m̃ əjikələu<br />

Whitesands: jiu Whitesands: m̃ əjikərəu

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!