08.07.2014 Views

A Comprehensive Comparison of Lexemes in the ... - SIL International

A Comprehensive Comparison of Lexemes in the ... - SIL International

A Comprehensive Comparison of Lexemes in the ... - SIL International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3<br />

Map 1. Map <strong>of</strong> Tanna: Language areas and villages where data was elicited.<br />

Table 1.1. Demographic <strong>in</strong>formation on <strong>the</strong> languages <strong>of</strong> Tanna.†<br />

Language Selfnames Population Village(s) where elicited<br />

Kwamera/South nəfe ‘what’ 3,300–5,000 Yenmarei<br />

Tanna<br />

Lenakel<br />

nɨtuar ‘what’ 8,500– Lonapkiko<br />

(historically) 11,500<br />

N Tanna nɨnakə ‘say what’ 5,000 Lomakaun<br />

SW Tanna naha ‘what’; sipəru 3,500–4,500 Yenemilen, Yenapkasu<br />

‘give it’<br />

Vaha (‘give it’) nəlpai mɨne ‘fat 400–600 Isaka<br />

tribe’<br />

Whitesands narak ‘what’ 5,500–7,500 Loarfi, Loniel<br />

(historically)<br />

†The 2009 census data would have been preferable but was not yet available at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g this<br />

paper. L<strong>in</strong>dstrom (1983:387) argues that nɨtuar (Lenakel selfname) and narak (Whitesands selfname) are<br />

unanalyzable, and that language names without apparent mean<strong>in</strong>g carry less political weight than those<br />

with mean<strong>in</strong>g; hence <strong>the</strong> appearance <strong>of</strong> folk etymologies. He records ano<strong>the</strong>r selfname for SW Tanna, hauap̃ə,<br />

which means ‘come (PL) here.’

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!