3432 ACC Report f/a 1 - Australian Citizenship
3432 ACC Report f/a 1 - Australian Citizenship
3432 ACC Report f/a 1 - Australian Citizenship
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The Council endorses the thrust of the<br />
Committee’s views outlined above. The Council<br />
believes this provision discriminates against<br />
<strong>Australian</strong> Citizens who hold, for various<br />
reasons including accident of birth, another<br />
<strong>Citizenship</strong> in addition to <strong>Australian</strong><br />
<strong>Citizenship</strong>. The fundamental tenet underlying<br />
<strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Citizenship</strong> is that of inclusivity and<br />
full participation in all aspects of <strong>Australian</strong><br />
life. The Council believes that all <strong>Australian</strong><br />
Citizens should be able to stand for Parliament<br />
irrespective of whether they hold another<br />
<strong>Citizenship</strong>. Those who hold another<br />
<strong>Citizenship</strong> are not required by <strong>Australian</strong><br />
<strong>Citizenship</strong> law to renounce their other<br />
<strong>Citizenship</strong>/s when acquiring <strong>Australian</strong><br />
<strong>Citizenship</strong> and, as a general principle,<br />
the Government encourages migrants/new<br />
Citizens to maintain their cultural heritage<br />
whilst living in Australia. Sub-section 44(i)<br />
of the Constitution is therefore at odds with<br />
<strong>Citizenship</strong> law and government policies of<br />
successive governments.<br />
The Council is in accord with the views of both<br />
the Committee and the Government that there<br />
is a need to protect the parliamentary system.<br />
However, it could be argued that the holding of<br />
another <strong>Citizenship</strong> does not of itself mean that<br />
a person would necessarily act in a disloyal<br />
manner. Any <strong>Australian</strong> Citizen whether or not<br />
they hold another <strong>Citizenship</strong> potentially could<br />
have split loyalties or conflict of interests for<br />
various reasons. One circumstance could be<br />
where an <strong>Australian</strong> Citizen who does not<br />
possess another <strong>Citizenship</strong> has commercial<br />
interests in another country. Sub-section 44(i)<br />
as it currently stands assumes that if a person<br />
holds another <strong>Citizenship</strong> there will<br />
automatically be issues of conflict of interests<br />
and divided loyalties. The holding of another<br />
<strong>Citizenship</strong> is perhaps the most obvious way<br />
of alerting others to potential divided loyalty.<br />
However, it would appear that the issue is not<br />
whether a person holds another <strong>Citizenship</strong>,<br />
but rather whether a person might not act in<br />
Australia’s best interests at all times. Therefore,<br />
another measure or identifier relating to<br />
loyalty may need to be found.<br />
The Council supports Recommendation 2<br />
in the report of the Standing Committee on<br />
Legal and Constitutional Affairs, on Aspects of<br />
Section 44 of the <strong>Australian</strong> Constitution,<br />
in particular that there be a requirement for<br />
intending candidates and members of<br />
Parliament to be <strong>Australian</strong> Citizens, but<br />
recommends that further consideration be<br />
given by government to the issue of how to<br />
more appropriately measure ‘undivided loyalty<br />
to Australia’ for intending candidates for<br />
Parliament and members of Parliament.<br />
77