Constructed Action in an Unfamiliar Sign Language Register

More documents

Recommendations

Info

References Fischer, Renate /Kollien, Simon (2006). Constructed action in DGS: Roses Aktions=Fragmente (Teil I). Das Zeichen 72, pp. 96-106. Fischer, Renate /Kollien, Simon (2010). Gibt es Constructed Action in Deutscher Gebärdensprache und in Deutsch (in der Textsorte Bedeutungserklärung)? Das Zeichen 86, pp.502-510. Günther, Hartmut /Ludwig, Otto (Eds.) (1994). Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: ein interdiszipinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung. Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, Vol. 10.1. Berlin: De Gruyter. Hansen, Martje (2005). Verfahren der Markierung semantischer Rollen am Erstaktanten in der Deutschen Gebärdensprache. Doctoral diss., University of Hamburg. Koch, Peter / Oesterreicher, Wulf (1990). Gesprochene Sprache in der Romania: Französisch, Italienisch, Spanisch. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. Liddell, Scott (2003). Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Metzger, Melanie (1995). Constructed action and constructed dialogue in American Sign Language. In Lucas, Ceil (Ed.): Sociolinguistics in Deaf communities, pp. 255-271. Washington D.C.: Gallaudet University Press. Oesterreicher, Wulf (1997). Types of Orality in Text. In Bakker, Egbert / Kahane, Ahuvia (Eds.): Written Voices, Spoken Signs, pp.190-214. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Ong, Walter J. (1985). Orality and Literacy. The Technologizing of the Word. New York: Methuen & Co. Quinto-Pozos, David / Mehta, Sarika / Reynolds, Wanette (2006): The effects of register on the production of an ASL text. Conference poster. Theoretical Issues in Sign Langage Research 9. Florianópolis, Brasil. Quinto-Pozos, David (2007). Why Does Constructed Action Seem Obligatory? An Analysis of “Classifiers” and the Lack of Articulator-Referent Correspondence. Sign Language Studies 7(4), pp. 458-506. Roy, Cynthia. B. (1989). Features of Discourse in an American Sign Language Lecture. In Lucas, Ceil (Ed.): The Sociolinguistics of the Deaf Community, pp. 231-251. San Diego, California: Academic Press.
Acknowledgements CDS (Bristol), esp. Deaf informants and interpreters My supervisors Prof. Renate Fischer & Simon Kollien The workshop organisers and interpreters Thank you for your attention Contact silke.matthes@sign-lang.uni-hamburg.de
Page 1 and 2: Constructed Action in an Unfamiliar
Page 3 and 4: Sociocultural Context: Orality & Li
Page 5 and 6: Sign Languages & Academia • Incre
Page 7 and 8: Conception: Communicative Condition
Page 9 and 10: Immediacy & Distance in Sign Langua
Page 11 and 12: Constructed Action (CA) • The sig
Page 13 and 14: CA as a Functional Discourse Elemen
Page 15 and 16: Example from MSc Dissertation: •
Page 17 and 18: Parallelisation M24a CA / WAIT++ CA
Page 19 and 20: Occurrences of CA MSc dissertation:
Page 21: Conclusion • “Oral” minority

Constructed Action in an Unfamiliar Sign Language Register

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?