06.07.2014 Views

Nicole Roberts MFA Thesis Visual Component Artwork - Savannah ...

Nicole Roberts MFA Thesis Visual Component Artwork - Savannah ...

Nicole Roberts MFA Thesis Visual Component Artwork - Savannah ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Unlike any other major of study, graphic design<br />

education is riddled with countless inconsistencies, from<br />

the trade schools to the liberal art colleges; from the<br />

independent art schools to the university departments<br />

of design. National academic accreditation is not in<br />

demand and professional certification does not exist.<br />

Realistically, a student’s performance in the<br />

professional workplace upon graduation is the only<br />

measurable indicator as to the qualitative success<br />

of pedagogical practices. One of the primary goals<br />

for graphic design curricula is to prepare students<br />

for success in today's professional workplace.<br />

However, with vast curricular variables and<br />

ever-evolving technological advances, students<br />

are left with an opaque definition of what<br />

it truly means to ‘meet industry standards.’<br />

Changing Graphic Design Pedagogy seeks to<br />

clarify this definition by providing a consistent<br />

criterion of professional expectations.<br />

CHANGING GRAPHIC DESIGN PEDAGOGY<br />

scad-atlanta 2010<br />

<strong>MFA</strong> THESIS<br />

a master OF<br />

fine arts thesis by<br />

NICOLE R. ROBERTS<br />

With surveys from leading designers,<br />

professionals, educators, and students, Changing<br />

Graphic Design Pedagogy provides diverse, informative<br />

perspectives that highlight opportunities and formulate<br />

solutions to better prepare students for the heightened<br />

demands of the twenty-first century workplace.<br />

NICOLE R. ROBERTS<br />

Educator Objectives<br />

Student Realities<br />

Professional Expectations<br />

for the<br />

21 ST Century<br />

Wor k p l ace


CHANGING<br />

GRAPHIC<br />

DESIGN<br />

PEDAGOGY<br />

a master of fine arts thesis by<br />

NICOLE R. ROBERTS<br />

i


© 2010<br />

<strong>Nicole</strong> R. <strong>Roberts</strong><br />

nrober24@student.scad.edu<br />

<strong>Savannah</strong> College of Art & Design<br />

Atlanta, Georgia<br />

All Rights Reserved<br />

Special thanks to:<br />

Barry Roseman, <strong>Thesis</strong> Committee Chair<br />

Liset Robinson, Topic Consultant<br />

Stephanie Batcos, Editor<br />

Peter Wong, Advisor<br />

and participants of the research survey<br />

ii


Design is one of the most perplexing pursuits in<br />

which to excel, yet as a profession it is relatively<br />

easy to enter. It requires no accreditation, no<br />

authorization from official institutions. There is no<br />

set body of knowledge that must be mastered by<br />

the practitioners. [Regardless] the designer must<br />

contend with encyclopedic amounts of information,<br />

not limited to any particular idea or form.<br />

Paul Rand<br />

iii


contents<br />

Abstract .................................................................................... 1<br />

Introduction ............................................................................... 2<br />

Fundamental Skills ..................................................................... 6<br />

Creativity .................................................................................. 10<br />

Craft & Technique ..................................................................... 14<br />

Design Discourse ...................................................................... 18<br />

Dexterity in Digital Media ......................................................... 22<br />

Multi-Disciplinary Approach ...................................................... 28<br />

Innovative Business Strategies .................................................... 34<br />

Social Responsibility ................................................................. 40<br />

<strong>Visual</strong>izing Curricular Concepts ................................................. 46<br />

Conclusion ............................................................................... 62<br />

Bibliography ............................................................................ 64<br />

About the Author ...................................................................... 67<br />

About Survey Participants ......................................................... 68<br />

v


Craft continues to be a big part of<br />

design today, but what’s changing<br />

is the movement outward. Design<br />

is becoming less inwardly directed<br />

and more socially directed.<br />

Ellen Lupton<br />

vi


abstract<br />

Leading professionals learn to adapt quickly as technology<br />

and globalization continue to change how we consume<br />

graphic design. All too frequently, it is the collegiate<br />

design schools that are slow to respond to this continuous<br />

learning curve. Unlike any other major of study, graphic<br />

design education is riddled with countless variables and<br />

lacking professional certification to ensure the proficiency<br />

of its graduates. Realistically, a student’s performance<br />

in the professional workplace upon graduation is the<br />

only measurable indicator as to the qualitative success of<br />

pedagogical practices. Expectations of new graduates are<br />

defined by leading professionals in terms of (1) creativity,<br />

(2) craft and technique, (3) design discourse, (4) digital<br />

media, (5) multi-disciplinary approaches, (6) innovative<br />

business strategies, and (7) social responsibility. By aligning<br />

professional expectations with student realities, educators<br />

will be able to better visualize current curricular objectives<br />

and initiate an informed future of pedagogical change that<br />

ensures more competent graduates for the twenty-first<br />

century workplace.<br />

1


introduction<br />

The curriculum for the Bauhaus<br />

School in Weimar, Germany<br />

combined coursework derived<br />

from architectural programs, crafts<br />

schools, and academies of the arts.<br />

2


introduction<br />

Since William A. Dwiggins first coined it in 1922, the term ‘graphic design’ has<br />

witnessed a definitive expansion from its origins of exclusively printed communications.<br />

Its perception has evolved from a mere craftsman’s trade to a multifarious “professional<br />

craft, strategic tool and vital cultural force.” 1 How we perceive design has evolved<br />

in tandem with the expeditious advancements in communicative technology and the<br />

globalization of business in a continual expansion. Twenty-first century graphic design<br />

is no longer a luxury commissioned by billion dollar conglomerations, or exclusively<br />

found tucked away in highbrow museum galleries. Design is now a household term<br />

for the average consumer, however loosely understood. With this increased public<br />

awareness comes increased public demand. Leading professionals learn to adapt quickly<br />

in the field, continually learning and implementing new methods and technologies as<br />

consumer demands arise. All too frequently, it is the collegiate design schools that are<br />

slow to respond to this continuous learning curve. Some progressive graphic design<br />

departments revisit their curricula often to incorporate new industry advancements, while<br />

others stumble upon the politics of academia, preventing their good intentions of timely<br />

refinement. Many hold fast to the form-based Bauhaus teachings, while others embrace<br />

the complex postmodern concepts and tools of what is now termed the “information era.”<br />

Proactive educators learn new software and have begun to reinvent the balance of teaching<br />

technical skills with teaching critical thinking. 2 Graphic design historian – Philip Meggs<br />

denounces, “While many schools are busy manipulating form, the profession is busy<br />

manipulating minds. American design education has drifted toward European modernism,<br />

while American graphic design has maintained a pluralistic pragmatism. Students often<br />

suffer an intense culture shock after graduation, for they have been taught to be form<br />

manipulators, while the profession demands that they become message makers.” 3<br />

1 AIGA: The Professional Association for<br />

Design, “About AIGA,” AIGA, http://<br />

www.aiga.org/content.cfm/about-aiga<br />

(accessed January 31, 2010).<br />

2 Ellen Lupton and Jennifer Cole Phillips,<br />

Graphic Design: The New Basics<br />

(New York, NY: Princeton Architectural<br />

Press, 2008), 5.<br />

3 Philip Meggs, “Pedagogy vs. the Real<br />

World,” from AIGA Journal of Graphic<br />

Design, vol. 4, no. 1, 1986, in Meggs:<br />

Making Graphic Design History, ed.<br />

Rob Carter, Libby Meggs, and Sandra<br />

Wheeler (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley &<br />

Sons, Inc., 2008), 75.<br />

3


introduction<br />

The dichotomy Meggs describes is evident within many of today’s new graduates.<br />

Their shortcomings are the result of an intrinsic design school struggle between<br />

the development of experimental creativity and critical thinking versus the need to<br />

concurrently prepare students for practical clientele and real-world workplace limitations.<br />

Defining a universal solution is complex, as graphic design education is laden with<br />

variables unlike any other major of study. Discrepancies in pedagogical practice are<br />

accepted, with no professional certification to validate its graduates, or to definitively<br />

validate the outcome of the school’s curriculum itself. Unlike graphic design’s neighboring<br />

disciplines of interior design and architecture, laymen proficient in certain software are<br />

able to easily self-impose the title – graphic designer. Paul Rand often made reference to the<br />

misalignments from pedagogy to practice, “Design is one of the most perplexing pursuits in<br />

which to excel, yet as a profession it is relatively easy to enter. It requires no accreditation,<br />

no authorization from official institutions. There is no set body of knowledge that must be<br />

mastered by the practitioners. [Regardless] the designer must contend with encyclopedic<br />

amounts of information, not limited to any particular idea or form.” 4<br />

The inconsistencies are apparent from the community trade schools to the liberal art<br />

colleges, from the independent art schools to the university departments of design. Graphic<br />

design education has continued to be diversely interpreted into multiple configurations<br />

throughout the country. National academic accreditation is not demanded, and many<br />

schools align their curricular updates with differing regional standards. In order to bridge<br />

these gaps – three initiatives must commence. First, graphic design educators and collegiate<br />

administration must mandate consistent student portfolio reviews. Second, industry<br />

professionals must unite to prescribe a national certification program that ensures those<br />

who claim to have gained a professional graphic design education truly meet industry<br />

expectations. And third, if objectives of collegiate design programs are to comprehensively<br />

prepare students for success in the professional workplace, there must be a consistent<br />

criterion established of what it means to truly meet industry expectations. Without<br />

this paradigm, graphic design education as a whole is left with an opaque definition<br />

of professional expectations for the twenty-first century workplace – a definition the<br />

subsequent study seeks to clarify.<br />

4 Paul Rand, Design, Form, and Chaos<br />

(New Haven, CT: Yale University Press,<br />

1993), 15.<br />

4


INTrODUCtiON<br />

Currently, a student’s competency in the professional field upon graduation is the main<br />

and potentially only measurable indicator as to the qualitative success of one’s design<br />

education. In this vein, the expectations of today’s industry practitioners become paramount<br />

to the objectives of graphic design pedagogy. And with today’s heightened public perception of<br />

design, it is becoming even more imperative to relay to students exactly what will be expected<br />

of them upon entering into the competitive twenty-first century workplace, as measured by<br />

today’s leading graphic design professionals. In this quest for a comprehensive set of industry<br />

expectations, a medley of perspectives becomes applicable from the realities of current or newly<br />

graduated design students, to the views from design educators within noteworthy schools and<br />

leading design professionals actively working in the field. Amongst the variant professional and<br />

educational perspectives surveyed arose three over-arching educational tenets: fundamental<br />

skills; new modalities, methods, and media; and parallel principles of business. Their categorical<br />

tenets ultimately served to define seven essential expectations of new graduates entering into<br />

the twenty-first century workplace: (1) creativity, (2) craft and technique, (3) design discourse,<br />

(4) digital media, (5) multi-disciplinary approaches, (6) innovative business strategies, and (7)<br />

social responsibility. By defining today’s leading professional expectations, we create an informed<br />

module of evaluation for how well current graphic design pedagogies are (or are not) preparing<br />

students for the workplace of today. History has proven that graphic design is a profession that<br />

will continue to grow and transform through time, thus changing the way it is taught along the<br />

way is an inevitable requisite. These expectations combine to provide a present-day barometer<br />

to better visualize current curricular priorities and pitfalls and to evoke an informed future of<br />

pedagogical change.<br />

We teach students to experiment, we teach<br />

them to produce, we teach them methods<br />

that will get them good jobs. Graphic design<br />

education indeed, graphic design practice,<br />

requires an even greater intellectual rigor.<br />

Steven Heller<br />

5


fundamental skills<br />

5 Steven Heller and Lita Talarico,<br />

Design School Confidential<br />

(Beverly, MA: Rockport Publishers,<br />

2009), 8.<br />

Fundamental skills for a professional graphic design education are outlined in<br />

black and white by each accrediting institution with which the school is associated.<br />

Examples include regional associations like sacs (Southern Association of Colleges<br />

and Schools), organizations exclusive to independent colleges like aicad (Association<br />

of Independent Colleges of Art and Design), or the largest, nationally recognized<br />

association – nasad (National Association of Schools of Art and Design). nasad<br />

has worked in tandem with aiga (the professional association for design) to publish<br />

essential competencies that undergraduate graphic design programs must address in<br />

their curricula. No matter where in the world the school is located, most classes teach<br />

the same fundamental skills and knowledge–it would be foolish to do otherwise. 5<br />

The criteria of accrediting associations is thorough, yet densely laced with so much<br />

industry jargon that it becomes almost cryptic for the pre-design student who is trying<br />

to choose which school to attend and why. nasad’s verbose, yet essential competencies<br />

can be boiled down to seven terms palpable by laymen’s standards listed below in<br />

alphabetical order. This abridged list of core competencies is used to survey leading<br />

professionals, educators, and students alike.<br />

6


fundamental<br />

skills<br />

Collective Cognizance<br />

Awareness of multiple disciplines<br />

with a wide range of influences<br />

Craft & Technique<br />

Proficiency of tools from hand<br />

sketches to computers to mock-ups<br />

Creativity<br />

The ability to brainstorm and generate<br />

a diversity of concepts visually<br />

Design Discourse<br />

Adept written and verbal communication<br />

of design, contributing astute criticism<br />

Portfolio<br />

Comprehensive and diverse professional<br />

display of project experience<br />

Process<br />

Knowledge of professional project<br />

process with documentation<br />

from concept to completion<br />

Research & Theory<br />

Ability to effectively analyze contemporary<br />

and historical data per one’s own ‘voice’<br />

fundamental skills<br />

Your best work is your expression<br />

of yourself. Now, you may not be<br />

the greatest at it, but when you<br />

do it, you’re the only expert.<br />

Frank Gehry<br />

7


Which are most important to you?<br />

Professional<br />

Educator<br />

Student<br />

Collective Cognizance<br />

Awareness of multiple<br />

disciplines with a wide<br />

range of influences<br />

Craft & Technique<br />

Proficiency of tools from<br />

hand sketches to computers<br />

to mock-ups<br />

Creativity<br />

The ability to brainstorm<br />

and generate a diversity<br />

of concepts visually<br />

fundamental skills<br />

Design Discourse<br />

Adept written and verbal<br />

communication of design,<br />

astute criticism<br />

Portfolio<br />

Comprehensive and diverse<br />

professional display of project<br />

experience<br />

Process<br />

Knowledge of professional<br />

project process with<br />

documentation from<br />

concept to completion<br />

Research & Theory<br />

Ability to effectively analyze<br />

contemporary and historical<br />

data per one’s own voice<br />

8


fundamental skills<br />

*Creativity ranks the most<br />

important for professionals,<br />

educators, and students alike.<br />

creativity<br />

is a type of learning process<br />

where the teacher and pupil are<br />

located in the same individual.<br />

Arthur Koestler<br />

9


EXPECTATION 1 | creativity<br />

Design requires esthetic,<br />

inspiration, and guts. To<br />

me, nothing is more vibrant<br />

than having the power<br />

to do something but not<br />

having the experience<br />

of knowing what’s right<br />

and what’s wrong.<br />

Tibor Kalman<br />

10


EXPECTATION 1 | creativity<br />

EXPECtAtiON 1<br />

creativity<br />

When a variety of leading professionals were asked<br />

which fundamental skill they believed to be most essential<br />

for today’s design workplace, the majority agreed that<br />

creativity is the highest expectation. In the field of design<br />

this expectation is basic, but the exact formula for teaching<br />

creative insight is widely debated. Educational philosophers<br />

like John Dewey would advocate that “an ideally perfect<br />

knowledge [of creativity] would represent such a network of<br />

interconnections that any past experience would offer a point<br />

of advantage from which to get at the problem presented in a<br />

new experience.” 6 Dewey’s description becomes indisputable<br />

upon further analysis of current graphic design curricula.<br />

With conceptualization and critical thinking at the forefront,<br />

students must posses both intuitive, aesthetic artistry in<br />

combination with a vast array of influences and experiences<br />

to inherently inform creative output.<br />

6 John Dewey, Democracy<br />

and Education: An Introduction<br />

to the Philosophy of Education<br />

(New York: The Macmillan<br />

Company,1916), 396.<br />

[For new grads] enthusiasm, optimism,<br />

energy, and a can do spirit are<br />

imperative, but ultimately the creative<br />

output needs to be demonstrated first.<br />

Connie Birdsall, Creative Director<br />

Lippincott<br />

New York, NY<br />

11


72<br />

CREATIVItY<br />

% of students<br />

worry that their<br />

fundamental skills<br />

are not strong<br />

enough to be<br />

successful in<br />

a professional<br />

workplace.<br />

7 Rachael Posnak, “Job Outlook: Juniors,”<br />

CMYK Magazine, vol. 44, July 2009, 74.<br />

8 Steven Heller, Education of an<br />

E-Designer, (NY: Allworth Press), 103.<br />

Along with industry professionals, both<br />

graphic design educators and students surveyed<br />

also feel as though creativity is the fundamental<br />

skill most emphasized within their current<br />

curriculum. However, upon further review, student<br />

insecurities became apparent; 72% of students<br />

surveyed claim they are not confident that their<br />

fundamental skills are currently strong enough<br />

to compete professionally. Students must realize<br />

that creativity is one facet of design education<br />

that derives predominantly from the passion and<br />

inspiration within themselves. Educators must<br />

not only teach students the constructs of critical<br />

thinking, but also strive to inspire them to expand<br />

their influences from which creativity is ignited.<br />

The opportunities for pedagogical change can<br />

be found in the framework that further peaks<br />

student curiosities to discover and create. This<br />

framework “defines the limits, but the canvas<br />

varies, from student to student, from time to time,<br />

and from technology to technology.” 8 Taking into<br />

account how rapidly the field of graphic design has<br />

and will continue to evolve, the best solution to<br />

instilling creativity that succeeds in the twenty-first<br />

century workplace is to promote the necessity for<br />

continuous learning.<br />

We’re in the ideas business,<br />

first and foremost. Creativity is<br />

not something you can switch<br />

on and off. You need to live it. 7<br />

Colin Jeffery, Creative Director/Partner<br />

David & Goliath<br />

Los Angeles, CA<br />

12


pORTFOLIO<br />

DESIGN<br />

DISCOURSE<br />

PROCESS<br />

CRAFT &<br />

TECHNIQUE<br />

PORTFOLIO<br />

CREATIVITY<br />

DESign<br />

discourse<br />

CREATIVITY<br />

craft &<br />

technique<br />

CREATIVITY<br />

CRAFT &<br />

TECHNIQUE<br />

PROCESS<br />

DESIGN<br />

DISCOURSE<br />

professional<br />

EXpectations<br />

Educator<br />

Objectives<br />

student<br />

proficiency<br />

13


EXPECTATION 2 | craft & technique<br />

It took me a few seconds<br />

to draw it, but it took me<br />

34 years to learn how to<br />

draw it in a few seconds.<br />

Paula Scher’s sketchbook of hand<br />

drawn typefaces. This Pincushion sketch<br />

inspired the design of an Eames chair<br />

for a Herman Miller charity auction.<br />

Paula Scher<br />

14


EXPECTATION 2 | craft & technique<br />

EXPECtAtiON 2<br />

craft &<br />

technique<br />

After creativity, craft and technique comprise the second<br />

fundamental skill today’s leading professionals expect from<br />

new design graduates. When asked what qualities his firm<br />

looks for in recent graduates, Colin Jeffery of David &<br />

Goliath advises students to, “Pay attention to the detail.<br />

It matters. Idea is king, but a great idea poorly executed is<br />

a missed opportunity. I’d rather see a great idea sketched<br />

up on paper than badly Photoshopped.” 9 Jeffery touches<br />

upon the fact that for many students, computers become a<br />

crutch. They are intrinsic tools that provide endless software<br />

opportunities to facilitate productivity. On the other hand,<br />

they created the need for a more technological education,<br />

and in certain cases diminish the attention given to skills<br />

of handcraft and technique. To ensure students’ success in<br />

today’s workplace, educators must cultivate student artistry<br />

both by hand and by computer.<br />

9 Posnak, 74.<br />

You have to roll up your sleeves<br />

and be a stonecutter before you<br />

can become a sculptor – command<br />

of craft always precedes art.<br />

Philip Gerard<br />

15


EXPECTATION 2 | craft & technique<br />

As a Project Designer, Liz Teston of asd in<br />

Atlanta observes, “Recent graduates often have<br />

tremendous computer skills that give the perception<br />

that they can also hand sketch, but actually many<br />

cannot.” This is a skill typically emphasized during<br />

first year foundation programs, but according to<br />

multiple professional testimonies, students are not<br />

retaining this knowledge. The deficiency of new<br />

graduates’ handcraft in the professional workplace<br />

is attributed not only to their exclusive dependency<br />

upon the computer, but also to the diminishing role<br />

of foundation studies and its inconsistent quality.<br />

Early design education should avoid the constructs<br />

of computer labs, only using them sparingly as an<br />

introduction to software for future use. An inadequate<br />

foundation curriculum yields students whose craft<br />

and technique are subordinate to that of the computer.<br />

These are the students who rush to commemorate the<br />

first idea that pops into their head by making it digital,<br />

versus taking half of the time to brainstorm numerous<br />

concepts with quick thumbnails by hand on paper.<br />

“This generally inhibits the development of ideas,<br />

because psychologically you tend to restrict yourself<br />

to what you are capable of achieving technically.” 10<br />

Research shows that students are not practicing<br />

their handcraft and technique by their own disposition.<br />

The solution is reminiscent of elementary math class<br />

when teachers admonished the old “show your work”<br />

adage to adolescents calculating their long division<br />

problems. There is validation in showing the process.<br />

For graphic design coursework, process books must<br />

be a non-negotiable expectation for each project from<br />

conception to completion. Ideally, process books<br />

are considered as a portion of the student’s grade<br />

at midterm and the end of the course. As educators<br />

emphasize and expect continual documentation of<br />

preliminary sketches, students will infuse the practice<br />

of handcraft into their permanent repertoire for<br />

the professional workplace. We are past the Milton<br />

Glaser heyday when he proclaimed, “Computers are<br />

to design as microwaves are to cooking.” 11 But despite<br />

these technological advances, it will always remain<br />

critical for design students to develop the skill of<br />

hand sketching concepts on paper. The opportunities<br />

for pedagogical change seem cut and dry to leading<br />

professionals like Mike Sloan, Partner at Lippincott<br />

in New York, “Schools need to pay more attention to<br />

hand sketching skills, not just computer skills.”<br />

You don’t have to give<br />

up your pencil when you<br />

switch to computer design.<br />

The Mac’s just another pencil!<br />

April Greiman<br />

16


Statement of the Eames Design Process<br />

by Charles Eames for the Louvre Show,<br />

“What is Design,” 1969<br />

EXPECTATION 2 | craft & technique<br />

10 David Dabner, Graphic Design<br />

School: A Foundation Course in<br />

the Principles and Practices of<br />

Graphic Design, 3rd ed. (Hoboken, NJ:<br />

John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2005), 56.<br />

11 ThinkExist.com, “Milton Glaser<br />

Quotes,” ThinkExist, http://thinkexist.<br />

com/quotes/milton_glaser/ (accessed<br />

January 31, 2010).<br />

Process is more important<br />

than outcome. When the<br />

outcome drives the process<br />

we will only ever go to<br />

where we’ve already been.<br />

If process drives outcome<br />

we may not know where<br />

we’re going, but we will<br />

know we want to be there.<br />

Bruce Mau<br />

17


Many students are competent<br />

designers, and some are better than<br />

that, but they must be equally good as<br />

thinkers. They must be able to research,<br />

analyze, critique, and write.<br />

Steven Heller<br />

EXPECTATION 3 | design discourse<br />

18


EXPECTATION 3 | design discourse<br />

EXPECtAtiON 3<br />

design<br />

discourse<br />

Steven Heller indicates that, “In professional schools,<br />

the tendency is to stress craft and skills. It is a continuing<br />

battle to remind students that there is no poetry in skills<br />

alone.” 12 For that reason, it is becoming more critical than<br />

ever for design students develop their own informed ‘voice’<br />

within the context of design – past, present, and future.<br />

Ben Graham, Creative Director/Principal of Turnstyle<br />

Design Studio in Seattle discloses, “The best candidates<br />

are those who have done their research well and can<br />

communicate why they’re qualified to work for us versus<br />

another firm.” Professionals like Graham reaffirm that a<br />

student’s articulation of design begins with the presentation<br />

of their own work. Unfortunately, survey results show that<br />

design students are not mastering this fundamental skill.<br />

Design discourse ranks as the number one shortcoming of<br />

new graduates entering today’s professional workplace.<br />

12 Heller, Education of an e-Designer,103.<br />

We [as educators] cover<br />

form-giving well, but our<br />

students need to work harder<br />

to develop their critical thinking<br />

and communication skills.<br />

Samantha Lawrie, Professor<br />

Auburn University<br />

Auburn, Alabama<br />

19


What is the most common<br />

of new graduates?<br />

Collective<br />

Cognizance<br />

Design Discourse<br />

EXPECTATION 3 | design discourse<br />

Craft & Technique<br />

Process<br />

Creativity<br />

Research<br />

& Theory<br />

Portfolio<br />

13 Nancy Mayer, “Putting Criticism into<br />

Critique,” in The Education of a Graphic<br />

Designer, ed. Steven Heller (New York,<br />

NY: Allworth Press, 2005), 98.<br />

14 Michael Rock, “The Designer as Author,”<br />

in Graphic Design Theory: Readings<br />

from the Field, ed. Helen Armstrong<br />

(New York, NY: Princeton Architectural<br />

Press, 2009), 114.<br />

20


EXPECTATION 3 | design discourse<br />

To become adept in expressing and defending<br />

the conceptual content of one’s work, it is largely<br />

understood that students must study art and design<br />

history, theory, and criticism. Today’s design students<br />

face a disturbing disconnection between the art and<br />

design discourse they study, and the design discourse<br />

they receive in their studio critiques. Design discourse<br />

is largely initiated by thinking out loud. Ideally, a<br />

student will verbally present visual concepts to the<br />

class by first restating the design problem, including<br />

researched aspects of audience, culture, competitor<br />

precedents, etc. Then a student will describe<br />

thoroughly how each design decision fundamentally<br />

serves to solve said problem, from the form to the<br />

color selection to the typeface and imagery choices.<br />

The student’s peers and professor are then cognizant<br />

of the designer’s intentions (visually successful or<br />

not) and may proceed to contribute to an informed<br />

critique. However, far too frequently this ideal<br />

scenario does not occur. Many times a classroom<br />

critique is merely quick judgment, while truly<br />

informed criticism must relate to in depth inquiry. 13<br />

I would revamp our Intro to<br />

Graphic Design course to include<br />

more history, understanding of<br />

current issues and designers as<br />

well as the various professional<br />

outcomes of the profession. It<br />

would be more seminar and<br />

discourse with less projects.<br />

Eric Benson, Professor<br />

University of Illinois<br />

Urbana, Illinois<br />

This is due in part to the increased complexity<br />

and new technology per student project, which often<br />

presents a learning curve for both professor and<br />

student, thus chipping away essential critique time.<br />

It can also be attributed to educators not enforcing<br />

formal studio presentations, which in turn allows<br />

undergraduates to connote a lax approach to design<br />

discourse. Despite these challenges, educators are well<br />

aware of the significance of design discourse within<br />

today’s design education. Introductory courses are where<br />

the precedent for discourse must begin. Thereafter, each<br />

design project must originate with formal written and<br />

verbal presentations. By educators necessitating written<br />

creative briefs and proposals at the start and artist’s<br />

statements at the conclusion of studio coursework,<br />

students will develop more authority over their visual<br />

communication through an author’s perspective.<br />

The study of design discourse has presented<br />

designers of the twenty-first century with the insight<br />

and capability to no longer restrict them to simply<br />

mediating the text. Graphic designers have expanded to<br />

not only be creators of form, but also of the audience<br />

and of the textual message itself. Principal of 2x4,<br />

Inc. – Michael Rock calls for “an examination of the<br />

designer-as-author” relationship. “[It] could help us to<br />

rethink process, expand design methods, and elaborate<br />

our historical frame to incorporate all forms of graphic<br />

discourse.” 14 As a catalyst for the future of graphic<br />

design and the number one ranked shortcoming of new<br />

graduates, educators must push design discourse to the<br />

forefront of pedagogical priorities, while maintaining<br />

the balance between critical thought and technical<br />

proficiency. By accompanying every design project with<br />

formal written and verbal presentations, students will<br />

be more prepared for this expectation upon entering<br />

the professional workplace.<br />

21


EXPECTATION 4 | digital media<br />

You never can do what the kids do. What<br />

you do is look at yourself and find your<br />

own way to address the fact that the times<br />

have changed and that you have to pay<br />

attention. You can’t be a designer and say,<br />

Oh, this is timeless. Nothing is timeless!<br />

Paula Scher<br />

22


EXPECTATION 4 | digital media<br />

EXPECtAtiON 4<br />

dexterity with<br />

dIGITAL MEDIA<br />

When leading professionals were asked about new industry<br />

issues or trends that students in school must learn now for<br />

future success in the workplace, the results were evident. New<br />

graduates entering into the workplace are expected to be<br />

proficient not only with print design, but have a commanding<br />

knowledge of digital media design as well. Cartoon Network’s<br />

Art Director – Jay Rogers reports, “Many employers are<br />

seeking über designers – those who can jump between digital<br />

and print platforms seamlessly.” Digital technology brought<br />

fundamental transformation to the practice and pedagogy<br />

of graphic design. We witnessed a transition from a field<br />

primarily vested in two-dimensional printed media, now<br />

become a hybrid of visual communication in the third and<br />

fourth dimensions. In comparison to its print origins, timebased<br />

digital media is still a fairly new facet under the graphic<br />

design umbrella and designers are still experimenting with its<br />

vast potential. Yet the public demand for digital/interactive<br />

design persists and its communicative impact has proven to<br />

be resounding. The comments of leading professionals serve<br />

as warnings for graphic design students of the twenty-first<br />

century – it is now relatively impossible to surround a whole<br />

career on print design alone.<br />

Design, in its broadest sense, is<br />

the enabler of the digital era – it’s<br />

a process that creates order out<br />

of chaos, that renders technology<br />

usable to business.<br />

Clement Mok<br />

23


EXPECTATION 4 | digital media<br />

Conversely, when surveyed on this topic, 60% of<br />

educators do not believe that print design and digital<br />

design should be treated equally within undergraduate<br />

graphic design curricula. The opposite is true for their<br />

students; 73% feel that with the direction technology<br />

is heading, print and digital design should be taught as<br />

equals within their curriculum. The dichotomy persists<br />

when educators and students were asked which aspects<br />

of their curriculum are emphasized the most. Digital<br />

media ranked second highest for educators, while<br />

students ranked it as the least emphasized within their<br />

current curriculum.<br />

It is undisputed that digital design education<br />

must be incorporated into collegiate graphic design<br />

programs. The problem remains that with this<br />

addition there are significant time constraints placed<br />

upon educators and more pressure placed upon<br />

students to master new media while concurrently<br />

developing a quality design project. Therefore, how<br />

technology is taught must change. Ideally in design<br />

education, technical proficiency comes prior to the<br />

application of these skills to extensive design problems.<br />

Students report that when expected to master the<br />

two simultaneously, the results were both technically<br />

and aesthetically below average. Ultimately, when<br />

the aesthetics within new media projects suffer, it<br />

is predominately due to poor technical proficiency.<br />

The solution for graphic design curricula resides in<br />

separating the two tracks of new media learning<br />

(technical versus conceptual/aesthetic) to ensure<br />

students are equally competent in both. A close<br />

comparison can be made in respect to international<br />

students who must first take an ‘English as a<br />

Second Language’ class in order to fully articulate<br />

and comprehend future coursework within their<br />

curriculum. They do not expect other professors in<br />

each of their core classes to teach them basic English<br />

comprehension in order to verbally communicate,<br />

just as students of graphic design cannot expect their<br />

design studio professors to spend time teaching them<br />

basic new media software techniques in order to<br />

visually communicate. Students must come to these<br />

courses equipped with a moderate level of technical<br />

knowledge. This is not to add yet another requirement<br />

to an already lengthy course list for graphic design<br />

majors. But curricula must publicly offer elective<br />

courses focused exclusively on mastering software<br />

immediately prior to each relevant studio class.<br />

This effort will serve to set the pre-requisite of<br />

acquiring a moderate level of experience with new<br />

media software prior to the design studio coursework.<br />

As a result, students will no longer be weighed down<br />

by a technical learning curve while they try to produce<br />

quality design projects, and educators will not feel<br />

compelled to lecture an entire class on software<br />

techniques. This solution will save time and energy<br />

by allowing both educators and students to focus<br />

more so on the critical thinking and aesthetics to<br />

solve the digital design problem. The field of graphic<br />

design will always be intrinsically linked to the tools<br />

and technology its practitioners use to create. But as<br />

technology is destined to continually reinvent itself,<br />

so must the skill set of its students. The opportunity<br />

for pedagogical change lies in promoting technical<br />

proficiency prior to design studio requirements,<br />

while continuing to exercise their new media skill<br />

sets throughout their educational career. Graphic<br />

design curricula must not allow students to become<br />

technologically complacent.<br />

We as educators have not taken<br />

web design and interactive media<br />

as seriously as other areas like<br />

typography and imaging.<br />

martha Scotford, Professor<br />

North Carolina State University<br />

Raleigh, North Carolina<br />

24


It’s no longer possible<br />

to make a career<br />

in print alone.<br />

Jon Garcia, VP of Design<br />

Fuzebox Inc.<br />

Atlanta, Georgia<br />

This solution is actualized in the following academic scenario:<br />

A graphic design curriculum calls for a student to take<br />

‘Interactive Design Studio’ during spring/summer term.<br />

[1] Therefore, an academic advisor contacts the student<br />

prior to this term to inform them that this upcoming<br />

course requires a moderate level of technical proficiency<br />

in Adobe Flash ® for example.<br />

[2] The advisor then allows the student to self-assess their<br />

comfort level with the new media in question. At this<br />

point, most students have a low to below average<br />

comfort level using this program.<br />

[3] The student is made aware of the ‘Introduction to<br />

Flash’ elective course available for registry the fall/<br />

winter term before their ‘Interactive Design Studio’<br />

requirement. For the students who already have<br />

moderate knowledge with technical aspects of the new<br />

media in question, advisors will direct them to tutorial<br />

resources, like the web site lynda.com to briefly refresh<br />

their skill set prior to beginning the digital design course.<br />

EXPECTATION 4 | digital media<br />

I graduated without knowing much<br />

about web and interactive design;<br />

now I feel lost and behind the times.<br />

Amy McNeil, Class of 2007<br />

University of Cincinnati<br />

Cincinnati, Ohio<br />

25


73% Students SAY YES<br />

There should be more of an emphasis<br />

on web design and interactive classes.<br />

Our syllabus should be able to change<br />

with the times, rather than restricting<br />

us to the calendar year we enroll.<br />

Nandhini Mehra, Senior Student<br />

SCAD-Atlanta<br />

Atlanta, Georgia<br />

DIGITALDESIGN<br />

Should digital design and print design coursework receive<br />

equal emphasis within today’s graphic design curricula?<br />

PRINTDESIGN<br />

I would revamp the way<br />

new technology is taught<br />

because there is too high<br />

of a percentage that do not<br />

completely understand it.<br />

Renee Seward, Professor<br />

University of Cincinnati<br />

Cincinnati, Ohio<br />

60% PROFESSORS SAY NO<br />

26


Students must continually practice the use<br />

of digital, interactive, and web techniques<br />

during the length of their studies.<br />

Holly Quarzo, Professor<br />

<strong>Savannah</strong> College of Art & Design<br />

Atlanta, Georgia<br />

27


Wide Influence<br />

EXPECTATION 5 | multi-disciplinary approach<br />

The new way of joining<br />

& interweaving in the<br />

development of design<br />

talents & use of relevant<br />

scientific knowledge and<br />

working methods is the key<br />

to graphic design education<br />

suitable for modern times.<br />

Focused Specialization<br />

Igildo G. Biesele<br />

28


EXPECTATION 5 | multi-disciplinary approach<br />

EXPECtAtiON 5<br />

multi<br />

disciplinary<br />

approach<br />

Amongst the design professionals surveyed, multidisciplinary<br />

design is the second most prevalent industry<br />

trend today, after digital media. More professionals now<br />

expect new graduates entering into their design studio to<br />

possess a collective cognizance of other relevant disciplines,<br />

not just that of graphic design. Tim Brown, ceo of ideo<br />

is avidly acclaimed for his multi-disciplinary expectations<br />

with the creation of the term t-shaped people. His definition<br />

encapsulates what leading professionals will be seeking in<br />

new graduates in the future, “We look for people who are<br />

so inquisitive about the world that they’re willing to try to<br />

do what you do. We call them t-shaped people. They have<br />

a principal skill that describes the vertical leg of the t. But<br />

they are so empathetic that they can branch out into other<br />

skills, and do them as well. They are able to explore insights<br />

from many different perspectives and recognize patterns of<br />

behavior that point to a universal human need.” 15<br />

15 Tim Brown, “Strategy by Design,”<br />

Fast Company, June 1, 2005, from<br />

Issue 95, http://www.fastcompany.<br />

com/magazine/95/design-strategy.<br />

html (accessed February 5, 2010).<br />

I foresee students having the necessity<br />

of being more diversified in the<br />

knowledge of mediums. To be able<br />

to communicate amongst multiple<br />

disciplines is becoming a necessity.<br />

yolonda Baker, Senior Designer<br />

Deloitte<br />

Atlanta, Georgia<br />

29


In addition to core requirements<br />

graphic design curricula should<br />

direct students to general studies<br />

that support their specialty study in<br />

design. Design coursework should<br />

make use of concepts and skills<br />

acquired through study in areas<br />

other than design and vice versa.<br />

public relations<br />

computer science<br />

sociology<br />

anthropology<br />

philosophy<br />

systems theory<br />

communications<br />

mathematics<br />

psychology<br />

humanities<br />

physics<br />

generalist<br />

economics<br />

foreign language<br />

engineering<br />

statistics<br />

journalism<br />

world history<br />

programming<br />

EXPECTATION 5 | multi-disciplinary approach<br />

photography<br />

publications<br />

marketing<br />

architecture<br />

business<br />

interior design<br />

writing<br />

human factors<br />

entrepreneurship<br />

environmental<br />

graphic design<br />

advertising<br />

industrial design<br />

print design<br />

digital design<br />

branding<br />

specialist<br />

identity design<br />

30


EXPECTATION 5 | multi-disciplinary approach<br />

Art & Design History<br />

10% 20%<br />

Supporting Design Disciplines<br />

Graphic Design Core<br />

35% 35%<br />

General Education<br />

16 Steven J. Teper, “The Creative Campus:<br />

Who’s No. 1,” The Chronicle of<br />

Higher Education, October 1, 2004.<br />

http://chronicle.com/article/The-<br />

Creative-Campus-Who-s/4870<br />

(accessed January 31, 2010).<br />

17 Daniel van der Velden, “Research<br />

& Destroy: A Plea for Design as<br />

Research,” Graphic Design Theory,<br />

2006. http://graphicdesigntheory.<br />

net/Velden.html (accessed February<br />

12, 2010).<br />

The average newly graduated graphic designer<br />

does not laud all that falls within their educational or<br />

occupational grasp. The twenty-first century has presented<br />

a more technological and more global industry than ever<br />

before. Pioneering designers are broadening their horizons<br />

into new dimensions, combating the ephemeral stigma<br />

of print, and integrating a multi-disciplinary approach<br />

to design, digital technology, product development,<br />

and the built environment. Students entering into<br />

the professional workplace see their career paths as<br />

graphic designers in a more fluid manner than collegiate<br />

design department names suggest. 16 Practitioners who<br />

capitalize on this philosophy distinguish themselves<br />

from more traditional design titles with specificity, such<br />

as environmental graphic designer, interactive space<br />

designer, network brand manager, or experience designer.<br />

Daniel van der Velden, Partner in the design research<br />

think tank Metahaven witnessed that “the ambition of<br />

the designer always leads beyond his discipline and his<br />

official mandate, without this above-and-beyond having a<br />

diploma or even a name of its own. Still, it is remarkable<br />

that design… enjoys far less respect than the combination<br />

of design and one or more other specialisms.” 17<br />

Van de Velden’s notion of ‘beyond the discipline itself’<br />

reinforces the need for multi-disciplinary knowledge.<br />

The term ‘graphic design’ exists today as a profession of<br />

pluralism, yet so often design education becomes insular<br />

in its process and methodologies. Many educational<br />

programs strive to further define individual disciplines,<br />

yet inadvertently create a void. After foundation studies<br />

design students are partitioned off, many find themselves<br />

enduring a multitude of projects, critiques, research, and<br />

theory, rarely crossing the paths of sister fields of design<br />

study. Naively, design students allow themselves to remain<br />

secluded, and mistakenly, collegiate administration fuels<br />

this divide by enabling curricula that does not require<br />

them to do otherwise.<br />

31


85<br />

% of educators<br />

are against taking<br />

away any liberal<br />

arts courses, even<br />

if it may allow<br />

for more design<br />

studio time.<br />

For many schools, infusing ample liberal arts<br />

into a design program is one way they strive to meet<br />

professional multi-disciplinary expectations. When<br />

surveyed, both students and educators agree with its<br />

significance. 85% of educators were against taking<br />

away any liberal arts courses, even if it meant it<br />

allowed for more studio time. The ideal ratio of liberal<br />

arts courses to art and design courses varies per each<br />

institution’s educational objectives and their various<br />

accrediting association requirements. But it is a crucial<br />

nasad requirement that prescribes in addition to core<br />

graphic design courses, curricula must direct students to<br />

general studies that support their coursework in graphic<br />

design and vice versa. 18 Graphic design pedagogy is at<br />

its best when it makes valid use of multi-disciplinary<br />

concepts and skills acquired through non-design liberal<br />

arts coursework.<br />

Premature specialization in schools<br />

perpetuates a similar isolation in<br />

practice and works against the<br />

hybridization that is increasingly<br />

desirable in real professions.<br />

Dan Friedman<br />

18 Teper, http://chronicle.com/article/<br />

The-Creative-Campus-Who-s/4870<br />

(accessed January 31, 2010).<br />

19 Ellen Lupton and Abbott Miller, Design<br />

Writing Research: Writing on Graphic<br />

Design, (London: Phaidon Press Limited,<br />

1996), 66.<br />

20 Igildo G. Biesele, Graphic Design<br />

Education, (Zurich: ABC Verlag,<br />

1981), 5.<br />

21 Randy Pierce,“Graphic Design and<br />

the Built Environment,” InformeDesign,<br />

vol 1, issue 4, http://www.informe<br />

design.umn.edu/_news/may_v01-p.<br />

pdf (accessed January 06, 2010).<br />

32


EXPECTATION 5 | multi-disciplinary approach<br />

The opportunity for pedagogical change is found<br />

in fusing cross-platform coursework, above and beyond<br />

that of offering elective general education courses. As<br />

the French philosopher Michel Foucault once said,<br />

“Design becomes powerful only when it enters the<br />

domain of other discourses.” 19 Graphic design programs<br />

must not only recommend, but also require and foster<br />

collaborative design projects with other programs of<br />

study outside of the graphic design department. In<br />

this instance, graphic design students will work on<br />

environmental graphic design projects in collaboration<br />

with architecture students; portfolio classes will harness<br />

the expertise of photography majors; brand identity<br />

studios will reach out to industrial, interior and fashion<br />

design classes. The result of such collaborative efforts<br />

is two-fold – architecture students, for example, will<br />

gain knowledge outside of their traditional curriculum,<br />

such as principles of typography. In return, graphic<br />

design students will become more astute with design for<br />

the built environment, learning human scale, differing<br />

materiality, and three-dimensional rendering techniques.<br />

The result is conclusively favorable from each side.<br />

These collaborative design experiences will educate<br />

all students involved (not just graphic designers) to<br />

be versed in the language of various disciplines, thus<br />

empowering them to apply a myriad of methodologies<br />

to future design process.<br />

It is undeniable that design pedagogy of the<br />

twenty-first century is now more multifaceted than ever<br />

before, and it is up to educators to ensure curricula is<br />

globally cohesive. International design critic – Igildo G.<br />

Biesele indicates, “the totality exists in the first place<br />

through an interdisciplinary cooperation, which, when<br />

the structure of the syllabus is appropriate, can also<br />

find its expression in the individual [graphic design]<br />

courses.” 20 Curricula must begin to incorporate not<br />

only the essence of the ever-changing message, but also<br />

its capability to pull from relative ideologies such as the<br />

permanence of architectural structure, the ergonomics<br />

of industrial form, and the psychology of human<br />

behavior within a virtual environment. Progressive<br />

educators are mindful of these concerns and some<br />

programs have already made gradual pedagogical<br />

changes. Rhode Island School of Design’s Professor<br />

Nancy Skolos reports, “We recently incorporated<br />

more strategic thinking into our senior studio in order<br />

to prepare students to work across many media.”<br />

Multi-disciplinary, collaborative design coursework<br />

will facilitate students to bridge the gap between the<br />

intangible design concept, the tangible sense of identity<br />

on paper or on screen, and the sense of place within<br />

the built environment. 21 Professional graphic design<br />

processes have evolved from singular tasks to multidisciplinary<br />

agents of change; graphic design education<br />

must follow suit to ensure the all-inclusive competence<br />

of a new generation of designers.<br />

Eliminating liberal arts would<br />

be detrimental to a student’s<br />

ability to draw inspiration<br />

from many different areas.<br />

David Short, <strong>MFA</strong> Candidate<br />

<strong>Savannah</strong> College of Art & Design<br />

Atlanta, Georgia<br />

33


#25 & #26 of Michael Bierut’s<br />

26 year old sequential collection<br />

of notebooks.<br />

EXPECTATION 6 | innovative business strategy<br />

There always seems to be a lot of<br />

interest in designers’ sketchbooks,<br />

but I call these notebooks for a<br />

reason. Page after page contain<br />

nothing but records of phone<br />

conversations, notes from meetings,<br />

price estimates, specifications. I<br />

keep the random doodles to a<br />

minimum. Someone looking at<br />

those pages would think the book<br />

might belong to a lawyer or, more<br />

likely, a party planner.<br />

Michael Bierut<br />

34


EXPECTATION 6 | innovative business strategy<br />

EXPECtAtiON 6<br />

innovative<br />

business<br />

strategy<br />

Knowledge of parallel principles of business is<br />

another increasingly prominent expectation that industry<br />

professionals look to acquire in new design graduates<br />

entering into today’s workplace. According to Angelo Carusi,<br />

Principal at Cooper Carry, Inc, “More than ever, clients are<br />

going to be looking for design firms who understand the<br />

client’s business. New graduates who have an understanding<br />

of business and can present their ideas are going to have<br />

a leg up on their competition.” Graphic design curricula<br />

must take into account – there is no innovation without the<br />

connection to client objectives and business strategy. 22 When<br />

asked what new industry issue or trend he foresees that<br />

students in school need to learn now for future success in<br />

the workplace, Mike Sloan, Partner at Lippincott affirms this<br />

tenet by simply stating, “Client needs analysis, and businessdriven<br />

design strategy.”<br />

22 IDEO, “Innovation Strategy,” http://<br />

www.ideo.com/thinking/focus/<br />

innovation-strategy/ (accessed<br />

February 13, 2010).<br />

We don’t get hired to make<br />

pretty things or win design<br />

awards. We get hired to<br />

solve business problems.<br />

James Bradley<br />

35


EXPECTATION 6 | innovative business strategy<br />

One opportunity to better incorporate business<br />

strategies into the graphic design curriculum is for<br />

students to experience the client/designer relationship<br />

first hand in class. Students show proactive enthusiasm<br />

when asked to rate their interest level in various<br />

educational initiatives. Working on real client-based<br />

projects in class ranked most interesting for students.<br />

As an expert in operations management for creatives,<br />

Shel Perkins shares their enthusiasm. “An essential skill<br />

set for a designer is business savvy. We need to clearly<br />

understand [our client’s] business challenges, trends and<br />

options. We also need to be just as smart when it comes<br />

to our own. Business savvy is what makes our careers<br />

sustainable over the long haul.” 23<br />

As a witness to the recent economic downturn,<br />

Sarah Miller, Partner at Miller-Cormier in Cincinnati,<br />

Ohio, agrees that business knowledge is even more<br />

important during a troubled economy. “Design firms<br />

hire a lot of folks when times are good and lay them off<br />

when times are bad,” says Miller. “Many designers take<br />

on freelance work when times are tough and it is helpful<br />

to have prior business knowledge – how to bring in new<br />

clients, writing estimates, invoicing, and book keeping.”<br />

A typical graphic design curriculum does not include a<br />

plethora of business-driven design strategy above and<br />

beyond lectures on business conduct, proposal writing,<br />

and copyright basics. For this reason, educators ranked<br />

business practices the least emphasized within their<br />

curriculum as a whole.<br />

Which educational initiatives do you find most interesting?<br />

Student<br />

23 Shel Perkins, “Making a Living,” AIGA<br />

Center for Practice Management,<br />

Design: Business Issue 4, May 2005<br />

http://cpm.aiga.org (acessed<br />

February 13, 2010).<br />

*Real Client-<br />

Based Projects<br />

Revolving<br />

Courses<br />

Collaboration with<br />

Other Majors<br />

Graduate<br />

School<br />

5–Year<br />

Curriculum<br />

Recommend My<br />

School to Peers<br />

Trade Liberal Arts<br />

for More Studio<br />

36


Being good in<br />

business is the<br />

most fascinating<br />

kind of art.<br />

Andy Warhol<br />

What does your curriculum emphasize most?<br />

Educator<br />

Student<br />

*Business<br />

Strategies<br />

Contemporary<br />

Issues<br />

Design for the Built<br />

Environment<br />

Digital<br />

Media<br />

Global<br />

Culture<br />

Multi-Disciplinary<br />

Approach<br />

Professional<br />

Practice<br />

Securing<br />

a Job<br />

37


61<br />

46<br />

% of students<br />

respect the<br />

perspectives more<br />

so of professors<br />

who maintain<br />

a professional<br />

design position<br />

% of educators<br />

maintain a<br />

professional<br />

design position<br />

outside of school<br />

EXPECTATION 6 | innovative business strategy<br />

50<br />

% of students<br />

feel their<br />

curriculum<br />

doesn’t allow<br />

for enough<br />

professional<br />

practice time<br />

58<br />

% of educators<br />

surveyed believe<br />

that all design<br />

schools should<br />

make multiple<br />

professional<br />

practice terms<br />

mandatory<br />

38


EXPECTATION 6 | innovative business strategy<br />

There are several avenues within a student’s<br />

educational journey from which business strategy<br />

must begin to be instilled. The obvious source of this<br />

information is from professors’ expertise with client<br />

interaction. 61% of students surveyed said they respect<br />

the perspectives more so of professors who maintain<br />

a professional business position over those who do<br />

not. Yet the larger portion of educators polled (54%)<br />

do not practice professionally outside of the school<br />

environment. It is an obligation for educators in graphic<br />

design to stay up-to-date with their discipline. For busy<br />

professors, this may transform into authoring essays<br />

for academic publications or lecturing at various design<br />

conferences outside of their school of employment. 24<br />

Another opportunity for graphic design programs<br />

to encourage knowledge of business strategy, above and<br />

beyond the standard coursework, is from professional<br />

practice (also known as interning, co-oping, or<br />

apprenticeship). “A well thought-out internship program<br />

creates a relationship between the design firm and the<br />

student that is mutually beneficial. For the student, it<br />

provides exposure to the work environment and the<br />

complex challenges of ‘real world’ design projects.” 25<br />

58% of educators surveyed believe that all design<br />

schools should make multiple professional practice<br />

terms mandatory prior to graduation, although few<br />

schools comply. 50% of students feel that there are<br />

not enough opportunities for adequate professional<br />

practice experience within their undergraduate design<br />

program. Without this exposure, students will find<br />

themselves unprepared for the professional workplace.<br />

Design schools must not be content with offering<br />

professional practice on an elective basis, or expect<br />

students to acquire business connections on their own<br />

fruition. Collegiate programs must build this necessary<br />

component into their curricula as a requirement and<br />

assist students by providing the necessary contact<br />

information of interested employers. Business Week<br />

magazine recently published an article confirming this<br />

shift in demand for designers, “Those who can marry<br />

creative right-brain thinking and analytical left-brain<br />

thinking are at a premium. Right now a lot of new<br />

value is being found at the intersection of design and<br />

business. Professionals who can understand and respect<br />

both sides are at an advantage. 26 For new graduates<br />

to be competitive in today’s job market, they must<br />

come equipped with knowledge not just of creativity<br />

and craft; they must also be considerably strategic and<br />

innovative on the business side as well.<br />

My professors lacked a serious<br />

connection to real world trends and<br />

practices. This wasn’t as apparent<br />

in college, but became much<br />

more evident after being in the<br />

professional environment myself.<br />

24 Meggs, 75.<br />

25 Shel Perkins, “Be Smart about Student<br />

Internships,” AIGA Center for Practice<br />

Management, May 20, 2009, http://<br />

cpm.aiga.org (accessed Feb. 13, 2010).<br />

26 Harry West, “The Cross-Discipline<br />

Design Imperative,” Business<br />

Week, October 4, 2007.<br />

http://www.businessweek.com<br />

(accessed February 15, 2010).<br />

Amberlee Isabella, Recent Graduate<br />

University of Kentucky<br />

Lexington, Kentucky<br />

39


EXPECTATION 7 | social responsibility<br />

Adbusters magazine<br />

cover design portraying<br />

the Bush administration’s<br />

disregard of critical<br />

environmental issues<br />

Design creates culture.<br />

Culture shapes values.<br />

Values determine the future.<br />

Robert L. Peters<br />

40


EXPECTATION 7 | social responsibility<br />

EXPECtAtiON 7<br />

social<br />

responsibility<br />

In 1963, Kevin Garland, a British graphic designer wrote<br />

the First Things First manifesto which challenged designers<br />

to become more responsible with their contributions to a<br />

global culture. In 1999, a revised version of the manifesto<br />

was resurrected in the United States by a younger generation<br />

of designers and was widely published in a variety of design<br />

journals and the likes of Adbuster magazine. As far as<br />

intrinsic design issues go, the First Things First manifesto<br />

sparked significant controversy concerning design ethics. 27<br />

Its revolutionary sentiments have since resurfaced within<br />

professional expectations of new graduates entering the<br />

twenty-first century workplace. Today’s leading designers<br />

are not just evaluating the ethics of commercial content, but<br />

are also evaluating the ethics of the processes by which they<br />

conceptualize, produce, and distribute visual communication.<br />

With today’s newfound public awareness of design<br />

comes a newfound social responsibility for designers. Graphic<br />

designers must acknowledge that they have the responsibility<br />

(and the ability to respond) not just to the needs of their clients<br />

but also to those of society. 28 When leading professionals were<br />

asked about new industry issues students need to learn now for<br />

future success in the workplace, the dominant social topic was<br />

sustainability. Concepts of global culture were also mentioned,<br />

as social media continues to expand as the popular form of<br />

dynamic communication.<br />

27 Michael Bierut, William Drenttel<br />

and Steven Heller, ed. Looking<br />

Closer Four: Critical Writings on<br />

Graphic Design, (New York,<br />

NY: Allworth Press, 2002) 4.<br />

28 Charlotte & Peter Fiell, Graphic<br />

Design for the 21st Century,<br />

(Hohenzollernring: Taschen,<br />

2005) 10.<br />

Designers have a dual duty;<br />

contractually to their clients<br />

and morally to the later users<br />

and recipients of their work.<br />

Hans Höger<br />

41


87<br />

% of professionals<br />

view sustainability<br />

as a top priority<br />

and are beginning<br />

to learn how to<br />

apply its principles<br />

more effectively.<br />

Too many design students<br />

are making without intent or<br />

understanding of the context<br />

in which they live as simple<br />

humans, let alone designers.<br />

Eric Heiman, Professor<br />

California College of the Arts<br />

San Francisco, California<br />

“As one of the defining ideas of the 21st century,<br />

sustainability holds tremendous possibilities for the<br />

creative community, its business partners and society.” 29<br />

‘Green design,’ as it is termed, seeks to find processes<br />

and materials that do not negatively impact the<br />

environment. For example, graphic designers may<br />

“research things such as recycled and tree-free papers;<br />

or try to find nontoxic inks; or devise folds and<br />

structures that result in less waste.” 30 The eminence of<br />

sustainability became even more apparent as our nation<br />

watched the first political campaigns of the twentyfirst<br />

century, which focused heavily on the importance<br />

of clean energy efficiency. Ideologies of conservation<br />

and environmental protection are changing how the<br />

world operates globally. “87% of recently surveyed<br />

aiga members view sustainability as a top priority, but<br />

many of them confess they are ill-equipped to apply its<br />

principles effectively.” 31 Opportunities for pedagogical<br />

change can be found in teaching applications that<br />

embrace these basic principles. It is critical that design<br />

students stay informed of increased environmental efforts<br />

for global business, as professional expectations of<br />

sustainability knowledge are guaranteed to follow suit.<br />

29 AIGA Center for Sustainable Design,<br />

“The Living Principles,” AIGA, http://<br />

www.livingprinciples.net/ (accessed<br />

February 11, 2010).<br />

30 Brian Dougherty, Green Graphic<br />

Design, (New York, NY: Allworth Press,<br />

2008), 10.<br />

31 AIGA, http://www.livingprinciples.net<br />

(accessed February 11, 2010).<br />

32 Heller, Steven and Lita Talarico, Design<br />

School Confidential, (Beverly, MA:<br />

Rockport Publishers, 2009), 168.<br />

May 2009 Time Magazine<br />

illustrating the cover story<br />

on ‘green designers’<br />

42


EXPECTATION 7 | social responsibility<br />

A collegiate curriculum is the ideal vehicle to propel<br />

such ideals to the forefront of future graphic design<br />

practice. Traditionally, studio courses such as ‘Social<br />

Awareness,’ ‘Design for Society,’ or ‘Contemporary Issues<br />

in Design’ provide opportunities for students to research<br />

and design a socially responsible campaign. Student<br />

projects typically range anywhere from literacy, politics,<br />

or animal cruelty to the likes of clean water, global<br />

warming, and recycling campaigns. Learning outcomes<br />

from such courses are imperative, as students digest the<br />

vital role of graphic design within society and global<br />

culture as a whole. However, survey results from today’s<br />

leading practitioners conclude that another layer of<br />

social responsibility knowledge must be added to existing<br />

syllabi to better meet twenty-first century professional<br />

expectations. Studio courses must begin to inform<br />

and encourage students to critically apply practical<br />

sustainable processes to any and all design problems.<br />

The Royal College of Art in London, uk has<br />

incorporated a class entitled ‘Passion for Print,’ which<br />

investigates printing possibilities “beyond the surface.”<br />

Students produce design solutions where the influence<br />

of production and process is a primary consideration.<br />

For example, student Lottie Crumbleholme designed a<br />

lithography campaign using sustainable ideals entitled<br />

‘This is the Environmental Impact of your Work,’<br />

which encourages graphic designers to think more<br />

environmentally about the printing process. 32 American<br />

graphic design syllabi must take note and not only<br />

require students to research the content of such visual<br />

communications, but also research and practice with<br />

ethical production methods and materials.<br />

Barack Obama presidential campaign<br />

poster design by Scott Hanson of<br />

ISO50 highlights eco-friendly ideals<br />

This questionnaire gives designers the This opportunity questionnaire to audit gives a piece designers of work they<br />

have recently sent to print in order to see the the opportunity impact that to audit will a have piece made of on<br />

the environment. Non-drying inks printed work on they back have of recently the first sent page to print transfer<br />

any answers that relate to a poor environmental in order to choice see the onto impact the that image it below,<br />

literally showing the impact made.<br />

43


EXPECTATION 7 | social responsibility<br />

Amongst industry professionals, the notion<br />

of social responsibility also spawns discussions<br />

concerning the need for students to increase their<br />

cultural awareness prior to entering the twentyfirst<br />

century workplace. “Today’s new pluralism<br />

in graphic design must be seen as a response to the<br />

greater multiculturalism of today’s global society.” 33<br />

With the opulence of technology and our expanded<br />

global demands, the audience for which we design is<br />

increasingly important. Design history lectures will<br />

always idolize the “universal” design solutions of<br />

Bauhaus Modernism as the true “international style”<br />

of yesteryear. But with the new wave of social media<br />

and other forms of technology that broaden our<br />

communicative abilities, there is no longer such a thing<br />

as a universal audience. 34 With each project, students<br />

must learn to become experts on “the audience’s<br />

values, symbolic codes, and communicative styles;<br />

and preferred media and distribution channels must<br />

inform how we shape the written message.” 35 The First<br />

Things First manifesto reminds us that designers have<br />

the potential to create messages that have a profound<br />

impact on the world. Opportunity for pedagogical<br />

change rests in infusing practical principles of design<br />

ethics in students by requiring each studio project to<br />

fully research the global audience’s perspective and<br />

incorporate aspects of social responsibility by concept,<br />

process, and production.<br />

Design is directed toward human beings.<br />

To design is to solve human problems by<br />

identifying them & executing the best solution.<br />

Ivan Chermayeff<br />

33 Fiell, 8<br />

34 Katherine McCoy, “Maximize the<br />

Message: Tailoring Design for Your<br />

Audience in a Multicultural Era,” in The<br />

Education of a Graphic Designer, ed.<br />

Steven Heller, (New York, NY: Allworth<br />

Press, 2005), 279.<br />

35 Ibid, 283.<br />

The First Things First manifesto<br />

was published in January 1964.<br />

Inexplicably, reverberations are<br />

still apparent.<br />

44


EXPECTATION 7 | social responsibility<br />

Design is a<br />

call to action.<br />

Charles Eames<br />

45


visualizing curricular concepts<br />

46


VISUALIZING CURRICULAR CONCEPTS<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

visualizing<br />

curricular<br />

concepts<br />

With all of the aforementioned variables of graphic<br />

design education, it is difficult for beginners to visualize<br />

which design programs are best suited for their individual<br />

priorities. As neophytes to design in general, most would not<br />

have an inkling of how to determine which programs are best<br />

aligned with today’s professional expectations. Under this<br />

premise, it becomes imperative for students to evaluate the<br />

competitive industry expectations they will face before they<br />

embark upon their educational journey. Bridging these gaps<br />

becomes possible by retaining educators that remain informed<br />

of current and future professional expectations. But also by<br />

equipping beginner students up front with the informational<br />

tools to make knowledgeable decisions about their choice of<br />

graphic design programs.<br />

Nothing is more tragic than to have<br />

students attend programs expecting<br />

to receive professional preparation,<br />

only to find after graduation that<br />

major gaps exist in their education.<br />

Philip Meggs<br />

47


What makes a<br />

graphic design<br />

course a success?<br />

Freedom<br />

When students are able to<br />

independently define and follow<br />

through with their own unique<br />

project parameters<br />

Educator<br />

Student<br />

Context<br />

When lectures and assignments<br />

connect with historical and/or<br />

contemporary real-world issues<br />

A class is a success when<br />

students demonstrate<br />

conceptual development,<br />

increased understanding<br />

and capacity for effective<br />

design methodologies.<br />

Discourse<br />

When the group engages in<br />

consistent thought-provoking<br />

discussion and critiques in class<br />

Dawn Barrett, Professor<br />

Rhode Island School of Design<br />

Providence, Rhode Island<br />

Challenge<br />

When the assignments have<br />

demanding yet attainable<br />

goals and objectives<br />

The students’ abilities<br />

to make intelligent design<br />

decisions, to work independently,<br />

to attain visual sensitivity and<br />

produce work that is visually<br />

cohesive and that reflects<br />

typographic competence.<br />

Learning Curve<br />

When I am able to learn<br />

something fundamentally new<br />

from my professor and perhaps<br />

vice versa<br />

Barry Roseman, Professor<br />

SCAD-Atlanta<br />

Atlanta, Georgia<br />

GPA<br />

When grade point averages<br />

are favorable and improve<br />

throughout the term<br />

Experimentation, enthusiasm,<br />

integration of theory and<br />

thinking beyond the expected<br />

design solution<br />

Sherry Blankenship, Professor<br />

Ohio University<br />

Athens, Ohio<br />

Multimedia<br />

When I am able to expand<br />

my knowledge of new<br />

media and technology to<br />

solve a design problem<br />

Projects<br />

When there is a portfolioworthy<br />

project at the end<br />

of the term<br />

48


visualizing curricular concepts<br />

CHALLENGE<br />

DISCOURSE<br />

FREEDOM<br />

PROJECTS<br />

LEARNING<br />

PROJECTS<br />

DISCOURSE<br />

CHALLENGE<br />

CONTEXT<br />

FREEDOM<br />

CONTEXT<br />

LEARNING CURVE<br />

MULTIMEDIA<br />

GPA<br />

MULTIMEDIA<br />

GPA<br />

Most Important<br />

Least Important<br />

49


70<br />

% of educators<br />

believe courses<br />

should focus<br />

less on polished<br />

portfolios and<br />

more on the<br />

development of<br />

core skill sets.<br />

Existing curricular concepts can be examined in various forms, but most reek of<br />

industry jargon and provide no connection by description of their pedagogical objectives<br />

to the expectations of today’s practice. Elaborate booklets and promotional brochures<br />

about each school are distributed to entice and inform potential students, yet are often<br />

presented as a glamorized hyper-reality of the college experience. The award-winning<br />

catalog Proof, a School of <strong>Visual</strong> Arts’ publication for prospective students, is an ideal<br />

example. While the school is indisputably amongst the most successful, the majority of<br />

this oversized catalog serves to excite the creative spirit and showcase individual student<br />

work. Very few of the visuals are dedicated to deciphering core curricular concepts in<br />

respect to professional expectations. Upon visiting numerous web sites of collegiate design<br />

programs, it is the norm to see a lengthy list of course numbers provided within a cryptic<br />

matrix of credit hours required. Rarely do they discuss how their educational tenets align<br />

with what leading industry professionals expect from new graduates of the future. With<br />

industry expectations left undefined in information issued to prospective students, how<br />

exactly are they expected to conclusively visualize what they will need upon graduation?<br />

How are they expected to differentiate among design schools under review, when<br />

professional expectations of the twenty-first century workplace are not published?<br />

visualizing curricular concepts<br />

Proof, a SVA publication<br />

to prospective students<br />

50


visualizing curricular concepts<br />

Unless students have prior recommendation from a guidance counselor or<br />

attend the local design school close to their residence, many students turn to outside<br />

sources for answers. The streamlined us News and World Report is known for<br />

publishing an annual “Best Design Schools” ranking, as is Business Week’s “Top<br />

Design Schools” list, or industry resources such as aiga’s link to nasad accredited<br />

institutions. These sources seem to cater more so to popularity and status and fail to<br />

discern a comparative outlook on how the ‘top schools’ align with expectations of<br />

twenty-first century professionals. In an effort to bridge this gap, Changing Graphic<br />

Design Pedagogy serves as a visual research manual that marries expectations from<br />

top design professionals with corresponding information about the top design schools<br />

per industry standards. Initially, leading professionals were asked from which design<br />

schools their most successful new employees graduated. Many of their responses<br />

align with the ‘top schools’ ranking, but they also drew attention to a variety of<br />

astute programs students may never consider should they only rely upon the allure<br />

of undergraduate catalogs, kitschy web sites, or ‘top school’ publicity. Each school’s<br />

curriculum deemed noteworthy by the surveyed professionals was closely evaluated<br />

and compared. Several factors were considered with a goal of distinguishing what<br />

each had in common to qualify them as a ‘top design school’ per leading practitioner<br />

standards. The region, accreditation, admission policy, term structure, ratio of<br />

liberal arts credits, review requirements, professional practice policies, and senior<br />

project mandates were all evaluated.<br />

Students should have a plan<br />

when they begin as to what<br />

kind of portfolio they will<br />

need when they graduate,<br />

otherwise how can they<br />

decide on a curriculum?<br />

Cary Staples, Professor<br />

University of Tennessee<br />

Knoxville, Tennessee<br />

Yale University School of Art<br />

web site with course listing<br />

51


Where did your most successful designers attend undergraduate school?<br />

Arizona State University Tempe, AZ<br />

Art Center College of Design Pasadena, CA<br />

Art Institute of Atlanta Atlanta, GA<br />

Auburn University Auburn, AL<br />

Boston University Boston, MA<br />

California Institute of the Arts Valencia, CA<br />

Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA<br />

Clemson University Clemson, SC<br />

College for Creative Studies Detroit, MI<br />

Cornish College of the Arts Seattle, WA<br />

Creative Circus Atlanta, GA<br />

Georgia State University Atlanta, GA<br />

Grand Valley State University Allendale, MI<br />

Herron School of Art & Design Indianapolis, IN<br />

Maryland Institute College of Art Baltimore, MD<br />

North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC<br />

Ohio State University Columbus, OH<br />

Ohio University Athens, OH<br />

Parsons the New School for Design NY, NY<br />

Penn State University Altoona, PA<br />

Portfolio Center Atlanta, GA<br />

Pratt Institute Brooklyn, NY<br />

Rutgers State University Newark, NJ<br />

Rhode Island School of Design Providence, RI<br />

<strong>Savannah</strong> College of Art & Design Atlanta, GA<br />

School of the Art Institute of Chicago Chicago, IL<br />

School of <strong>Visual</strong> Arts New York, NY<br />

University of the Arts Philadelphia, PA<br />

University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, OH<br />

University of Illinois Champaign, IL<br />

University of Tennessee Knoxville, TN<br />

University of Washington Seattle, WA<br />

Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, VA<br />

Yale University New Haven, CT<br />

52


visualizing curricular concepts<br />

In visualizing the pedagogical change of graphic design, the biggest issue is the time<br />

limitation in comparison with the “encyclopedic amounts of information” to learn (as<br />

Paul Rand would say). During the onset of this research, several educators and students<br />

expressed concern as to how a graphic design curriculum could possibly incorporate any<br />

additional components. Professors seemed already overwhelmed with back-to-back studios,<br />

full to capacity. They are pressed for time; 55% of educators would rather have the longer<br />

semester term system over the collegiate ten-week quarter structure to administer the new<br />

and necessary coursework. Students frowned at the proposition of tagging on an additional<br />

year of coursework, when four years already seemed like an eternity. Given the necessity of<br />

including new professional expectations into the curriculum, it is fair to say that four years<br />

has become unrealistic to complete a comprehensive undergraduate education where the<br />

student is truly prepared for today’s increasingly demanding workplace. 50% of educators<br />

surveyed agreed. Graphic Design Department Chair, Santiago Piedrafita of North Carolina<br />

State University is part of the other 50% who believe as the need for additional coursework<br />

arises, it means certain existing coursework has become outdated.<br />

The problem in thinking four<br />

years isn’t enough to prepare<br />

undergraduates for entry<br />

level positions is the fault of<br />

design faculty who refuse to<br />

reconsider or let go of sacred<br />

cows in the curriculum.<br />

Santiago Piedrafita, Department Chair<br />

North Carolina State University<br />

Raleigh, North Carolina<br />

53


Frequent debates occur over which curricular<br />

components are ‘sacred cows,’ but the solution is<br />

tangibly resolved only in a handful of programs like<br />

Rhode Island School of Design (risd) and University<br />

of Cincinnati’s College of Design, Architecture,<br />

Art, and Planning (daap). risd’s Bachelor of Fine<br />

Arts (bfa) degree is a typical four-year program<br />

offering the expected course requirements, such as<br />

foundations, liberal arts, electives, and various design<br />

studios. Above and beyond the bfa curriculum, risd<br />

also offers an optional fifth year of coursework,<br />

which results in a Bachelor of Graphic Design (bgd)<br />

degree. This additional year enables students to<br />

acquire 6 credit hours of professional internships<br />

(as opposed to zero required for the bfa). It also<br />

incorporates 12 more graphic design studio credit<br />

hours, 9 additional art and design elective credit<br />

hours, and 3 more liberal arts credit hours. risd’s<br />

solution is a win-win for both educators and students.<br />

RISD 2009–2010 Undergraduate<br />

Graphic Design Curriculum comparing<br />

BFA & BGD credit hour distribution<br />

The need for additional time beyond the fourth<br />

year is addressed, along with the preservation of<br />

established coursework to compensate for the lack of<br />

time. By giving students this option, it allows them to<br />

gauge their competency level versus their career goals<br />

during their senior year of the design program and<br />

decide if the additional year is warranted.<br />

In contrast, daap in Cincinnati, Ohio also offers<br />

a five-year program, yet it is treated as a standard<br />

requirement to obtain a Bachelor of Science in<br />

Graphic Design, not a supplemental add-on. As a<br />

result, graphic design majors graduate from daap<br />

with a year and a half of professional practice<br />

experience, and are therefore better prepared to enter<br />

into the full-time workplace over other students with<br />

little to no experience.<br />

Another curricular concept that is rarely<br />

visualized within design school publications is their<br />

evaluation process of student work. Due to the<br />

increase in complexity of today’s design programs,<br />

portfolio reviews for admissions is more necessary<br />

than ever. 70% of professors polled are against open<br />

admission policies and believe that portfolios should<br />

be required for acceptance into reputable graphic<br />

design programs. This process favorably catches<br />

students who may need preliminary instruction<br />

prior to delving into the rigorous graphic design<br />

studio courses, yet it also creates an adverse aura<br />

of exclusivity surrounding the program itself.<br />

54


visualizing curricular concepts<br />

Noteworthy schools, like Art Center College of Design in Pasadena, California, or Maryland Institute College<br />

of Art in Baltimore, Maryland require 10–20 portfolio pieces up front from applying high school seniors to<br />

assess advanced student potential. This type of evaluation often becomes circumstantial, deterring promising<br />

students who have yet to be exposed to creative studies in high school, or who do not have the means to<br />

produce a collection of portfolio pieces. Other collegiate design programs more logically accept students<br />

without a portfolio evaluation into their foundation program for fundamental ‘pre-graphic design’ studies. It<br />

is more practical for schools to assess student talent after requiring a first year of intense coursework. Only at<br />

this point should student work be pragmatically reviewed to grant or deny their continuation into the official<br />

graphic design program.<br />

When comparing the success of certain curricular concepts, another point of contention amongst<br />

professors and students is the necessity of interim and exit reviews. 67% of students polled were not required<br />

to go through any sort of provisional or final review to gauge their progress. With open admission design<br />

school policies at the beginning of a student’s educational career, and the aforementioned lack of professional<br />

certification upon graduation, it is imperative for collegiate programs to implement reviews as academic<br />

checkpoints. They act as an essential barometer to ensure the release of fully competent graduates into the<br />

professional workplace. When surveyed, educators overwhelmingly agreed. 89% advocate for mandated<br />

interim and exit reviews prior to graduation and 96% believe that undergraduates should be required to<br />

complete a comprehensive senior capstone project or thesis to summate their studies in graphic design.<br />

Lastly, a design school’s accreditation is also a vital component to evaluate when comparing curricular<br />

concepts. 73% of educators agree that a design school’s accrediting association is an important indicator of<br />

their viability, yet several design schools remain only regionally (as opposed to nationally) accredited. For<br />

higher education as a whole, it is largely disputed which type of accrediting association, regional or national,<br />

possesses more quality control over curricular components. But for graphic design specifically, the National<br />

Association of Schools of Art and Design (nasad) is the most logical choice due to the collaboration with<br />

aiga (the professional association for design). nasad showcases substantial strides to homogenize successful<br />

curricular requirements for graphic design education; for this reason, design schools are remiss should they<br />

choose not to align themselves with such initiatives.<br />

55


70<br />

73<br />

% of educators<br />

say portfolios<br />

should be<br />

required for<br />

admission into<br />

graphic design<br />

programs<br />

% of educators<br />

say a school’s<br />

accrediting<br />

association is<br />

an important<br />

barometer of<br />

their viability<br />

visualizing curricular concepts<br />

89<br />

96<br />

% of educators<br />

say interim or exit<br />

reviews should<br />

be mandatory<br />

to better gauge<br />

student progress<br />

and levels of<br />

proficiency<br />

% of educators<br />

say undergrads<br />

should be<br />

required to<br />

complete a<br />

senior project<br />

or thesis prior<br />

to graduation<br />

56


visualizing curricular concepts<br />

Portfolio Review<br />

for Admissions in<br />

to Graphic Design<br />

Nationally<br />

Accredited<br />

(NASAD)<br />

Interim or<br />

Exit Reviews<br />

Required<br />

Senior Project<br />

or <strong>Thesis</strong><br />

Required<br />

Arizona State University<br />

Art Center College of Design<br />

Art Institute of Atlanta<br />

Auburn University<br />

Boston University<br />

California Institute of the Arts [cal arts]<br />

Carnegie Mellon University<br />

Clemson University<br />

College for Creative Studies<br />

Cornish College of the Arts<br />

Creative Circus*<br />

Georgia State University<br />

Grand Valley State University<br />

Herron School of Art & Design<br />

Maryland Institute College of Art<br />

North Carolina State University<br />

Ohio State University<br />

Ohio University<br />

Parsons the New School for Design<br />

Penn State University<br />

Portfolio Center*<br />

Pratt Institute<br />

Rhode Island School of Design [risd]**<br />

Rutgers State University<br />

<strong>Savannah</strong> College of Art & Design<br />

School of the Art Institute of Chicago<br />

School of <strong>Visual</strong> Arts [sva]<br />

University of the Arts<br />

University of Cincinnati [daap]**<br />

University of Illinois<br />

University of Tennessee at Knoxville<br />

University of Washington<br />

Virginia Commonwealth University<br />

Yale University<br />

Two-year program*<br />

Five-year program**<br />

57


58<br />

50<br />

% of educators<br />

say multiple<br />

professional<br />

practice terms<br />

should be<br />

mandatory prior<br />

to graduation<br />

% of students<br />

say they do not<br />

have enough<br />

opportunities<br />

for adequate<br />

professional<br />

practice<br />

visualizing curricular concepts<br />

58<br />

50<br />

% of educators<br />

believe a two<br />

semester school<br />

year is more<br />

favorable than<br />

the four quarter<br />

system per year<br />

% of educators<br />

think four years<br />

is becoming<br />

insufficient for a<br />

comprehensive<br />

graphic design<br />

education in the<br />

21st century<br />

58


visualizing curricular concepts<br />

More than 2-Terms<br />

Professional Practice<br />

2-Semester<br />

School Year<br />

4-Quarter<br />

School Year<br />

More than 4-Year<br />

Program Length<br />

Arizona State University<br />

Art Center College of Design<br />

Art Institute of Atlanta<br />

Auburn University<br />

Boston University<br />

California Institute of the Arts [cal arts]<br />

Carnegie Mellon University<br />

Clemson University<br />

College for Creative Studies<br />

Cornish College of the Arts<br />

Creative Circus*<br />

Georgia State University<br />

Grand Valley State University<br />

Herron School of Art & Design<br />

Maryland Institute College of Art<br />

North Carolina State University<br />

Ohio State University<br />

Ohio University<br />

Parsons the New School for Design<br />

Penn State University<br />

Portfolio Center*<br />

Pratt Institute<br />

Rhode Island School of Design [risd]**<br />

Rutgers State University<br />

<strong>Savannah</strong> College of Art & Design<br />

School of the Art Institute of Chicago<br />

School of <strong>Visual</strong> Arts [sva]<br />

University of the Arts<br />

University of Cincinnati [daap]**<br />

University of Illinois<br />

University of Tennessee at Knoxville<br />

University of Washington<br />

Virginia Commonwealth University<br />

Yale University<br />

Two-year program*<br />

Five-year program**<br />

59


55–70%<br />

Liberal Arts<br />

30–35%<br />

Liberal Arts<br />

15–25%<br />

Liberal Arts<br />

0%<br />

Liberal Arts<br />

Arizona State University<br />

Art Center College of Design<br />

Art Institute of Atlanta<br />

Auburn University<br />

Boston University<br />

California Institute of the Arts [cal arts]<br />

Carnegie Mellon University<br />

Clemson University<br />

College for Creative Studies<br />

Cornish College of the Arts<br />

Creative Circus*<br />

Georgia State University<br />

Grand Valley State University<br />

Herron School of Art & Design<br />

Maryland Institute College of Art<br />

North Carolina State University<br />

Ohio State University<br />

Ohio University<br />

Parsons the New School for Design<br />

Penn State University<br />

Portfolio Center*<br />

Pratt Institute<br />

Rhode Island School of Design [risd]**<br />

Rutgers State University<br />

<strong>Savannah</strong> College of Art & Design<br />

School of the Art Institute of Chicago<br />

School of <strong>Visual</strong> Arts [sva]<br />

University of the Arts<br />

University of Cincinnati [daap]**<br />

University of Illinois<br />

University of Tennessee at Knoxville<br />

University of Washington<br />

Virginia Commonwealth University<br />

Yale University<br />

Note: Percentages are an average approximation calculated per total credit hours required; student electives and individual exemptions may apply.<br />

Two-year program*<br />

Five-year program**<br />

60


visualizing curricular concepts<br />

Dexterity with<br />

Digital Media<br />

Design<br />

Discourse<br />

Multi-Disciplinary<br />

Approach<br />

Innovative<br />

Business<br />

Strategies<br />

Social<br />

Responsibility<br />

Arizona State University<br />

Art Center College of Design<br />

Art Institute of Atlanta<br />

Auburn University<br />

Boston University<br />

California Institute of the Arts [cal arts]<br />

Carnegie Mellon University<br />

Clemson University<br />

College for Creative Studies<br />

Cornish College of the Arts<br />

Creative Circus*<br />

Georgia State University<br />

Grand Valley State University<br />

Herron School of Art & Design<br />

Maryland Institute College of Art<br />

North Carolina State University<br />

Ohio State University<br />

Ohio University<br />

Parsons the New School for Design<br />

Penn State University<br />

Portfolio Center*<br />

Pratt Institute<br />

Rhode Island School of Design [risd]**<br />

Rutgers State University<br />

<strong>Savannah</strong> College of Art & Design<br />

School of the Art Institute of Chicago<br />

School of <strong>Visual</strong> Arts [sva]<br />

University of the Arts<br />

University of Cincinnati [daap]**<br />

University of Illinois<br />

University of Tennessee at Knoxville<br />

University of Washington<br />

Virginia Commonwealth University<br />

Yale University<br />

Note: Selections are based upon published curricular descriptions and requirements; syllabi per professor and elective choices per student will vary.<br />

Two-year program*<br />

Five-year program**<br />

61


conclusion<br />

37 MarshallMcLuhan.com, http://www.<br />

marshallmcluhan.com/poster.html<br />

38 Heller, Education of an E-designer,<br />

105.<br />

The field of graphic design has constantly and consistently changed upon its<br />

inception and will continue to reinvent itself as technology advances. Pedagogy should<br />

not be defined by or limited to industry expectations, but should be greatly informed<br />

and influenced by them. Graphic design education must not rest on serving the public’s<br />

current definition of it or reacting to change only after it surfaces within the industry. The<br />

best curricula anticipate future change and produce design professionals that embody the<br />

same philosophy. The essence of this proactive vision in education can be traced back to<br />

the Marshall McLuhan caveat, “If we look at the present through a rearview mirror, we<br />

march backwards into the future.” 37 Armed with the knowledge of what today’s leading<br />

professionals expect from new graduates of the future, visualizing certain pedagogical<br />

change seems all the more tangible. Research shows that in order for design student to be<br />

fully prepared to enter the today’s professional graphic design workplace, they must be<br />

proficient in fundamental skills of (1) creativity, (2) craft and technique, and (3) design<br />

discourse; new modalities and methods of (4) digital media and (5) multi-disciplinary<br />

approaches; and knowledge of business with (6) innovative strategy, and a sense of (7)<br />

social responsibility. Realistically, even with the best schools and the top professors, a<br />

design curriculum cannot carry the entire responsibility of a graphic designer’s success or<br />

failure post-graduation. As Steven Heller says, “The content of education is more than<br />

62


the college curriculum.” 38 Even after mastering the core set of professional expectations,<br />

a design student’s body of knowledge can never be looked upon in completion; it<br />

remains ongoing and continuous. The best remain curious, thirst for knowledge, and<br />

39 Heller, Education of an E-designer, 105.<br />

surround themselves with forward-thinkers who embrace the same notion of change.<br />

Graphic design education must continue striving to stay ahead of the industry’s learning<br />

curve and to bridge the dichotomy between pedagogy and professional practice. More<br />

strides need to be made to develop professional certification for graphic designers, more<br />

portfolio reviews need to occur within academia, and more design programs need to<br />

consistently seek national recognition through nasad. Currently, without the universal<br />

acceptance of these tenants, the sole criterion for measuring a design program’s success<br />

lies within the competency of their students in the professional workplace upon<br />

graduation. Impending change and growth is the one unrivaled consistency schools<br />

embrace globally, as graphic design pedagogy continues to be translated into diverse<br />

configurations across the nation. On this account, the seven distinct professional<br />

expectations identified are in stride with the twenty-first century workplace today, but<br />

also come with the guarantee to evolve through time and technological advancement.<br />

This is the cyclical nature of the cultural force that is graphic design, its “education has<br />

no beginning or ending.” 39<br />

Education itself might be looked upon<br />

as the assimilation of experience – the<br />

content of education is more than the<br />

college curriculum. Education has no<br />

beginning or ending.<br />

Steven Heller<br />

63


ibliography<br />

aiga Center for Sustainable Design. “The Living Principles.” aiga,<br />

http://www.livingprinciples.net/(accessed February 11, 2010).<br />

aiga: The Professional Association for Design. “About aiga.” aiga,<br />

http://www.aiga.org/content.cfm/about-aiga (accessed January 31, 2010).<br />

Bierut, Michael, William Drenttel and Steven Heller, ed. Looking Closer Four:<br />

Critical Writings on Graphic Design. New York, ny: Allworth Press, 2002.<br />

Biesele, Igildo G. Graphic Design Education. Zurich: abc Verlag, 1981.<br />

Brainyquote.com. http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/t/tseliot101421.html<br />

(accessed February 15, 2010).<br />

Brown, Tim. “Strategy by Design.” Fast Company, June 1, 2005,<br />

http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/95/design-strategy.html<br />

(accessed February 10, 2010).<br />

Dabner, David. Graphic Design School: A Foundation Course in the Principles<br />

and Practices of Graphic Design, 3rd ed. Hoboken, nj: John Wiley &<br />

Sons Inc., 2005.<br />

Dewey, John. Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy<br />

of Education. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1916.<br />

Dougherty, Brian. Green Graphic Design. New York, ny: Allworth Press, 2008.<br />

Fiell, Charlotte & Peter. Graphic Design for the 21st Century. Hohenzollernring:<br />

Taschen, 2005.<br />

Heller, Steven. Education of an E-Designer. New York, ny: Allworth Press, 2001.<br />

Heller, Steven and Lita Talarico. Design School Confidential. Beverly, ma:<br />

Rockport Publishers, 2009.<br />

IDEO. “Innovation Strategy.” ideo, http://www.ideo.com/thinking/focus/<br />

innovation-strategy/ (accessed February 13, 2010).<br />

Lupton Ellen and Abbott Miller. Design Writing Research: Writing on Graphic<br />

Design. London: Phaidon Press Limited, 1996.<br />

64


Lupton, Ellen, and Jennifer Cole Phillips. Graphic Design: The New Basics.<br />

New York, ny: Princeton Architectural Press, 2008.<br />

MarshallMcLuhan.com. http://www.marshallmcluhan.com/poster.html<br />

(accessed February 15, 2010).<br />

Mayer, Nancy. “Putting Criticism into Critique.” In The Education of a Graphic<br />

Designer, edited by Steven Heller, 98-101. New York, ny: Allworth<br />

Press, 2005.<br />

McCoy, Katherine. “Maximize the Message: Tailoring Design for Your Audience in<br />

a Multicultural Era.” In The Education of a Graphic Designer, edited by<br />

Steven Heller, 279-283. New York, ny: Allworth Press, 2005.<br />

Meggs, Philip. “Pedagogy vs. the Real World.” In Meggs: Making Graphic Design<br />

History, edited by Rob Carter, Libby Meggs, and Sandra Wheeler, 74-76.<br />

Hoboken, nj: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2008.<br />

nasad: National Association of Schools of Art and Design. “Making Choices<br />

About the Study of Graphic Design.” aiga, http://nasad.arts-accredit.org/<br />

site/docs/aiga-nasad%20publications/aiga-nasad-gened_briefing_paper.pdf<br />

(accessed February 28, 2010).<br />

Perkins, Shel. “Making a Living.” aiga Center for Practice Management, Design:<br />

Business Issue 4, May 2005 http://cpm.aiga.org/content.cfm/<br />

making_a_living (accessed February 13, 2010).<br />

Perkins, Shel. “Be Smart about Student Internships.” aiga Center for Practice<br />

Management, May 20, 2009. http://cpm.aiga.org/content.cfm/be-smartabout-student-internships<br />

(accessed February 13, 2010).<br />

Pierce, Randy. “Graphic Design and the Built Environment.” InformeDesign, vol 1,<br />

issue 4, http://www.informedesign.umn.edu/_news/may_v01-p.pdf<br />

(accessed January 06, 2010).<br />

Posnak, Rachael. “Job Outlook: Juniors.” cmyk Magazine, vol. 44, July 2009.<br />

Rand, Paul. Design, Form, and Chaos. New Haven, ct: Yale University Press, 1993.<br />

65


Rock, Michael. “The Designer as Author.” In Graphic Design Theory: Readings<br />

from the Field, edited by Helen Armstrong, 108-114. New York, ny:<br />

Princeton Architectural Press, 2009.<br />

Teper, Steven J. “The Creative Campus: Who’s no. 1.” The Chronicle of Higher<br />

Education, October 1, 2004. http://chronicle.com/article/The-Creative-<br />

Campus-Who-s/4870 (accessed January 31, 2010.)<br />

ThinkExist.com. “Milton Glaser Quotes.” ThinkExist, http://thinkexist.com/quotes/<br />

milton_glaser/(accessed January 31, 2010).<br />

Van der Velden, Daniel. “Research & Destroy: A Plea for Design as Research.”<br />

Graphic Design Theory, 2006. http://graphicdesigntheory.net/Velden.html<br />

(accessed February 12, 2010).<br />

bibliography<br />

West, Harry. “The Cross-Discipline Design Imperative.” Business Week, October 4,<br />

2007. http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/content/oct2007/<br />

id2007104_562559.htm?chan=innovation_special+report+--+d-schools_<br />

special+report+--+d-schools (accessed February 15, 2010).<br />

I think what I feel fortunate<br />

about is that things still<br />

amaze me. The possibility<br />

for learning never disappears.<br />

MILTON GLASER<br />

66


about the<br />

author<br />

<strong>Nicole</strong> <strong>Roberts</strong> is a recent Master of Fine Arts degree recipient<br />

and is currently completing coursework for a Master of Arts<br />

in Interior Design as well. Changing Graphic Design Pedagogy<br />

is the visual component of her thesis submitted to the graphic<br />

design faculty of <strong>Savannah</strong> College of Art and Design in<br />

Atlanta, Georgia. Along with a Bachelor of Science in Design<br />

degree from the University of Cincinnati, College of Design,<br />

Architecture, Art and Planning – <strong>Nicole</strong> has 9½ years of<br />

professional experience with a specialization in environmental<br />

graphic design. Equipped with the her teaching assistant<br />

internships and the enlightening thesis research enclosed,<br />

<strong>Nicole</strong> hopes to expand her career into education as an<br />

advocate for the continual advancement of design pedagogy.<br />

Book Designer<br />

<strong>Nicole</strong> R. <strong>Roberts</strong><br />

paper<br />

Red River Premium Matte<br />

32# Text, 60# Cover<br />

TypefaceS<br />

Sabon, designed by Jan Tschichold, 1967<br />

Futura, designed by Paul Renner, 1927<br />

67


about<br />

the survey<br />

participants<br />

The research included within this book<br />

would not have been possible without<br />

the survey participants who contributed<br />

their time, opinions, and perspectives<br />

on today’s graphic design pedagogy<br />

and how they envision future change.<br />

Statistical information is based upon<br />

design professionals, educators, and<br />

students. Survey participants are diverse<br />

in geographic location, type of institution<br />

or business, and background experience.<br />

There is no design without<br />

discipline. There is no<br />

discipline without intelligence.<br />

Massimo Vignelli<br />

68


about survey participants<br />

professionals<br />

Aggie Toppins<br />

Aggie is a senior designer at Simple Truth in Chicago, Illinois,<br />

a leader in the branding industry. Aggie holds a bs in Graphic<br />

Design from the University of Cincinnati.<br />

Angelo Carusi<br />

Angelo is a principal at Cooper Carry, a premier architecture<br />

firm headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia. He has led the firm’s<br />

retail studio since 1989 and has since acquired numerous<br />

awards. Angelo holds a Bachelor of Architecture from the<br />

University of Tennessee.<br />

Bart Caylor<br />

Bart is the principal of Brainstorm, a premier marketing<br />

agency in Indianapolis, Indiana. Bart is responsible for many<br />

of Brainstorm’s higher education accounts, leading several<br />

large-scale web initiatives which garnered acclaim in The<br />

Chronicle of Higher Education and us News and World<br />

Report. Bart graduated magna cum laude from Anderson<br />

University and is a member of the Council for Advancement<br />

and Support of Education.<br />

Ben Graham<br />

Ben is a principal and creative director at Turnstyle in<br />

Seattle, Washington. Turnstyle, founded in 2004, is an<br />

innovative studio focused on print, packaging, web, and<br />

retail design. They recently won an award in the 365 aiga<br />

Annual Design Competition and were also featured in the<br />

January 2010 CommArts magazine. Ben holds a bfa in visual<br />

communications from University of Washington.<br />

Connie Birdsall<br />

Connie leads the design practice at Lippincott and is a member<br />

of the firm’s executive committee. Her experience encompasses<br />

20 years of directing and designing global corporate and brand<br />

identity, marketing communications, and information design.<br />

Connie has held positions on the national board of aiga. Her<br />

bfa was received from Kansas City Art Institute with an mfa<br />

from Cranbrook Academy of Art.<br />

Dominique Hirsiger<br />

Dominique is a project designer at asd/Sky Design in Atlanta,<br />

Georgia. She received her bfa in Interior Design from<br />

<strong>Savannah</strong> College of Art and Design.<br />

Jan Lorenc<br />

Jan was born in Poland and currently residing in Roswell,<br />

Georgia. He is co-owner of Lorenc+Yoo Design, a studio<br />

formed in 1998. They include specialists in industrial design,<br />

exhibition design, architectural design, furniture design,<br />

interior design, and environmental graphics. Jan is a graduate<br />

of the Illinois Institute of Technology with a bs and ms in<br />

Industrial Design and <strong>Visual</strong> Communication respectively, as<br />

well as a graduate of the Georgia Institute of Technology with<br />

a ms in Architecture.<br />

Jay Rogers<br />

Jay is an art director at Cartoon Network in Atlanta, Georgia<br />

where he focuses on everything from print, packaging, and<br />

identity, to interactive design. He is a recent Southeastern<br />

Excellence in Design awards winner.<br />

Jon Garcia<br />

Jon is vice president of design at Fuzebox, Inc., a technology<br />

consulting firm in Atlanta, Georgia where he practices digital,<br />

virtual, and interactive design. He has nearly 10 years of<br />

creative design experience and holds a bfa from Art Institute<br />

of Atlanta.<br />

Liz Teston<br />

Liz is currently working as a project design at asd/Sky Design<br />

in Atlanta, Georgia. She holds a bfa from the <strong>Savannah</strong><br />

college of Art and Design.<br />

Mark Drye<br />

Mark is the owner of Caruso–Drye, a graphics, signage,<br />

and wayfinding design consulting firm in Marietta, Georgia.<br />

He holds a Bachelor of Education in graphic design and<br />

architecture from North Carolina State University.<br />

Mike Sloan<br />

Mike is a partner at Lippincott New York, an international<br />

brand identity consultant where he concentrates on<br />

retail design. He has close to 20 years’ experience in the<br />

design, development and implementation of international<br />

environmental branding programs. Mike holds a Bachelor of<br />

Architecture degree from Syracuse University.<br />

Sara Cormier<br />

Sara is co-owner of Miller–Cormier, a freelancing design<br />

partnership in Cincinnati, Ohio. She has also been the<br />

advertising design manager at Cincinnati Magazine for over<br />

5 years. Sara received her bs in Graphic Design from the<br />

University of Cincinnati.<br />

Sarah Miller<br />

Sarah is co-owner of Miller–Cormier, a freelancing design<br />

partnership in Cincinnati, Ohio. She specializes in interactive<br />

design and has taught as an adjunct professor at the University<br />

of Cincinnati, where she acquired her bs in Graphic Design.<br />

Steve Carlin<br />

Steve is a Senior Graphic Designer at Cooper Carry, Inc. in<br />

Atlanta, Georgia, specializing in environmental graphic design.<br />

Steve holds a bs in Technical Graphics from Purdue University<br />

in Indiana.<br />

Tracy Pohl<br />

Tracy is currently working as a senior interior designer at<br />

Champlin Architecture in Cincinnati, Ohio with 10 years<br />

of experience in the field. She holds a bs in Design from the<br />

University of Cincinnati.<br />

Yolonda Baker<br />

Yolonda is a senior graphic designer at Deloitte, an<br />

international accounting and consulting firm based in Atlanta,<br />

Georgia. She focuses on print design, marketing materials,<br />

identity, and environmental graphics. Yolonda studied design<br />

at Creative Circus in Atlanta.<br />

69


educators<br />

Alysia Kaplan<br />

Alysia currently teaches foundation studies, design aesthetics, and<br />

photography at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago (saic).<br />

She previously held a professorship position at the Museum<br />

School of Boston. Alysia graduated with a bfa from Rochester<br />

Institute of Technology in New York with her mfa from saic.<br />

Barry Roseman<br />

Barry is currently a professor at <strong>Savannah</strong> College of Art and<br />

Design (scad) in Atlanta, Georgia. He has taught previously<br />

at Atlanta College of Art and University of Tennessee at<br />

Chattanooga. With 17 years of experience, Barry has taught<br />

everything from typography, to brand/identity, packaging,<br />

publication, and information design. He attended both Yale<br />

University School of Art in Connecticut and Basel School of<br />

Design in Switzerland.<br />

Bill Newkirk<br />

Bill is currently a professor and department head of graphic<br />

design at Rhode Island School of Design (risd). He studied<br />

architecture and graphic design at risd, receiving a bfa in<br />

Graphic Design in 1968. With his 34 years of teaching experience,<br />

Bill has taught various coursework in foundation studies and<br />

graphic design.<br />

Carl Marxer<br />

Carl currently teaches motion media design at scad–Atlanta.<br />

He has previous taught at the Art Institute of Atlanta, Portfolio<br />

Center, and American InterContinental University. Carl received<br />

his bs in Design from the University of Tennessee with an mfa<br />

from scad. He also founded a design practice of his own in 1982<br />

entitled Video Production Services.<br />

Cary Staples<br />

Cary currently teaches at the University of Tennessee – Knoxville.<br />

With 25 years of teaching experience, she has also held positions<br />

at the University of Connecticut and the University of New<br />

Orleans. Cary received her bfa from Kent State University and<br />

her mfa from Michigan State University, with additional study at<br />

Yale School of Art and Basel School of Design. Cary also practices<br />

professionally at f-one Design and Lightcone Interactive.<br />

Chitra Gopalakrishnan<br />

Chitra currently teaches graphic design at Grand Valley State<br />

University. His undergraduate degree was acquired from esag<br />

Penninghen in Paris, France with a mfa from Cranbrook<br />

Academy of Art in Michigan. Chitra practices design<br />

professionally with Illum Design Project pvt ltd, a<br />

brand strategy firm based in India.<br />

Daniel Morgenthaler<br />

Daniel has 25 years of experience teaching foundation studies,<br />

print design , and typography. He currently provides instruction<br />

within the visual communication department at SAIC with<br />

previous experience at DePaul University. Daniel attended the<br />

Basel School of Design in Switzerland for 6 years. He maintains<br />

his professional practice as owner of Studio29 in Chicago, Illinois.<br />

David Asari<br />

David currently teaches graphic design at California College of<br />

the Arts (cca) in San Francisco. He worked as a senior designer<br />

at Pentagram for 11 years. David acquired his bfa from the<br />

University of California, Berkeley and continued his graduate<br />

studies at cca.<br />

Dawn Barrett<br />

Dawn is the dean of architecture and design and a professor of<br />

graphic design at risd in Providence. Previously she held the<br />

position of head of design at the Jan van Eyck Akademie in the<br />

Netherlands. Dawn studied Fine Art at Smith College and unc,<br />

Chapel Hill and received a bachelors degree in art history from<br />

the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and a masters degree<br />

in product design from the School of Design, nc State University,<br />

Raleigh. Since 2008 Dawn is also a member of nasad's Commission<br />

on Accreditation.<br />

Deborah Brooks<br />

Deborah currently teaches at <strong>Savannah</strong> College of Art and Design.<br />

With 35 years’ experience, she previously held professorship<br />

positions at Texas Tech, the University of Kentucky, Arizona State,<br />

Washington State, and Texas Christian University. Deborah is an<br />

University of North Carolina – Greensboro graduate.<br />

Denise Gonzales Crisp<br />

With her 20 years of teaching experience, Denise currently leads<br />

typography coursework at North Carolina State University, with<br />

previous positions at Art Center College of Design, California<br />

Institute of the Arts, and Otis Art Institute. Denise received her<br />

undergraduate degree from Art Center in illustration and graphic<br />

design with graduate studies at California Institute of the Arts.<br />

Don Adleta<br />

Don is a professor of design and the chair of the graphic design<br />

program at Ohio University. With his 30 years of experience, he<br />

has also taught at risd and Western Michigan University. Don<br />

attended the University of Cincinnati and Ohio University during<br />

his undergraduate studies with additional graduate study at Basel<br />

School of Design.<br />

Eric Heiman<br />

With 10 years of experience, Eric currently teaches graphic design<br />

at the California College of the Arts (cca) in San Francisco. He<br />

received a bachelor degree in architecture at Carnegie Mellon<br />

University with a bfa in graphic design from cca. Eric currently<br />

practices design professionally at a firm he co-founded entitled<br />

Volume Inc.<br />

Eric Benson<br />

Eric currently teaches full time at the University of Illinois Urbana-<br />

Champaign. His research areas of expertise include sustainable and<br />

greener graphic design practices and socially responsible design. Eric<br />

holds a bfa in Graphic and Industrial Design from the University of<br />

Michigan and a mfa in Design from the University of Texas.<br />

Henry Kim<br />

Henry is currently a professor and associate chair of the graphic<br />

design department at scad-Atlanta. With his 8 years of experience,<br />

Henry has also taught at the School of The Art Institute of Chicago,<br />

Robert Morris College, and the University of Illinois at Chicago.<br />

He received a bachelor of science in agriculture degree from Kyung<br />

Hee University in South Korea, a bfa from University of Illinois at<br />

Chicago, and a mfa from the School of the Art Institute of Chicago.<br />

Holly Quarzo<br />

Holly currently teaching interactive and web design studios at<br />

scad-Atlanta. She has a ba from the University of Rochester<br />

and a mfa from Indiana State University. Holly also practices<br />

professionally working with the Human Center Design Team<br />

at at&t Mobility.<br />

70


about survey participants<br />

educators<br />

John Sharp<br />

John currently teaches interactive design and game development<br />

at scad-Atlanta. With his 10 years of experience, he has also<br />

held a teaching position at Parsons The New School for Design.<br />

John received his ba from the University of Georgia, and a ma<br />

and a ph.d from Indiana University.<br />

Kelly Bryant<br />

Kelly and her 22 years of experience currently teach<br />

publication, book, identity and logo design at Auburn<br />

University in Alabama. She previously taught at Samford<br />

University in Birmingham. In addition she works as a freelance<br />

illustrator and painter in the mediums of watercolor and acrylic.<br />

Kelly has a ma in Illustration from Syracuse University and a<br />

bfa in Graphic Design from Auburn University.<br />

Kermit Bailey<br />

Kermit has 20 years of experience, currently teaching interactive<br />

media, information design and typography at North Carolina<br />

State University. He received his ba in visual communication<br />

from North Carolina Central University and a master of<br />

product design in visual design from nc State University.<br />

Laura Chessin<br />

Laura is a current professor at Virginia Commonwealth<br />

University. With her 14 years of teaching experience, she<br />

has also instructed coursework at risd and the University of<br />

Massachusetts. Laura holds an mfa in graphic design from risd<br />

and a bfa in photography from Cornell University. Prior to<br />

her position at vcu, she maintained her own studio focused<br />

on publication and print-media design based in Amherst, ma.<br />

Leslie Becker<br />

Leslie is a professor with 31 years of experience. She currently<br />

teaches at the California College of the Arts, and previously<br />

at Cooper Union. Leslie has a ma in Design and a ph.d in<br />

Architectural Theory and Methods from uc Berkeley. She will<br />

lecture on design pedagogy to design professors in Beijing<br />

(Summer 2010) and she is an aiga fellow.<br />

Martha Scotford<br />

Martha currently teaches at North Carolina State University.<br />

With her 29 years of experience, she teaches everything from<br />

typography, to brand/identity, design aesthetics, design history,<br />

design methodology, foundation studies, packaging, portfolio,<br />

and publication design. Martha has a bfa and a mfa in Graphic<br />

Design from Yale University School of Art with post-graduate<br />

study at Bath Academy of Art in the uk. Martha also received<br />

a ba in Art History from Oberlin College. Her research focuses<br />

on women in art history and feminist theory.<br />

Mary McLaughlin<br />

Mary currently teaches typography, design methodology,<br />

and environmental graphic design coursework at Virginia<br />

Commonwealth University. She has a total of 23 years teaching<br />

experience with former positions at nc State and Boston<br />

University. Mary attended undergraduate school at<br />

the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.<br />

Merrick Henry<br />

Merrick currently teaches graphic design at scad. With 8 years<br />

of experience, he has also taught at Kansas State University. His<br />

attended undergraduate school at Kansas Wesleyan University,<br />

graduate school at Kansas State University, with additional<br />

study at Taft College in California. Merrick specializes<br />

teaching coursework in brand/identity design, print design,<br />

and typography.<br />

Mookesh Patel<br />

Mookesh currently teaches at Arizona State University School<br />

of Design Innovation. With his 32 years of experience, he has<br />

also taught at risd and the National Institute of Design (nid)<br />

in India. Mookesh received a ba in visual communication from<br />

nid in India, a bs from Ahmedabad Science College, Gujarat<br />

University in India, and a mfa in graphic design from risd. He<br />

is a practicing information/experience designer, principal and<br />

partner at InfoDesign Management Inc. in Scottsdale.<br />

Nancy Skolos<br />

With 20 years of experience, Nancy currently teaches graphic<br />

design at risd. She originally studied at the University of<br />

Cincinnati in industrial design. After two years of study, she<br />

was accepted as one of a few undergraduate students at<br />

Cranbrook Academy of Art where she completed her bfa in<br />

interdisciplinary design, and then went directly to Yale and<br />

received an mfa in graphic design. She currently practices design<br />

professionally with her husband to form the firm specializing in<br />

innovative poster design – Skolos-Wedell.<br />

Renee Seward<br />

Renee currently teaches digital design, brand/identity, design<br />

aesthetics, design methodology, and environmental graphic<br />

design at the University of Cincinnati (uc). She received her bs in<br />

Graphic design from uc and her mfa from North Carolina State<br />

University.<br />

Richard Shanks<br />

With his 14 years of teaching experience, Richard currently<br />

teaches at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. He received<br />

his bfa from the University of Michigan and his mfa from the<br />

California Institute of the Arts. Richard currently practices design<br />

professionally as president of UpShift Creative Group in Chicago.<br />

Samantha Lawrie<br />

Samantha currently teaches graphic design at Auburn<br />

University with 11 years of experience. She has a bfa and a<br />

Master of Education from Auburn, with a mfa from Louisiana<br />

Tech University.<br />

Santiago Piedrafita<br />

Santiago is currently an associate professor and chair of the<br />

department of graphic design and industrial design at North<br />

Carolina State University. Previously, Santiago chaired the Design<br />

Department at Minneapolis College of Art and Design (mcad).<br />

He holds a bfa from the College of Industrial Design in Brazil,<br />

and a ms from Pratt Institute in New York. Recently Santiago<br />

was named to the prestigious id Forty, The International Design<br />

Magazine’s annual list of 40 top designers, architects and visual<br />

professionals from around the globe.<br />

Sherry Blankenship<br />

With her 13 years of experience, Sherry currently teaches graphic<br />

design at Ohio University. She has previously taught in New<br />

Zealand, Lebanon and Qatar where she was also the graphic<br />

designer for Virginia Commonwealth University in Qatar. She<br />

has also taught courses in India, Turkey and Zimbabwe. She has<br />

a degree in education from Paterson State College in New Jersey<br />

and a mfa in visual communication design from North Carolina<br />

State University.<br />

71


students<br />

Amberlee Isabella<br />

University of Kentucky in Lexington, Kentucky<br />

Bachelor of Art in Interior Design, Class of 2007<br />

Amy McNeil<br />

University of Cincinnati, College of Design,<br />

Architecture, Art and Planning in Cincinnati, Ohio<br />

Bachelors of Science in Graphic Design, Class of 2006<br />

Ariana Parenti<br />

Yale University School of Art in New Haven,<br />

Connecticut bfa in Design Candidate, Class of 2011<br />

Bess Weyandt<br />

<strong>Savannah</strong> College of Art and Design, Atlanta, Georgia,<br />

Class of 2009. Smith College in Northampton,<br />

Massachusetts Class of 2004<br />

Brandon <strong>Roberts</strong><br />

University of Cincinnati College of Applied Science,<br />

Cincinnati, Ohio, Class of 2008<br />

Chris Baareman<br />

Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, Georgia,<br />

Bachelor of Science in Industrial Design, Class of 2006<br />

David Short<br />

scad-Atlanta mfa in Graphic Design Candidate.<br />

Iowa State University in Ames, Iowa Bachelor of<br />

Fine Arts in Graphic Design<br />

Jillian Paul<br />

scad-Atlanta mfa in Interior Design.<br />

University of Florida in Gainesville, Florida<br />

bfa in English, Film and Media Studies<br />

Johanna Barger<br />

scad-Atlanta mfa in Interior Design.<br />

Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tennessee,<br />

bfa in Art History, Class of 2006<br />

Julia Ruzich<br />

scad-Atlanta mfa in Graphic Design Candidate.<br />

Florida State University in Tallahassee, Florida<br />

Bachelor of Science in Studio Art<br />

Kaley Henning<br />

scad-Atlanta bfa in Graphic Design<br />

and Painting Candidate, Class of 2010<br />

Marisa Carter<br />

scad-Atlanta mfa in Interior Design Candidate.<br />

Spelman College in Atlanta, Georgia<br />

ba in English, Class of 2005<br />

Meg McClelland<br />

scad-Atlanta mfa in Graphic Design Candidate.<br />

Westmont College in Santa Barbara, California<br />

bfa in Studio Arts, Class of 2007<br />

Meghan Crosser<br />

scad-Atlanta bfa in Graphic Design Candidate.<br />

Young Harris College in Young Harris, Georgia<br />

Associate of Science, Class of 2006<br />

Michael Gluzman<br />

Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, Georgia<br />

Bachelor of Science in Industrial Design<br />

Nandhini Mehra<br />

<strong>Savannah</strong> College of Art and Design, Atlanta, Georgia,<br />

bfa in Graphic Design Candidate, Class of 2010<br />

Ryan Vihlen<br />

<strong>Savannah</strong> College of Art and Design in Atlanta, ga,<br />

mfa in Graphic Design Candidate.<br />

<strong>Savannah</strong> College of Art and Design in<br />

<strong>Savannah</strong>, Georgia, bfa in Furniture Design<br />

Sean Gladden<br />

<strong>Savannah</strong> College of Art and Design in<br />

Atlanta, Georgia, bfa in Graphic Design Candidate.<br />

Silvina Guerreiro<br />

<strong>Savannah</strong> College of Art and Design in<br />

Atlanta, Georgia bfa in Advertising Candidate.<br />

Therese Mushock<br />

<strong>Savannah</strong> College of Art and Design in Atlanta, ga,<br />

mfa in Graphic Design, Class of 2009.<br />

University of Georgia in Athens, Georgia<br />

ba in Journalism and Political Science, Class of 2004<br />

72


about survey participants<br />

I think what I feel fortunate<br />

about is that things still amaze<br />

me... the possibility for learning<br />

never disappears.<br />

Milton Glaser<br />

73


I am still<br />

learning.<br />

Michelangelo<br />

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!