05.07.2014 Views

Polyparty-ism - Search for Common Ground

Polyparty-ism - Search for Common Ground

Polyparty-ism - Search for Common Ground

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Solve your own problems<br />

A view from Skopje: NATO does very little <strong>for</strong> Macedonia - A view from Brussels: You<br />

should be able to solve your own, internal problems<br />

Daut Dauti<br />

In my opinion, there have been<br />

"certain obstacles" in the communication<br />

between Brussels and Skopje,<br />

or better said, between NATO and<br />

Macedonia <strong>for</strong> the last two years.<br />

The idyll, which lasted <strong>for</strong> almost a<br />

decade, was a little disturbed by the<br />

events in Kosovo<br />

(anti-NATO and anti-<br />

American protests),<br />

and especially this<br />

spring as the lack of<br />

trust toward the<br />

Alliance increased out<br />

of suspicion that it<br />

didn't do enough to<br />

control the border<br />

between Kosovo and<br />

Macedonia. After the<br />

events in Tanushevci,<br />

an avalanche of speculations<br />

and accusations,<br />

which Prime<br />

Minister Ljubcho<br />

Georgievski too nervously,<br />

tactlessly and<br />

undiplomatically<br />

expressed toward two countries<br />

belonging to the alliance (US and<br />

Germany), inevitably led to colder<br />

relations.<br />

Strangely enough, the reaction<br />

that came from the other side was<br />

not identical. It seemed as if NATO<br />

leaders at headquarters tended to<br />

minimize the accusations that came<br />

from the Macedonian side, or, in a<br />

way, silently accepted the remarks.<br />

So, instead of giving an answer, they<br />

continued convincing the<br />

Macedonian public in a diplomatic<br />

manner, and through some concrete<br />

actions, that things are not exactly as<br />

they seem. It was never explicitly<br />

said in those accusations whether it<br />

is NATO as a whole that doesn't do<br />

enough <strong>for</strong> Macedonia, or whether it<br />

is "individual" parts of NATO <strong>for</strong>ces<br />

(German and American soldiers<br />

from KFOR in Kosovo). Answers<br />

came from individual countries,<br />

which were trying to take certain<br />

measures in order to reassure the<br />

Macedonian public and government.<br />

However, NATO has never given<br />

up Macedonia as a partner in the<br />

region. The author of this text had an<br />

opportunity to see with his own eyes<br />

NATO Headquarters, while he was<br />

staying there together with nine<br />

other journalists from Macedonia.<br />

But the journey to Brussels also<br />

proved that there is a certain misunderstanding<br />

concerning the perception<br />

of critical situations, and<br />

NATO's (in)efficiency<br />

in dealing<br />

with them.<br />

Probably<br />

nobody in Macedonia<br />

has any doubts<br />

about the total support<br />

given by the<br />

alliance. But certain<br />

distrust could be<br />

noticed in many<br />

questions put by<br />

Macedonian journalists<br />

to NATO's<br />

political and military<br />

representatives,<br />

including the secretary<br />

general himself<br />

Lord George<br />

Robertson, during<br />

our time spent in Brussels. It seemed<br />

as if the journalists from Macedonia<br />

wanted to tell their hosts, indirectly<br />

or directly, that their support didn't<br />

help much because "they failed to<br />

fulfil their obligations concerning<br />

the defence of the border from the<br />

side where they should have done<br />

so."<br />

Upon hearing those questions,<br />

41<br />

What now, June 2001

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!