05.07.2014 Views

Polyparty-ism - Search for Common Ground

Polyparty-ism - Search for Common Ground

Polyparty-ism - Search for Common Ground

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

128<br />

<strong>for</strong> the stability and integrity of the<br />

country.<br />

In that context, it seems that the<br />

most constructive and thought-provoking<br />

ground <strong>for</strong> serious thinking<br />

could be among those citizens <strong>for</strong><br />

whom the given results are realistic,<br />

and do not come as a surprise because<br />

they con<strong>for</strong>m with their experience<br />

from their everyday environment.<br />

However-and this is most important!-<br />

those results do not justify outstanding<br />

optim<strong>ism</strong>; on the contrary, they<br />

justify maximum precaution and even<br />

prolonged concern.<br />

This realization is really worrying:<br />

from every ten citizens of<br />

Macedonia three have lost their faith<br />

in the possibility of living together in<br />

the same country with the ethnic<br />

group with whom they have lived <strong>for</strong><br />

longer than their family tradition can<br />

remember,. The theoretical number of<br />

600,000 such cases in a population of<br />

2 million, only further intensifies the<br />

worry and justifies it!<br />

THE POWER OF<br />

THE CITIZENS<br />

The citizens of the Republic of<br />

Macedonia, even after such fierce,<br />

organized, systematic, media-rich,<br />

political, armed irritations, are still<br />

the most mature factor, and simply<br />

have not entered into a wider conflict<br />

whereas every other society (it is easy<br />

but also superfluous to offer arguments<br />

on that at the moment) would<br />

surely have entered into a bloody<br />

civil war, The fact that they are such a<br />

mature factor is a first-class argument<br />

in favor of the relatively high percentage<br />

of "yes" answers to the three<br />

questions! Also the power of the citizens,<br />

their self-awareness and their<br />

political sobriety are surely confirmed<br />

in the electoral results, in<br />

which the most militant political<br />

<strong>for</strong>ces experienced a real Waterloo;<br />

they were defeated with an astonishingly<br />

high concentration of clearly<br />

expressed disagreement with their<br />

saber-rattling . The citizens have<br />

shown the same surety in their power<br />

with their spontaneous and perfectly<br />

harmonious action against the ideas<br />

and calls <strong>for</strong> civil war, i.e. <strong>for</strong> the act<br />

of dividing people and territories, and<br />

they have given a lesson to the institution<br />

with the highest intellectual<br />

and moral authority in every country -<br />

the national academy!<br />

Finally, if on the basis of this we<br />

ask ourselves how things stand in the<br />

Republic of Macedonia, we could,<br />

with ample evidence, conclude that the<br />

epidermis of interethnic relations in<br />

our country is seriously wounded and<br />

that even the deep wound has become<br />

scar tissue. But the core of the civil<br />

vital capacity is firm enough, and able<br />

to return to its previous mien, to regenerate<br />

the scars. Their clear critic<strong>ism</strong><br />

towards government institutions and<br />

the actions of the politicians, their<br />

fierce verdict on corruption and nepot<strong>ism</strong>,<br />

are marked indicators which on<br />

all bases completely nullify the primary<br />

relevancy of the fragmentation<br />

resulting from the ethnic distribution,<br />

and unite the ethnic Macedonian and<br />

ethnic Albanians, and also the representatives<br />

of the Turks, the Serbs, the<br />

Roma, the Bosnians, the Vlachs into a<br />

single grouping of civil and political<br />

citizenry of Macedonia.<br />

Said directly: Conditions in<br />

Macedonia have undoubtedly<br />

changed <strong>for</strong> the better, with clear<br />

awareness that they were never as bad<br />

as we were afraid they were, and that<br />

they could be even better than we<br />

hope they can.<br />

(The author is a<br />

university professor)<br />

Two years later<br />

Balance of<br />

ethnocultural identities<br />

The Ohrid Agreement<br />

exhausts the Albanian<br />

option that even a violent<br />

clash may serve<br />

as a political plat<strong>for</strong>m,<br />

whereas<br />

Macedonians accepted<br />

the agreement<br />

regardless of the feeling<br />

that it has been<br />

imposed by war<br />

Ljubomir D. Frchkoski<br />

Why do certain agreements, although<br />

logical and justified, fail while others,<br />

which are not so good, survive? What is<br />

agreement sustainability based upon?<br />

When transitional conflicts are taken<br />

into consideration, there are generally<br />

two types:<br />

Strategic conflicts, which comprise<br />

the usual political conflicts of interest<br />

within the state and conflicts of<br />

geostrategic importance with neighbors;<br />

and identity conflicts that relate to the<br />

collective, cultural identity of the conflicting<br />

parties. Most often the two types<br />

are mixed into a concrete political constellation<br />

of their resolution or crisis.<br />

The point of the matter is that the<br />

presence of identity conflicts significantly<br />

complicates and makes the transitional<br />

politics of democratic stabilization<br />

more difficult, at times even extremely<br />

violent. The <strong>for</strong>mer Yugoslavian con-<br />

Two years of the ohrid agreement, August 2003

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!