Polyparty-ism - Search for Common Ground
Polyparty-ism - Search for Common Ground
Polyparty-ism - Search for Common Ground
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Agreement." One of them wasn't satisfied,<br />
so he asked "to change the<br />
state symbols in the spirit of the<br />
agreement." We can suppose that with<br />
such action they will emphasize the<br />
double benefit: a referendum and<br />
plenty of work <strong>for</strong> the tailoring industry<br />
that will be engaged in the additional<br />
ornamentation of the state flag.<br />
The parties in power are not far<br />
behind. Although the territorial division<br />
and the authorization of local selfgovernment<br />
are two independent areas,<br />
the government majority is trying to so<br />
intertwine them that one cannot function<br />
without the other. Such interpretations<br />
vulgarize the Ohrid Agreement,<br />
which emphasizes human rights and<br />
cultural identity in the society.<br />
To be clear, the following are not<br />
an issue here: more extensive language<br />
rights, the functioning of<br />
Badenter's majority on both the state<br />
and local levels and the decentralization<br />
of government authority.<br />
Nevertheless, despite the willingness<br />
to move <strong>for</strong>ward, some postulates of<br />
that agreement require time while<br />
none of them endanger the unitary<br />
character of the state.<br />
If it's true that the energy of an era is<br />
measured by the number of beings who<br />
suffer and that every political credo is<br />
substantiated by the very victims it creates,<br />
then Macedonia is on its way to<br />
fulfilling the obligations created by the<br />
Ohrid Agreement. There are many people<br />
still suffering from the conflict<br />
be<strong>for</strong>e the agreement, and the number of<br />
direct victims was not trivial either.<br />
Macedonia is in a time of tolerance. The<br />
greater good deed that the world has created.<br />
And that good deed cannot be the<br />
worst evil at the same time!<br />
(The author is a member of the<br />
editorial board of<br />
Multiethnic Forum and deputy<br />
editor-in-chief of Dnevnik)<br />
How are things going when they<br />
are not moving at all in the first place?<br />
Hope keeps us going even<br />
when things are not well<br />
126<br />
Ferid Muhich<br />
How's everything?<br />
Great!<br />
Don't worry, that will end soon!<br />
It is very clear that we are not<br />
doing so will. But does that mean that<br />
this situation will not come to an end?<br />
Anyway, how do things stand in<br />
Macedonia? If not great, are they on<br />
the verge of disaster? If they are not<br />
as we want them to be, are they worse<br />
than circumstances permit?<br />
To evaluate the problems in a<br />
country objectively is the most difficult<br />
of tasks, especially if you evaluate<br />
them as a whole, integrally, with<br />
all the relevant aspects coordinated in<br />
a logically organized system. It<br />
requires strong interpretive capacity<br />
and an extensive in<strong>for</strong>mation network.<br />
Focused upon one aspect only,<br />
this estimation can suggest certain<br />
valid insights, with a plausible base of<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong> making additional<br />
insights, applicable even <strong>for</strong> a general<br />
diagnosis. The neuralgic marks of the<br />
state of interethnic relations and their<br />
urgent need <strong>for</strong> stabilization present<br />
sufficient arguments <strong>for</strong> choosing that<br />
very segment from the conglomerated<br />
complex of social, political, security<br />
and economic segments in the country.<br />
SOME RESULTS<br />
1. From disagreements, through<br />
tensions, to conflict.<br />
The most remarkable indicator of<br />
the situation in the Republic of<br />
Macedonia during the last decade has<br />
been the issue of interethnic relations.<br />
Interethnic relations have colored the<br />
atmosphere from the first day of<br />
Conditions in Macedonia have undoubtedly changed <strong>for</strong><br />
the better, with clear awareness that they were never as<br />
bad as we were afraid they were, and that they could be<br />
even better than we hope they might be<br />
establishing full statehood and sovereignty,<br />
even immediately after the<br />
completion of that process, especially<br />
with the disagreements regarding the<br />
<strong>for</strong>mulation of the issue <strong>for</strong> which the<br />
referendum was staged. After the<br />
refusal of the ethnic Albanian political<br />
parties and most of the ethnic<br />
Albanian citizens to vote <strong>for</strong> the first<br />
Constitution of the Republic of<br />
Macedonia, the problematic relations<br />
escalated to become actual tensions.<br />
Eventually, at the beginning of the<br />
new millennium, in January 2001, the<br />
interethnic relations progressed from<br />
tensions to radicalization and resulted<br />
in direct armed conflict on the frontline,<br />
with the ethnic Albanian population<br />
on one side and the state security<br />
Two years of the ohrid agreement, August 2003