Ultrasound Blocks for the Anterior Abdominal Wall
Ultrasound Blocks for the Anterior Abdominal Wall
Ultrasound Blocks for the Anterior Abdominal Wall
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
72 | <strong>Ultrasound</strong> <strong>Blocks</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Anterior</strong> <strong>Abdominal</strong> <strong>Wall</strong><br />
Iliohypogastric and Ilioinguinal Nerve Block and<br />
Wound Infiltration<br />
Many studies have compared IIB to LIA. Simple infiltration of<br />
<strong>the</strong> wound with local anes<strong>the</strong>tic solution should be encouraged<br />
in pediatric anes<strong>the</strong>sia as it may become as effective as IIB. IIB<br />
has been shown to be more effective than simple wound<br />
infiltration <strong>for</strong> postoperative pain and analgesic request in<br />
inguinal surgery (Caetano 2006). Also, IIB associated with LIA<br />
may improve analgesia after inguinal surgery.<br />
<strong>Ultrasound</strong>-guided IIB is effective in reducing intra- and<br />
postoperative pain in children undergoing inguinal hernia<br />
repair, orchidopexy or hydrocele repair (Willschke 2005).<br />
<strong>Ultrasound</strong>s reduce <strong>the</strong> required volume of local anes<strong>the</strong>tic<br />
(Willschke 2006). The reduction in <strong>the</strong> dose is also necessary<br />
because of reported higher plasma levels of local anes<strong>the</strong>tic after<br />
ultrasound-guided blocks (Weintraud 2009).<br />
Iliohypogastric and Ilioinguinal Nerve Block and<br />
Caudal Anes<strong>the</strong>sia<br />
The IIB <strong>for</strong> inguinal procedures may provide analgesia<br />
comparable to a caudal injection, possibly with a longer mean<br />
duration (Hannallah 1987, Markham 1986). The adverse effects of<br />
motor block and urinary retention are eliminated. Heart rate,<br />
linear analogues score, total amount of analgesic and time of<br />
first administration of analgesics have been evaluated as criteria<br />
<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> efficacy of <strong>the</strong> analgesic technique.<br />
The IIB compared to a caudal block revealed similar recovery<br />
times and no difference in postoperative pain or discom<strong>for</strong>t<br />
scores after inguinal hernia repair (Hannallah 1987). Both<br />
procedures have a similar duration of action of at least 6 hours.<br />
No difference in <strong>the</strong> number of patients without pain <strong>for</strong> 4 h or<br />
in those requiring analgesics by 24 h has been reported<br />
compared to caudal block (Fisher 1993). Similarly, children