05.07.2014 Views

Ultrasound Blocks for the Anterior Abdominal Wall

Ultrasound Blocks for the Anterior Abdominal Wall

Ultrasound Blocks for the Anterior Abdominal Wall

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

72 | <strong>Ultrasound</strong> <strong>Blocks</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Anterior</strong> <strong>Abdominal</strong> <strong>Wall</strong><br />

Iliohypogastric and Ilioinguinal Nerve Block and<br />

Wound Infiltration<br />

Many studies have compared IIB to LIA. Simple infiltration of<br />

<strong>the</strong> wound with local anes<strong>the</strong>tic solution should be encouraged<br />

in pediatric anes<strong>the</strong>sia as it may become as effective as IIB. IIB<br />

has been shown to be more effective than simple wound<br />

infiltration <strong>for</strong> postoperative pain and analgesic request in<br />

inguinal surgery (Caetano 2006). Also, IIB associated with LIA<br />

may improve analgesia after inguinal surgery.<br />

<strong>Ultrasound</strong>-guided IIB is effective in reducing intra- and<br />

postoperative pain in children undergoing inguinal hernia<br />

repair, orchidopexy or hydrocele repair (Willschke 2005).<br />

<strong>Ultrasound</strong>s reduce <strong>the</strong> required volume of local anes<strong>the</strong>tic<br />

(Willschke 2006). The reduction in <strong>the</strong> dose is also necessary<br />

because of reported higher plasma levels of local anes<strong>the</strong>tic after<br />

ultrasound-guided blocks (Weintraud 2009).<br />

Iliohypogastric and Ilioinguinal Nerve Block and<br />

Caudal Anes<strong>the</strong>sia<br />

The IIB <strong>for</strong> inguinal procedures may provide analgesia<br />

comparable to a caudal injection, possibly with a longer mean<br />

duration (Hannallah 1987, Markham 1986). The adverse effects of<br />

motor block and urinary retention are eliminated. Heart rate,<br />

linear analogues score, total amount of analgesic and time of<br />

first administration of analgesics have been evaluated as criteria<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> efficacy of <strong>the</strong> analgesic technique.<br />

The IIB compared to a caudal block revealed similar recovery<br />

times and no difference in postoperative pain or discom<strong>for</strong>t<br />

scores after inguinal hernia repair (Hannallah 1987). Both<br />

procedures have a similar duration of action of at least 6 hours.<br />

No difference in <strong>the</strong> number of patients without pain <strong>for</strong> 4 h or<br />

in those requiring analgesics by 24 h has been reported<br />

compared to caudal block (Fisher 1993). Similarly, children

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!