Heft36 1 - SFB 580 - Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
Heft36 1 - SFB 580 - Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
Heft36 1 - SFB 580 - Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
KATHRIN REFERENCES LITERATUR LOER<br />
automotive companies, particularly the OEMs,<br />
have dug their own (economic) grave step by<br />
step because of immense overcapacities over<br />
the last decade. Of course, this picture is onedimensional,<br />
as the problem of overcapacities is<br />
not only caused by (independent) management<br />
or executive decisions but is the result of<br />
parallels in the development of the market<br />
that complicate these decisions. To describe it<br />
concisely: The opening of Central and Eastern<br />
European countries opens new markets with<br />
a huge demand and backlog in people having<br />
their own automobiles. This is an example<br />
of a (quite) unexpected potential to expand<br />
for market changes during a short period of<br />
time (van Tulder, Ruigrok 1998, Keune, Tóth<br />
2005). As demand for expensive investment<br />
goods such as automobiles cannot be exactly<br />
predicted, the forecast of trends is sophisticated<br />
and partly coincidently. As new competitors<br />
enter the market and the automotive<br />
industry is profoundly dependent on general<br />
developments of national and international<br />
economies and their rapid shocks and changes,<br />
unilateral criticism against the OEM does<br />
not cope with the complexity of the situation.<br />
However, the impact of market instabilities,<br />
the need for flexibility and fast adaptation<br />
to new circumstances pressures workers and<br />
employees in the sector as their employment<br />
conditions are often seen as an “adjustable<br />
screw” in the eyes of company management<br />
( Jürgens 2005a, Jürgens 2005b, Jürgens 2004,<br />
Kahancová, van der Meer 2006, Charron,<br />
Stewart 2004). Another remarkable change is<br />
related to cooperation between competitors in<br />
the market that reach from buying syndicates<br />
to joint production sites. On the other hand,<br />
new competitors enter the international market<br />
and discover Europe as an interesting economic<br />
region (mostly cheap automotive producers<br />
from emerging markets, India or China…).<br />
In summary the transformation of the automotive<br />
sector proceeds in different respects:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Growing cost pressure.<br />
Changes regarding the terms and<br />
conditions for workers in the sector.<br />
Growth of new flexible employment<br />
strategies, namely temporary employment,<br />
which produces a segmentation of<br />
employees with permanent staff, on<br />
the one hand, and workers that accept<br />
precarious employment conditions<br />
(continuity, wage levels), on the other.<br />
Organized labour is hardly achievable<br />
and the counterpart of the management<br />
weakened.<br />
After years of implementation, the<br />
concept of “lean production” and the<br />
idea of a “breathing plant” are enforced<br />
to cope with changing circumstances<br />
(Schumann et al. 2006) 4 . The concept<br />
aims at introducing terms of employment<br />
that allow hiring and firing at short<br />
notice, without difficult legal bindings.<br />
Of course, this concept is judged very<br />
differently depending on the perspective.<br />
Employers recognize the need<br />
to be flexible if they want to<br />
stay competitive and search Seite page 67<br />
for solutions in the range of<br />
employment conditions as they<br />
turn out to be the most extensive cost<br />
factor. The employees’ perspective claims<br />
the trend to capitalize the current market