05.07.2014 Views

Heft36 1 - SFB 580 - Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena

Heft36 1 - SFB 580 - Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena

Heft36 1 - SFB 580 - Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SZALMA IVETT / SZEL BERNADETT<br />

Table 42. What do people think: Government should cut taxes vs. Government<br />

should no spend more on education, health care and pension? Measured on a 7 degree scale.<br />

1-7 degree<br />

scale %<br />

Government should<br />

decrease taxes even if this<br />

means less funding for education,<br />

health care and pension. (1-3)<br />

The middle of<br />

the scale (4)<br />

Government should spend<br />

more on education, health<br />

care and pension. (5-7)<br />

Mean<br />

In the survey<br />

research<br />

Pre-deliberation<br />

in the small groups<br />

Post-deliberation<br />

in the small groups<br />

39.2% 34.9% 25.9%<br />

3.61<br />

30.5% 34.3% 35.2%<br />

4.14<br />

29.8% 35.6% 34.6% 4.14<br />

T1 – T2: Statistically significant change (t=-2.717, p0.05)<br />

Table 42 proves that there are significant<br />

differences between the T1 and T2 sessions.<br />

Deliberation did not bring significant changes<br />

in this issue, as we can see in table 42. Both in<br />

the pre- and post- deliberation small groups,<br />

around 30% of respondents prefered decreased<br />

taxes, even if this means less funding for<br />

education, health care and pensions. On the<br />

other hand, 35% declared that the government<br />

should spend more on education, health care<br />

and pension. It is surprising that the deliberation<br />

did not bring any significant changes, because<br />

the most important result of earlier research<br />

on the tax awareness (Csontos, Kornai, &<br />

Tóth, 1996) was that if the citizens know<br />

more about the cost of the state programs they<br />

will change their opinion about the role of<br />

the state, subsequently prefering to decrease<br />

the role of the state and emphasizing more the<br />

role of the market.<br />

The differences between T1 and T2 might<br />

be due to the composition effect and/or the<br />

briefing materials. The composition effect can<br />

be excluded by focusing the analyses on those<br />

people who took part in the small group conversation<br />

(Table 43). In Table 43 the component<br />

effect has been excluded because answers<br />

of the same people can be found there. Still,<br />

the significant differences between T1 and T2<br />

remain. Consequently, it is assumed that the<br />

variance is caused by the briefing materials.<br />

page 191

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!