Heft36 1 - SFB 580 - Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
Heft36 1 - SFB 580 - Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
Heft36 1 - SFB 580 - Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SZALMA IVETT / SZEL BERNADETT<br />
Table 42. What do people think: Government should cut taxes vs. Government<br />
should no spend more on education, health care and pension? Measured on a 7 degree scale.<br />
1-7 degree<br />
scale %<br />
Government should<br />
decrease taxes even if this<br />
means less funding for education,<br />
health care and pension. (1-3)<br />
The middle of<br />
the scale (4)<br />
Government should spend<br />
more on education, health<br />
care and pension. (5-7)<br />
Mean<br />
In the survey<br />
research<br />
Pre-deliberation<br />
in the small groups<br />
Post-deliberation<br />
in the small groups<br />
39.2% 34.9% 25.9%<br />
3.61<br />
30.5% 34.3% 35.2%<br />
4.14<br />
29.8% 35.6% 34.6% 4.14<br />
T1 – T2: Statistically significant change (t=-2.717, p0.05)<br />
Table 42 proves that there are significant<br />
differences between the T1 and T2 sessions.<br />
Deliberation did not bring significant changes<br />
in this issue, as we can see in table 42. Both in<br />
the pre- and post- deliberation small groups,<br />
around 30% of respondents prefered decreased<br />
taxes, even if this means less funding for<br />
education, health care and pensions. On the<br />
other hand, 35% declared that the government<br />
should spend more on education, health care<br />
and pension. It is surprising that the deliberation<br />
did not bring any significant changes, because<br />
the most important result of earlier research<br />
on the tax awareness (Csontos, Kornai, &<br />
Tóth, 1996) was that if the citizens know<br />
more about the cost of the state programs they<br />
will change their opinion about the role of<br />
the state, subsequently prefering to decrease<br />
the role of the state and emphasizing more the<br />
role of the market.<br />
The differences between T1 and T2 might<br />
be due to the composition effect and/or the<br />
briefing materials. The composition effect can<br />
be excluded by focusing the analyses on those<br />
people who took part in the small group conversation<br />
(Table 43). In Table 43 the component<br />
effect has been excluded because answers<br />
of the same people can be found there. Still,<br />
the significant differences between T1 and T2<br />
remain. Consequently, it is assumed that the<br />
variance is caused by the briefing materials.<br />
page 191