Heft36 1 - SFB 580 - Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
Heft36 1 - SFB 580 - Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
Heft36 1 - SFB 580 - Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE POLITICS OF LABOUR MARKET ADJUST-<br />
MENT IN POST-1989 POLAND<br />
Finally, Bismarckian policies, or conservativecorporatist<br />
policies, are based on an insider<br />
status enjoyed by a category of individuals<br />
who contribute to social insurance in exchange<br />
for future entitlements. Therefore, they tend to<br />
emphasise the link between contributions and<br />
social security, or individual fairness, rather<br />
than universal solidarity.<br />
The inherited ‘state of entitlements’ (Inglot<br />
2003) in Poland in the early 1990s combined<br />
universal and Bismarckian aspects. With<br />
respect to a shift of welfare regime, three<br />
hypotheses can be formulated. First, generous<br />
universalistic policies tend to become<br />
minimalist residual ones when there is a shift<br />
in, or a breakdown of the coalition among risk<br />
communities in favour of self-reliant ones.<br />
Second, redistributive politics characterised<br />
by a recurrent two-side conflict are likely<br />
to be observed primarily in areas in which<br />
entitlements pre-exist. Third, as a consequence,<br />
Bismarckian (conservative-corporatist) policies<br />
are unlikely to be easily replaced by minimalist<br />
residual ones because they are supported by<br />
identifiable categories of beneficiaries who<br />
gained rights and entitlements in return for<br />
resources invested in the system, and seek<br />
to maintain these benefits. The dynamics of<br />
adjustment in Poland and policies connected<br />
with labour market risks provide new grounds<br />
on which to examine the validity of these<br />
hypotheses.<br />
page 128 With a view to testing these propositions,<br />
sections 2 and 3 trace the trajectory<br />
of successive reforms of un/<br />
employment policy with a focus on two institutions<br />
that can be considered cornerstones of<br />
the post-industrial capitalist welfare state: the<br />
employment relationship and unemployment<br />
insurance.<br />
2. UNEMPLOYMENT POLICY BY DEFAULT: THE<br />
WEAKNESS OF SOCIAL INSURANCE AND THE IM-<br />
PORTANCE OF PARTICULARISTIC REGIMES.<br />
This section reviews the policies that<br />
contributed to the institutionalization (and to a<br />
lesser extent the alleviation) of unemployment,<br />
the management of mass dismissals through<br />
exit to inactivity and the slow emergence of a<br />
broader government program of action against<br />
unemployment, including active labour market<br />
policies eventually seeking to add obligations<br />
to social rights.<br />
2.1. The recent institutionalisation of<br />
unemployment<br />
Unlike other social problems, unemployment<br />
really appeared on the political agenda in 1990<br />
as a result of the first transition measures and<br />
was to be addressed with little experience to<br />
build upon. Unemployment compensation and<br />
labour market policies more generally do not<br />
have a long history in Poland. 5<br />
Unemployment as a new social problem<br />
Prior to 1989, everyone had a constitutional<br />
right to work; and unemployment had been<br />
made illegal (Mlonek 1999). As a result, the<br />
concept of unemployment was rarely used as<br />
an analytical category and was inexistent as a<br />
category of public intervention. While at a<br />
marginal level a form of frictional unemployment<br />
(the gap between one’s job and the<br />
successive one, when one changes jobs) could