05.07.2014 Views

Heft36 1 - SFB 580 - Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena

Heft36 1 - SFB 580 - Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena

Heft36 1 - SFB 580 - Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE POLITICS OF LABOUR MARKET ADJUST-<br />

MENT IN POST-1989 POLAND<br />

Finally, Bismarckian policies, or conservativecorporatist<br />

policies, are based on an insider<br />

status enjoyed by a category of individuals<br />

who contribute to social insurance in exchange<br />

for future entitlements. Therefore, they tend to<br />

emphasise the link between contributions and<br />

social security, or individual fairness, rather<br />

than universal solidarity.<br />

The inherited ‘state of entitlements’ (Inglot<br />

2003) in Poland in the early 1990s combined<br />

universal and Bismarckian aspects. With<br />

respect to a shift of welfare regime, three<br />

hypotheses can be formulated. First, generous<br />

universalistic policies tend to become<br />

minimalist residual ones when there is a shift<br />

in, or a breakdown of the coalition among risk<br />

communities in favour of self-reliant ones.<br />

Second, redistributive politics characterised<br />

by a recurrent two-side conflict are likely<br />

to be observed primarily in areas in which<br />

entitlements pre-exist. Third, as a consequence,<br />

Bismarckian (conservative-corporatist) policies<br />

are unlikely to be easily replaced by minimalist<br />

residual ones because they are supported by<br />

identifiable categories of beneficiaries who<br />

gained rights and entitlements in return for<br />

resources invested in the system, and seek<br />

to maintain these benefits. The dynamics of<br />

adjustment in Poland and policies connected<br />

with labour market risks provide new grounds<br />

on which to examine the validity of these<br />

hypotheses.<br />

page 128 With a view to testing these propositions,<br />

sections 2 and 3 trace the trajectory<br />

of successive reforms of un/<br />

employment policy with a focus on two institutions<br />

that can be considered cornerstones of<br />

the post-industrial capitalist welfare state: the<br />

employment relationship and unemployment<br />

insurance.<br />

2. UNEMPLOYMENT POLICY BY DEFAULT: THE<br />

WEAKNESS OF SOCIAL INSURANCE AND THE IM-<br />

PORTANCE OF PARTICULARISTIC REGIMES.<br />

This section reviews the policies that<br />

contributed to the institutionalization (and to a<br />

lesser extent the alleviation) of unemployment,<br />

the management of mass dismissals through<br />

exit to inactivity and the slow emergence of a<br />

broader government program of action against<br />

unemployment, including active labour market<br />

policies eventually seeking to add obligations<br />

to social rights.<br />

2.1. The recent institutionalisation of<br />

unemployment<br />

Unlike other social problems, unemployment<br />

really appeared on the political agenda in 1990<br />

as a result of the first transition measures and<br />

was to be addressed with little experience to<br />

build upon. Unemployment compensation and<br />

labour market policies more generally do not<br />

have a long history in Poland. 5<br />

Unemployment as a new social problem<br />

Prior to 1989, everyone had a constitutional<br />

right to work; and unemployment had been<br />

made illegal (Mlonek 1999). As a result, the<br />

concept of unemployment was rarely used as<br />

an analytical category and was inexistent as a<br />

category of public intervention. While at a<br />

marginal level a form of frictional unemployment<br />

(the gap between one’s job and the<br />

successive one, when one changes jobs) could

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!