05.07.2014 Views

Heft36 1 - SFB 580 - Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena

Heft36 1 - SFB 580 - Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena

Heft36 1 - SFB 580 - Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PÉTER LITERATUR CSIZMADIA<br />

importance. The main focus of innovation<br />

research here was the creation rather than use<br />

of new technologies. According to the authors,<br />

this perspective has remained dominant until<br />

today.<br />

The second generation is labelled as the period<br />

of assimilation. In this phase researchers tended<br />

to examine service innovation using the<br />

conceptual framework developed to understand<br />

innovation in manufacturing. They assumed<br />

that innovation shows universal patterns<br />

that should exist both in manufacturing and<br />

services.<br />

The distinction approach in service innovation<br />

appeared in the 1990s as a critique of the<br />

assimilation period. Authors representing<br />

this line of innovation research argued<br />

that innovation in services differs from the<br />

manufacturing sector. Researchers in this<br />

period focused on organisational innovations<br />

and the “soft” skills playing a dominant role<br />

in knowledge-intensive business services, such<br />

as management consultancy, and regarded the<br />

role of “hard” technologies to be less dominant<br />

in the innovation activities.<br />

role of organisational innovations in shaping<br />

the service innovation process.<br />

The latest results of service innovation research<br />

suggest that service innovations are highly<br />

dependent on organisational practices and<br />

represent and open and networked form of<br />

innovation (Salter – Tether 2006). In addition,<br />

in the case of service innovation the different<br />

forms of innovation – product, process and<br />

organisational – are more closely connected<br />

than in manufacturing, which implies that the<br />

economic value of service innovation heavily<br />

relies on the combination of the different<br />

forms of innovation (Hipp et al. 2000).<br />

Finally, Gann and Salter (2000) identified<br />

the following basic characteristics of service<br />

innovations:<br />

<br />

<br />

the role of highly skilled labour in<br />

the creation and exploitation of new<br />

solutions;<br />

the importance of new organisational<br />

practices in supporting the realisation of<br />

new innovative opportunities;<br />

The latest stream of service innovation research,<br />

however, intents to synthesise the experiences<br />

of the traditional innovation research as well<br />

as the experiences stemming from a deeper<br />

understanding of the special characteristics<br />

of services. These researchers highlight the<br />

complex and multidimensional character<br />

of modern services and manufacturing and<br />

focus on such issues as organisational change,<br />

social networks and other, mainly institutional<br />

mechanisms that support innovation in services.<br />

In this approach special attention is paid to the<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

the cooperation between clients and<br />

producers;<br />

the key role of social networks in generating<br />

and supporting knowledge<br />

creation and exchange; and<br />

Seite page 109<br />

the ‘ad hoc’ or ‘informal’ organisational<br />

form of most knowledge-intensive<br />

service firms.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!