Heft36 1 - SFB 580 - Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
Heft36 1 - SFB 580 - Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
Heft36 1 - SFB 580 - Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ORGANISATIONAL LITERATUR INNOVATION IN HUNGARY<br />
development ICT facilitates changes in<br />
the inherent characteristics of services.<br />
The majority of the former theoretical<br />
contributions emphasized the following three<br />
basic features of services in distinguishing<br />
them from manufacturing activities: (1)<br />
service is intangible and, therefore, cannot be<br />
accumulated; (2) production and consumption<br />
are simultaneous activities; and (3) services<br />
are produced jointly with the customer (as the<br />
customer represents a basic input for services)<br />
(Kuusisto & Meyer 2003, Chesbrough &<br />
Spohrer 2006). The changing role of ICT<br />
has resulted in a standardisation of services.<br />
Some services are becoming more similar to<br />
manufacturing products: they are standardised,<br />
storable and deliverable (Sundbo 2002). These<br />
changes 1 , which are labelled “productising of<br />
services”, are visible in the increasing weight of<br />
services in the international trade (Sako 2005).<br />
A similar tendency has also taken place in the<br />
manufacturing sector. The basic idea here is to<br />
utilise economy of scale of mass production<br />
and, simultaneously, the greater value added<br />
by the costumer-specialisation of products. As<br />
a consequence, there is a growing interest in<br />
modularisation of products, on the one hand,<br />
and a development of services related to the<br />
products or a shift of activities in direction of<br />
services, on the other (e.g. IBM or Siemens).<br />
This process is often called “servicising<br />
products”. (Sundbo 1999, Kuusisto & Meyer<br />
2003, Sako 2005).<br />
Seite page 104<br />
The changes presented briefly<br />
above, e.g. the standardisation<br />
and “productising” of services, the<br />
modularisation and “servicising” of products<br />
and the blurring boundaries between service<br />
and manufacturing sector, caused radical<br />
changes in the economic weight of services.<br />
In this relation it is important to stress the<br />
increasing role of knowledge-intensive services<br />
in innovation, knowledge development and<br />
transfer that are of particular importance<br />
in opening a new development path for an<br />
economy.<br />
1.1 Distinguishing characteristic of the<br />
service sector: extreme heterogeneity<br />
The aggregated data presented in Table 1<br />
do not provide information on the internal<br />
composition of the service sector nor on its<br />
changes, although it is composed of very<br />
heterogeneous activities representing diverse<br />
productivity, employment, working conditions<br />
and patterns of knowledge use. There have been<br />
several attempts to classify the different service<br />
activities focused characteristics of the sector<br />
such as role of technology, the intangibility of<br />
outputs and modes of innovation (Pavitt 1984,<br />
Porter 1990, Evangelista 2000, Miozzo-Soete<br />
2001, Hollenstein 2003). Salter and Tether<br />
(2006) differentiate three basic types of services<br />
firms in their classification based on economic<br />
function: traditional services, system firms and<br />
knowledge-intensive business services.<br />
Traditional service firms are small and serve<br />
local needs. These firms suffer from poor<br />
technology base, weak managerial and labour<br />
force skills, and a lack of abilities to provide<br />
high value-added services. Traditional service<br />
firms often have no full-time employees and<br />
rely on self-employment or part-time staff.<br />
They are often associated with a “low-skill<br />
equilibrium” in their manpower use.<br />
System firms, on the other hand, are large and