05.07.2014 Views

Heft36 1 - SFB 580 - Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena

Heft36 1 - SFB 580 - Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena

Heft36 1 - SFB 580 - Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ORGANISATIONAL LITERATUR INNOVATION IN HUNGARY<br />

development ICT facilitates changes in<br />

the inherent characteristics of services.<br />

The majority of the former theoretical<br />

contributions emphasized the following three<br />

basic features of services in distinguishing<br />

them from manufacturing activities: (1)<br />

service is intangible and, therefore, cannot be<br />

accumulated; (2) production and consumption<br />

are simultaneous activities; and (3) services<br />

are produced jointly with the customer (as the<br />

customer represents a basic input for services)<br />

(Kuusisto & Meyer 2003, Chesbrough &<br />

Spohrer 2006). The changing role of ICT<br />

has resulted in a standardisation of services.<br />

Some services are becoming more similar to<br />

manufacturing products: they are standardised,<br />

storable and deliverable (Sundbo 2002). These<br />

changes 1 , which are labelled “productising of<br />

services”, are visible in the increasing weight of<br />

services in the international trade (Sako 2005).<br />

A similar tendency has also taken place in the<br />

manufacturing sector. The basic idea here is to<br />

utilise economy of scale of mass production<br />

and, simultaneously, the greater value added<br />

by the costumer-specialisation of products. As<br />

a consequence, there is a growing interest in<br />

modularisation of products, on the one hand,<br />

and a development of services related to the<br />

products or a shift of activities in direction of<br />

services, on the other (e.g. IBM or Siemens).<br />

This process is often called “servicising<br />

products”. (Sundbo 1999, Kuusisto & Meyer<br />

2003, Sako 2005).<br />

Seite page 104<br />

The changes presented briefly<br />

above, e.g. the standardisation<br />

and “productising” of services, the<br />

modularisation and “servicising” of products<br />

and the blurring boundaries between service<br />

and manufacturing sector, caused radical<br />

changes in the economic weight of services.<br />

In this relation it is important to stress the<br />

increasing role of knowledge-intensive services<br />

in innovation, knowledge development and<br />

transfer that are of particular importance<br />

in opening a new development path for an<br />

economy.<br />

1.1 Distinguishing characteristic of the<br />

service sector: extreme heterogeneity<br />

The aggregated data presented in Table 1<br />

do not provide information on the internal<br />

composition of the service sector nor on its<br />

changes, although it is composed of very<br />

heterogeneous activities representing diverse<br />

productivity, employment, working conditions<br />

and patterns of knowledge use. There have been<br />

several attempts to classify the different service<br />

activities focused characteristics of the sector<br />

such as role of technology, the intangibility of<br />

outputs and modes of innovation (Pavitt 1984,<br />

Porter 1990, Evangelista 2000, Miozzo-Soete<br />

2001, Hollenstein 2003). Salter and Tether<br />

(2006) differentiate three basic types of services<br />

firms in their classification based on economic<br />

function: traditional services, system firms and<br />

knowledge-intensive business services.<br />

Traditional service firms are small and serve<br />

local needs. These firms suffer from poor<br />

technology base, weak managerial and labour<br />

force skills, and a lack of abilities to provide<br />

high value-added services. Traditional service<br />

firms often have no full-time employees and<br />

rely on self-employment or part-time staff.<br />

They are often associated with a “low-skill<br />

equilibrium” in their manpower use.<br />

System firms, on the other hand, are large and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!