05.07.2014 Views

Joint modelling of transit and stellar temperature using an MCMC ...

Joint modelling of transit and stellar temperature using an MCMC ...

Joint modelling of transit and stellar temperature using an MCMC ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 6. JOINT MODELLING OF TRANSIT AND STELLAR TEMPERATURE USING AN <strong>MCMC</strong> APPROACH 170<br />

6.2 Application to CoRoT-2b<br />

6.2.1 Method<br />

The IRF-filtered light curve <strong>of</strong> CoRoT-2 is corrected for the 5.6% contamin<strong>an</strong>t flux due to<br />

a star falling into the CoRoT mask <strong>of</strong> CoRoT-2. This is done by subtracting 0.056 to the<br />

normalised IRF-filtered light curve <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> re-normalising the resulting light curve.<br />

The <strong>MCMC</strong> is applied to fit the <strong>tr<strong>an</strong>sit</strong> <strong>of</strong> CoRoT-2b in the IRF-filtered CoRoT light<br />

curve <strong>of</strong> CoRoT-2. The IRF-filtered light curve used is filtered with a time scale for <strong>stellar</strong><br />

variability <strong>of</strong> 0.25 days, as this version has less residual <strong>stellar</strong> variability th<strong>an</strong> the 0.5 day<br />

version while the <strong>tr<strong>an</strong>sit</strong> shape is still well recovered (Chapter 3 Section 3.2.3). To speed<br />

up the <strong>MCMC</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> allow us to run a larger number <strong>of</strong> iterations, the number <strong>of</strong> data<br />

points are reduced by binning the phase folded filtered light curve with bin size <strong>of</strong><br />

0.0006 phase units (0.06% <strong>of</strong> the pl<strong>an</strong>et’s orbit), <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> keeping only the section within<br />

±0.2 phase units <strong>of</strong> the <strong>tr<strong>an</strong>sit</strong> centre. The uncertainty associated to each bin is taken<br />

as the st<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>ard deviation <strong>of</strong> the points binned together in this bin. In the <strong>MCMC</strong>, the<br />

uncertainty associated to the data set is taken as the maximum <strong>of</strong> these uncertainties.<br />

The data points were re-normalised by fitting a 2 nd order polynomial function about<br />

the <strong>tr<strong>an</strong>sit</strong> <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> the data points were divided by this fit.<br />

The <strong>MCMC</strong> is run varying the time <strong>of</strong> <strong>tr<strong>an</strong>sit</strong> T 0 , the impact parameter b, the pl<strong>an</strong>etto-star<br />

radius ratio R p /R , <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> k the line index <strong>of</strong> <strong>stellar</strong> density in Padova2002. P , e <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />

w are fixed to the value in Alonso et al. (2008). The limb darkening coefficients are fixed<br />

to the quadratic limb darkening coefficients corresponding to the CoRoT b<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>pass,<br />

derived from Sing (2010). The adjusted parameters are then tr<strong>an</strong>slated into T 0 (T 0p +cst)<br />

the epoch <strong>of</strong> the <strong>tr<strong>an</strong>sit</strong> centre, a/R <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> i.<br />

When the <strong>MCMC</strong> is run with the prior on the T eff the <strong>stellar</strong> atmosphere parameters<br />

<strong>of</strong> CoRoT-2 are T eff =5516±33 K, log g=4.3±0.2, [M/H]=0.0±0.1. The value <strong>of</strong> T eff , used here,<br />

is the one derived <strong>using</strong> the equivalent width ratios, the other parameters have not<br />

been re-calculated <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> are kept the same as in the discovery paper. The associated<br />

quadratic limb darkening coefficients in the CoRoT b<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>pass are u a =0.478±0.010 <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong><br />

u b = 0.205±0.007. These are the coefficient used in all the fitting procedures below ,<br />

including the LMA, to allow a direct comparison <strong>of</strong> the derived parameters.<br />

First, no prior on the <strong>stellar</strong> <strong>temperature</strong> is applied, then a gaussi<strong>an</strong> prior on the T eff<br />

is added later. The <strong>stellar</strong> <strong>temperature</strong> used as prior is the <strong>temperature</strong> derived for<br />

CoRoT-2 in Chapter 5 <strong>using</strong> the <strong>temperature</strong> calibrated equivalent width line ratios:<br />

T eff =5516±33 K.<br />

The scale stepe sizes chosen when no prior on the T eff was applied, is 2 10 −5 for T 0 ,<br />

4 10 −3 for b, 2 10 −4 for R p /R , <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> 1000 for k. The scales were obtained by trial <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> errors<br />

starting from scale sizes equal to the uncertainty on the initial values <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> reducing the<br />

scale size until the number <strong>of</strong> accepted steps was close to 50% when no prior on the<br />

T eff was used, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> close to 30% when a prior on the T eff was applied. When the prior

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!