05.07.2014 Views

Report - School of Physics

Report - School of Physics

Report - School of Physics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ground requires simultaneous observations <strong>of</strong> the target and an astrometric reference.<br />

In a dual-star interferometer, each telescope accepts two small fields and sends two<br />

separate beams through the delay lines. The delay difference between the two fields<br />

is taken out with an additional short-stroke differential delay line; an internal laser<br />

metrology system is used to monitor the delay difference (which is equal to the<br />

phase difference multiplied with λ/2π). For astrometric observations, this delay<br />

difference ∆D is the observable <strong>of</strong> interest, because it is directly related to the<br />

coordinate difference between the target and reference stars; it follows that ∆D ≡<br />

D t −D r = B·(ŝ ⃗ t − ŝ r ) = B(cos θ t −cos θ r ), where the subscript t is used for the target,<br />

and r for the reference. To get robust two-dimensional position measurements,<br />

observations <strong>of</strong> the target with respect to several references and with a number <strong>of</strong><br />

baseline orientations are required.<br />

Measurements <strong>of</strong> the delay difference between two stars give relative astrometric<br />

information; this means that the position information is not obtained in a global<br />

reference frame, but only with respect to nearby comparison stars, which define<br />

a local reference frame on a small patch <strong>of</strong> sky. This approach greatly reduces<br />

the atmospheric errors, and some instrumental requirements are also relaxed. The<br />

downside is that the information that can be obtained in this way is more restricted,<br />

because the local frame may have a motion and rotation <strong>of</strong> its own. This makes it<br />

impossible to measure proper motions. Moreover, all parallax ellipses have the same<br />

orientation and axial ratio, which allows only relative parallaxes to be measured.<br />

Specific instrument approaches are discussed in Section 2.1.6 (NAOS-CONICA,<br />

Planet Finder, PRIMA) and Section 2.2.2 (Gaia, SIM, etc.).<br />

No planets have been discovered using this technique to date.<br />

2.1.6 Direct Detection<br />

The light coming from an extra-solar planet is much fainter (<strong>of</strong> order 10 9 in the<br />

optical, and a factor 10–100 less in the infrared) than the signal from the star.<br />

Therefore the challenge is to build instruments that are able to provide extremely<br />

high contrast and spatial resolution. The different approaches are summarised below<br />

and in Table 4. The first direct detection <strong>of</strong> a young planet may already have<br />

been achieved by a team using NACO on the VLT. An object detected close to<br />

2MASS WJ1207334–393254 is either a planet or possibly a brown dwarf (Chauvin<br />

et al., 2004). Regardless <strong>of</strong> the exact nature <strong>of</strong> this particular object, it is likely that<br />

imaging <strong>of</strong> more massive, young extra-solar planets will become more feasible in the<br />

near future.<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> programmes are using, or planning to use, interferometry to achieve<br />

high spatial resolution. Destructive interference can be used to remove most <strong>of</strong><br />

the light from the central star (nulling). ESA and ESO are collaborating on a<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!