Report - School of Physics
Report - School of Physics
Report - School of Physics
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ground requires simultaneous observations <strong>of</strong> the target and an astrometric reference.<br />
In a dual-star interferometer, each telescope accepts two small fields and sends two<br />
separate beams through the delay lines. The delay difference between the two fields<br />
is taken out with an additional short-stroke differential delay line; an internal laser<br />
metrology system is used to monitor the delay difference (which is equal to the<br />
phase difference multiplied with λ/2π). For astrometric observations, this delay<br />
difference ∆D is the observable <strong>of</strong> interest, because it is directly related to the<br />
coordinate difference between the target and reference stars; it follows that ∆D ≡<br />
D t −D r = B·(ŝ ⃗ t − ŝ r ) = B(cos θ t −cos θ r ), where the subscript t is used for the target,<br />
and r for the reference. To get robust two-dimensional position measurements,<br />
observations <strong>of</strong> the target with respect to several references and with a number <strong>of</strong><br />
baseline orientations are required.<br />
Measurements <strong>of</strong> the delay difference between two stars give relative astrometric<br />
information; this means that the position information is not obtained in a global<br />
reference frame, but only with respect to nearby comparison stars, which define<br />
a local reference frame on a small patch <strong>of</strong> sky. This approach greatly reduces<br />
the atmospheric errors, and some instrumental requirements are also relaxed. The<br />
downside is that the information that can be obtained in this way is more restricted,<br />
because the local frame may have a motion and rotation <strong>of</strong> its own. This makes it<br />
impossible to measure proper motions. Moreover, all parallax ellipses have the same<br />
orientation and axial ratio, which allows only relative parallaxes to be measured.<br />
Specific instrument approaches are discussed in Section 2.1.6 (NAOS-CONICA,<br />
Planet Finder, PRIMA) and Section 2.2.2 (Gaia, SIM, etc.).<br />
No planets have been discovered using this technique to date.<br />
2.1.6 Direct Detection<br />
The light coming from an extra-solar planet is much fainter (<strong>of</strong> order 10 9 in the<br />
optical, and a factor 10–100 less in the infrared) than the signal from the star.<br />
Therefore the challenge is to build instruments that are able to provide extremely<br />
high contrast and spatial resolution. The different approaches are summarised below<br />
and in Table 4. The first direct detection <strong>of</strong> a young planet may already have<br />
been achieved by a team using NACO on the VLT. An object detected close to<br />
2MASS WJ1207334–393254 is either a planet or possibly a brown dwarf (Chauvin<br />
et al., 2004). Regardless <strong>of</strong> the exact nature <strong>of</strong> this particular object, it is likely that<br />
imaging <strong>of</strong> more massive, young extra-solar planets will become more feasible in the<br />
near future.<br />
A number <strong>of</strong> programmes are using, or planning to use, interferometry to achieve<br />
high spatial resolution. Destructive interference can be used to remove most <strong>of</strong><br />
the light from the central star (nulling). ESA and ESO are collaborating on a<br />
22