03.07.2014 Views

MT Express Sample Low Resolution Issue ... - Monitoring Times

MT Express Sample Low Resolution Issue ... - Monitoring Times

MT Express Sample Low Resolution Issue ... - Monitoring Times

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The World Above 30 MHz<br />

Dan Veeneman<br />

danveeneman@monitoringtimes.<br />

Scanning in 2005<br />

As we start a new year it’s worth taking<br />

some time to reflect on our hobby and<br />

consider the effect of changes that<br />

are occurring in radio monitoring. Technology,<br />

regulation and security are all having an effect<br />

on what we can hear, but as the French say, plus<br />

ca change, plus c’est la meme chose (the more<br />

things change the more they stay the same).<br />

❖ A Future for Scanning?<br />

Dan,<br />

About two years ago, I got interested in<br />

scanning after a bit of an absence from the hobby.<br />

With shortwave radio stations disappearing<br />

at an alarming rate, I looked for another aspect<br />

of the radio hobby to entertain and inform.<br />

Unfortunately, it now looks like scanning could<br />

become a thing of the past. With more and more<br />

law-enforcement agencies encrypting their communications,<br />

is there hope for life on the action<br />

bands? I know there is ham traffic – I got my<br />

general-class license last year – air traffic, railroads,<br />

etc., but the police bands are fascinating<br />

and draw many into this exciting hobby.<br />

Let me know what you think. It’s just sad<br />

to see so many forms of radio seemingly fading<br />

away. Thanks.<br />

– Chris in California<br />

Although this isn’t a shortwave column,<br />

I would encourage you to take another look at<br />

shortwave listening. As with many other hobbies,<br />

digital has come to longwave reception.<br />

Digital Radio Mondiale (DRM) is a new broadcasting<br />

standard for signals below 30 MHz and<br />

holds out some hope for shortwave listening in<br />

the years to come.<br />

Back to scanning – I don’t think it will<br />

become a thing of the past. Let’s take a quick<br />

look at some of the previous challenges faced<br />

by our hobby:<br />

In the early 1980s we were afraid of being<br />

locked out as public safety agencies began<br />

to operate in the 800 MHz band. Electronic<br />

experimenters responded by designing and<br />

building down-converters that allowed our VHF<br />

scanners to hear 800 MHz signals. Eventually<br />

manufacturers began to market scanners capable<br />

of tuning 800 MHz directly.<br />

In the mid 1990s we started to become<br />

concerned about this new thing called trunking<br />

that would make it impossible for a scanner<br />

listener to follow an entire conversation. Computer<br />

programmers responded by writing custom<br />

software that could decode trunking signals and<br />

automatically tune a receiver, allowing a listener<br />

to follow these new systems. It took a little<br />

more work and some additional equipment, but<br />

it became possible for nearly everyone to trunk<br />

track. Eventually manufacturers began to market<br />

scanners capable of automatically monitor<br />

trunked systems.<br />

Just a few years ago there was real concern<br />

that the new APCO Project 25 digital standards<br />

would mean the end of scanning. Today we have<br />

a choice of several consumer receivers capable<br />

of decoding APCO 25 audio and tracking these<br />

fully digital systems.<br />

In each of these cases a solution was found<br />

and the hobby continued. Now we are faced with<br />

public safety agencies moving to encryption.<br />

Because the restriction now is as much legal as<br />

technical, the hobby may have to pursue a nontechnical<br />

solution. We may have to press the<br />

case in the court of public opinion that agencies<br />

should be open and accountable to their citizens,<br />

and that encryption goes against those goals.<br />

Whichever way that effort may go, certainly<br />

most agencies will never encrypt their traffic,<br />

whether for cost or other reasons. I think there<br />

will be quite a bit to hear for quite some time to<br />

come.<br />

❖ Bristol, Tennessee<br />

In 2000, Sullivan County in northeastern<br />

Tennessee partnered with the cities of Bristol,<br />

Kingsport and Bluff City to install an $11 million<br />

Motorola trunk radio system across the county.<br />

The system was operated “mixed-mode” with<br />

both analog and digital voice traffic.<br />

In November of 2004 the Bristol police<br />

department finally switched over to all-digital<br />

operation after a delay of several months.<br />

Unfortunately for scanner listeners, according<br />

to reports all of their transmissions are now<br />

encrypted. The police department had gone to<br />

the city finance board<br />

to press for additional<br />

funding for encrypted<br />

radios, citing security<br />

concerns.<br />

The Bristol Police<br />

Department handles<br />

about 50,000 calls<br />

each year, serving a<br />

population of just over<br />

25,000 residents. You may be familiar with the<br />

city as the home of the Bristol Motor Speedway,<br />

a busy tourist attraction hosting numerous races<br />

on their half-mile oval.<br />

The Bristol Fire Department and Emergency<br />

Medical Services are still operating<br />

unencrypted and in analog, although they may<br />

move to digital in the future.<br />

The county-wide system is a Motorola Type<br />

II network transmitting on the following frequencies:<br />

855.9875, 856.2625, 856.7375, 857.2625,<br />

857.7375, 858.2625, 858.7375, 859.2625,<br />

859.7375, 860.2625 and 860.7375 MHz. Three<br />

repeater sites provide coverage, with one on top<br />

of Holston Mountain in Blountville, another on<br />

top of Bays Mountain in Kingsport and a third<br />

at the Sullivan Justice Center in Blountville.<br />

Decimal Hex Description<br />

16400 401 Bristol Police Dispatch<br />

16432 403 Bristol Police Supervisors<br />

16464 405 Bristol Police Patrol<br />

16496 407 Bristol Police Tactical 1<br />

16528 409 Bristol Police Tactical 2<br />

16560 40B Bristol Police Tactical 3<br />

16592 40D Bristol Police Detectives<br />

16656 411 Bristol Animal Control<br />

16752 417 Bristol Fire Dispatch<br />

16784 419 Bristol Fire 2<br />

16816 41B Bristol Fire 3<br />

16848 41D Bristol Fire Mutual Aid<br />

16880 41F Bristol Fire Rescue<br />

16912 421 Bristol Fire Inspectors<br />

16944 423 Bristol Fire Training<br />

16976 425 Bristol Fire Command<br />

32432 7EB Kingsport Police Patrol 1<br />

32464 7ED Kingsport Police Patrol 2<br />

32496 7EF Kingsport Police Traffic<br />

32528 7F1 Kingsport Police Detective 1<br />

32560 7F3 Kingsport Police Detective 2<br />

32592 7F5 Kingsport Police Records<br />

32624 7F7 Kingsport Police Special Operations<br />

32784 801 Kingsport Fire East 1<br />

32816 803 Kingsport Fire East 2<br />

32848 805 Kingsport Fire West 1<br />

32880 807 Kingsport Fire West 2<br />

32912 809 Kingsport Fire Central 1<br />

32944 80B Kingsport Fire Central 2<br />

32976 80D Kingsport Fire Training<br />

33008 80F Kingsport Fire Hazardous Materials<br />

1<br />

33040 811 Kingsport Fire Hazardous Materials<br />

2<br />

33072 813 Kingsport Fire Special Operations<br />

48560 BDB County Rescue (Tactical 1)<br />

48592 BDD County Rescue (Tactical 2)<br />

48624 BDF County Rescue (Tactical 3)<br />

48656 BE1 County Rescue Hospital 1<br />

48688 BE3 County Rescue Hospital 2<br />

24 MONITORING TIMES January 2005

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!