MT Express Sample Low Resolution Issue ... - Monitoring Times
MT Express Sample Low Resolution Issue ... - Monitoring Times
MT Express Sample Low Resolution Issue ... - Monitoring Times
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The World Above 30 MHz<br />
Dan Veeneman<br />
danveeneman@monitoringtimes.<br />
Scanning in 2005<br />
As we start a new year it’s worth taking<br />
some time to reflect on our hobby and<br />
consider the effect of changes that<br />
are occurring in radio monitoring. Technology,<br />
regulation and security are all having an effect<br />
on what we can hear, but as the French say, plus<br />
ca change, plus c’est la meme chose (the more<br />
things change the more they stay the same).<br />
❖ A Future for Scanning?<br />
Dan,<br />
About two years ago, I got interested in<br />
scanning after a bit of an absence from the hobby.<br />
With shortwave radio stations disappearing<br />
at an alarming rate, I looked for another aspect<br />
of the radio hobby to entertain and inform.<br />
Unfortunately, it now looks like scanning could<br />
become a thing of the past. With more and more<br />
law-enforcement agencies encrypting their communications,<br />
is there hope for life on the action<br />
bands? I know there is ham traffic – I got my<br />
general-class license last year – air traffic, railroads,<br />
etc., but the police bands are fascinating<br />
and draw many into this exciting hobby.<br />
Let me know what you think. It’s just sad<br />
to see so many forms of radio seemingly fading<br />
away. Thanks.<br />
– Chris in California<br />
Although this isn’t a shortwave column,<br />
I would encourage you to take another look at<br />
shortwave listening. As with many other hobbies,<br />
digital has come to longwave reception.<br />
Digital Radio Mondiale (DRM) is a new broadcasting<br />
standard for signals below 30 MHz and<br />
holds out some hope for shortwave listening in<br />
the years to come.<br />
Back to scanning – I don’t think it will<br />
become a thing of the past. Let’s take a quick<br />
look at some of the previous challenges faced<br />
by our hobby:<br />
In the early 1980s we were afraid of being<br />
locked out as public safety agencies began<br />
to operate in the 800 MHz band. Electronic<br />
experimenters responded by designing and<br />
building down-converters that allowed our VHF<br />
scanners to hear 800 MHz signals. Eventually<br />
manufacturers began to market scanners capable<br />
of tuning 800 MHz directly.<br />
In the mid 1990s we started to become<br />
concerned about this new thing called trunking<br />
that would make it impossible for a scanner<br />
listener to follow an entire conversation. Computer<br />
programmers responded by writing custom<br />
software that could decode trunking signals and<br />
automatically tune a receiver, allowing a listener<br />
to follow these new systems. It took a little<br />
more work and some additional equipment, but<br />
it became possible for nearly everyone to trunk<br />
track. Eventually manufacturers began to market<br />
scanners capable of automatically monitor<br />
trunked systems.<br />
Just a few years ago there was real concern<br />
that the new APCO Project 25 digital standards<br />
would mean the end of scanning. Today we have<br />
a choice of several consumer receivers capable<br />
of decoding APCO 25 audio and tracking these<br />
fully digital systems.<br />
In each of these cases a solution was found<br />
and the hobby continued. Now we are faced with<br />
public safety agencies moving to encryption.<br />
Because the restriction now is as much legal as<br />
technical, the hobby may have to pursue a nontechnical<br />
solution. We may have to press the<br />
case in the court of public opinion that agencies<br />
should be open and accountable to their citizens,<br />
and that encryption goes against those goals.<br />
Whichever way that effort may go, certainly<br />
most agencies will never encrypt their traffic,<br />
whether for cost or other reasons. I think there<br />
will be quite a bit to hear for quite some time to<br />
come.<br />
❖ Bristol, Tennessee<br />
In 2000, Sullivan County in northeastern<br />
Tennessee partnered with the cities of Bristol,<br />
Kingsport and Bluff City to install an $11 million<br />
Motorola trunk radio system across the county.<br />
The system was operated “mixed-mode” with<br />
both analog and digital voice traffic.<br />
In November of 2004 the Bristol police<br />
department finally switched over to all-digital<br />
operation after a delay of several months.<br />
Unfortunately for scanner listeners, according<br />
to reports all of their transmissions are now<br />
encrypted. The police department had gone to<br />
the city finance board<br />
to press for additional<br />
funding for encrypted<br />
radios, citing security<br />
concerns.<br />
The Bristol Police<br />
Department handles<br />
about 50,000 calls<br />
each year, serving a<br />
population of just over<br />
25,000 residents. You may be familiar with the<br />
city as the home of the Bristol Motor Speedway,<br />
a busy tourist attraction hosting numerous races<br />
on their half-mile oval.<br />
The Bristol Fire Department and Emergency<br />
Medical Services are still operating<br />
unencrypted and in analog, although they may<br />
move to digital in the future.<br />
The county-wide system is a Motorola Type<br />
II network transmitting on the following frequencies:<br />
855.9875, 856.2625, 856.7375, 857.2625,<br />
857.7375, 858.2625, 858.7375, 859.2625,<br />
859.7375, 860.2625 and 860.7375 MHz. Three<br />
repeater sites provide coverage, with one on top<br />
of Holston Mountain in Blountville, another on<br />
top of Bays Mountain in Kingsport and a third<br />
at the Sullivan Justice Center in Blountville.<br />
Decimal Hex Description<br />
16400 401 Bristol Police Dispatch<br />
16432 403 Bristol Police Supervisors<br />
16464 405 Bristol Police Patrol<br />
16496 407 Bristol Police Tactical 1<br />
16528 409 Bristol Police Tactical 2<br />
16560 40B Bristol Police Tactical 3<br />
16592 40D Bristol Police Detectives<br />
16656 411 Bristol Animal Control<br />
16752 417 Bristol Fire Dispatch<br />
16784 419 Bristol Fire 2<br />
16816 41B Bristol Fire 3<br />
16848 41D Bristol Fire Mutual Aid<br />
16880 41F Bristol Fire Rescue<br />
16912 421 Bristol Fire Inspectors<br />
16944 423 Bristol Fire Training<br />
16976 425 Bristol Fire Command<br />
32432 7EB Kingsport Police Patrol 1<br />
32464 7ED Kingsport Police Patrol 2<br />
32496 7EF Kingsport Police Traffic<br />
32528 7F1 Kingsport Police Detective 1<br />
32560 7F3 Kingsport Police Detective 2<br />
32592 7F5 Kingsport Police Records<br />
32624 7F7 Kingsport Police Special Operations<br />
32784 801 Kingsport Fire East 1<br />
32816 803 Kingsport Fire East 2<br />
32848 805 Kingsport Fire West 1<br />
32880 807 Kingsport Fire West 2<br />
32912 809 Kingsport Fire Central 1<br />
32944 80B Kingsport Fire Central 2<br />
32976 80D Kingsport Fire Training<br />
33008 80F Kingsport Fire Hazardous Materials<br />
1<br />
33040 811 Kingsport Fire Hazardous Materials<br />
2<br />
33072 813 Kingsport Fire Special Operations<br />
48560 BDB County Rescue (Tactical 1)<br />
48592 BDD County Rescue (Tactical 2)<br />
48624 BDF County Rescue (Tactical 3)<br />
48656 BE1 County Rescue Hospital 1<br />
48688 BE3 County Rescue Hospital 2<br />
24 MONITORING TIMES January 2005