03.07.2014 Views

Reliability of Spring Contacts in Industrial Environments - Semikron

Reliability of Spring Contacts in Industrial Environments - Semikron

Reliability of Spring Contacts in Industrial Environments - Semikron

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

22 POWER MODULES www.semikron.com<br />

<strong>Reliability</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spr<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Contacts</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>Industrial</strong> <strong>Environments</strong><br />

The connection between a power module substrate and a pr<strong>in</strong>ted circuit board can be established by<br />

spr<strong>in</strong>g pressure contacts. This type <strong>of</strong> contact allows easy assembly without additional solder<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>Spr<strong>in</strong>g</strong>s<br />

are used for a variety <strong>of</strong> current ranges, from sensor currents <strong>of</strong> a few milliamperes to load currents <strong>of</strong><br />

several amperes. Environmental stra<strong>in</strong>s by mechanical wear, rapid temperature changes and corrosive<br />

atmosphere are significant stress factors <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustrial applications. The reliability <strong>of</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g contacts under<br />

various harsh environment conditions is <strong>in</strong>vestigated. Florian Lang and Uwe Scheuermann,<br />

SEMIKRON Elektronik, Nuremberg, Germany<br />

<strong>Spr<strong>in</strong>g</strong> pressure contacts are <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

compared to the reliability <strong>of</strong> wrap- or<br />

solder-connections. However, the contact<br />

forces are <strong>in</strong> different ranges for classical<br />

wrap connectors and the spr<strong>in</strong>gs. Here,<br />

an <strong>in</strong>terconnection between a pr<strong>in</strong>ted<br />

circuit board (PCB) with driver<br />

components and power connections and<br />

a ceramic substrate (DBC) with dies is<br />

formed by spr<strong>in</strong>gs. Each spr<strong>in</strong>g has two<br />

contact spots. A loop <strong>of</strong> at least two<br />

spr<strong>in</strong>gs is used for test<strong>in</strong>g. Due to the<br />

assembly, an <strong>in</strong>dividual contact is not<br />

accessible.<br />

The pressure range determ<strong>in</strong>es the<br />

choice <strong>of</strong> contact materials for the<br />

different connectors. T<strong>in</strong> and silver plat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

are suitable for a contact force <strong>of</strong><br />

approximately 2 to 20N, while gold<br />

plat<strong>in</strong>gs are preferred <strong>in</strong> the range from 1<br />

to 2N.<br />

Frett<strong>in</strong>g corrosion<br />

‘Frett<strong>in</strong>g corrosion’ is the<br />

phenomenon <strong>of</strong> the grow<strong>in</strong>g, abrasion<br />

and compact<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> oxide particles by<br />

repeated micro-movement by vibration.<br />

This process is well known for wrap<br />

connectors <strong>of</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> contact<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ations.<br />

To simulate a repetitive movement <strong>of</strong><br />

the contact partners, as caused by<br />

vibration or different coefficients <strong>of</strong><br />

thermal expansion, a set-up was<br />

designed that allows a controlled<br />

movement <strong>of</strong> a PCB over a spr<strong>in</strong>g at a<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ed frequency, load and amplitude<br />

(Figure 1).<br />

Test results on the spr<strong>in</strong>g contacts<br />

proved to be entirely different from the<br />

published results on wrap connectors.<br />

Displayed <strong>in</strong> Figure 2 is the change<br />

<strong>of</strong> contact resistance <strong>of</strong> two spr<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

versus the <strong>in</strong>itial value. The contact<br />

resistance decreases <strong>in</strong>itially. This<br />

process is associated with the<br />

clean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the contact spot.<br />

Contam<strong>in</strong>ation is removed. No<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>of</strong> the contact resistance was<br />

detected dur<strong>in</strong>g 4.65 million<br />

movement cycles. This is attributed to<br />

the high contact forces <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong><br />

the spr<strong>in</strong>g contact, as well as the<br />

shape <strong>of</strong> the spr<strong>in</strong>gs head and the<br />

contact materials. Good contacts are<br />

Figure 2:<br />

<strong>Spr<strong>in</strong>g</strong> contact<br />

resistance<br />

change <strong>of</strong> two<br />

pairs <strong>of</strong><br />

spr<strong>in</strong>gs at<br />

4.65 million<br />

cycles, 50µm,<br />

1Hz<br />

Figure 1: Test set-up<br />

for micro-vibration,<br />

the contact resistance<br />

<strong>of</strong> the system can<br />

be monitored us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

four conductor<br />

measurement<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ed by show<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong><br />

contact resistance <strong>of</strong> less than 10mΩ<br />

after 100.000 cycles [2].<br />

Temperature shock<br />

Rapid thermal shocks <strong>in</strong>duce stress <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>in</strong>terface between materials with<br />

different coefficients <strong>of</strong> expansion. As the<br />

spr<strong>in</strong>g pressure connection is not form<br />

lock<strong>in</strong>g, thermal movement and potential<br />

wear would be possible. This could lead to<br />

Issue 6 2006<br />

Power Electronics Europe


24 POWER MODULES www.semikron.com<br />

a change <strong>of</strong> the contact force, orientation<br />

and <strong>in</strong>terface.<br />

To evaluate the development <strong>of</strong> the<br />

contact resistance the change <strong>of</strong> the<br />

resistance aga<strong>in</strong>st the first full cycle is<br />

plotted. The temperature evolution <strong>of</strong> each<br />

cycle was measured by a soldered<br />

thermocouple attached to the device under<br />

test (DUT).<br />

It was found that some contact<br />

systems were susceptible to degradation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the contact resistance: As an example<br />

a test system with nickel DBC shows a<br />

rise <strong>of</strong> the contact resistance due to<br />

oxidation.<br />

Experiments were performed to verify<br />

the beneficial effect <strong>of</strong> higher currents on<br />

the contact resistance. In literature a<br />

change <strong>of</strong> the contact resistance is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

attributed to th<strong>in</strong> surface layers [2]. ‘Drycircuit<br />

conditions’ accord<strong>in</strong>g to DIN EN<br />

60512-2-1 are limited to a current <strong>of</strong> up to<br />

100mA and a voltage <strong>of</strong> up to 20mV to<br />

avoid melt<strong>in</strong>g and dielectric breakdown,<br />

respectively.<br />

A test system was prepared with a<br />

material comb<strong>in</strong>ation that shows a gradual<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> contact resistance over time.<br />

The current was <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> steps from 1<br />

to 400mA. Figure 3 shows the contact<br />

resistance development. Each step leads to<br />

Figure 3: Test<br />

System:<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong><br />

the current<br />

level on the<br />

contact<br />

resistance <strong>of</strong><br />

an aged<br />

contact<br />

system us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a copper DBC<br />

Figure 4:<br />

M<strong>in</strong>iSKiiP II<br />

contact<br />

system -<br />

temperature<br />

shock test<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

an ENIG DBC<br />

at a<br />

permanent<br />

current <strong>of</strong><br />

1mA<br />

a significant reduction <strong>of</strong> the contact<br />

resistance. Test<strong>in</strong>g performed at higher<br />

permanent current levels confirms these<br />

results. Practically no changes <strong>in</strong> contact<br />

resistance could be found at 6A over 200<br />

cycles. The reliability <strong>of</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>gs for load<br />

contacts is thus proven.<br />

Low current levels are typical for sensor<br />

applications. The contact resistance<br />

development <strong>of</strong> a genu<strong>in</strong>e power module<br />

is displayed <strong>in</strong> Figure 4. The optimised<br />

material selection leads to a stable contact<br />

resistance. 100 cycles with extreme<br />

temperature sw<strong>in</strong>gs are considered the<br />

Figure 5:<br />

Temperature<br />

record<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

soldered<br />

thermocouple<br />

(blue l<strong>in</strong>e) and a<br />

temperature<br />

sensor connected<br />

via two spr<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

(red l<strong>in</strong>e)<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustrial lifetime requirement. The largest<br />

change <strong>in</strong> contact resistance across a daisy<br />

cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> eight spr<strong>in</strong>gs is measured to be<br />

only 100mΩ, even after 200 temperature<br />

cycles.<br />

An extended temperature cycl<strong>in</strong>g test<br />

shows the temperature measured via a<br />

temperature sensor connected by spr<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

and a thermocouple. Figure 5 displays the<br />

temperature measurement for selected<br />

cycles. The temperature evolution <strong>of</strong> the<br />

thermocouple and the temperature sensor<br />

show a slightly different gradient, due to<br />

the differences <strong>in</strong> thermal capacity. The<br />

temperature sensor signal was stable for<br />

2000 cycles; for the extreme changes <strong>in</strong><br />

temperature this is equivalent to 20 times<br />

the <strong>in</strong>dustrial lifetime requirement <strong>of</strong> a<br />

power module. The soldered connection <strong>of</strong><br />

the reference thermocouple failed at 1000<br />

cycles and had to be replaced (see arrow<br />

<strong>in</strong> Figure 5).<br />

Corrosive atmosphere<br />

Corrosive atmosphere test<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigates the contact reliability <strong>in</strong> an<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustrial environment. Due to the high<br />

contact forces <strong>of</strong> the spr<strong>in</strong>gs, the metallic<br />

contact partners are impervious to outside<br />

contam<strong>in</strong>ation. Corrosion products could<br />

not be detected by EDX analysis <strong>in</strong>side the<br />

contact area. Test<strong>in</strong>g was evaluated by<br />

measur<strong>in</strong>g contact resistance before and<br />

after the test. The change <strong>in</strong> contact<br />

resistance for various systems was<br />

negligible. No signs <strong>of</strong> electromigration<br />

could be found <strong>in</strong> a test with additionally<br />

applied bias.<br />

Intermetallic phases<br />

T<strong>in</strong> on copper plat<strong>in</strong>g is known to grow<br />

<strong>in</strong>to <strong>in</strong>termetallic phases with changed<br />

mechanical properties. Those <strong>in</strong>termetallic<br />

phases can impair solder<strong>in</strong>g due to the<br />

formation <strong>of</strong> oxide layers that are difficult to<br />

remove with normal fluxes.<br />

The growth <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>termetallic phases is<br />

based on a diffusion process, and thus<br />

dependent on temperature. The pressure<br />

Issue 6 2006<br />

Power Electronics Europe

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!