02.07.2014 Views

Yorkshire's First Railway Station A commemorative booklet

Yorkshire's First Railway Station A commemorative booklet

Yorkshire's First Railway Station A commemorative booklet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Yorkshire’s <strong>First</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> <strong>Station</strong><br />

A <strong>commemorative</strong> <strong>booklet</strong><br />

Marking the 175 th anniversary<br />

of the opening of Selby station. 1<br />

22 nd September 1834.


Why a Rail Road?<br />

West Yorkshire wool and coal traders of the 1820s had a problem.<br />

Turnpike roads were a mass of mud.<br />

It could take a week to get wool from the West Riding to the coast.<br />

The waterways were no better either.<br />

Tides on the river were unpredictable – one week floods, the next<br />

ships are stuck on the shallows.<br />

To use the Aire and Calder canal was expensive and the Selby Canal<br />

was too small. In 1826, a new canal link was made to Ferrybridge, and<br />

the port of Goole was being developed, but basically, transport of<br />

goods was in the hands of monopolies who could charge what they<br />

wanted.<br />

So, this was the situation:<br />

Leeds was the capital of the clothing industry, and trade with Europe<br />

was increasing, but access to East Coast ports was unsatisfactory.<br />

The problem was not only with cloth merchants. Coal mine owners<br />

such as the Gott and Gascoigne families in and around Garforth had<br />

valuable materials to transport. Industry needed cheap coal. Journeys<br />

by canal could involve ten or more transfers between barges, which<br />

pushed up price and reduced quality.<br />

Wealthy landlords had agricultural produce to transfer, and quarry<br />

owners needed to get their stone to market. Many quarries were miles<br />

from the nearest canal, adding to the problem.<br />

The Miners’ Arms<br />

Two pubs, 2 still trading in Garforth, remind us why the Leeds and Selby was<br />

built. Miners hewed coal for industrialists such as the Gascoigne family.


All in all, there was a pent-up demand for an efficient way to<br />

move a vast range of produce. Liverpool and Manchester had a new<br />

railway, meaning the Lancastrians could transport their goods quicker<br />

and cheaper. A trade War of the Roses was brewing and Yorkshire<br />

needed a rail road to make the fight fair. The rail road would release<br />

all the pressure – eventually.<br />

The coming of the Rail Road<br />

Many efforts had been made to improve communications between<br />

Leeds and Selby. A canal link had been surveyed in 1769, and the<br />

Selby Canal between Selby and Haddlesey was opened in 1778, which<br />

solved some problems. The journey by river and canal was 30 miles as<br />

opposed to 20 by road, but the waterway was much more reliable.<br />

When the Aire and Calder canal opened to Goole in 1826, trade<br />

slipped away from Selby. Something had to be done!<br />

In 1821, a rail road had been suggested, and famous engineer George<br />

Stephenson surveyed a route in 1825. However this used the old<br />

technology of horses and ropes. The success of the Middleton <strong>Railway</strong><br />

in Leeds showed steam engines were the way forward.<br />

James Walker was asked to survey a route. In 1829 his report was<br />

published. It had an astonishing proposal. The railway would have a<br />

half-mile tunnel, and steam engines would pull loads through it!<br />

The route was just over 19 miles long and<br />

was to end in a “commodious station at Selby”<br />

with six platforms, two for passengers and<br />

the rest for goods. Goods were always more<br />

important than passengers.<br />

Selby<br />

Old <strong>Station</strong><br />

Sept. 2009<br />

Inside Selby Old<br />

station c 1950s.<br />

Courtesy R. Moody<br />

Passengers and goods had to cross<br />

Ousegate for packet boats to travel to<br />

Hull or York. So, to some extent<br />

3<br />

early train times depended<br />

on tides on the River Ouse.


Construction of the line<br />

Engineering in the 1830’s was done by hand. The men who did it<br />

were ‘navvies’, short for ‘navigators’, harking back to the days of<br />

canal building.<br />

The navvies had to be tough. They were expected to swing a pick and<br />

shovel and to barrow rock and soil for ten hours a day. In this time, a<br />

good navvy would shift 15 tons. Life and limb was risked in blasting<br />

tunnels and building bridges.<br />

Plenty of food was available for those who signed up. Four pounds of<br />

beef and a gallon of ale a day was a typical navvies’ diet.<br />

Navvies worked hard and they drank hard. "Going on a Randy" was<br />

slang for going on a drinking spree that could last several days.<br />

Hangovers halted track laying, and harvest time offered easier work<br />

in the fields, so progress was also slower in August.<br />

Living conditions were awful. Navvies lived in shanty towns, in huts<br />

beside the route. Eight men to a hut, with eight sets of clothes to dry<br />

after a day’s sweat and mud. No wonder they said “The best you’ll<br />

ever be is damp”.<br />

Pay was monthly – but everything came through the company store,<br />

so the navvies never saw cash – just a credit bill at the Tommy, or<br />

company, shop. The company always seemed to see to it that you<br />

were owing at the end of the month – so you’d always have to work<br />

another month to catch up. Of course there was an endless supply of<br />

beer.<br />

It took around three years to build the 19-mile long line, including the<br />

famous tunnel. Most of the line was built at a fairly gentle gradient of<br />

1 in 137, but this was only achieved by creating 6 miles of cuttings<br />

and embankments, 4<br />

by barrowing soil and rock from one part of the<br />

line to another.


Richmond Hill, on the outskirts of Leeds was too high for a cutting, so<br />

a tunnel was needed. As designed by James Walker it was almost half a<br />

mile long.<br />

Rock had to be blasted out using gunpowder, as dynamite had yet to<br />

be invented. Just like bonfire night, the fuse would often go out – but if<br />

you went back to check and the fuse blew, you’d be buried under tons<br />

of rock. Many men lost their lives. In 1832, the driving of the line was<br />

more important than health and safety.<br />

The tunnel was a thing of wonder to people in 1834, and many thought<br />

the darkness impenetrable. The Mechanics Magazine of 1835 describes<br />

the horrid experience:<br />

…As we entered the tunnel…. ”We were immediately enveloped in total<br />

darkness and every one of the coaches filled with smoke to a most annoying<br />

degree. Though we were but a few minutes going through such was the<br />

nuisance that we thought it was an hour”<br />

The railway company painted the inside of the tunnel with whitewash<br />

and used copper reflectors to try to relieve the gloom.<br />

The tunnel was widened and shortened in 1894.<br />

The effect on passengers of going through the tunnel was described in<br />

Parson’s “A Traveller’s companion” of 1835.<br />

“The change produced by transit through this tunnel is extraordinary, and as<br />

pleasing as it is extraordinary. The traveller leaves behind him a region where<br />

the smoke of countless factories pollutes the atmosphere…He enters upon a<br />

scene where no such contamination affects his organs, where the whole<br />

population is agricultural and where rural tranquillity and peace are never<br />

invaded and destroyed”<br />

Nowadays this is the area of Neville Hill depot.<br />

5


A 2009 Transpennine Express train passing under the 1830s<br />

“Wonder of the new industrial age” at Garforth<br />

Beyond Richmond Hill, the major structures were stone bridges. An<br />

arch bridge crosses what is now Selby Road, and was described in<br />

1834 as “an astonishing display of industry and art”, and a further angled<br />

bridge at Garforth was proclaimed “a wonder of the new industrial age”.<br />

The building of the line attracted foreign visitors too, and the cuttings<br />

around Micklefield <strong>Station</strong> were described by a French engineer as<br />

“superior to any other I have seen in England”.<br />

After Micklefield, the terrain was a good deal gentler and construction<br />

of the line into Selby that much easier to accomplish.<br />

However, the line did suffer subsidence as it crossed old mine<br />

workings, a problem that returned with the Selby coal field in 1984.<br />

Once the line was complete, canal owners reduced their charges in a<br />

vain effort to regain goods traffic.<br />

6


The first train arrives<br />

The 22 nd of September 1834 was seen as a very important day indeed. A<br />

few trial runs had been carried out prior to this over part of the line, but<br />

this was the day for the first complete run. The date was also chosen to<br />

allow music fans to attend a festival in Hull.<br />

The engine ‘Nelson’ was attached to nine carriages, containing 156<br />

passengers. Three of the carriages were painted yellow and were<br />

enclosed, like stage coaches. They were called “Juno”, “Diana” and<br />

“Vesta”. These were for first class passengers. The other six were open<br />

to the air. Nowadays we would call them cattle trucks!<br />

This adaptation of the “Leeds Mercury” story tells the day’s events<br />

“At first the journey was extremely slow. The first two miles took 40 minutes<br />

to be covered. Spectators began to jest and ridicule,. Merry derision came from<br />

the crowd…some passengers got off and pretended to push the carriages. After<br />

an hour and three quarters, “Nelson” came to a halt, having covered just 4<br />

miles.<br />

One of the trucks was removed, and “Nelson” tried again, to much better<br />

effect.<br />

Garforth was reached comfortably, but a stop had to be made for water. Five<br />

minutes later, off again down the slope to Selby. Speeds as rapid as 20 mph<br />

were reached. The final 16 miles were covered in just over the hour.<br />

Arrival in Selby was in perfect safety just before 9 am. A great number of<br />

persons greeted the train with loud cheers and a small cannon was fired. Those<br />

who wished could catch the boat for Hull.<br />

Nelson had some running repairs and left for Leeds at 11:10. The journey back<br />

was achieved in just over the hour, averaging 16mph and the train was<br />

welcomed back to Leeds by a crowd in excess of 30000.<br />

The conclusion was<br />

‘The day was beautiful, passengers were delighted and the whole affair 7<br />

resounded to the credit of the company”


Journeys in the early days<br />

Once the service had settled down, trains regularly left Leeds for<br />

Selby at 6am to connect with packet boats for Hull and York. Stage<br />

coaches and packet boats altered their timings to meet up with the<br />

train.<br />

For instance, a carriage ran from Kirkgate to catch the train at Marsh<br />

Lane in Leeds.<br />

The 5 am “<strong>Railway</strong>” stagecoach from Knaresborough had seven<br />

calling points before making the connection at Micklefield.<br />

Travellers were tough back then! A cheap single from Knaresboro’ to<br />

Hull was 6/6 (33p).<br />

The return was early in the afternoon. Journey time was around 75<br />

minutes.<br />

In the first week of operation, about 1500 passengers were carried.<br />

After a year or so, this had increased to 3500 passengers a week which<br />

is ten times the number of people who had used the coach on the<br />

roads.<br />

Prices paid depended on how far you went. Up to five miles, it was<br />

sixpence (2.5p). Between 5 and 10 miles was a shilling (5p). The Leeds<br />

to Selby trip, second class, was 2 shillings (10p). It was an extra<br />

shilling for the boat to Hull. For comparison, an agricultural workers<br />

wage was about 10/- (50p) per week.<br />

Tickets were purchased in the Superintendent’s house next to the<br />

railway station.<br />

<strong>Station</strong>s were at Hambleton, Milford, Micklefield, Garforth and Cross<br />

Gates. The journey ended at Marsh Lane – about a mile short of the<br />

current<br />

8<br />

Leeds terminus.<br />

In the first year, 100913 passengers were carried, paying £11947.


Early problems<br />

There were complaints and concerns about the new mechanical<br />

monsters. To fight these criticisms, the Act of Parliament that<br />

authorized the line stated “The furnaces of every steam engine…every<br />

locomotive or movable engine will be constructed on such a principal as to<br />

consume its own smoke…” Amazingly, MPs believed smoke-eating was<br />

possible, and passed the Act.<br />

Noise pollution problems also existed. Early reports suggest that the<br />

first locos made “sounds like the groans of a large elephant”<br />

Elephantine or not, the passage of the trains was such to cause<br />

commotion in animals. In 1857 the “Yorkshire Gazette” reports an<br />

unfortunate Mr Wood from Drax was driving his gig when the horse<br />

was alarmed at the sight of the steam engine. It bolted towards the<br />

park wall. A passer-by had to leap over the wall to avoid being run<br />

down and Mr Wood and his startled passenger were ejected onto the<br />

street.<br />

A few years later, a similar mishap befell a Mr Holdsworth.<br />

Unfortunately his carriage contained a piano. As the horse bolted the<br />

unwilling pianist was dragged “a considerable distance” leaving him<br />

severely black and blue rather than ebony and ivory.<br />

Problems could also be caused by lack of locomotive power. Several<br />

reports exist of problems on the inclined parts of the line, however<br />

gentle the gradient. In one case, the train shuddered to a halt between<br />

Milford and Micklefield with “spurting and groaning noises coming from<br />

the engine”.<br />

Whilst today, we might groan, complain about the railways and wait<br />

for a replacement bus, travellers back then were more resilient.<br />

Gentlemen were asked “please leave your seats to lighten the loads” and to<br />

help push the train. This was done “with great alacrity” before jumping 9<br />

back aboard to coast into Leeds.


Onwards to Hull ?<br />

Mind you, whilst the trip from Leeds to Selby was now much smoother,<br />

it was still quite an adventure to get to Hull!<br />

The river journey was 43 miles, and the Ouse and Aire have many<br />

narrow bends, areas of shallow water and tricky tides.<br />

A report of 1835 in Head’s “Home Tours” described the antics that<br />

passengers had to undergo.<br />

“Whenever, in a course, gruff voice, the Captain ordered ’Rowl her’ the crowd,<br />

like sheep at the barking of a dog, walked across the deck, treading on one<br />

another’s heels, with much inconvenience.<br />

At the same time they hailed a rope, previously sent on shore, and made it fast<br />

to a post or a tree until the vessel disengaged from her soft bed. It could then<br />

float again in the river channel”<br />

An average trip took around 4 hours. Despite this, by 1838, the Leeds<br />

and Selby railway was advertising one of the first rail excursions in the<br />

world “To Hull and back – in a day!”<br />

These river voyages couldn’t last. Rail was far more efficient, so it was<br />

no surprise when the railway was extended to Hull in July 1840. Selby<br />

became just a half-way halt on the railway between Leeds and Hull. A<br />

new swing 10 bridge was opened over the river, and the current<br />

passenger station was built.


The end of the independent Leeds to Selby line<br />

Just three months later, the Leeds to Selby was involved in railway<br />

politics. George Hudson, the York-based ‘<strong>Railway</strong> King’ negotiated a<br />

lease on the line. This cost him £17000 per year. He soon got this back<br />

however, as no sooner had he got the lease than he shut the line to<br />

passengers in November 1840! The idea was to force everyone to use<br />

the lines that Hudson owned, to maximize his profits.<br />

By 1841, the original station had its passenger entrances onto Ousegate<br />

bricked up. There is still a lintel in place on the exterior wall showing<br />

this date. This did not mean that the old station had no further use.<br />

Indeed it became a goods warehouse, and was well used to store the<br />

huge volume of goods that still travelled through Selby by rail, river,<br />

canal and road.<br />

But Hudson had other ideas. He purchased the line outright in 1844.<br />

Goods still used the services, but Hudson then put a stop to that when<br />

he closed the line completely in July 1848!<br />

The situation was only resolved when Hudson went bust in 1850.<br />

Freight and then passenger services were reintroduced over the line in<br />

the course of the next 4 months.<br />

After this turbulent start, the Leeds to Selby line settled down to a quiet<br />

existence. The York and North Midland <strong>Railway</strong>, which was Hudson’s<br />

company, became part of the North Eastern <strong>Railway</strong> in 1854. This then<br />

became part of the London and North Eastern <strong>Railway</strong> in 1923, then<br />

British <strong>Railway</strong>s in 1948.<br />

Following privatization, the line’s franchise is worked by Northern<br />

Rail, and TransPennine Express. Hull Trains also use the line as an<br />

Open Access operator.<br />

The frequency and speed of services along the line greatly exceed<br />

James Walker’s original plans, but he might be intrigued by how 11 little<br />

freight now passes between Leeds and Selby by rail.


A modern journey from Leeds to Selby<br />

Today’s journey starts at the main Leeds station, built in 1869. Pass<br />

the Parish Church on the right on an embankment paved with<br />

gravestones. Church authorities insisted on this ostensibly to avoid<br />

disturbing graves.<br />

As the cement terminal is passed on the left, so the train also passes<br />

the Marsh Lane site of the original station for the Leeds to Selby line.<br />

This closed in 1958, but George Hudson’s actions over a century<br />

before had greatly reduced its importance by concentrating all<br />

services on stations in central Leeds.<br />

Crossing over the skew bridge referred to in glowing terms in 1834,<br />

Cross Gates station is reached. Beyond this station was Vickers<br />

armaments factory, once “Barnbows Plant”, closed in the 1990s.<br />

The train is now approaching Garforth, and the area that was full of<br />

the coal mines whose produce was a vital factor in the planning and<br />

building of the line. Garforth station is little changed and is typical of<br />

the mid 19 th century station buildings of the North Eastern <strong>Railway</strong>,<br />

with pointed roofs, a veranda and gable ends facing the platform.<br />

12<br />

Garforth <strong>Station</strong> 2009


Travelling past Garforth, as the line eases left, modern factory units<br />

mark where the branch to Kippax and Castleford – and more coal –<br />

branched off on the right, until the 1980s.<br />

Whilst that line has been abandoned as freight lost importance, a sign<br />

that passengers became more significant is East Garforth station,<br />

opened in May 1987. The contrast with Garforth could hardly be more<br />

marked, as the newcomer has the bare minimum in terms of shelters<br />

and platforms, but it fulfils a vital role for hundreds of commuters.<br />

More former coal fields are on the right. The train then passes under<br />

the A656, and past a little – used industrial estate on the site of<br />

Peckfield Colliery. History is not static and whilst Micklefield is now<br />

just a commuter halt, exciting plans exist for the future of the Leeds to<br />

Selby line here. These include a new “turnback” facility to increase<br />

peak capacity to and from Leeds, a park and ride station called East<br />

Leeds Parkway, where long distance services may call, a fifth<br />

TransPennine Express each hour and electrification to Selby.<br />

The 1834 arch bridge at Micklefield<br />

Whatever the provision, the rails still run<br />

on a fine 1834 bridge over the Great North<br />

Road. Here, the 5am coach from<br />

Knaresboro’ deposited its weary<br />

passengers. Goods came to the station by<br />

this route, and were lifted up to the line<br />

from a rail building on the road below.<br />

Just beyond the platform end<br />

at Micklefield, the line to York<br />

leaves to the left, but the Selby<br />

train forges straight ahead, passing<br />

under the new Great North Road,<br />

the A1(M). The cuttings are those<br />

which attracted the French<br />

enthusiasm, mentioned earlier.<br />

“A marvellous cutting”<br />

13


South Milford<br />

2009 2009<br />

Moving beyond West<br />

Yorkshire, the next station is<br />

South Milford. Again, all<br />

trace of 19 th century building<br />

has gone, and two platforms<br />

and simple shelters are all<br />

that are present.<br />

The line in this area is mainly level, and the locomotives of the 1830s<br />

would have accelerated to around 20 mph on these stretches. Beyond<br />

Milford, the line passes over what was Hudson’s York and North<br />

Midlands <strong>Railway</strong> scene of much controversy over the years.<br />

Here, Hudson’s control closed the Leeds to Selby.<br />

Just beyond is Gascoigne Wood. In the early 1900s,<br />

migrants travelled between Hull and Liverpool as<br />

part of their journey from Russia to the USA. Their<br />

trains had no toilets, so the station here acted as a<br />

welcome “relief stop”! Gascoigne Wood goods<br />

yard also dealt with Selby coalfield’s output,<br />

closing in 2004. The derelict site was proposed as a<br />

location for West Yorkshire’s “eco town”.<br />

Gascoigne Wood<br />

Signal box 2009<br />

The line then crosses the newest stretch of East Coast Main Line, at<br />

the site of Hambleton <strong>Station</strong>, closed in 1959. The new ECML opened<br />

in 1983 to avoid possible subsidence from Selby coalfield workings,<br />

and speed restrictions on severe curves north of Selby.<br />

The level crossing on the A63 is at Thorpe Willoughby. Selby Canal is<br />

to the right, over which a line went to Goole until the 1950s.<br />

The train now winds slowly round sharp corners to enter Selby. The<br />

original station is beyond the current running lines. From Platform 3,<br />

the white gable ends of the original station are visible, with the Viking<br />

Shipping 14 Services logo. Six tracks ran in, four for freight, two for<br />

passengers. All links were removed in the 1980s.


What is visible of the 1834 station today?<br />

The running lines and old station building are now private property<br />

and part of the busy working environment of Viking Shipping. There is<br />

therefore no public access. To see how the lines went into the station,<br />

go onto the road overbridge and look back towards the station. The<br />

triangular pediments mark the top of the train sheds, with modern<br />

buildings on what were the goods areas in front.<br />

Much of the station’s exterior can be investigated from Ousegate.<br />

Turn right out of the station, right at the end and under the current<br />

lines. On your right is the station master’s house, with rail-inspired air<br />

bricks. This is where tickets were purchased. Beyond that are the<br />

massive blue doors that would open for access to the rail-transported<br />

goods. Take a few seconds to marvel at the massive timbers, mighty<br />

wheels, handles and pulleys that are still in place. High on the central<br />

wall is the 1841 lintel marking the development of the new station.<br />

In 1834, if you wished to continue your journey, you would now have<br />

to cross Ousegate to one of the staithes or jetties.<br />

These are still in place today, but rapidly becoming derelict, and are<br />

not available for public inspection. On the town side of the rail bridge<br />

one of the jetties still has a gate post and pulley that seem to show rail<br />

ancestry.<br />

However, you can still see how passengers would have embarked onto<br />

those packet boats. Walk up Ousegate, cross the river at the road<br />

bridge and walk back on the far bank.<br />

15


Just before the current rail bridge, look over the flood wall. A cinder<br />

track shows the line of the original Selby to Hull 1840 extension. Go<br />

under the rail bridge and look across the river through the rampant<br />

vegetation and you will see the remnants of a jetty and a ladder that<br />

could once have been used. This is all that remains of the<br />

embarkation points for boats to Hull or York.<br />

Roof of train shed<br />

Decaying jetty<br />

With that view the investigation of Yorkshire’s first main line is<br />

complete. In 1834, the “Leeds Times” described the arrival of the first<br />

train in these words: “A great number of respectably attired persons …<br />

loudly cheered the passengers and gave a hearty and exulting welcome to…<br />

this delightful, improving and hospitable town”.<br />

Whilst the cannon fire that greeted the first arrival is unlikely to be<br />

repeated, do take some time now to enjoy the delights of what still is a<br />

“delightful, improving and hospitable town”.<br />

SELBY CIVIC SOCIETY<br />

References<br />

Terry Coleman : “The <strong>Railway</strong> Navvies”<br />

METRO : “Yorkshire’s first main line” and quotations therein.<br />

Edward Parsons 16 : “The Traveller’s Companion”<br />

Patricia Scott : “The History of Selby”, and quotations therein<br />

W.W. Tomlinson : “History of the North Eastern <strong>Railway</strong>”<br />

Researched and published by Groundwork North Yorkshire September 2009. groundwork-northyorkshire.org.uk

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!