Tracked Version of Core Strategy, November 2012 - Selby District ...
Tracked Version of Core Strategy, November 2012 - Selby District ... Tracked Version of Core Strategy, November 2012 - Selby District ...
Selby District Submission Draft Core Strategy – May 2011 ___________________________________________________________________ conversion/redevelopment of a farmstead). (PC7.10) 4.48 In the case of farmsteads, the loss of agricultural use may result in substantial sites becoming available within villages. These exhibit a variety of characteristics but often contain buildings with considerable character and heritage value. The policy aims to provide guiding principles for any conversion and/or redevelopment in order that proposals retain the best of that character whilst making efficient use of the site, appropriate to the role and function of the village. 4.49 In all cases proposals will be expected to show high regard for protecting local amenity and preserving and enhancing the local area, with the full regard taken of the principles contained in Village Design Statements, where available. In villages washed over by Green Belt, development must accord with national Green Belt policy and not significantly prejudice its openness. - 50 -
Selby District Submission Draft Core Strategy – May 2011 ___________________________________________________________________ Minor word changes to CP1A – PC7.11 Policy CP1A Management of Residential Development in Settlements a) In order to ensure that speculative (windfall) housing development on non-allocated sites (PC1.23) contributes to sustainable development and the continued evolution of viable communities, the following types of residential development will be acceptable in principle, within Development Limits 12 : in different settlement types, as follows: • In Selby, Sherburn in Elmet, Tadcaster and Designated Service Villages – conversions, replacement dwellings, redevelopment of previously developed land, and appropriate scale development on greenfield land (including garden land and conversion/ redevelopment of farmsteads). • In Secondary Villages – conversions, replacement dwellings, redevelopment of previously developed land, filling of small linear gaps in otherwise built up residential frontages, and conversion/redevelopment of farmsteads. b) Proposals for the conversion and/or redevelopment of farmsteads to residential use within Development Limits will be treated on their merits according to the following principles: • Priority will be given to the sympathetic conversion of traditional buildings which conserves the existing character of the site and buildings • Redevelopment of modern buildings and sympathetic development on farmyards and open areas may be acceptable where this improves the appearance of the area and • Proposals must contribute to the form and character relate sensitively to the existing form and character (PC1.22) of the village c) In all cases proposals will be expected to protect local amenity, to preserve and enhance the character of the local area, and to comply with normal planning considerations, with full regard taken of the principles contained in Design Codes (e.g. Village Design Statements), where available. d) Appropriate scale will be assessed in relation to the density, character and form of the local area and should be appropriate to the role and function of the village settlement within the settlement hierarchy. e) All proposals in villages washed over by Green Belt must accord with national Green Belt policy. 12 References to Development Limits in this document refer to the Development Limits as defined on the Policies Map. Development Limits will be reviewed through further Local Plan documents (PC7.8) - 51 -
- Page 11 and 12: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 13 and 14: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 15 and 16: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 17 and 18: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 19 and 20: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 21 and 22: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 23 and 24: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 25 and 26: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 27 and 28: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 29 and 30: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 31 and 32: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 33 and 34: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 35 and 36: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 37 and 38: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 39 and 40: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 41 and 42: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 43 and 44: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 45 and 46: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 47 and 48: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 49 and 50: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 51 and 52: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 53 and 54: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 55 and 56: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 57 and 58: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 59 and 60: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 61: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 65 and 66: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 67 and 68: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 69 and 70: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 71 and 72: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 73 and 74: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 75 and 76: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 77 and 78: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 79 and 80: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 81 and 82: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 83 and 84: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 85 and 86: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 87 and 88: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 89 and 90: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 91 and 92: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 93 and 94: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 95 and 96: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 97 and 98: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 99 and 100: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 101 and 102: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 103 and 104: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 105 and 106: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 107 and 108: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 109 and 110: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 111 and 112: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
<strong>Selby</strong> <strong>District</strong> Submission Draft <strong>Core</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> – May 2011<br />
___________________________________________________________________<br />
Minor word changes to CP1A – PC7.11<br />
Policy CP1A<br />
Management <strong>of</strong> Residential Development in Settlements<br />
a) In order to ensure that speculative (windfall) housing development on<br />
non-allocated sites (PC1.23) contributes to sustainable development<br />
and the continued evolution <strong>of</strong> viable communities, the following<br />
types <strong>of</strong> residential development will be acceptable in principle,<br />
within Development Limits 12 : in different settlement types, as follows:<br />
• In <strong>Selby</strong>, Sherburn in Elmet, Tadcaster and Designated Service<br />
Villages – conversions, replacement dwellings, redevelopment <strong>of</strong><br />
previously developed land, and appropriate scale development on<br />
greenfield land (including garden land and conversion/<br />
redevelopment <strong>of</strong> farmsteads).<br />
• In Secondary Villages – conversions, replacement dwellings,<br />
redevelopment <strong>of</strong> previously developed land, filling <strong>of</strong> small linear<br />
gaps in otherwise built up residential frontages, and<br />
conversion/redevelopment <strong>of</strong> farmsteads.<br />
b) Proposals for the conversion and/or redevelopment <strong>of</strong> farmsteads to<br />
residential use within Development Limits will be treated on their<br />
merits according to the following principles:<br />
• Priority will be given to the sympathetic conversion <strong>of</strong> traditional<br />
buildings which conserves the existing character <strong>of</strong> the site and<br />
buildings<br />
• Redevelopment <strong>of</strong> modern buildings and sympathetic<br />
development on farmyards and open areas may be acceptable<br />
where this improves the appearance <strong>of</strong> the area and<br />
• Proposals must contribute to the form and character relate<br />
sensitively to the existing form and character (PC1.22) <strong>of</strong> the<br />
village<br />
c) In all cases proposals will be expected to protect local amenity, to<br />
preserve and enhance the character <strong>of</strong> the local area, and to comply<br />
with normal planning considerations, with full regard taken <strong>of</strong> the<br />
principles contained in Design Codes (e.g. Village Design<br />
Statements), where available.<br />
d) Appropriate scale will be assessed in relation to the density,<br />
character and form <strong>of</strong> the local area and should be appropriate to the<br />
role and function <strong>of</strong> the village settlement within the settlement<br />
hierarchy.<br />
e) All proposals in villages washed over by Green Belt must accord<br />
with national Green Belt policy.<br />
12 References to Development Limits in this document refer to the Development Limits as defined on the<br />
Policies Map. Development Limits will be reviewed through further Local Plan documents (PC7.8)<br />
- 51 -