Tracked Version of Core Strategy, November 2012 - Selby District ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Selby District Submission Draft Core Strategy – May 2011 ___________________________________________________________________ conversion/redevelopment of a farmstead). (PC7.10) 4.48 In the case of farmsteads, the loss of agricultural use may result in substantial sites becoming available within villages. These exhibit a variety of characteristics but often contain buildings with considerable character and heritage value. The policy aims to provide guiding principles for any conversion and/or redevelopment in order that proposals retain the best of that character whilst making efficient use of the site, appropriate to the role and function of the village. 4.49 In all cases proposals will be expected to show high regard for protecting local amenity and preserving and enhancing the local area, with the full regard taken of the principles contained in Village Design Statements, where available. In villages washed over by Green Belt, development must accord with national Green Belt policy and not significantly prejudice its openness. - 50 -
Selby District Submission Draft Core Strategy – May 2011 ___________________________________________________________________ Minor word changes to CP1A – PC7.11 Policy CP1A Management of Residential Development in Settlements a) In order to ensure that speculative (windfall) housing development on non-allocated sites (PC1.23) contributes to sustainable development and the continued evolution of viable communities, the following types of residential development will be acceptable in principle, within Development Limits 12 : in different settlement types, as follows: • In Selby, Sherburn in Elmet, Tadcaster and Designated Service Villages – conversions, replacement dwellings, redevelopment of previously developed land, and appropriate scale development on greenfield land (including garden land and conversion/ redevelopment of farmsteads). • In Secondary Villages – conversions, replacement dwellings, redevelopment of previously developed land, filling of small linear gaps in otherwise built up residential frontages, and conversion/redevelopment of farmsteads. b) Proposals for the conversion and/or redevelopment of farmsteads to residential use within Development Limits will be treated on their merits according to the following principles: • Priority will be given to the sympathetic conversion of traditional buildings which conserves the existing character of the site and buildings • Redevelopment of modern buildings and sympathetic development on farmyards and open areas may be acceptable where this improves the appearance of the area and • Proposals must contribute to the form and character relate sensitively to the existing form and character (PC1.22) of the village c) In all cases proposals will be expected to protect local amenity, to preserve and enhance the character of the local area, and to comply with normal planning considerations, with full regard taken of the principles contained in Design Codes (e.g. Village Design Statements), where available. d) Appropriate scale will be assessed in relation to the density, character and form of the local area and should be appropriate to the role and function of the village settlement within the settlement hierarchy. e) All proposals in villages washed over by Green Belt must accord with national Green Belt policy. 12 References to Development Limits in this document refer to the Development Limits as defined on the Policies Map. Development Limits will be reviewed through further Local Plan documents (PC7.8) - 51 -
Page 1 and 2:
Selby District Local Development Fr
Page 3 and 4:
The Status of RSS and the Implicati
Page 5 and 6:
List of Maps, Figures and Appendice
Page 7 and 8:
General PC6.1 PC6.2 PC6.3 Selby Dis
Page 9 and 10:
Selby District Submission Draft Cor
Page 11 and 12: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
Page 61: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Selby District Publication Draft Co
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
gradually diminish as those sites a
Page 175 and 176:
Table 2 Settlement Hierarchy (Round
Page 177 and 178:
in total over the Plan period. A fu
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
show all

Tracked Version of Core Strategy, November 2012 - Selby District ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?