Tracked Version of Core Strategy, November 2012 - Selby District ...

Tracked Version of Core Strategy, November 2012 - Selby District ... Tracked Version of Core Strategy, November 2012 - Selby District ...

02.07.2014 Views

Selby District Submission Draft Core Strategy – May 2011 ___________________________________________________________________ D. PC7.3 E. [Was F] PC7.3 may exist where: there is a compelling need to accommodate development in a particular settlement to deliver the aims of the settlement hierarchy, and in that settlement, sufficient land to meet the identified needs is not available outside the Green Belt, and removal of land from the Green Belt would represent a significantly more sustainable solution than development elsewhere on non-Green Belt land. To ensure that Green Belt boundaries endure in the long term, any Green Belt review through the Local Plan will: define boundaries clearly using physical features that are readily recognisable and likely to be permanent review washed-over villages ensure that there is sufficient land available to meet development requirements throughout the Plan period and identify safeguarded land to facilitate development beyond the Plan period. Any sites considered for removal from amendments to the Green Belt under Criterion C (above) will be subject to public consultation and a Sustainability Appraisal, and assessed for their impact upon the following issues (non-exhaustive): • any other relevant policy/strategy; and • flood risk; and • nature conservation; and • impact upon heritage assets; and • impact upon landscape character; and • appropriate access to services and facilities; and • appropriate access to public transport. Management of Residential Development in Settlements 4.42 The Core Strategy seeks to ensure a close match between housing growth and job growth, in order to help create sustainable communities rather than communities with excessive outcommuting. While most growth is concentrated in Selby, and to a lesser extent in Tadcaster, Sherburn in Elmet, it is also recognised that there should be some scope for continued growth in villages to help maintain there viability and vitality. However this must be balanced with concerns about the impact of continued residential infilling on the form and character of our villages, particularly through the practice of developing on garden land (garden grabbing), and redeveloping existing properties at higher densities. - 48 -

Selby District Submission Draft Core Strategy – May 2011 ___________________________________________________________________ 4.43 Monitoring reveals that approximately one in ten of all new dwellings built in 2009/10 were on garden land, and a similar proportion of dwellings currently have planning permission. The Coalition Government has amended the definition of ‘previously developed land’ by excluding residential gardens in order to assist local authorities in resisting over-development of neighbourhoods. 4.44 Policy CP1A provides greater clarity about the way proposals for speculative residential development development on nonallocated sites (PC1.21) (often referred to as ‘windfall’ development) will be managed, by identifying the types of residential development that will be acceptable in different settlement types. The policy reflects changes in national guidance, and is intended to support development in the most sustainable locations, in a way which strikes a balance between maintaining the vitality and longer term sustainability of all settlements while avoiding the worst excesses of ‘garden grabbing ’particularly in smaller settlements. It also addresses a number of anomalies, for example regarding the treatment of proposals for converting buildings (including intensive livestock units) to residential use. 4.45 If this action is not taken unacceptable amounts of housing may be provided in smaller, less sustainable settlements reducing the need for planned allocations of land where the maximum community benefit can be secured, and further stretching existing services and resources. 4.46 Residential development in smaller Secondary Villages will therefore be restricted to conversions, replacement dwellings, redevelopment of previously developed land, the filling of small gaps in otherwise built up frontages and the conversion/ redevelopment of farmsteads to residential use. Other than filling small gaps in built up frontages or converting/redeveloping farmsteads (which are currently classed as greenfield) development on greenfield land including garden land, will be resisted. 4.47 At the same time restrictions on housing growth in Selby, Sherburn in Elmet, Tadcaster and Designated (PC6.33) Service Villages will therefore (PC6.33) be relaxed to enable appropriate scale development on greenfield land including garden land and (PC6.33) the conversion/ redevelopment of farmsteads. This is intended to help sustain their roles in catering for community needs, including local employment opportunities, services, facilities and affordable housing. The policy applies to speculative residential development within Development limits and does not imply release of the Selby District Local Plan, Policy H2 Phase 2 allocations. Release of Phase 2 sites will be considered as part of the Site Allocations Development Plan Document. (PC5.7) Residential development in Secondary Villages will be more restrictive so that development on garden land will be resisted. (PC6.34) (unless it comprises the filling of a small liner gap in an otherwise built up residential frontage or - 49 -

<strong>Selby</strong> <strong>District</strong> Submission Draft <strong>Core</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> – May 2011<br />

___________________________________________________________________<br />

4.43 Monitoring reveals that approximately one in ten <strong>of</strong> all new<br />

dwellings built in 2009/10 were on garden land, and a similar<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> dwellings currently have planning permission. The<br />

Coalition Government has amended the definition <strong>of</strong> ‘previously<br />

developed land’ by excluding residential gardens in order to assist<br />

local authorities in resisting over-development <strong>of</strong> neighbourhoods.<br />

4.44 Policy CP1A provides greater clarity about the way proposals for<br />

speculative residential development development on nonallocated<br />

sites (PC1.21) (<strong>of</strong>ten referred to as ‘windfall’<br />

development) will be managed, by identifying the types <strong>of</strong><br />

residential development that will be acceptable in different<br />

settlement types. The policy reflects changes in national guidance,<br />

and is intended to support development in the most sustainable<br />

locations, in a way which strikes a balance between maintaining<br />

the vitality and longer term sustainability <strong>of</strong> all settlements while<br />

avoiding the worst excesses <strong>of</strong> ‘garden grabbing ’particularly in<br />

smaller settlements. It also addresses a number <strong>of</strong> anomalies, for<br />

example regarding the treatment <strong>of</strong> proposals for converting<br />

buildings (including intensive livestock units) to residential use.<br />

4.45 If this action is not taken unacceptable amounts <strong>of</strong> housing may be<br />

provided in smaller, less sustainable settlements reducing the<br />

need for planned allocations <strong>of</strong> land where the maximum<br />

community benefit can be secured, and further stretching existing<br />

services and resources.<br />

4.46 Residential development in smaller Secondary Villages will<br />

therefore be restricted to conversions, replacement dwellings,<br />

redevelopment <strong>of</strong> previously developed land, the filling <strong>of</strong> small<br />

gaps in otherwise built up frontages and the conversion/<br />

redevelopment <strong>of</strong> farmsteads to residential use. Other than filling<br />

small gaps in built up frontages or converting/redeveloping<br />

farmsteads (which are currently classed as greenfield)<br />

development on greenfield land including garden land, will be<br />

resisted.<br />

4.47 At the same time restrictions on housing growth in <strong>Selby</strong>, Sherburn<br />

in Elmet, Tadcaster and Designated (PC6.33) Service Villages will<br />

therefore (PC6.33) be relaxed to enable appropriate scale<br />

development on greenfield land including garden land and<br />

(PC6.33) the conversion/ redevelopment <strong>of</strong> farmsteads. This is<br />

intended to help sustain their roles in catering for community<br />

needs, including local employment opportunities, services, facilities<br />

and affordable housing. The policy applies to speculative<br />

residential development within Development limits and does not<br />

imply release <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Selby</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan, Policy H2 Phase 2<br />

allocations. Release <strong>of</strong> Phase 2 sites will be considered as part <strong>of</strong><br />

the Site Allocations Development Plan Document. (PC5.7)<br />

Residential development in Secondary Villages will be more<br />

restrictive so that development on garden land will be resisted.<br />

(PC6.34) (unless it comprises the filling <strong>of</strong> a small liner gap in an<br />

otherwise built up residential frontage or<br />

- 49 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!