Tracked Version of Core Strategy, November 2012 - Selby District ...
Tracked Version of Core Strategy, November 2012 - Selby District ... Tracked Version of Core Strategy, November 2012 - Selby District ...
Selby District Submission Draft Core Strategy – May 2011 ___________________________________________________________________ 4.35 National guidance stresses the importance of new development being accessible by modes of transport other than the private car and where the need to travel is minimised. Selby, Sherburn in Elmet and a number of Designated Service Villages are served by rail services although buses are generally the predominant form of public transport in the District (PC1.18). Guidance also seeks to make the best use of the existing transport infrastructure and capacity and to maximise the use of rail and water for uses generating large freight movements. d) Environment and Natural Resources 4.36 Protection and enhancement of biodiversity and natural resources is a basic principle of national planning guidance, which can also influence the location of development. e) Green Belt [Replace 4.37 – 4.39 with new supporting text and new Policy CPXX. (PC5.6) ] [SEE ALSO BELOW] 4.37 The District is covered by parts of the West Yorkshire and York Green Belts 10 . National planning guidance stresses the importance of protecting the open character of Green Belt. Only ‘appropriate’ forms of development identified in national guidance, such as affordable rural exceptions housing, will be permitted unless very special circumstances can be demonstrated. 4.38 One of the functions of the Green Belt is to prevent the coalescence of settlements, for example by preserving the open countryside gap between Sherburn in Elmet and South Milford. 4.39 While the Strategy aims to maintain the overall extent of Green Belt, in locations where there are difficulties in accommodating the scale of growth required, consideration will be given to undertaking localised Green Belt boundary reviews. The reviews will need to balance the relative need for new development within each settlement against the value of Green Belt as assessed against the basic purposes of the Green Belt, as well as other considerations such as the effect on landscape, biodiversity and access to the natural environment. 4.39a PC7.2 The District is covered by parts of both the West Yorkshire and York Green Belts. One of the functions of the Green Belt is to prevent the coalescence of settlements, for example by preserving the open countryside gap between Sherburn in Elmet and South Milford. National planning guidance The NPPF (PC6.20) stresses the importance of protecting the open character of Green Belt, and that ‘inappropriate’ forms of development as expressed in higher order policy (PC6.20) will be resisted unless very special circumstances can be demonstrated. See below for Green Belt Policy CPXX. 10 See Figure 6 Key Diagram for indication of extent of Green Belt - 40 -
Selby District Submission Draft Core Strategy – May 2011 ___________________________________________________________________ f) Character of Individual Settlements 4.40 It is also important to maintain the character of individual settlements outside the Green Belt by safeguarding ‘strategic countryside gaps’ between settlements, particularly where they are at risk of coalescence or subject to strong development pressures as is the case with Selby and the surrounding villages. 4.41 Policy CP1 sets out the broad policy framework for delivering the spatial development strategy for Selby District. It recognises particularly the rural character of the District and the emphasis on Selby for new development. Its locational principles have influenced the preparation of this development strategy and the policy is applicable to all development proposals. [Renumber policies to avoid confusion between CP1, CP1A, CP2 and CP2A] (PC4.1) Policy CP1 Spatial Development Strategy A. The location of future development within Selby District will be based on the following principles: a) The majority of new development will be directed to the towns and more sustainable villages depending on their future role as employment, retail and service centres, the level of local housing need, and particular environmental, flood risk and infrastructure constraints • Selby as the Principal Town will be the focus for new housing, employment, retail, commercial, and leisure facilities. • Sherburn in Elmet 2 and Tadcaster 2 are designated as Local Service Centres where further housing, employment, retail, commercial and leisure growth will take place appropriate to the size and role of each settlement. • The following Designated Service Villages have some scope for additional residential and small-scale employment growth to support rural sustainability and in the case of Barlby/Osgodby, Brayton and Thorpe Willoughby to complement growth in Selby. Appleton Roebuck Barlby/Osgodby 1 Brayton Hambleton Hemingbrough Kellington - 41 -
- Page 1 and 2: Selby District Local Development Fr
- Page 3 and 4: The Status of RSS and the Implicati
- Page 5 and 6: List of Maps, Figures and Appendice
- Page 7 and 8: General PC6.1 PC6.2 PC6.3 Selby Dis
- Page 9 and 10: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 11 and 12: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 13 and 14: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 15 and 16: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 17 and 18: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 19 and 20: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 21 and 22: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 23 and 24: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 25 and 26: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 27 and 28: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 29 and 30: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 31 and 32: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 33 and 34: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 35 and 36: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 37 and 38: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 39 and 40: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 41 and 42: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 43 and 44: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 45 and 46: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 47 and 48: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 49 and 50: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 51: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 55 and 56: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 57 and 58: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 59 and 60: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 61 and 62: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 63 and 64: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 65 and 66: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 67 and 68: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 69 and 70: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 71 and 72: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 73 and 74: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 75 and 76: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 77 and 78: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 79 and 80: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 81 and 82: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 83 and 84: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 85 and 86: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 87 and 88: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 89 and 90: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 91 and 92: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 93 and 94: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 95 and 96: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 97 and 98: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 99 and 100: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
- Page 101 and 102: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
<strong>Selby</strong> <strong>District</strong> Submission Draft <strong>Core</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> – May 2011<br />
___________________________________________________________________<br />
f) Character <strong>of</strong> Individual Settlements<br />
4.40 It is also important to maintain the character <strong>of</strong> individual<br />
settlements outside the Green Belt by safeguarding ‘strategic<br />
countryside gaps’ between settlements, particularly where they are<br />
at risk <strong>of</strong> coalescence or subject to strong development pressures<br />
as is the case with <strong>Selby</strong> and the surrounding villages.<br />
4.41 Policy CP1 sets out the broad policy framework for delivering the<br />
spatial development strategy for <strong>Selby</strong> <strong>District</strong>. It recognises<br />
particularly the rural character <strong>of</strong> the <strong>District</strong> and the emphasis on<br />
<strong>Selby</strong> for new development. Its locational principles have<br />
influenced the preparation <strong>of</strong> this development strategy and the<br />
policy is applicable to all development proposals.<br />
[Renumber policies to avoid confusion between CP1, CP1A, CP2<br />
and CP2A] (PC4.1)<br />
Policy CP1 Spatial Development <strong>Strategy</strong><br />
A. The location <strong>of</strong> future development within <strong>Selby</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />
will be based on the following principles:<br />
a) The majority <strong>of</strong> new development will be directed to<br />
the towns and more sustainable villages depending<br />
on their future role as employment, retail and service<br />
centres, the level <strong>of</strong> local housing need, and particular<br />
environmental, flood risk and infrastructure<br />
constraints<br />
• <strong>Selby</strong> as the Principal Town will be the focus<br />
for new housing, employment, retail,<br />
commercial, and leisure facilities.<br />
• Sherburn in Elmet 2 and Tadcaster 2 are<br />
designated as Local Service Centres where<br />
further housing, employment, retail,<br />
commercial and leisure growth will take place<br />
appropriate to the size and role <strong>of</strong> each<br />
settlement.<br />
• The following Designated Service Villages have<br />
some scope for additional residential and<br />
small-scale employment growth to support<br />
rural sustainability and in the case <strong>of</strong><br />
Barlby/Osgodby, Brayton and Thorpe<br />
Willoughby to complement growth in <strong>Selby</strong>.<br />
Appleton Roebuck<br />
Barlby/Osgodby 1<br />
Brayton<br />
Hambleton<br />
Hemingbrough<br />
Kellington<br />
- 41 -