Tracked Version of Core Strategy, November 2012 - Selby District ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Selby District Submission Draft Core Strategy – May 2011 _________________________________________________________________ G H I J K L also work collaboratively with private sector bodies, utility and infrastructure providers. Since the government’s announcement of the intended revocation of RSS, there have been wider national and regional changes outside the control of the Council. LPAs in the region have sought to establish both informal and formal working relationships in order to tackle crossboundary issues through regional spatial planning in both the sub regions of Leeds City Region (LCR) and North Yorkshire and York (NY&Y) (Selby District falls within both sub regions) to demonstrate that the Core Strategy is compliant with the strategic priorities agreed with neighbours. The LCR Interim Spatial Strategy (ISS), to which all LPAs in the LCR are signed up, takes forward the key strategic policies from the RSS. Local Government for North Yorkshire and York agreed the “NY&Y Sub Regional Strategy” in 2011 but this hasn’t been formally approved. In terms of emerging methods of cooperation, the Council has been actively involved in a wide range of vehicles for cooperation including: LCR Leaders Board; LCR Local Enterprise Partnership; York, North Yorkshire and East Riding Local Enterprise Partnership; North Yorkshire Development Plans Forum; York Sub Area Joint Infrastructure Working Forum; and Duty to Cooperate Working Group LCR These are both informal and formal structures where cross-boundary issues are raised and approaches decided in order to ensure cooperation between the LPAs in the region, including the spatial planning aspects of the work of the LEPs. The Leeds city region partnership is also the LEP. Whilst housing numbers and strategic priorities have been agreed in the RSS and strategic priorities in the region taken forward in principle through the ISS; regional arrangements are not yet at a stage where formal joint planning is established, nor are specific housing numbers agreed across borders. One of the reasons for this is that neighbouring LPAs are at different stages in developing their Local Development Frameworks It has therefore not been possible to work with and agree housing numbers with our neighbours. Instead the Council considers that cross boundary issues have been taken into account because : • The methodology of re-assessing housing numbers in the light of ONS/CLG population and household projections is based on best practice in the light of local evidence and taking into account migration, household size and economic • The ONS population projection figures take into account migration across borders so already cross boundary impacts are reflected in figures - 10 -
Selby District Submission Draft Core Strategy – May 2011 _________________________________________________________________ • The Council cooperated with public bodies on infrastructure requirements • The method used for re-assessment of the District housing requirement is not inconsistent with approaches of neighbours • Neighbouring LPAs recognise that because of this further work it is apparent that Core Strategy is catering for Selby District’s own requirements • Most neighbouring LPAs have also done similar exercises and are catering for their own needs M N O The Council has considered cross boundary impacts of housing growth on and from neighbouring authorities as set out in Background Papers taking into account views of adjoining LPAs and formally consulting on revised housing target in January 2012. Neighbouring LPAs have confirmed the above and that the level of growth would not have a significant impact on at least two planning areas. The Core Strategy includes a strategic policy to review Green Belt and only consider boundary alterations of those settlements within SDC if exceptional circumstances can be demonstrated (it is not a wholesale review of the West Yorkshire and York Green Belts). This approach conforms to Policy YH9 of the RSS (specifically part D) and is compliant with the NPPF. The LCR Interim Strategy Statement signs up to the principle of Green Belt review through its endorsement of YH9. Adjoining LPAs consider that the Core Strategy green belt policy does not raise any strategic implications. When the review is triggered full cooperation with relevant bodies will commence. Overall the Council has fulfilled its duty to cooperate on all cross boundary issues in developing the plan (not limited to the issues highlighted above). This cooperation has ensured that Selby District and the neighbouring authorities can meet their own and common objectives within the umbrella of understanding the relationships between the authority areas. (PC 6.11) District Portrait 2.1 Selby District is a relatively small rural District with an estimated mid 2009 population of 82,200. It is the most southerly District in North Yorkshire, covering an area of approximately 6,190 sq kilometres to the south of York and broadly contained by the A1 (M) / A1 to the west and the River Derwent to the east. Neighbouring local authorities are York, Leeds, Doncaster, Harrogate, Wakefield and the East Riding of Yorkshire. - 11 -
Page 1 and 2: Selby District Local Development Fr
Page 3 and 4: The Status of RSS and the Implicati
Page 5 and 6: List of Maps, Figures and Appendice
Page 7 and 8: General PC6.1 PC6.2 PC6.3 Selby Dis
Page 9 and 10: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
Page 17: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
Page 69 and 70:
Selby District Submission Draft Cor
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Selby District Publication Draft Co
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
gradually diminish as those sites a
Page 175 and 176:
Table 2 Settlement Hierarchy (Round
Page 177 and 178:
in total over the Plan period. A fu
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
show all

Tracked Version of Core Strategy, November 2012 - Selby District ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?