Tracked Version of Core Strategy, November 2012 - Selby District ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Selby District Submission Draft Core Strategy – May 2011 To be done when finalised: Consequential amendment to reflect changes at CP1, CP3 and associated text above. (PC6.101) Appendix 1 Previously Developed Land Trajectory 1. PPS3 indicates that Local Development documents should include a local previously developed land (PDL) target and trajectory. This Appendix provides the background information used in selecting a long-term target for the proportion of dwellings to be constructed on previously developed land. 2. While the former Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) did not RSS does not (PC4.45) include a PDL target for local authorities, the evidence base (which was referred to in an earlier draft version of RSS 1 .) suggested a target figure of 45% of dwellings on PDL for the District. Analysis of the Council’s overall PDL Trajectory reveals that there is capacity for a modest increase over and above the target suggested by RSS evidence. Over the years 2004 – 2009, the average percentage of dwellings built on previously developed land is 63%. However, with increasing reliance in the longer term on greenfield sites to accommodate growth in the three towns, it is inevitable that this percentage will not be maintained. Work will continue to be undertaken through future DPD’s in order to maximise the proportion of allocations using previously developed land. However, the availability of such sites is often extremely difficult to predict, particularly in the longer term. 3. In the above circumstances, a practical target of 40% of new dwellings on previously developed land and conversions is proposed between 2004 and 2017. This represents a reduction of 10% from that proposed in the Draft Core Strategy as a result of the Government’s decision to remove garden curtilages from the definition of previously developed land. Garden curtilages have consistently provided approximately 10% of all completions over the last 10 years. 4. There is insufficient information at present to predict the long-term supply of PDL within the District to provide a meaningful target beyond 2017. However, the Council will continue to pursue policies, which give priority to the use of PDL, subject to consistency with other elements of the Strategy, with the aim of achieving the highest possible percentage. 5. In a rural District such as Selby, previously developed land is unlikely to come forward evenly on an annual basis. For example, within the five years 2004/9 the proportion of development on 1 The Yorkshire and Humber Plan – Draft published for public consultation - December 2005 - 129 -
Selby District Submission Draft Core Strategy – May 2011 previously developed land varied between 72 and 51 %. Its availability is likely to be more uncertain than in a larger metropolitan area. Nevertheless its use will be encouraged in appropriate circumstances, particularly within settlements, and delivery will be monitored in relation to the trajectory set out below. The trajectory provides a forecast of the cumulative average percentage of the use of previously developed land for housing purposes over the plan period up to 2017. The cumulative average provides a better guide to monitoring the overall 40% target than annual split figures which are highly variable and do not allow the overall trend to be easily discerned. Previously Developed Land Trajectory PDL Trajectory % PDL(Cumulative Ave) 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 Cumulative Average PDL% (Existing Completions) Cumulative Average PDL%(Existing Completions + Projected Completions) Target PDL% (2010 -2017) - 130 -
Page 1 and 2:
Selby District Local Development Fr
Page 3 and 4:
The Status of RSS and the Implicati
Page 5 and 6:
List of Maps, Figures and Appendice
Page 7 and 8:
General PC6.1 PC6.2 PC6.3 Selby Dis
Page 9 and 10:
Selby District Submission Draft Cor
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120: Selby District Submission Draft Cor
Page 161 and 162: Selby District Publication Draft Co
Page 169: Selby District Publication Draft Co
Page 173 and 174: gradually diminish as those sites a
Page 175 and 176: Table 2 Settlement Hierarchy (Round
Page 177 and 178: in total over the Plan period. A fu
show all

Tracked Version of Core Strategy, November 2012 - Selby District ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?